8151_SITE PLAN - RIVERSIDE LIQUORS, INC. - 1811 MAIN STREET g � SI � � -� eP�� �
�� v� r�� � � I� � ��� �- S,
��� . -
� � � � Maw, sr�� e t-
AGAWAM OFFICE OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
SITE PLAN REVIEW
REVIEWER: D. Dachos DATE: February 13, 2001
DATE RECEIVED. February 1, 2001 DISTRIBUTION DATE: February 1, 2001
PLANNING BOARD MEETING DATE: February15, 2001
APPLICANT INFORMATION
1. Name of Business: Riverside Liquors, Inc.
Address: 1811 Main Street, Agawam, MA 01001
2. Owner: Carlo Bonavita
Address: Same address
Telephone: 789-6448 Fax:
3. Engineer: Anderson Associates (Ron Huot)
Address: 1130 Williams Street, Longmeadow, MA 01106
Telephone: (413) 525-4145
PLAN REVIEW
Scale: 1 "=20'
Date: Jan. 2001
Fax: (413) 567-4540
Title Block (Street Address, Applicant's Name, Address, Scale, Name of Preparer
of Plan): O.K.
Description of Project: Proposed expansion of existing liquor store by 20' along Main
Street and 52' along Kanawa Avenue.
Site Plan Review
Page 2
Description of Site: Site of proposed addition is presently paved for parking of
existing store. A wetlands delineation was approved by the Conservation Commission
in 1994. A new Delineation Request has been submitted for Commission action.
Provision for Traffic Flow: Unchanged.
Parking: The plan shows twenty-three (23) parking spaces with one (1) handicapped
space. During the review of the earlier plan (9/1994) the issue of parking was raised.
The attached Site Plan approval indicates that the approval is for a liquor store only. If
the applicant wished to change the use he would have come back to the Board for a
review of the parking. The use of the proposed addition should be specified. See also
the Engineering comments concerning the size of the parking spaces.
Drainage: As per the Engineering comments, a Storm Drainage Permit must be
obtained.
Public Utilities: Not provided.
Landscaping/Screening and Buffers: Size and species must be provided. The
following landscape note must be placed on the plan. "All planting must be maintained
and that portion of the public way abutting the parcel and including the treebelt shall be
maintained in a safe and attractive condition by the owner of the parcel."
Sign Location: Not provided.
Exterior Lighting: Unchanged.
Rendering or Elevations: Colors and textures must be provided.
Dumpster Location: O.K.
Other Comments or Concerns:
TO: Engineering Department
FROM: Planning Board
DATE: February 26, 2001
SUBJECT: Site Plan - Riverside Liquors - 1811 Main Street
The attached revised Site Plan was approved by the Planning Board on February 15". The
applicant's representative stated that it was revised to address your comments.
DSD:prk
Town of Agawam
36 Main Street Agawam, Mamiachusetts 01001-1837
Tel. 41.3-786-0400 Fax 413-786-9927
February 22, 2001
Carlo Bonavita
1911 Main Street
Agawam, MA 01001
Dear Mr. Bonavita:
At its duly called meeting held on February 15, 2001, the Agawam Planning Board voted to approve
the Site Plan entitled: "Site Plan in Agawam, MA, Riverside Liquors, Inc., 1811 Main Street,
Agawam, MA" prepared by Anderson Associates and dated January, 2001 and revised February 15,
2001 with the following continents:
1. The comments contained in the memos from the Town Engineer dated February 9
and February 15, 2001 must be addressed. The memos are attached.
2. The number of tables in the proposed deli are not to exceed three (3) with six chairs
per table.
3. If, in the future, the owner proposes to change the use from a liquor store/deli, he
must return to the Planning Board for a new Site Plan review.
If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Board at 786-0400, extension 283.
Sincerely,
Charles R. Calabrese, Chairman
Agawam Planning Board
cc: Clerk
Anderson Associates
Engineering
Building
File
a
• ; ';' - a
TowN OF AGAWAM,
MEMORANDUM
To: Planning Board
CC: File; .D.P.W .John Stone
From: Engineering
Date: February 15, 2001
Subject:. Site Plan 376 - Riverside Liquors, Inc. - Agawam, Massachusetts
In addition to comments made in our February 911, 2001 memorandum to the Planning board,
we have no objection to partially filling in the bathtub designed basin towards the northeast corner
of the lot as proposed since we never recognized it as a storm water detention pond during original
project construction.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our division.
