Loading...
8776_SITE PLAN - 94 GARDEN STREET.pdf~lllD - S \K ()tCl(l - YLl 0(A~() StC"ttt- • Town of Agawam 36 Main Street Agawam, Massachusetts 01001-1801 Tel. 413-786-0400 Fax 413-786-9927 October 2, 2015 Don Cameron, Manager The Plex Sports Park, LLC 22 Whippletree Lane Amherst, MA 01002 Dear Mr. Cameron: At its duly called meeting held on October I, 2015, the Agawam Planning Board voted to approve the Site Plan entitled "Sportsplex -94 Garden Street, Agawam, MA, Prepared for: The Plex Sports Park, LLC", Prepared by Milone and MacBroom, Inc. and dated September 3, 2015, revised September 30, 2015 with the following conditions: • An ANR plan is to be submitted combining the parcels; • Conservation Commission Determination of Applicability to be issued; • All professional staff comments are to be addressed including the Engineering Department comments dated October;f12015 (attached) . . If you have any questions, please contact this office at 413786-0400, extension 8737. Sincer)-~-1' Mark R. Paleologopoulos, Chairman AGAWAM PLANNING BOARD MRP:prk Cc: Milone & MacBroom, Bldg. Inspector, Eng. Dept., Town Clerk, File To: CC: From: Date: SubJect: Planning • • TOWN OF AGAWAM Department of Public Works 1000 Suffield Street • Agawam, MA 01001 Tel (413) 8210600 • Fax (413) 8210631 Chrlrtopher J. Golba • Superintendent MEMORANDUM Milone and MacBroom; File Engineering Division October I, 2015 Site Plan: SP-595 -The Sportsplex -Garden Street Per your request, we have reviewed the Site Plan entitled, "Sportsplex -94 Garden Sfr!let, Agawam, MA; Prepared for: The Plex Sports Park, LLC, 22 Whipple Tree Lane, Amherst, MA 01002; Prepared by: Milone & MacBroom, Inc., 1350 Main Street, Springfield, MA 01103; Scale: I" = 40'; Dated: September 3, 2015; Revision No. 1-September 30,2015," and we have the following comments: Site· Plan Comments: I. Engineering has reviewed the traffic impact study and parking generation calculations prepared by Milone and MacBroom and we have no comment. 2. Engineering has been wozking directly with Milone and MacBroom to come up with the following solution to provide a clear sight distance for vehicles exiting the driveway: a. A sight distance easement shall be established through the length of the property at 84/86 Garden Street and recorded in the Hampden County Regirtryof Deeds. b. Two no parking signs and two easement diskslpins shall be installed on either side of the driveway at 84/86 Garden Street as shown in Detail B on sheet SD-4. Also, parking spaces shall be painted as shown. c. Due to the location of the edge of right of way, it was determined that a sidewalk would not be helpful in keeping the sight distance area clear, therefore that request from our previous memo has been removed. d. As shown on sheet LA: Two advisory 25 MPH speed limit signs (W13-IP) and intersection signs (WI-lOA) with a curve shall be placed on Garden Street (one in each direction), all signs shall meet MUTCD standards, and be high intensity prismatic with breakaway posts. Engineering reserves the right to make additional comments as new information is submitted. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this division . . SinC~L~!'!e.Cc __ _ Michelle C. Chase, P.E. Town Engineer To: cc: From: Date: Subject: Planning • TOWN OF AGAWAM Department of Public Works 1000 Suffield Street • Agawam, MA 01001 Tel (413) 821 0600 • Fax (413) 821 0631 Christopher J. Golba • Superinteadeot MEMORANDUM Milone and MacBroom; File Engineering Division October 1,2015 Site Plan: SP-595 -The Sportsplex -Garden Street Per your request, we have reviewed the Site Plan entitled, "Sportsplcx -94 Garden Street, Agawam, MA; Prepaml for: The Plex Sports Park, LLC, 22 Whipple Tree Lane, Amherst, MA 01 002; Prepared by: Milone & MacBroom, Inc., 1350 Main Street, Springfield, MA 01103; Scale: 1" = 40'; Dated: September 3,2015; Revision No.1 -September 30, 2015," and we have the following COIIUnents: Site-PIeD Commepts: I. Enginccriag has reviewed lhe traffic impact study 8nd parking generation calculatiOWI pn:parcd by Milone and MacBroom and we have no comment. 2. Engineering has been working directly with Milone and MacBroom to come up wilh lhe following solution to provide a clear sight distance for vehicles exiting lhc driveway: a. A sight distance casement shall be established through the length of the plUperty at 84186 Garden Street and recorded in the Hampden County Registry of Deeds. b. Two no parking signs and two easement disksIpins shall be inatal1ed on either side of the driveway at 84186 Garden Street as shown in Detai1 B on sheet SD-4. Also, parlcing spaces shall be painted as ahown. c. Due to the location of the edge of right of way, it was determined that a sidewalk would not be helpful in Icceping the sight distance area clear, thCTCfore that request from our previous memo has beco removed. d. As shown on sheet LA: Two adviaory 25 MPH speed limit ai&nS (W13-IP) and intersection -signs (WI-lOA) with a curve shall be placed on Garden Street (one in each direction), all signs shall meet MUTCD standards, and be high intensity prismatic with breakaway posts. Engineering reserves the right to make additional comments as new information is submitted. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this division. Sin~ JM/7 7~a._-~<­ Michelle C. Chase, P.E. Town Engineer • • To~n of Agawam Interoffice Memorandum To: CC: From : Date: Subject: Engineering Department Planning Board 9/30/15 Garden Street -The Sportsplex Please review and comment on the revised plan and supporting documentation that was submitted today on The Sportsplex prior to the Board's meeting Thursday evening. Thank you. MS :prk FROM THE DESK OF .•• YOUR NAME TITl.E TOWN OF AGAWAM 36MAINST AGAWAM, MA 01001 Email address Here 413·786·0400 X Extension Fax: 413·786·9927 ~~~ , --Transmittal TO: Town of Agawam Planning Department 36 Main Street DATE: 9/30/2015 JOB #: 5736-{)1 Agawam, Massachusetts Attention: Mr. Marc Strange -Town Planner RE: Agawam 5portsplex 01001 Revised Site Plans and documents PHONE: 413-786-0400 METHOD OF DELIVERY: DFedEx~ __ ~ ____ __ (please indicate type) DRegular Mail DPickUp D Electronic Copy WE ARE SENDING YOU: DShop Drawings tiS! Copy of Letter DCertified/Return Receipt tiS! Delivery OPrints OChange Order tiS!Plans tiS!Samples OSpecifications DPermit Application DOther ___ _ Copies Date No./Action Description 1 9/18/2015 Traffic AnalysiS -The Agawam Sportsplex 1 9/30/2015 Cut Sheet -RoadView LED Series Luminaire 1 9/18/2015 Parking Generation Analysis 1 9/30/2015 Intersection Site Distance -Proposed Driveway 1 9/17/2015 Response to comments letter 3 9/29/2015 Revised Site Plans -The Agawam Sportsplex THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: o For Approval o Rejected o Resubmit for Record REMARKS: COPY TO: o Make Corrections Noted oAs Requested o For review and comment I8J For your use oNot Acceptable -Revise & Resubmit o For Information Only -Review Waived o Other ________ _ RECEIVED SEP 302015' If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Milone & MacBroom, Inc. 1350 Main Street, Suite 1012, Springfield, MA (413) 241-6920 MiioneandMacBroom.com • liIW-uw. J~AIdI_ tIIfd Jom/....