Loading...
TR-93-2 h'oppa)(A) p RESOLUTION TR-93--2 , o 3 r A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE REAPPOINTMENT OF DENNIS B. HOPKINS, 108 MONROE STREET, AGAWAM, MA TO THE AGAWAM PLANNING BOARD FOR A TERM EXPIRING JANUARY 1, 1998 ' WHEREAS, The term of Dennis B. Hopkins as member of the Agawam Planning Board has expired on January 1, 1993; and ' WHEREAS, The Mayor has reappointed Dennis B. Hopkins, 108 Monroe Street, Agawam, MA to the Agawam Planning Board for a term expiring January 1, 1998; ' NOW THEREFORE, THE AGAWAM TOWN COUNCIL hereby resolves confirmation of the reappointment of Dennis B. Hopkins, 108 Monroe Street, Agawam, MA to the Agawam Planning Board for a term ' expiring January 1, 1998 . DATED THIS TWENTY-FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY , 1993 . ' PER ORDER OF THE AGAWAM TOWN COUNCIL jAdes D. Taylor, P sident �Lb ��`A,O� l q6 Agawam Town Council. ,' ?...JJJ APPROVED 0 FORM AND LEGALITY A ' Tho s S. e, Solicitor C ' 4 C� MAYORAL ACTION Received this 24TH day of FEBRUARY , 1993 from Town ' Council Clerk. ' APPROVAL OF LEGISLATION By the powers vested in me pursuant to Article 3, Section 3-6 of the Agawam Charter, as amended, I h eby approve the massage of the above legislation on thisTH day of RUARY , 1993. Christophe C. J VSSAPPROVAL on, Mayor OF LEGISLATION By the powers vested in me pursuant to Article 3, Section 3-6 of the Agawam Charter, as amended, I hereby veto the passage ' of the above legislation on this day of 1993 for the following reason(s) : ' Christopher C. Johnson, Mayor RETURN OF LEGISLATION TO COUNCIL CLERK Returned to Council Clerk this 26TH day of HBRUARY 1993 . OF AQ4 F qG V JPpORRftD�pl MAYOR CHRiSTOPHER C. JOHNSON February 16, 1993 Linda J. Melconian, State Senator 375 Walnut Street Extension Agawam, MA 01001 ' Dear Senator Melconian, I am writing to express my concerns over House loo0 ("Education Reform Bill") which is scheduled to come out of ' Senate Ways and Means in the near future. As a strong advocate for public education in Agawam, I wholeheartedly support the addition of new funds at the state level for education. As you are aware, in FY1989 the Commonwealth sent to Agawam $10,607,981 in local aid, by FY1992 that figure had dropped to $7,778,207. I am certainly supportive of any efforts to restore local aid funds ' which were previously reduced by the state. As Chairperson of the Agawam School Committee, I encourage new initiatives to strengthen public education in Massachusetts I and across the nation. I strongly believe that those initiatives should be directed at improving the quality of educational service that are provided to the students in the classroom. I believe that we must update and improve our curriculum, strengthen the skills of our educators, and bring more technology into the classroom. I note that some of the provisions of House 1000 are designed to further these goals, but many others will have a detrimental effect on public education. one of the cornerstones of education in America has been the fact that it is governed at the local level. For many generations, Americans have enjoyed the ability to shape their children's education with input and participation in local government. Education is the top priority of local government, and parents and citizens possess an unparalled access to local officials. This access allows them to have almost immediate impact on the direction-that public education will take in their community. Over the years, this local control has been eroded by ' 36 Main Street • Agawam. Massachusetts 01001 • (413) 786-0400 • FAX(413) 786-9927 ' Printed on Recyled Paper Linda J. Melconian February 15, 1993 Page Two many new state and federal mandates, but for the most part each community can steer its own course with regard to educating its youth. I believe that House 1000 will strip control of public education from each community and place that control in the Commonwealth. I an cognizant that the bill provides for a watered down version of school based management through "school councils", but this can hardly offset the mandated funding, staffing and spending provisions of the bill. I truly believe that the residents of Agawam do not want to relinquish control of their public schools to the Commonwealth. Conversely, I believe that they want to exert more influence on their children's future. I understand the burden on the state to equalize spending ' amongst the many school districts in the Commonwealth. I believe that this goal can be achieved without removing control of the public schools from each municipality. I also believe that this goal must be achieved through the infusion of new state revenues, and not by mandating the expenditure of locally raised revenue. It is possible to equalize spending through new state revenue while still leaving control of local schools and local revenues in the hands of local officials. In reviewing the bill which was passed by the House of Representatives, I noted many provisions which I believe are not in the best interests of my community. I have listed below many my problem areas with the bill; 1. 