Sincerely, Sincerely,
;am—esT. Daley, P.E. Harold Piligian, .I.T.
Town Engineer Civil Engineer I
HAEVGMERISITEPL kMSp376_02.wpd
0
TOWN OF AGAw"
MEMORANDUM
To:
Planning Board
CC:
File, D.P.W. Superintendent John Stone
From:
Engineering
Date:
February 9, 2001
Subject: Site Plan 376 - Riverside Liquors, Inc. - Agawam, Massachusetts
Per yourxequest dated February 1, 2001, we have reviewed the site plan entitled, "Site Plan
in Agawam Massachusetts" dated January 2001, for Riverside Liquors, Inc., 1811 Main Street
Agawam, MA, prepared by Anderson Associates. We have the following comments:
1.) Anderson Associates should show existing and proposed contour lines, which extend
approximately 30 feet beyond lot lines, on the site plan
2.) We recommend the owner or its representative file a "WPA Form I - Request for
Determination of Applicability" with the Conservation Commission. We also recommend
showing a silt fence on the site plan to protect areas beyond construction activities.
3.) We recommend Anderson Associates locate and show all tree lines within the area shown
on the site plan.
4.) A parking space generation calculation using "Rhode Island Community Detailed Parking
Standards" results in 40 parking spaces for a building of type and proposed size as shown on
the site plan. We recommend the planning board consider the adequacy of the proposed 23
parking spaces by Anderson Associates.
5.) We recommend dimensioning parking space lengths, widths, and aisle widths, and marking
one and two way traffic paths with directional arrows, on the site plan. We recommend
Anderson Associates design parking spaces in accordance with standards set forth in the
Institute bf Transportation Engineers "Guidelines for Parking Facility Location and Desi "
April 1994. Shown below are some applicable dimensional guidelines taken
source'.4
Basic Stall Stall Depth _"t a
4 ,
Width (ft) To Wall (ft) ::441 t.
One Way Aisle - 60' 9 18
Two Way Aisle 90 ° 9 17.5 26
Handicap accessible parking_ spaces should also be provided in aCC A . sdards
set forth in "Massachusetts 521 CMR: Architectural Access Board.` tan
6.) We recommend describing proposed landscaping in a legend and showing it on the site plan.
7.) We recommend locating a benchmark on the site plan.
8.) The owner or its representative should obtain a storm drain permit per Agawam's Storm
Drain Ordinance.
9,) Anderson Associates should consider the impact from proposed construction, on site
drainage and supply calculations as required. Anderson Associates should also show any
needed pipes, culverts, structures, etc. on the site plan.
10.) Anderson Associates should show all existing underground and aboveground utilities as well
as the sanitary sewer clean out, within the area shown on the site plan.
11.) We recommend Anderson Associates design a handicap ramp in accordance with the
standards set forth in the Massachusetts Highway "Wheelchair Ramp Standards," 10/8/97.
12.) We recommend showing the following notes on the site plan:
"Prior to any installation of any sewer, water or drainage lines, the contractor/owner shall
contact the Town of Agawam's Engineering Division, 786-0400 x 275/8, No
piping/appurtenances will be installed or backfilled without the permission of the division".
"Ali plantings must be maintained and that portion of the public way abutting the parcel and
including the treebelt shall be maintained in a safe and attractive condition by the owner of
the parcel."
"The contractor/owner shall be responsible for testing any existing Town gate valve where
anew connection will be made. The contractorfowner will also be responsible for repairing
or replacing such valve or installing a new valve at the property Iine in order to allow
pressure testing of the new water main."
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our division.
Sine ely, Sincerely,
amen T.or
Daley, P.E. Harold Piligian, E.I.T.
Town Engineer Civil Engineer I
HAENGINEEMS ITEPLAMSp) 760 l . wpd
1
6 Guidelines for Parking Facility Location and Design
3 Surface Parking Design
Most of the basic principles of parking
layout can be illustrated by a review of
surface lot design. Stall and aisle dimen-
sions and arrangements, horizontal cir-
culation patterns, reservoir needs, and
entry -exit revenge controls are similar
for lots and garages. The special ele-
ments introduced by garages (coluatns,
ramps, vertical circulation patterns, day-
time lighting, and ventilation) are cov-
ered separately in the "Parking Struc-
ture Design" chapter.