-bIl_ ~l~ MIWNE &MACBROOM' Sep~ber17,2015 Mr. Marc Strange Town Planner Town of Agawam 36 Main Street Agawam, MA 01001 RE: Aaawam Sportsplex MMI1I5736001-6 Dear Mr. Strange: • RECEIVED SEP 302015' AGAWAM PLANNING BOARD We are In receipt of correspondence from the Agawam Office of Planninc " Community DewIopment dated September 14, 2015, the Aiawam ponce Department Safety Officer dated September 10, 2015, the Agawam Department of Public worb dated September 16, 2015, and the Agawam Fire Department dated September 9, 2015. We offer the following responses to any comments or concerns expressed In these correspondences. SIte Plan Review -Office af Plannllll " Community Development -Dated September 14. 2015 C1. Title Block (Street Address, Applicant's Name, Address, Scale, Name of Preparer of Plan): Street address needed. R1. 94 Garden Street 0. Description of Project: Proposed sports facility consisting of 2 full size synthetic turf soccer fields, with seasonal enclosures, gnvel parking area for +250 cars, one 12,800 sf aa:essooy buMdlng and associated driveway, walkways, stormwater management areas and Iindscapins. RZ. No response Is needed. 0. Description of Site: Proposed site Is 22.89 acres and is currently two separate parcels of ReSidential B property located on the south side of Garden Street. An ANR Plan will be necessary to combine these parcels. One parcel contains land that is currently cultivated; the second parcells Wooded. A Wetland Investigation Report was conducted by Milone & MacBroom, attached, which indicates no evidence of wetlands was found. A formal Request for Determination of Applicability should be filed with the Agawam Conservation Commission. Ri. If determined to be required, a RFDA will be filed with the ApwMn ConCom. Milone & MacBroom, Inc., One Financial Plaza, 1350 Main Street, Suite 1012, SpriDgfield Massacb_ 01103 (4\3) 241-6920 Fax (413) 241·6911 www.miloneandmacbroom.com Connecticut. Mn[nc • Mwisachusetts • North Carolina. South Carolina • Vermont Mr.M...:Str.,. september 17, 2015 Pap 2 • • C4. Provision for Traffic Flow: SIte Is proposed to be accessed via a 26' wide driveway off of Garden Street. The first 140' ofthe driveway Is to be paved. R4. No response Is needed. CS. Parking: Gravel parking area provides for approximately 220 (6 handicapped plus 1 van accessible) parking spaces. Agawam's Parking Guidelines do not provide guidance on calculating the number of spaces necessary for such a use. As such, the applicant should provide a parking study. This should Include a comparison to existing similar faCilities. RS. A Parillng Generation Study has been provided to support the partdncaHotment propoled. C6. Orallllle: See Engineering comments. R6. Refer to the EnelnMrtnc comments and ~ section of tills ...... O. Public Utilities: All utilities must be shown on the plan. R7. PubHc utilities are shown on the plan. ca. Landscaping/Screening and Buffers: The following landscape not must be placed on the plan: MAli plantlncs must be maIntained and that portion of the PUbrlC way abutting the parcel and including the tleebeJt shllil be maintained in a safe and attractive condition by the owner of the parcel'- RS. Will Comply. 11Ie landlClpl", note wRI be lidded to the plans. C9. Sign Location: The proposed sign elevation and location must be provided. R9. Will Comply. A sIcn detail and location mntIn& Apwam repllItIo .. will be IIddlld to 1M pl .... Cl0. Exterior Lighting: The location of all exterior Iishting must be provided. Cut sheets must be provided and allUghting must be recessed and shielded and shall not flow over on to adjacent residential properties. RID. Will Comply. A1111..,t fixtures will be cut«t type flxtures/larnps and wll not cast "I'" off of property. A cut sheet of _lectecIlllht ftxtures .nd poles will btl provided. Cll. RenderIng or Elevations: Colors and textures must be provided. RlL Will Comply. RenderlllP/elevations and color palette wi. btl pnNldeci. ~~~ MILONB &:MAcBIlOOM' • • Mr. MM: 5tr .... September 17, 2015 ..... 3 C12. Dumpster Location: Dumpster(s) must be shown. All dumpsters must be fenced, gated and weened. R12. WIll comply. Dumpster location and screenlne will be shown on the plans. (13. Other Comments or Conce.rns: A Traffic Study should be conducted to explore any potential local Impacts. R13. A I'IIrIckw Generation and Preliminary Tl'llffIc Study has been completed for the project. Auwam Police Department Safety OffIce -Dated Septlmber 10. Z01S Cl. Curb cut must be wide enough for the entrance/exit for the facUlties driveway to allow ample traffic flow In both directions as wei as for emergency vehicles. The driveway must allow for a large volume of traffic to keep moving when the facility has a big turnover between schedule events with teams. R1. The site Is proposed to be ICC lsud viii a 26' wide drtveway off Garden Street. The first 140' of the driveway are to be paved. Q. The driveway must be unobstructed for motorist exiting the facility both easter1y and wester1y direction on Garden Street. RZ. No parkinc wiN be aIoWlld on the entrance/exit clrivewayto the facility. 0 . Where the existins driveway stands Iooklns easter1y towards RT 57 off ramp Is unobstructed. However, when looking Wester1y towards Poplar Street. The Motorists have an obstruction due to the residence next to 94. Ex. Vehicles parked in the driveway and a tree Nne conslstins of pine trees. R3. Rmr to Enclneerlng comments ,..."lIne this comment for a detailed response. CA. Where the existing driveway is located presently promotes and issue due to the bend In the road which will also have an effect on motorist safely entering/exiting the fadlity. R4. Amr to Enclneerlnc comments reprdlns these comments for detailed responses and sllhtIlne/safety measures prIIpOMCI. CS. I would also like to see Garden Street have ample no parking signs on both sides of the road even though it is marked with a double solid line and Is a no passins zone. We wit need to keep the roadway dear at all times secondary to the road being heavily used by commercial vehicles as well as residents within the area. RS. Will comply and work with the E.,.." .. rlng Depli b.1eM on the flnlilloc:atIon of liens. f~~ MILONE acMAcBROOM' Mr. Mare Str .... September 17, 2015 P ... 