1 oppose the financing sections (SECTIONS 32 & 33) of the bill because they provide for state mandated expenditure of local property tax revenue. I believe that revenues raised at the local level should be spent at the discretion of elected local officials. I have a philosophical problem with state officials now entering the local arena to mandate how funds raised in each community are spent. It is bad enough that the state and federal governments continue to pass along unfunded mandates to each community, but the direct control ' provided by "minimum required local contributions" is surely going too far. Also why is Agawam mandated to spend nearly 65% of its property tax levy on education ($13 million/ $20 million) while Springfield only has to spend approximately 25% ($20 million/ $80 million)? I am sure it is the same ' Linda J. Melconian February 15, 1993 Page Three rreason why Springfield received over $17 million in new EEOG money in FY1993 , while Agawam received only $300,000. ' 2 . I oppose the formula for determining the "minimum required local contribution" (See Section 2 of SECTION 32) . This formula provides that the prior year's local contribution must increase by the percentage of growth present in the property tax levy (Proposition 2 1/2 growth plus new growth) (See Section 2 & 6 of SECTION 32) . This formula fails to take into consideration other revenue streams vital to each community such as "free cash", motor vehicle excise tax and local fees and fines. Under the existing formula, Agawam would have to increase its "minimum required local contribution for FY1994 by $486, 157 based on projected levy growth of $752,988. Unfortunately our certified "free cash" is going down by $880, 319, and our motor vehicle excise taxes will probably go down between $50, 000 and $100, 000. Please explain how given the overall local revenue picture, Agawam can be expected to increase spending on education by $486,157 without devastating other local services such as police, fire, public works, public library and elder services. 3 . I oppose the mandated spending provisions contained in the bill. In SECTION 32, there are many formulas which provide for mandated minimum spending by local public schools. These provisions include minimum spending in such areas as 1 "foundation payroll", "foundation athletic expenses", "foundation extracurricular activity expenses" , "foundation utility and ordinary maintenance expenses", and "professional development allotment" to name only a few. These mandated minimum spending levels remove control from elected local officials, and they fail to take into consideration the many ' differences which exist amongst the many public school districts in the Commonwealth. For example, what happens if a school district fails to spend the minimum "foundation utility expense" because it has energy efficient buildings? 4. I oppose the mandated staffing provisions contained in the bill. In SECTION 32, there are many formulas which provide for minimum staffing levels such as "foundation aides", "foundation central office professional staff", "foundation clerical staff", "foundation custodial staff", "foundation teaching staff" , and- "foundation health care staff" to name only a few. Again these provisions take control away from ' Linda J. Melconian February 15, 1993 Page Four ' local officials and place it in the state. Also they are uniformly based on "foundation enrollments" and not on real world considerations. For example, what happens if a community fails to provide the minimum "foundation custodial staff" because it cleans its buildings more efficiently or its buildings have less area? 5. I oppose the circumvention of the provisions of Proposition 2 1/2 . (Chapter 29 Section 27 - See Section 12 of SECTION 32) The people of Massachusetts voted for the passage of Proposition 2 1/2 to limit the growth of property taxes and to limit the placement of unfunded mandates on the communities. This bill is probably the largest mandate ever placed on the communities by the Commonwealth. If you are serious about placing this mandate on the cities and towns to improve education, then please pay for it as Proposition 2 1/2 requires. 6. I oppose the certification of school nurses by the board of education (See SECTIONS 39, 41, 42, 43, 45 & 47) . School nurses are already governed by other state licensing provisions. I have severe reservations that the board of education is familiar enough with public health to properly certify school nurses. Also SECTION 93 which attempts to exempt existing school nurses would not apply in Agawam because the nurses are employed by the Health Department and ' not the School Committee. 7 . Please note that the entire bill fails to take into consideration the structure of government in Agawam. According to our Home Rule Charter which was duly approved by the citizens of Agawam, both our school building maintenance services and our school health services are provided by the town. In addition, grounds maintenance and data processing are also provided by the town. I can find no provision for this in House 1000. Can Agawam charge these expenses to the schools? Will they reduce our "minimum required local contribution"? I oppose the language in SECTION 17 (See line 96) which provides that if a community fails to fulfill its fiscal responsibilities under the act, then ultimately the Department of Revenue -can withhold approval of that Linda J. Melconian February 15, 1993 Page Five community's tax rate. It does not make a lot of sense to utilize a delay in the collection of revenue as a means of forcing compliance. 9. I oppose the addition of the "just cause" standard for the dismissal of teachers (See SECTION 51) . Many communities have fought long and hard at the negotiating table to keep this language out of collective bargaining agreements, and to maintain the utilization of "good cause" as the standard for teacher dismissal. Please consider the ramifications of this change, as well as, look at the inconsistency of granting one standard for teachers and a different one for other school employees. (See SECTION 50 - "good cause" for Superintendents; SECTION 49 - "good cause" for Principals etc. ) 10. I oppose the elimination of School Committee involvement in dismissal of employees (See SECTIONS 49, 50 $ 51) . The School Committee as the elected local body charged with overseeing the public schools should retain the ability to hire and fire all employees in the school system. I also oppose the elimination of School Committee involvement in ' student discipline as outlined in Section 90 of SECTION 61. (See line 151) 11.. I oppose the mandatory five year certification requirement contained in SECTION 44. This provision is not well thought out because it fails to consider the financial impact on the state college system, and the emphasis should be on the attainment of academic and professional degrees and not on meeting potentially weak certification requirements. 