3.01 Relationship between
Design and Operation
The operation of a parking facility is
greatly influenced by its design. The
design elements and their associated
operational features may be identified
in successive steps as follows:
1. Vehicular access from the street sys-
tem (entry driveway);
2. Search for a parking stall (circulation
and/or access aisles);
3. Maneuver space to enterthe stall (ac-
cess aisle);
4. Sufficient stall size to accommodate
the vehicle's length and width plus
space to open car doors wide enough
to enter and exit vehicle;
S. Pedestrian access to and from the
facility boundary (usually via the
aisles);
6. Maneuver space to exit from the
parking stall (access aisles);
7. Routing to leave the facility (access
and circulation aisles); and .
8. Vehicular egress to the street system
(exit driveway).
The simplest form of off-street parking
is the single stall at a home.Assuming a
straight driveway, steps 1 and 8 use the
same lane and curb cut. Steps 2 and 7
are rudimentary. Thus, a driveway serv-
ing a one -car parking stall or garage
cannot be considered as representing a
second parking space if such parking
would block continuous access to the
basic stall. Step 6 usually involves back-
ing out into the public street or alley, as
8 Parking angle
W, Parking module width (wall to
wall), single loaded aisle
W, Parking module width (wall to
wall), double loaded aisle
W3 Parking module width (wall to
in=lock), double loaded
W, Parking module width (interlock
to interlock), double loaded.aisle
AW Aisle width
WP Stall width parallel to aisle
VP, Projected vehicle length from
interlock
VP,, Projected vehicle length from wall
measured perpondicalar to aisle
SL Stall length
S,, Stall width
i
WP
W,
Wz
W3
W4
A
BIgure 3. Dimensional elements of parking layouts. (Source: Adapted 6rom, cited Refer-
ence 13, FIgure 4.)
part of 7'and 8. Herein lies the essential
difference between low -volume parking
and what generally should be practiced
in facilities designed to Randle more
than two or three cars. Except along al-
leys, the larger lots should have most
parldng and unparking maneuvers con-
tained off-street. Frequent backing of
cars across sidewalks and into public
streets increases congestion and creates
hazards.
3.02 Stall and Aisle
Dimensions —Large Cars
In developing the design of a parking
facility, it is customary to work with
stalls, aisles, and combinations called
"modules".
A complete module is one access aisle
servicing a row of parldng on each side
of theaisle (sec Figure 3). In some cases,
partial modules are used where the aisle
selves only a single one -side row of
parking. This arrangement is inefficient
and should be avoided.
The minimum practical stall width
varies principally with turnover (fm-
quency of stall use), experience of the
parker, and vehicle size. Commercial
parking attendants can park large cars
in stalls less than 8.0 feet wide. With
self-parldng, stall widths that will ac-
commodate most passenger cars and
light trucks range between 8.3 feet and
8.8 feet, depending on anticipatedparlt
Ing activity. Site -specific circumstances
will influence determinations of the
most appropriate stall width dimension.
I
8 Guidelines for Parking Facility Location and Design
Table 2. Large -Size Parking Layout Dimension Guidelines'
GYP
Modules
SM Stall Kith
VP.
VP,
AW
W2
Wi
Parking
Basic Stall Parallel to
SAW Depth
Stull Depth
Aisle
Wall to
Interlock so
Glues'
Width` A Aisle (t)
to Weill (ft)
to Interlockd (t)
WuMO({t)
Waff(it)
InterlocW di)
Two- Way Aide-90Degrees
A
9.00 9.00
B
C
8.75 8.75
8.50 8.50
17-5
17.5
26.0
61.0
61.0
D
8.25 8.25
Two -Wiry Aisle- 60 Degrees
A
9.00 10.4
B
C
8.75 10.1
8.50 9.8
19.0
16.5
26.0
62.0
59.0
D
8.25 9.5
One -Way Aisle-75 Degrees
A
9.00 9.3
B
C
8.75 9•0
8.50 8.8
18.5
17.5
22.0
59.0
$7.0
D
8.25 8.5
One -Way Aisle-60 Degrees
A
9.00 10.4
B
C
8.75 10.1
8.50 9.8
18.0
16.5
18.0
54.0
51.0
D
8.25 9.5
One -Way Aisle--45 Degrees
A
9.00 12.7
B
C
8.75 12.4
8.50 12.0
16.5
14.5
15.0
48.0
44.0
D
8.25 11.7
Rotes: These dimensions act subject. to slight reductions by local agencies ender high -cost conditions (such as garages) or slight increase; in arras subject to
special needs (such as extensive snowfall). The aisle width may be narrowed by approximately one foot without experiencing a major increase in congestion
and aooembility of parking stalls. This would particularly apply in structures where high conoruction cost is a sigrri&m factm Also, a one-step unde-0ff
can be made between stall and aisle width. A deereasc of 2-feet in Table 2 module can be compensated by a 0.5 foot intense in stall width for the appropriate
class.