4 • • C6. This area of Garden Street is also narrow in appearance due to the businesses and residential houses which our In dose proximity to the roadway. R6. No response Is needed. C7. I would also recommend the 30 mph speed be posted due to the present traffic and increased traffic from the facility due to overwhelming popularity with soccer especially with a dosed In facility during the winter months. R7. Refer to Ensineerlll8 comments and responses reprdlne the Installation of 25 MPH advisory plaques. ca. I would also recommend an emergency access road to the rear of building fur emergency vehicles. RI. Will Comply. Ernerpncy vehicle access will be pnwlcled to the rear of the bulldlnc. C9. The fadlity must obviously have ample parting for the proposed 220 vehicles as well as fullowing Agawam's Town Ordinance code fur Handicap parking. R9. Will comply. Department of Public Works -Dated September 16. 2015 Cl. Please submit a traffic impact study and parking generation calculation for the project. Ri. A Pirkl.,. Generation and Preliminary Traffic Analysis of the exlsti~ no-bulld, and future conditions for year 2017 his been completed for the project and shows that the proposed project will have no Impact on traffic: operations. C2. An Engineering study will be required to show that adequate sight distance Is achieved at the proposed driveway. There is a concern that vehicles parking at 84-86 Garden Street will block sight distance. To help prevent vehicles from parking In the way, a sidewalk should be installed in the right of way through the driveway. This sidewalk could be extended into the proposed project to the limit of asphalt line. R2. A sId_alk will be Installed along the driveway frontage of 84..16 Garden Street within the riJ/rt-of-way to prevent vehldes from parklll8ln tandem. Sichtllnes will be depicted on the site plan. ~l~ MILONE BtMACBROOM" Mr. MarcStnnp September 17, 2015 PaceS • • C3. All walkways and ramps must meet ADA and AAB standards. All accessible spaces should be 9 feet wide. See detail on Sheet S0-2. R3. Will comply. C4. Please provide a bike rack near the proposed building. R4. Will comply. CS. A stop sign and stop bar Is required at the exit to the site. Also, please add a center line to delineate enter and exit lanes. RS. Will comply; requested pavement marlclJIIS wfll be addad to the plans. C6. All proposed plantings need to be relocated away from the proposed water, sewer and gas laterals. R6. Proposed plantlnp will be relocated as requestad. 0. Show saw cuts on Garden Street with full depth pavement replacement required. When saw cuts are close to the edge of the road, repaving shall extend to edge. R7. Will comply. C8. Two advisory of 2S MPH speed limit signs (W13-1P) and an intersection sign (WI-lOA) with a curved shall be placed on Garden Street (one in each direction), all signs shall meet MUTCD standards, and be high intensity prismatic with breakaway posts. RI. Will comply. C9. Add sewer manhole rim/invert elevation information to the plans. Also, add the pitch of the sewer between manhole structures. R9. Sewer rims and Invert elevations will be added to the plans. CiO. Please show proposed snow storage areas. RiO. Snow storace areas wfll be depicted on the plans. Cll. Please show the location of the dumpsterfor the site. A fence and concrete pad is required. Rll. Dumpster pad and dumpster location will be added to the plans. ~~t MILoNE &MAc.B.R.OOM" ~ . ' . Mr. Marc Stranae September 17, 1015 Pap 6 • • C12. Please add the following note to the plan ·Silt fence shall be installed where necessary and needs to remain in place until all disturbed areas have sufficient vegetation to prevent erosion." R12. Note will be added to the pians. Aiawam Fire Department Dated September 9. 2015 C1. The accessory building will require sprinklers If it stays Its current size. There are no further comments, and the project has Fire Department approval. Rl. Will comply. Very truly yours, MILONE & MACBROOM, INC. Mark Arigoni, LA., Principal Massachusetts Regional Manager S736-01-6-s171$-kt ~l~ MILONE &MACBROOM" • • I[ Sul:jmltl:jy Emad ] I[ Print Form ~ I Project name Date l . :: I Type : Prepared by I I RVM ~15W128LED45 LE4 UNIV BK Luminaire Lamp Optical system Voltage Options Finish RoadView LED Series r-'VITH: RSAR-4" ROUND POLE fA,DAPTER BLACK RVM Lamps 4.66"(118mm) 0 fk;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;t ~~~~ =------f 2.38" (61 rrvn) 31 .25" (794mm) min. -35.25" (895mm) max. ~ 15.38" (391 mm) ,-~ • O ~ d ~ , ---I -For Type II distribution. see photometric file~ fer. 0ljdistribVHOns. E .... """'. . R \..rt:l! '~. b SEP 30 2015" RVM Weight 34 to 37 Ibs (15.4 to 16.8 kg) PHILIPS • Optical systems / LED Voltage [] LEl TYPE III AsymmetriGiI distribution GJ UN IV (120-277) [] LEl TYPE 1111 AsymmetriGiI distribution lEI LE4 TYPE IV I Asymmetrical distribution Driver options·· D D AST CDMG Driver pre·programmed with progressive lamp starting* Dynadimmer standard dimming program* D CDMGP Dynadimmer custom dimming program* • [] H7 D ~80 D CLO Constant light Output, drrver pre·programmed to achieve the same light intensity (or the duration of the lifespan of the lamp" D DALI D DMG Driver compatible with DALI control systems· Dimmable driver 0-10 volt D OTL OverThe Life, driver pre-programmed to signal the end of lamp life· D OVR Dynadimmer override function for use with motion detector or other switching device ·Only available with 120 -2n volts. .. For all programmable options please conslit the factory for details Lumi naire options ANSIINEMA w.ttage I.bel Bubble level o API D BL D OSL3W Motion detector (requires DMG or CDMG) o D PHS PH9 o RC o SR Photoelectric cell, twisdock type includes receptacle Shorting GIp for single phase (120,240,277, 347v) with receptacle Receptacle for a twist· lock photocell or shorting cap Strain relief Finish options D GY3 Gray D BR Bronze D WH White lEI BK Black o EXP RC Terminal block SpeoflCations subject to change without notICe. Const.Jt factory for full details. SR Strain relief BL Reversible '" bolt connection mounting Extrusion painted to match cast housing color selected a.bove (standa.rd extrusion color is ilnodized illuminum). Additional colors are available. Consult factory for complete speoflca"tlons. LEDGINE PHILIPS • Lamp Composed of high performance white LEOs. Color temperature of 4100 Kelvin +/. 