12. I oppose the addition of mandatory school choice language to the bill, especially if that language includes the option to attend charter (private) and parochial schools. I firmly oppose public money being spent on private and religious schools. I further believe that mandatory school choice will cause an influx of students into Agawam which will be impossible to accommodate given our existing space constraints. 13. I oppose the early retirement provision in its present form (See SECTION 82) . I believe that in the interests of 1 Linda J. Melconian February 15, 1993 Page six ' creating new teaching jobs and encouraging early retirements, that the State should bear loot of the cost of the early retirement incentive. The State presently bears the entire cost of the Teachers Retirement System, why should the communities have to share in the cost of an early retirement incentive? ' 14. 1 favor the addition of a provision which would mandate that non--school local aid would not be cut in order to provide the additional funding required by this bill. We should not improve our public schools at the expense of our other essential local services. ' 15. I favor the creation of a curriculum database which would be developed by the board of education through the utilization of leading academicians and teachers. This curriculum ' database would be available to every school district via a state wide computer system. This would provide up to date materials for classroom use by teachers, and improve the quality of education in the classroom. It would also do more to equalize education in Massachusetts than simply equalizing funding would do. ' In closing, I would urge you to vote against House 1000 ("Education Reform Bill") in its present form for the reasons that I have outlined above. I have serious reservations about ' the benefits of this legislation, and I have grave concerns over the potential impact this legislation will have on my community. I welcome your response to my concerns, and I hope that you will consider the views of local officials in reaching your decision on this important issue. For it is local officials who will be charged with the implementation of this bill. Thank you for your ' consideration, and please call with any questions. ery my o s, ristop er C. hnson Mayor/Ch irper o of the Agawam School Co ittee cc: Agawam School Committee Agawam Town Council S. Ryder, Supt of Schools Massachusetts Municipal Association i � a i�93 A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE PASSAGE OF HOUSE 1000 ("EDUCATION REFORM BILL") WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly supports public education in Agawam and across the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; and ' WHEREAS,W , the Agawam Town Council strongly supports a com mi tment by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to provide additional funding for public education in Agawam; and ' WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly supports the concept of equalizing spending on public education across the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; and WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly supports responsible ' reform of public education which will result in the improvement of services provided to students in the classroom in Agawam and throughout the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; and WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly opposes the sections (SECTIONS 32 & 33) of House 1000 ("Education Reform Bill") which mandate the level of local funding on education; and WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly opposes the section (Section 12 of SECTION 33) which circumvents the unfunded mandates provisions of Proposition 2 112; and WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly opposes the sections (SECTIONS 32 & 33 etc.) which mandate school spending and staffing levels in each community; and CD WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly supports the additn ` of local aid resolution provisions which would provide that non-education lFcal aid would not be reduced in order to provide the additional state revenue P. required to fund this bill; and---.--- _ C M r, ff WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly opposes the potential g g y PP reduction or elimination of other vital local services such as police, fire, public works, elder services, library services, etc. which may result from the mandated funding and spending provisions of House 1000 ("Education Reform Bill"); and WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council believes that the passage of House 1000 ("Education Reform Bill") in its present form is not in the best interests of Agawam; and NOW THEREFORE, the Agawam Town Council hereby resolves to oppose the passage of House 1000 ("Education Reform Bill"), and further resolves to send a copy of this resolution to His Excellency William F. Weld, Governor, State Senator Linda J. Melconian and State Representative Michael P. Walsh. Dated this Ett�m day of February, 1993. PER ORDER OF THE AGAWAM TOWN COUNCIL �_. James-D. Taylor, Preside ' Agawam Town Council APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY Thomks S. Locke, Solicitor ' By the powers vested in me pursuant to Article 3, Section 3-6 of the Agawam Home Rule Charter, I hereby approve