See Figure 3 for description of dements.
' See Table 1 for typical uses (A for high turnover, B and C for medium turnover, and C and D for low turnww}
=Measured at right angles to stall linm
dMay also apply to boundary coils where bumper overhang is allowed
,To vehicle mn=
/Rounded to nearest fool
shown in Figure 3. The other is the
"nested" interlock; it can be usedonly
at 45 degrees and is produced by adja-
cent aisles having one-way movements
in the same direction. This arrangement
requires the bumper of one car to face
the fender of another car. Wheel stops
are necessary for each stall, and., even
with their use, the probability of vehicu-
lar damage is much greater than for
other parking arrangements. Therefore,
this type of parldng layout is not rec-
ommended, unless the vehicle rows arc
separated by a curbed median.
Table 2 lists suggested'basic design
guidelines for large -size cars for typical
parking angles, stall widths, and mod -
ales that will also adequately accommo-
date date a mixture of latgv- small cars.
In practice, a faster parking operation
will. be achieved if the dimensions are
increased. Slight reductions are also fea-
sible, as given in the table notes. Aisle
widths are based on the stall depths
listed in Table 2. if an agency has set a
longer depth, then the total module di-
mension is the one to be considered (a
61 foot module would have a 21-foot
aisle, if stall depths are marked at 20 feet,
for example).
Narrowed stall width in each class for
parking angles of less than 90 degrees
is not desirable. There is a relation be-
tween stall width and aisle width, as
shown in Table 24 but the stall width
needs arc basically determined by door -
opening clearances. Only at very flat
angles of less than 35 degrees will doors
open ahead or behind the cars in adja-
cent stalls, and even then there can be
little reduction in basic stall width.
3.03 S=H-Car Dimensions
Special dimensions for small -car park_
ing have increased application in North
America. The percentage of such cars
varies by year and also somewhat by
geographical location. It is- currently
about 40 to 50 percent in the United
Stators.
A suitable stalls length for small cars is
•
TOWN OF AciAwAm
MEMORANDUM
To: Planning Board
CC: File; D_P.W .John Stone
From: Engineering
Date: February 15, 2001
Subject: Site Plan 376 - Riverside Liquors, Inc. - Agawam, Massachusetts
In addition to comments made in our February 91, 2001 memorandum to the Planning board,
we have no objection to partially filling in the bathtub designed basin towards the northeast corner
of the lot as proposed since we never recognized it as a storm water detention pond during original
project construction.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our division.
Sincerely,
James T. Daley, P.E.
Town Engineer
H:1ENGINEERISITEPLAN\Sp376_02.wpd
Sincerely,
Harold Piligian, .I.T.
Civil Engineer I
TOWN OF AGAWAM
MEMORANDUM
To: Planning Board
CC: File, D.P.W. Superintendent John Stone
From: Engineering
Date: February 9, 2001
Subject: Site Plan 376 - Riverside Liquors, Inc. - Agawam, Massachusetts
Per your xequest dated February 1, 2001, we have reviewed the site plan entitled, "Site Plan
in Agawam Massachusetts" dated January. 2001, for Riverside Liquors, Inc., 1811 Main Street
Agawam, MA, prepared by Anderson Associates. We have the following comments:
1.) Anderson Associates should show existing and proposed contour lines, which extend
approximately 30 feet beyond lot lines, on the site plan.
2.) We recommend the owner or its representative file a "WPA Form 1 - Request for
Determination of Applicability" with the Conservation Commission. We also recommend
showing a silt fence on the site plan to protect areas beyond construction activities.
3.) We recommend Anderson Associates locate and show all tree lines within the area shown
on the site plan.