300 nominal, 70 CRI. Ambient operating temperature range -40·C (-40°F) to +40°C (104°F). L70 lifetime of 100000 hours minimum at 25C ambient (75000 hours for 700mA model with 96 LEOs). Optical system Composed of high performance lenses, protected by a flat tempered glass lens. System is rated IP66. Photometric performance is tested according to IES LM-79. Surge protector Surge protective device provides all phases protection for line-ground, line-neutral, and neutral-ground in accordance with IEEE I ANSI C62.41.2 C High. Surge rating 10 kYo 10 kA and DOE Model Specification for Roadway Luminaires Elevated requirements per Appendix D.Surge protection is standard for all product models 120-480'11'. Driver Electronic driver. operating range 50-60 Hz. Auto-adjusting to input voltage between 120-277 volt AC, or 347 ·480 vo~ AC. Minimum power factor 0.90, maxTHD 20%. UL recognized component.IP66 rated. Optional dimming (O-IOv) and digital driver features available. Housing The upper and lower parts of the housing are made of die castA360 aluminum alloy. The 4-bolt mounting system includes a reversible bracket made of zinc plated steel. Fits on a 1.66" to 2.375" 00 by 5" long tenon, fixed by 3/8-16 UNC steel zinc plated bolts.An integral part of the housing permits an adjustment of +1-So by steps of 2.5°. Power door The housing is complete with a tool-less removable power door including quick disconnects for ease of service. A tool free latch assembly on the power door allows for easy access to the electrical compartment. PHILIPS e ©2012 Philips Roadway lighting All rights reserved. Documem order number: RVMTSl00R02 • Heat sink The extruded heat sink is made of A6063 aluminum alloy. and is shaped to draw heat away from the LEOs. Product does not use any cooling device with moving parts (has passive cooling device). LED platfonn The LEDGINE LED platform consist of two LED boards with 48, 64, or 80 LUXEON Rebel LEOs each, as required to provide total LEOs from 96· 160. The LED boards are removable and replaceable. Wiring Luminaire wiring is done using a terminal block located inside the housing.Terminal block accepts three wires (#2-14 AWG). Hardware and seals All hardware shall be stainless steel or corrosion resistant.AII seals and sealing devices are lined with silicone. Finish Application of a pofyester powder coat paint. (4 milsJ I 00 microns). The chemical composition provides a highly durable UV and salt spray resistant finish in accordance with the ASTM-B I 17 standard and humidity proof in accordance with the ASTM-D2247 standard. The specially formulated Lumital powder coat finish is available in standard gray. Additional colors are available. Consuk factory for complete specifications. Vibration resistance Meets the ANSI C 136.31-200 I table 2.American National Standard for Roadway luminaire Vibration specifications for Bridge/overpass applications (3G). Certifications and Compliance CSA, UL or cUL.ISO 900 1-200S.AII electrical components are RoHS compliant. listed on Design Lights Consortium (OLe) Qualified Products list (QPL). Philips Roadway Lighting 10275 W. Higgins Road Rosemont IL 60018 Tel: 847-390-5111 Fax: 847-332-0305 Customer SupponJTechnical Service: 847-390-5111 www.philips.comkoadwaylighting A Division 01 Genlyte n-. .. GrOl4' LLC • • ~~~ Memorandum TO: Mark Ariloni FROM: DATE: RE : Van Kacoyannakls Septentberl8,2015 TraffIC Analysis The Agawant 5portsplex MMI #5736-G1-6 Upon reviewing the parking generation provided, the site will generate approximately 120 trips entering and 120 exiting during a maximum capacity event (six small sided fields in use). There will be some overlap between hours, so to be conservative, I utilized 95% of the 120 trips for enterinl and exiting during the peak hour, 114 entering and 114 exiting, respectively. Please see Figure 3 attached. Based on the site location, 60% of the trips will be distributed to Route 57 while 40% of the trips will be distributed to the west, to Poplar Street. Fourteen percent of the overall trips will be distributed to the north, and 26% of the overall trips will be distributed to the west (see Figure 3). Based on the site generation, there really is no reason to analyze any intersections further east, west, or north due to the fact that trips have numerous ways to disperse through the transportation system. Generally, when traffic is analyzed, once the distribution to an intersection is lower than 100 overall trips, analysis typically is not required further or to the next intersection. The MassDOT Transportation Data Management System was utilized to generate existing traffic volumes along the existing roadways. An average daily traffic count was provided for Route 57 and collected in April 2015. Utilizing the data supplied, (K 10%, 0 57%) left and right movements could be obtained for the weekend peak hour. Additionally, a count was provided on Poplar Street west of the int.,rsection in 2014. Utilizing the data supplied, (K 11%, 050%), an easterly volume was generated. Based on other volumes within the overall area presented on the Data Management System, the remaining turning movements were created. The numbers provided in Figure 1 are very conservative for the area. To be conservative, a growth factor of 1% per year for 2 years was utilized for the 2017 No-Build scenario (see Figure 2). The site generation in Figure 3 was added to the No-Build scenario to create the 2017 Build scenario (see Figure 4). Utilizing Synchro, each of the unsignalized intersections was analyzed for the Existing, No-Build, and Build scenarios. The overall level of service (lOS) for each intersection in all scenarios was an lOS A; a table is provided. Typically, lOS 0 is acceptable for unsignalized intersections. The existing roadway network will be able to handle the trips generated by the Agawam Sportsplex. This memo is based on usage during the winter months when the fields will be more actively used and the trips will be greater. cc: Town of Agawam Officials Attachments S 736-01-6·s1815·ml!mo MiloneandMacBroom.com ~~~ MILONE& MACBROOM I I I I I POA.AR .",."". • a' J L _snrer • I - "" ... , I I I ! I • GARDEN STREET ---- • I - ....... • j ! -00 • WEBCEN) P£N( tt'JUR • • GARDEN STReET --1r II .. SITE 2017 aULD 'TRAfF£ VOL.UIES • TIIIP GSWtATtON AND'" .-ntI8UTION _--.x --..-.'b t .... - I • I ! ! POP1..AR STREET ! I • GARDEN 871fEET ZIj _ _f1J . .-- 1r .. SITE 2Otl8UILD T1tAFFIC VOI.UMEI -- • ....... • F • • • APPENDIX -SVNCHRO • • 2015 -EXISTING HeM Unsignalizedlntersection Capacity Analysis t GARDEN STREET & 57-OFF RAMP ...;Jf' -+ .,;.;. ~ "." Moveminl •.... Lane CormgU(1llioris . VoIlIllII (veJi.1i) : .. . Sign Control Grade . Peek Hour FacIOi' . Houdy ftPWiate (¥ph) Pedestrians lane W'1dth (I\) . Walking Speed (fils) P8IC!IIit BlocIaIgEi • Right tum flare(veh) Median type . .. Median storage Yah) lJpi-iiGMl(tl) pX, platoon unbloCked VC;~vol!it!e .. vCl, stage 1 conf vol vC2,,, 2 oonfVoi vCU, unblocked VOl iC:, aingte (.) te,2 stage (8) IF/i) .. pO queue free % cMc.pacity(veMi) .ESF 0 0.92 0 293 4.1 22 100 1268 OIreation, ~ II ' . EU Volume r 0181 Volume Left . Volume Righi . cSH Volumeki~ ... a~e Length 95th (ft) Control Oehiy (Ir ' Lane LOS Approach Delay (8) . Approach LOS 1n1er1edl0li SUmmary . Average Deley IntenleQt!on CipacityUtilization Analysis Perjod (min) 222 o o 1700 0:13 o 0.0 0.0 .. EST .. war waR sWl t + 'I 204 •• .. 270 .: 6 102 Frae Free Stop .. 0% o~ 0.% 0.92 0.92 . 0.92 0.92 222 .. 