passage of the above stated resolution. Chrisropier C.11ohns ty Mayor 1 vrq , oV% a!18 �13 A RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE PASSAGE OF HOUSE 1000 ("EDUCATION REFORM BILL") WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly supports public education in Agawam and across the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; and WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly supports a commitment by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to provide additional funding for public education in Agawam; and WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly supports the concept of equalizing spending on public education across the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; and WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly supports responsible reform of public education which will result in the improvement of services provided to students in the classroom in Agawam and throughout the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; and WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly opposes the sections ' (SECTIONS 32 & 33) of House 1000 ("Education Reform Bill") which mandate the level of local funding on education; and 1 WHEREAS the Agawam Town Council strongly opposes the section g g y PP (Section 12 of SECTION 33) which circumvents the unfunded mandates provisions of Proposition 2 1/2; and ' WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly opposes the sections (SECTIONS 32 & 33 etc.) which mandate school spending and staffing levels in each community; and WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly supports the addition ' of local aid resolution provisions which would provide that non-education local aid would not be reduced in order to provide the additional state revenue required to fund this bill; and WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council strongly opposes the potential reduction or elimination of other vital local services such as police, fire, public works, elder services, library services, etc. which may result from the mandated funding and spending provisions of House 1000 ("Education Reform Bill"); and WHEREAS, the Agawam Town Council believes that the passage of ■ House 1000 ("Education Reform Bill") in its present form is not in the best ■ interests of Agawam; and ' NOW THEREFORE, the Agawam Town Council hereby resolves to oppose the passage of House 1000 ("Education Reform Bill"), and further resolves to send a copy of this resolution to His Excellency William F. Weld, Governor, State Senator Linda J. Melconian and State Representative Michael P. Walsh. Dated this sixteenth day of February, 1993. PER ORDER OF THE AGAWAM TOWN COUNCIL ' James D. Taylor, President Agawam Town Council APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY Thomas S. Locke, Solicitor By the powers vested in me pursuant to Article 3, Section 3--6 of the Agawam Home Rule Charter, I hereby approve passage of the above stated resolution. Christopher C. Johnson, Mayor FA 0 9 TOWN OF AGAWAM 36 MAIN STREET AGAWAM, MASSACHUSETTS 01001 Tel. 413-786-0400 r gTED Mph ' February 16, 1993 His Excellency William F. Weld, Governor Commonwealth of Massachusetts State House - Room 360 Boston, MA 02133 Dear Governor Weld, Enclosed please find a copy of the resolution passed by the Agawam Town Council concerning House 1000 ("Education. Reform Bill") . The resolution opposes the passage of the bill in its present form. It seems likely that the bill will ultimately end ' up on your desk. Please consider the views of elected officials at the local level in your decision on whether to sign this piece of key legislation. We are the people who will be left with implementing whatever is approved by the Commonwealth. Thank you for your consideration on this issue, and please call with any questions. Very truly yours, Very truly yours, James D. Taylor Christopher C. Johnson President Mayor Agawam Town Council cc: Agawam Town Council FA TOWN OF AGAWAM 36 MAIN STREET AGAWAM, MASSACHUSETTS 01001 ' Te1. 413-786-0400 �4TED February 16, 1993 Michael P. Walsh, State Representative ' 549 Springfield Street Feeding Hills, MA 01030 ' Dear Representative Walsh, Enclosed please find a copy of the resolution passed by the Agawam Town Council concerning House 1000 ("Education Reform Bill") . The resolution opposes the passage of the bill in its present form. It seems likely that the bill will ultimately end up in conference, and you will be given another opportunity to ' vote on its passage. Please consider the views of elected officials at the local level when casting your important vote on this piece of key legislation. We are the people who will be left with implementing whatever is approved by the Commonwealth. Thank you for your consideration on this issue, and please call with any questions. Very truly yours, Very truly yours, James D. Taylor Christopher C. Johnson President Mayor Agawam Town Council cc: Agawam Town Council FA TOWN OF AGAWAM 36 MAIN STREET AGAWAM, MASSACHUSETTS 01001 y Tel. 413-786-0400 4 u gay February 16, 1993 Linda J. Melconian, state Senator 375 Walnut Street Extension Agawam, MA 01001 Dear Senator Melconian, Enclosed please find a copy of the resolution passed by the Agawam Town Council concerning House 1000 ("Education Reform Bill") . The resolution opposes the passage of the bill in its present form. Please consider the views of elected officials at the local level when casting your important vote on this piece of key legislation. We are the people who will be left with implementing whatever is approved by the Commonwealth. Thank you for your consideration on this issue, and please call with any questions. Very truly yours, Very truly yours, ' James D. Taylor Christopher C. Johnson President Mayor Agawam Town Council cc: Agawam Town Council