4.) A parking space generation calculation using "Rhode Island Community Detailed Parking
Standards" results in 40 parking spaces for a building of type and proposed size as shown on
the site plan. We recommend the planning board consider the adequacy of the proposed 23
parking spaces by Anderson Associates.
5.) We recommend dimensioning parking space lengths, widths, and aisle widths, and marking
one and two way traffic paths with directional arrows, on the site plan. We recommend
Anderson Associates design parking spaces in accordance with standards set forth in the
Institute of Transportation Engineers "Guidelines for Parking Facility Location and Desi
April 1994. Shown below are some applicable dimensional guidelines taken fr,tt
p
source:`
Basic Stall Stall Depth A �d1F4
Width (ft) To Wall (ft)k;
One Way Aisle - 60' 9 1$
Two Way Aisle - 90 ° 9 17.5 f 26 f s
Handicap accessible parking. spaces should also be provided in acc Mr standards
set forth in "Massachusetts 521 CMR: Architectural Access Board.'
6. We recommend debingproposed landscaping in a legend and showing it on the site plan.
7.) We recommend locating a benchmark on the site plan.
8.) The owner or its representative should obtain a storm drain permit per Agawam's Storm
Drain Ordinance.
9.) Anderson Associates should consider the impact from proposed construction, on site
drainage and supply calculations as required. Anderson Associates should also show any
needed pipes, culverts, structures, etc. on the site plan.
10.) Anderson Associates should show all existing underground and aboveground utilities as well
as the sanitary sewer clean out, within the area shown on the site plan.
11.) We recommend Anderson Associates design a handicap ramp in accordance with the
standards set forth in the Massachusetts Highway "Wheelchair Ramp Standards," 10/8/97.
12.) We recommend showing the following notes on the site plan:
"Prior to any installation of any sewer, water or drainage lines, the contractor/owner shall
contact the Town of Agawam's Engineering Division, 786-0400 x 275/8. No
piping/appurtenances will be installed or backfilled without the permission of the division".
"All plantings must be maintained and that portion of the public way abutting the parcel and
including the treebelt shall be maintained in a safe and attractive condition by the owner of
the parcel."
"The contractor/owner shall be responsible for testing any existing Town gate valve where
a new connection will be made. The contractor/owner will also be responsible for repairing
or replacing such valve or installing a new valve at the property line in order to allow
pressure testing of the new water main."
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our division.
ZarnesSincely, Sincerely,
T. Daley, P.E. Harold Piligian, E.I.T.
Town Engineer Civil Engineer I
H:\ENGINEER\SITEPLAN\Sp376_01.wpd
5 Guidelines for Parking Facility Location and Design
?J Surface Parking Design
Most of the basic principles of parking
layout can be illustrated by a review of
surface lot design. Stall and aisle dimen-
sions and arrangements, horizontal cir-
culation patterns, reservoir needs, and
entry -exit revenue controls are similar
for lots and garages. The special ele-
ments introduced by garages (columns,
ramps, vertical circulation patterns, day-
time lighting, and ventilation) are cov-
ered separately in the `larking Struc-
ture Design" chapter.
3.01 Relationship between
Design and Operation
The operation of a parking facility is
greatly influenced by its design. The
design elements and their associated
operational features may be identified
in successive steps as follows:
1. Vehicular access from the street sys-
tem (entry driveway);
2. Search for a parking stall (circulation
and/or access aisles);
3. Maneuver space to enter the stall (ac-
cess aisle);
4. Sufficient stall size to accommodate
the vehicle's length and width plus
space to open car doors wide enough
to enter and exit vehicle;
5. Pedestrian access to and from the
facility boundary (usually via the
aisles);
6. Maneuver space to exit from the
parking stall (access aisles);
7. Routing to leave the facility (access
and circulation aisles); and
8. Vehicular egress to the street system
(exit driveway).