293 · 0 ·111. .. .. .. .. None .... tb.e. , , .. .. , 515 ... 6.4 3.5 .. 79 W&l ··SwfSW2 .. .520 293 111 ' 150· . o 111 · 0 o ..0 .150 ·· 1700 520 · 7~ 0.17 02(· .. 0.20 . . o 20 . 19 0.0 ·· ;3.8 1 (0 < . B . . B · 0.0 122 . . B · 4.1 : .. : .. SWR ." 138 0.92 150 293 293 6.2 3.3 80 746 29;4% .....• ICU LeveloiServioe 15 THE SPORTSPLEX 12:00 em 911712015 2015 EXISTING VRK A .911712015 . .. . , . ,. . ;:.' ;:, !: .. ' . '.' .. Syrtchro 8 Report Page 1 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: POPLAR STREET & GARDEN STREET ~ ... LaneColi/igtmons . vcilime(~)· .. Sign ContrOl . GrId8 ... f'liik HoUr FactOr HoUitftow iate (.;.,h) .. . y .. .. ..,. Pecjestr1aOS .. . LAne. WIdIti (it) . . . . . Wi!idng S~(itJ8) . . ~ I!iOc:Itajje . . . . Right bini ia" (vilh) =~:e.veh).· .. .U/li1nIIiii iipI (Ii). .. •. pX, PIe\QOr\ ooblOcked ¥C, Qilnllitil1G ·Vilkn1e vC1. Stiigril 0QiJf vol YC2, Ii.ge 20cirt vol ¥Cu, UIlblOcked vol \C, ,1Igie (II .. tC,2I11ge(s) 11'(.) ....... . pO QiJ!lu8 ~% cM~(v8titb) . DnaIIoiI. 4r!' ... VOIo.i!)eTOtaI .. Voltmi Left . Volt.me RiI# cSH Voltmi to c.paaty aueue Length 95th (ft) CanIi9lDeIaY (8) Lane LOS ~D!!I8y(s) ~lOS ~.$u!n!n!ry. AV8.regeD$Y - of to . >V 100 130 .250 .. ·150 ••. ·100 .· Free Free Stop .0%. .0%... >0% 0.92 109 0.92 0:92 ·· 0:92 . .0.92 . 141 . . 272 >163 109 435 4.1 2.2 90 1125 ESl ·W8t .... $81 •. 250 435 ·· ·1!l3 · 109 0 109 o .163 .54 11251700 429 OAO . ·0.260,38 8 0 « 4.2 . 0.0 18.5 A C 4.2 0.0 1.8:5 C . . 712 6.4 3.5 70 360 0.92 54 - --" 353 6:2 3.3 92 690 Interaec:tilln CIp~ Utilizlltion Analyiis Period (min) 4.8 53.3% 15 .ICU Level Of Service THE SPORTSPLEX 12:00 am 9/1712015 2015 EXISTING VRK • ... .. ' ", .' . . . , .' . . ... 9I17f2015 .... ' . :. .. ..' " .. :',:', .... ...... , .. :" " . '. -':: .... A .. ." . w':, ,:,.:'._; .. SyndllO 8 Report Page 2 • • 2017 -NO BUILD • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: GARDEN STREET & RQUTE 57 OFF-RAMP lane Configurations Volume (veMl) Sign Control G~ .. Peak HOIIr~e1oJ HOIIl1y now rate (vph) Pedestriana I.8neWIdtll (lI) Walking S~ (111$) p~t Biockage Right tum fIa~ ('leh) Mediarrtype EBl 0 0.92 .0 ... EBT WBI t t 204 270 Free Free 0%. 0% 0.92 0.92 222 293 . None None WBR SWL.· 'I 0 102 Stop 0" 0.92 0.92 0 111 '(' 138 0.92 150 Mfldian slorl!ge'leh 1 Upstream ~I (fI) pX, plaloon unblocked vC, ccn1lictiJg vokJme vCl, stage 1 cent vol vC2, _2cenfvol vQl, unblocked vel te, singlll(s) . .515 293 te,2 stage(s) 1Ft.) pO queue free % eM C8p8llily ('leMJ) 293 4.1 2.2 tOO 1268 515 293 6;4 6.2 3.5 3.3 79 80 520 746 bgotioIj,L!!!! II ESt . -w1H ·SW.l ··SW2 . VOiumeTQiaI Volume left Volume RighI cSH Volume IQ Capacity Queu~ lenglh951h (ft) ControiDeiay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Irllen8~on Suinmary Average Delay Intersection capacity UtiliZation Anaiyllis Period (min) 222 0 0 1700 0_13 0 0.0 0.0 293 0 0 1700 0.11 0 0.0 0,0 1.11 111 0 520 0,21 20 13.8 B 12.2 B 4.1 29.4" 15 .. THE SPORTSPLEX 12:00 am 911712015 2017 NO-BUILD VRK 150 0 150 746 0.20 19 l1~O B ICULevaloi Slllvice • A 911712015 .. 0·. .. . --.-,. Synchro 8 Raport Pagel • HeM Unsignalizedlntersection Capacity Analysis 10: POPLAR STREET & GARDEN STREET Lane Configurations Volume (vehIh) Sign Control GlIIde Peak Hour Factor HolIrty ftow rate (Vph) Pedestrians Lane WIdIh(ft) Walking Speed (ftIs) PelwntBIockage Right turn flare (veh) MaclaniYPe Median storage veh) UpWoain. (11) pX, platoon Lrblocked vC,JlQRfticlingvolume vCl, stage 1 ronl vol vC2, stage 2 ronlvol vCu, unbloCked '101 IC,QJgIe(s) te, 2 stage (s) IF (s) pOqoeuafree% cMcapaoiIy {veMJ) DIr8ction, L_' • Volume Total Volume Left Volin Rig/JI cSH Volumekl Capacity Queue Lenglll 95th (ft) Control Delay (8) LsneLOS App_ Delay (s) ApprQllCh LOS In~ SUmme!)'. Average Delay ..I--+ ..... '- ESL . EST WBT ··.WBR of t- 102 133 255 153 Free Free 0% 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 111 145 277 166 None None 443 443 4.1 2.2 90 1117 ESt Wal 255 443 111 0 o 166 1117 1700 0.10 0.26 8 0 4.3 0.0 A 4.3 0,0 881 .. 166 111 55 420 0.40 46 19.1 C 19.1 C \. .. SBl V 102 stop 0% 0.92 111 727 727 6.4 3.5 69 352 4' S8R .. 51 0.92 55 360 360 6.2 3.3 92 684 IntersectiOl'l Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) 4.9 54.2% 15 ICll Level oi servroe THE SPORTSPLEX 12:00 am 9/1712015 2017 NO-BUILD VRK • A 911712015 .. Synchro 8 Report Page 2 ," . .. • • 2017-BUILP • HCM Unslgnalizedlntersectlon Capacity Analysis 1: GARDEN STREET & ROUTE 57 OFF-RAMP lane Configurations Wlume(vehlh) Sign Conlfol Grade P!lek Hour Factor Hou~yftow ra\lI (vp/l) Pedastrians laneWidIh (ft) Walking Speed (ftIs) Pen:enlBlockage Right tum nare (veil) Mediaotype ..J( .·EBl 0 0,92 0 -- EST WBT + + 272 270 Free Free 0% 0% 0,92 0.92 296 293 !.. " WBR SWI.. 11 0 102 stop 0% 0.92 0,92 0 111 ,./ SWR. " 206 0,92 224 Medi!ln storage veil) UpeMn aignal(ll) pX, platoon urblocked vC,~Votume '!Cl, stege 1 !lOn/vol '!C2, 11agt12 C)()n/ vol '!Cu, unblocked vol 1C,sing1e (Il 589. 293 • tC o 2 stage (s) IF[e) pO queue free % cMcapaCiiy (vehlh) Djr!o!io!I.lan8# . VOIumeTOIIIt Volume left Vol.umoa Right cSH Volume to: Capacity Queue lenglh95th eft) Contro1D81~ Cs) lane lOS Approach Delay ts) Approach lOS ~~ry .... Average Oelay Inlll!llection Capacity UtiliZation Analysis Period (min) 293 4.1 2.2 100 1268 EBl Win ..SWl ·8N2 296 293 111 224 o 0 111 0 a 0 0 224 1700 1700 471 746 0.17· 0:17 0.24 0.30 o 0 23 32 0,0 0.0 15.0 11,9 B B M 0,0 12.9 B 4.7 33~6% 15 THE SPORTSPlEX 12:00 am 911712015 2017 BUILD VRK 589 293 6.4 6.2 U ·3.3 76 70 471 746 tCU Level of ServiCe • A 911712015 SynchroaReport Page 1 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: GARDEN STREET & POPLAR STREET Volume VwRjlt cSH o ........... p.~ •. ~wxF.£V--, Queue Length 95th (II) ~"~!J) LeneLOS ~DeIay,.) Approach LOS Average Delay ~ CpciiIy Utillzatlon Analysis Period (min) -- Free .. .,. 0.92 0.92 •• , '. 171 111 Q 1M ~ 1070 1700 375 o.fO O~ 0." 9 0 65 4.11 0.0 29,5 A C 4.0 fl.O 23.5 C 5.7 59.2~ 15 THE SPORTSPLEX 12:00 em 911712015 2017 BUILD VRK • B 911712015 Synchro 8 Report Pege2 • I • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: SITE DRIVEWAY & GARDEN STREET ....... ""\-f"" -'" Moven\en1 EST ···EBR WBl. WBT NBl.·· lane ConfigUl8tions fo of V Volume (vetVh) Z35 46 68 476 46 Sign Control Free Free Slop Grade 0% 0% Q% Pask Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Houdy lIoWrate(vpb) 255 50 14 517 50 PedQSlrians lane Wtdlh (ft) Walking Spaad (1118) Perc4!IIt Blockage . Right tum flare (\'Ilh) t.Iedia" type .None . None Medilln storage \'Ilh) Upstream slgnal(ftl pX, platooo unblocfted yC, l1OOftlctingvolUnie 305 946 yCl, etage 1 coni vol yC2,sbIge 200nl vol vCU, unblocked vol 305 946 te,singie (s) 4.1 6.4 te.2 stage (s) IF(.) 