The simplest form of off-street parking
is the single stall at a home. Assuming a
straight driveway, steps 1 and 8 use the
same lane and curb cut. Steps 2 and 7
are rudimentary. Thus, a driveway serv-
ing a one -car parking stall or garage
cannot be considered as representing a
second parking space if such parking
would block continuous access to the
basic stall. Step 6 usually involves back-
ing out into the public street or alley, as
VPW
W1
8 Parking angle
f�
W, Packing module width (wall to
$1,
wall), single loaded aisle
WZ Parking module width (wall to
wall), double loaded aisle
B WP
5-4
W3 Parking module width (wall to
interlock), double loaded
W, Parking module width (interlock
Wz
to interlock), double loaded aisle
A W Aisle width
WP Stall width parallel to aisle
VP, Projected vehicle length from
interlock
W3
VPW Projected vehicle length from wall
measured perpendicular to aisle
SL Stall length
SW Stall width
W4
A
i
VPI—"�
Figure 3. Dimensional elements of parking layouts, (Soome: Adapted from cited Refer-
ence 11, Figwm 4.)
part of 7 and 8. Herein lies the essential
difference between low -volume parking
and what generally should be practiced
in facilities designed to handle more
than two or three cars_ Except along al-
leys, the larger lots should have most
parking and unparidng maneuvers con-
tained off-street. Frequent backing of
cars across sidewalks and into public
streets increases congestion and creates
hazards.
3.02 Stall and Aisle
Dimensions —Large Cars
In developing the design of a parking
facility, it is customary to work with
stalls, aisles, and combinations called
"modules".
A complete module is one access aisle
servicing a row of parking on each side
of the aisle (see Figure 3). In some cases,
partial modules are used where the aisle
serves only a single one -side row of
parking. This arrangement is inefficient
and should be avoided.
The minimum practical stall width
varies principally with turnover (fre-
quency of stall use), experience of the
Parker, and vehicle size. Commercial
parking attendants can park large cars
in stalls less than 8.0 feet wide. With
self -parking, stall widths that will ac-
commodate most passenger cars and
light trucks range between 8.3 feet and
8.8 feet, depending on anticipated park-
ing activity. Site -specific circumstances
will influence determinations of the
most appropriate stall width dimension.
8 Guidelines for Parking Atyocation Fwand Desig
n
Table 2. Large -Size Parking Layout Dimension Guidelines'
WP
Modules
SW StalI Width
VPV
VP.
AW
Wz
W,
Parking
Basic Stall Parallel to
Stall Deepth
Stall Depth
Aisle
Wall to
Interlock to
Classb
Width- (ft) Aisle (ft)
to Wall (ft)
to Interlock` (ft)
WuWef (ft)
Waff (ft)
InterlocW (ft)
Two -Way Aisle-90 Degrees
A
9.00 9.00
B
8.75 8.75
17.5
17.5
26.0
61.0
61.0
C
8.50 8.50
D
8.25 8.25
Two -Way Aisle--60 Degrees
A
9.00 10.4
B
8.75 10.1
18.0
16.5
26.0
62.0
59.0
C
9.50 9.8
D
8.25 9.5
One -Way Aisle-75 Degrees
A
9.00 9.3
B
8.75 9.0
I8.5
17.5
22.0
59.0
57.0
C
8.50 8.8
D
8.25 8.5
One -Way Aisle-60 Degrees
A
9.00 10.4
B
8.75 10.1
18.0
I6.5
18.0
54.0
51.0
C
8.50 9.8
D
8.25 9.5
One -Way Aisle-45 Degrees
A
9.00 12.7
B
8.75 12.4
16.5
14.5
15.0
48.0
44.0
C
8.50 12.0
D
8.25 11.7
Notes_ These dimensions are subject to slight reductions by local agencies under high -cost conditions (such as garages) or slight increases in areas subject to
special needs (such as extensive snowfall). The aisle width may be narrowed by approximately one foot without experiencing a major increase in cangestim
and accessibility of parking stags. This would particularly apply in structures where high consirvction cost is a significant factor. Also, a one-step trade-off
can be made between stall and aisie width. A decrease of 2-feet in Table 2 module can be compensated by a 0.5 foot increase in stall width for the appropriate
class.
,See Frgum 3 for description of elements.
See Table 1 for typical uses (A for high turnover, S and C for medium turnover, and C and D for low turnover),
Measured at right angles to stall line.
May also apply to boundary curb where bumper overhang is allowed.
To vehicle corner.
(Rounded to aearest foot
shown in Figure 3. The other is the
"nested" interlock; it can be used only
at 45 degrees and is produced by adja-
cent aisles having one-way movements
in the same direction. This arrangement
requires the bumper of one car to face
the fender of another car. Wheel stops
are necessary for each stall, and, even
with their use, the probability of vehicu-
lar damage is much greater than for
other parking arrangements. Therefore,
this type of parking layout is not rec-
ommended, unless the vehicle rows are
separated by a curbed median.
Table 2 lists suggested basic design
guidelines for large -size cars for typical
parking angles, stall widths, and mod -
ales that will also adequately accommo-
date a mixture of large -anti "small cars.
In practice, a faster pa ddng operation
will be achieved if the dimensions are
increased. Slight reductions are also fea-
sible, as given in the table notes. Aisle
widths are based on the stall depths
listed in Table 2. If an agency has set a
longer depth, then the total module di-
mension is the one to be considered (a
61 foot module would have a 21-foot
aisle, if stall depths are mmiced at 20 feet,
for example).
Narrowed stall width in each class for
parking angles of less than 90 degrees
is not desirable. There is a relation be-
tween stall width and aisle width, as
shown in Table 2, but the stall width
needs are basically determined by door -
opening clearances. only at very flat
angles of less than 35 degrees will doors
open ahead or behind the can in adja-
cent stalls, and even then there can be
little reduction in basic stall width.
3.03 Small -Car Dimensions
Special dimensions for small -car park-
ing have increased application in North
America. The percentage of such cars
varies by year and also somewhat by
geographical location. It is currently
about 40 to 50 percent in the United
States.
A suitable stall length for small cars is
0
MEMO
To: Planning Board
From: Sergeant Donald Gallerani(�p
Subject: Site Plan -Riverside Liquors, Inc. - 1811 Main Street
Date: February 9, 2001
The proposed expansion of Riverside Liquors by 20' along Main Street and 52' along Kanawa
Avenue will have no impact on pedestrian or traffic safety.
Also, the plans are in compliance with the Town Ordinance regarding Handicapped parking.
Town of Agawam
36 Main Street Agawam, Massachusetts 01001.-1.837
Tel_ 41.3-786-0400 Fax 413-786-9927
a-17
MEMO
TO: Building Inspector, Engineering Department, Police Dep rtment U ent
FROM: Planning Board
DATE: February 1, 2001
A s�
SUBJECT: Site PIan - Riverside Liquors, Inc. - 1811 Main Street.
Please review and comment on the attached Site Plan for Riverside Liquors, Inc., on 1811 Main
Street, prior to the Board's February 15, 20U�et �XAM FIRE
DEP
ARTMENT
Thank you. APPRQVAL
nsDijs DATE
Attachment SIGN ..&%
ALTHOUGH NOT REQUIRED BY LAW THIS OFFICE WOULD LIKE
TO SEE A BASIC FIRE ALARM WITH AN OUT SIDE HORN AND
STROB TO NOTIFY ANY ONE OF A FIRE WHEN NOT OPEN
& 0 1
Town of Agawam
36 Main Street Agawam, Massachusetts 01001-1837
Tel. 41.3-786-0400 Fax 413-786-9927
MEMO
TO: Building Inspector, Engineering Department, Police Department, Fire Department
FROM: Planning Board
DATE: February 1, 2001
SUBJECT: Site Plan - Riverside Liquors, Inc. - 1811 Main Street
Please review and comment on the attached Site Plan for Riverside Liquors, Inc., on 1811 Main
Street, prior to the Board's February 15, 2001 meeting.
Thank you.
D SD/j sg
Attachment
AGAWAM PLANNING BOARD
FEB 0 1 2001
Form D
Application for Site Plan Approval
Please complete the following form and return it and 10 copies of the Site Plan to:
Agawam Planning board
Office of Planning and Community Development. -
36 Main Street
Agawam, MA 01001
az
;.
1. Nam,: of Business
Add: ess Gq I tj A 6 0 w A rv, 1iY10 , w
Telephone h1 i 3
?. Name of .-kpplicant/Own. f� fL o �erl►q yr 1 A
Address 1811 tIrl d I.,LJ S r ,e t16 A .j A Pm t7,I A
Telephone qi 1 _(o 4 V v Fax
3. Name of Engineer/Architect A/qL E+1' So •,� o. C ► ? e_S o,,idoo i _
Address 03 D W ( J.JlAnL�—_ ..S? , )-0 A.)
Telephone 'J1.3 5 25--141
y13 -�,67-Y- c/o
4. Please give a brief description of the proposed project:
0 ela'4 y rY1`9►nJ ��.
-6 2 ` p Lave l K,1 f )14'd t3
Reviscd 9112/00
sol-0 0—
C4WT.
0 ,�O!t e>
Js *"
0
I
FEB 1 2 2001