2.2 3.5 pO queue free % 94 82 eM cepacIty (veMl) 1255 273 bireation,l1JlIII E81 . WBI Nat Volume Total 305 591 124 Volume left 0 74 50 Volume R~t 50 0 74 aSH 1700 1255 442 VoIumeIQ Cep8(lity 0.18 0.06 0.28 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 5 28 Control Delay (s) 0.0 1.6 16.3 LanelOS A C Apprilach Delay (s) 0.0 1.6 16.3 ApPrilach LOS C In_rsaction Sum!!!8l't Average Delay 2.9 I" N8R 68 0.92 74 280 280 6.2 3.3 90 758 Intersection Capacity Utilization 60.7% ICU level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 THE SPORTSPLEX 12:00 8m 911712015 Z017 BUILD VRK • 8 911712015 Synchro 8 Report Page 3 • • , . • ~~~ Technical Memorandum THE AGAWAM SPORTSPLEX September 18, 2015 MMI 115736-01-6 Perkin. Generation Analysis Programming: • REceIVED SEP 3 () 2015' AGAWAM PLANNING BOARD The applicant's management team provides a detailed institutional knowledge and history of how this type of facility operates. The team's significant history in the playing, coaching, and programming of collegiate as well as both regional and national soccer clubs and programs, coupled with the review of the operations of several similar regional facilities, including Soccer City (Wilbraham, MA), Ailsport (Northampton, MAl, and Oakwood Soccer (Glastonbury, CT), have led to this well-planned and programmed facility proposal in Agawam. The detailed understanding of the specific use characteristics of a year-round synthetic field sports complex is based upon three key factors: 1. The size of the proposed fie ld surface(s) 2. The detailed understanding of the programming (planned field usage) of the fields 3. Knowledge of typical patterns and quantities of players, spectators, and vehicles Size ofthe playing surface(s): The proposed project will house two full-size soccer fields that will function as outdoor venues from May through October and will be primarily used as two large fields with two ll-person teams competing against each other for approximately 9O-minute games on each field. The fields will then be enclosed via two seasonal dome enclosures from November through April and will be primarily used as three small fields per enclosure, with each small field containing two six-person teams competing against each other for approximately 50-minute games on each field. Programming of the fields: Weekday May-November: A full weekday would see limited field usage until 6:00 p.m. The Intent would be to have the two full-size fields fully utilized from 6:00 p.m. to sunset. Games would consist of 11 players versus 11 players, two 30-to 4S-minute halves, resulting in two to three games per night on each field . Weekend May-November: A full weekend day would see the fields programmed from 8:00 a.m. to sunset. Games would consist of 11 players versus 11 players, two 30-to 4S-minute halves. Weekday November-May: Two seasonal enclosures would be inflated, one over each field. The two la rge fields would each be separated into three small sided fields. A full weekday would see limited field usage until 6:00 p.m. The intent would be to have the six small sided fields (three fields per enclosure) utilized for six players versus six players, 50-minute games. A typical game schedule on a weekday evening in the winter schedule would be as follows: Games: 6:00 p.m. to 6:50 p.m., 7:00 p.m. to 7:50 p.m., 8:00 p.m. to 8:50 p.m., 9:00 p.m. to 9:50 p.m., 10:00 p.m. to 10:50 p.m. ~!~ MILONE & M AcBROOM THE AGAWAM SPORTSPLEX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • • September 18,1015 PAGE Z Weekend November-May: Two seasonal enclosures would be inflated, one over each field. The two large fields would each be separated into three small sided fields. A full weekend would see games starting at 8:00 a.m. and running throughout the day. The intent would be to have the six small sided fields (three fields per enclosure) utilized for six players versus six players, 50-minute games. The most intense usage would be by the youth age groups in the morning hours and would begin to taper off in the weekend afternoons. Practice times would be coordinated where game time slots were not filled; however, the number of participants would be similar. Parking: The preceding discussion regarding the programming of the facility, coupled with the unique understanding of players per team, visitors, and carpooling, allied to the proposed parking lot size and formed the basis for analysis of traffic to and from the proposed use. It is anticipated that the most, and documented that the most, intense use period of the facility will be between November and May, during the weekends, thus not conflicting with normal peak-hour traffic in the area. The number of 220 parking spaces required and proposed has been developed by utilizing the following conservative program estimate: Two enclosures -three small sided fields per each enclosure equals six small sided fields Six fields (12 players per field playing [six players versus six players]) Ten cars per team=20 cars per field=60 cars per dome=120 cars total for one game hour Overlap parking required for teams leaving and teams coming can be figured by assuming that some players will arrive early, some players will leave late, and some players will stay for additional games. We have assumed 10 cars per field, or spaces for 60 cars, will be required in addition to the 120 cars parked, thus pushing the parking requirement to 180 spaces. Consideration was given to referees and Sportsplex staff at 10 additional spaces, making the total 190 spaces required. With the total parking spaces proposed at 220 and the understanding that individual parking spaces are sometimes larger than normal within a gravel parking space, we have allowed for a 3D-space contingency. 5736-01-6·s171S-rpt ~~~ MrWNE & MACBROOM -------------- >-« l:w • Wz <'!s a: Q..J w Q> w~ it .... "-a:0 o.W a a:'" 0°0 "-w'" WL II ~~~ «"-~ ~~ -~ Q~ IO'w -> U)W z!'l a: -., w > wQ! Q a: • ~ a ~ I I Mf. --[1C ---:".......:::::::~- • • / I • • ~~~ Memorandum TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Mark Arigoni Van Kacoyannakis September 18, 2015 Traffic Analysis The Agawam Sportsplex MMI #5736-{)1-6 Upon reviewing the parking generation provided, the site will generate approximately 120 trips entering and 120 exiting during a maximum capacity event (six small sided fields in use). There will be some overlap between hours, so to be conservative, I utilized 95% of the 120 trips for entering and exiting during the peak hour, 114 entering and 114 exiting, respectively. Please see Figure 3 attached. Based on the site location, 60% of the trips will be distributed to Route 57 while 40% of the trips will be distributed to the west, to Poplar Street. Fourteen percent of the overall trips will be distributed to the north, and 26% of the overall trips will be distributed to the west (see Figure 3). Based on the site generation, there really is no reason to analyze any intersections further east, west, or north due to the fact that trips have numerous ways to disperse through the transportation system. Generally, when traffic is analyzed, once the distribution to an intersection is lower than 100 overall trips, analysis typically is not required further or to the next intersection. The MassDOT Transportation Data Management System was utilized to generate existing traffic volumes along the existing roadways. An average daily traffic count was provided for Route 57 and collected in April 2015. Utilizing the data supplied, (K 10%, 0 57%) left and right movements could be obtained for the weekend peak hour. Additionally, a count was provided on Poplar Street west of the intersection in 2014. Utilizing the data supplied, (K 11%, 0 50%), an easterly volume was generated. Based on other volumes within the overall area presented on the Data Management System, the remaining turning movements were created. The numbers provided in Figure 1 are very conservative for the area. To be conservative, a growth factor of 1% per year for 2 years was utilized for the 2017 No-Build scenario (see Figure 2). The site generation in Figure 3 was added to the No-Build scenario to create the 2017 Build scenario (see Figure 4). Utilizing Synchro, each of the unsignalized intersections was analyzed for the Existing, No-Build, and Build scenarios. The overall level of service (LOS) for each intersection in all scenarios was an LOS A; a table is provided. Typically, LOS 0 is acceptable for unsignalized intersections. The existing roadway network will be able to handle the trips generated by the Agawam Sportsplex. This memo is ba sed on usage during the winter months when the fields will be more actively used and the trips will be greater. cc : Town of Agawam Officials Attachments 5736·01· 6·5181 S-memo MiioneandMacBroom.com ~~~ MILONE &:MACBROOM POPLAR STREET ~ 00 -IJVEEKEND PEAK HOUR :i:~ .Jl 100~ ""- MAcBROOM, 1= GARDEN STREET 2015 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES THE SPORTSPLEX Garden Street Agawam, Massachusetts ... ~'&-~~' '" ~,.. ! I t .-~ . ~~ ~~# . ,,1 0 OU~ \" Q"'-!l ~ .... ", oI'~ ~<'). FIGURE 1 POPLAR STREET LEGEND 00 _ \'\'EEKEND PEAK HOUR ~~ .~ Jl 102~ 133 ----J> .. MACBROOM, In<. GARDEN STREET 2017 NO.BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES THE SPORTSPLEX Garden Str.et Agawam, Massachusetts ~~cl> ~ <>0 ! I t 5CII~11C p.~~ ~f''f .,1 0 ,;:,1~ 'fO Q.q-1l ~~4- oS'~~~". FIGURE 2 POPLAR STREET LEGEND , ~ . l 3(1 (2ll%) ----C> 00 -VlJEEKEND PEAK HOUR MACBROOM, In<. ~ ~ CO ~ ; ~ GARDEN STREET (40%) 46 ----v r-68 (60%) 1r II ::!,!e. .. .. SITE 2011 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES. TRIP GENERATION AND % D1STRIBUll0N THE SPORTSPlEX Garden Street Agwwam,Massachusetts -> ~ '" '~,./ t i n:HEMArIC I ~~~ ~O ~~'1 ~f'~ ~10 Q..,.j! ()~4- d'~~~", FIGURE 3 POPLAR STREET ~ 00 -'NEEKEND PEAK HOUR · u:;;:: .JL 102~ 163~ &. MAcBROOM, in<. GARDEN STREET 235 ----too 4--476 46 ---v ~M 1r ~~ SITE 2017 BUILD TRAFFIC VOLUMES THE SPORTSPLEX Garden Street Agawam, Massachusetts ''''"" <~' '" ~<>o ! I t ScHEMATIC ~~'l ~f''l' .,1 ° ",~t.- 'l'0 Q"'-I! "~4-.r~ ~~ FIGURE 4 • • • • APPENDIX -SYNCHRO • • 2015 -EXISTING • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: GARDEN STREET & 57 -OFF RAMP ...J( -- Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 0 204 270 Sign Control Free Free Grade 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 222 293 Pedestrians Lane 'Mdth (ft) Walking Speed (IUs) Pen:eot Blockage Right tu m flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 293 vC1, stage 1 confvol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 293 tC, single (s) 4.1 IC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 2.2 pO queue free % 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 1268 , " Volume Tolal 111 Volume Left 0 0 111 Volume Right 0 0 0 cSH 1700 1700 520 Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.17 0.21 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 20 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 13.8 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 12.2 Approach LOS B In~~ ;, ...... .": ,."',.,, -;', . .. ;.\ ,.,,', Average Delay 4.1 Intersection Capadty Utilization 29.4% Analysis Period (min) 15 THE SPORTSPLEX 12:00 am 9/17/2015 2015 EXISTING VRK !... " ,./ 0 102 138 Stop 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 111 150 515 293 515 293 6.4 6.2 3.5 3.3 79 80 520 746 .... 746 0.20 19 11.0 B " ) ',''-;; ICU Level of SeMce • :., ,,:.,,;"··j;,;'f~t' ::'::.",\J:~:):": A 9/17/2015 Synchro 8 Report Page 1 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: POPLAR STREET & GARDEN STREET ~ --'-'-. ~ ~f ' ':.."" . EBl 'U!:; ·wet·· ':WBR . 'SBl : . SBR .. '.,· Lane Configurations of to ¥ Volume (vehlh) 100 130 250 150 100 50 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 109 141 272 163 109 54 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right tum flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 435 712 353 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 435 712 353 te, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 pO queue free % 90 70 92 cM capacity (vehlh) 1125 360 690 Volume Total 250 435 163 Volume Left 109 0 109 Volume Right 0 163 54 cSH 1125 1700 429 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.26 0.38 Queue Length 95th (ft) 8 0 44 Control Delay (s) 4.2 0.0 18.5 Lane LOS A C Approach Delay (s) 4.2 0.0 18.5 Approach LOS C Average Delay Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.3% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 THE SPORTSPLEX 12:00 am 9/17/2015 2015 EXISTING VRK • ._ .... ' D{-;'('::': (~-::-. '". ·-r.·· " 9/17/2015 f;'?l:$IM"·- A Synchro 8 Report Page 2 • • 2017 -NO BUILD • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: GARDEN STREET & ROUTE 57 OFF-RAMP ...J( --'I!... " .,,/ Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 0 204 270 0 102 138 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 222 293 0 111 150 Pedestrians Lane Width (It) Walking Speed (It/s) Percent Blockage Right tum flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 293 515 293 vC1, stage 1 cont vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 293 515 293 te, single (5) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (5) tF (5) 2.2 3.5 3.3 pO queue tree % 100 79 80 cM capacity (veh/h) 1268 520 746 Volume Total 222 293 111 150 Volume Left 0 0 111 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 150 cSH 1700 1700 520 746 Volume to Capacity 0.13 0.17 0.21 0.20 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 20 19 Control Delay (5) 0.0 0.0 13.8 11.0 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (5) 0.0 0.0 12.2 Approach LOS B Average Delay 4.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 29.4% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 THE SPORTSPLEX 12:00 am 9/17/2015 2017 NO-BUILD VRK • A 9/17/2015 Synchro 8 Report Page 1 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: POPLAR STREET & GARDEN STREET Lane i Volume (vehlh) Sign Control Grade Peak Hour Factor Hourly flow rate (vph) Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ltIs) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume vCl , stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol tC, single (s) tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) pO queue free % cM capacity (vehlh) O!nt!:!l!?!j;'\:I!!!r';~" '. Volume Total Volume Left Volume Right cSH Volume to Capacity Queue Length 95th (ft) Control Delay (s) Lane LOS Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS .... Average Delay -- 102 133 255 Free Free 0% 0% 0.92 0.92 0.92 111 145 277 None None 443 443 4.1 2.2 90 1117 Etl1 WBi , .. §ttl 255 443 166 111 0 111 0 166 55 1117 1700 420 0.10 0.26 0.40 8 0 46 4.3 0.0 19.1 A C 4.3 0.0 19.1 C 153 102 Stop 0% 0.92 0.92 166 111 727 727 6.4 3.5 69 352 51 0.92 55 360 360 6.2 3.3 92 684 .. . Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) 54.2% 15 leu Level of Service THE SPORTSPLEX 12:00 am 911712015 2017 NO-BUILD VRK • "-t _ •. ,"-.'-.".-'" A 911712015 -.. -.. ~ >~' -. -~ -~,' :', Synchro 8 Report Page 2 • • 2017-BUILD • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: GARDEN STREET & ROUTE 57 OFF-RAMP ...J( -!... " - Lane Configurations Volume (vehlh) 0 272 270 0 102 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 296 293 0 111 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (!Us) Percent BIo<iage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 293 589 vC1 , stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 293 589 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 pO queue free % 100 76 cM capacity (veh/h) 1268 471 DiradIIIc;;~. . .. . r' .' . .. eBj1 ;JMU ·SW1 ;,'SW2 Volume T atal 296 293 111 224 Volume Left 0 0 111 0 Volume Right 0 0 0 224 cSH 1700 1700 471 746 Volume to Capacity 0.17 0.17 0.24 0.30 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 23 32 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 15.0 11.9 Lane LOS B B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 12.9 Approach LOS B .. Average Delay 4.7 ,./ 206 0.92 224 293 293 6.2 3.3 70 746 , ','--.-.-:";. Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.6% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 THE SPORTSPLEX 12:00 am 9/17/2015 2017 BUILD VRK • ' .. : .! -" /I}j _: ,·;.;0 9/17/2015 ~ ,,;;'1**' r pEn'S A Synchro 8 Report Page 1 • HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 10: GARDEN STREET & POPLAR STREET / -"-'-''; -.. ~:' ,'. Lane Configurations Volume (yeh/h) 102 163 285 169 118 51 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 111 177 310 184 128 55 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right tum flare (yeh) Median type None None Median storage yeh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked yC, conflicting volume 493 801 402 vC1, stage 1 conI vol vC2, stage 2 conI vol yCU, unblocked yol 493 801 402 tC, single (s) 4.1 6,4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 pO queue Iree % 90 60 91 eM capacity (veh/h) 1070 317 649 Volume Left 111 0 128 Volume Right 0 184 55 cSH 1070 1700 375 Volume to Capacity 0.10 0.29 0.49 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9 a 65 Control Delay (s) 4.0 0.0 23.5 Lane LOS A C Approach Delay (s) 4.0 0.0 23.5 Approach LOS C ",: . Average Delay 5.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.2% ICU Level 01 Service Analysis Period (min) 15 THE SPORTSPLEX 12:00 am 9/1712015 2017 BUILD VRK • . .. :. B 9/17/2015 Synchro 8 Report Page 2 • HeM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 11: SITE DRIVEWAY & GARDEN STREET -"'t ~ - :;, Lane Configurations Volume (vehlh) 46 68 Sign Control Free Free Grade 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Hourly flow rate (vph) 255 50 74 517 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Pen:ent Blockage Right tum flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) pX, platoon unblocked vC, conflicting volume 305 vC1 , stage 1 conI vol vC2, stage 2 conI vol vCu, unblocked vol 305 tC, single (s) 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 pO queue Iree % 94 cM capacity (vehlh) 1255 tli!!dic!t:l;anejt~· ." . ' EB"I~ lMl 'jjjj't,' , :;.,t;:") ': .~.- Volume Total 305 591 124 Volume Left 0 74 50 Volume Right 50 0 74 cSH 1700 1255 442 Volume to Capacity 0.18 0.06 0.28 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 5 28 Control Delay (s) 0.0 1.6 16.3 Lane LOS A C Approach Delay (s) 0.0 1.6 16.3 Approach LOS C Average Delay 2.9 Intersection Capadty Utilization 60.7% Analysis Period (min) 15 THE SPORTSPLEX 12:00 am 911712015 2017 BUILD VRK ~ 46 68 Stop 0% 0.92 0.92 50 74 946 280 946 280 6.4 6.2 3.5 3.3 82 gO 273 758 -;~ ""-' . . ">c,,·:, ICU Level 01 Service • :t.' r',_. J-;::~"';~.; ;;-._::).i~;.r . --j B 911712015 "mmr Syncl1ro 8 Report Page 3 • ~~~ Technical Memorandum THE AGAWAM SPORTSPLEX September 18, 2015 MMI #5736.01-6 Parking Generation Analvsis Programming: • The applicant's management team provides a detailed institutional knowledge and history of how this type of facility operates. The team's significant history in the playing, coaching, and programming of collegiate as well as both regional and national soccer clubs and programs, coupled with the review of the operations of several similar regional facilities, including Soccer City (Wilbraham, MA), Allsport (Northampton, MAl. and Oakwood Soccer (Glastonbury, CT), have led to this well-planned and programmed facility proposal in Agawam. The detailed understanding of the specific use characteristics of a year-round synthetic field sports complex is based upon three key factors: 1. The size of the proposed field surface(s) 2. The detailed understanding of the programming (planned field usage) of the fields 3. Knowledge of typical patterns and quantities of players, spectators, and vehicles Size of the playing surface(s): The proposed project will house two full-size soccer fields that will function as outdoor venues from May through October and will be primarily used as two large fields with two 11-person teams competing against each other for approximately 90-minute games on each field. The fields will then be enclosed via two seasonal dome enclosures from November through April and will be primarily used as three small fields per enclosure, with each small field containing two six-person teams competing against each other for approximately 50-minute games on each field. Programming of the fields: Weekday May-November: A full weekday would see limited field usage until 6:00 p.m. The intent would be to have the two full-size fields fully utilized from 6:00 p.m. to sunset. Games would consist of 11 players versus 11 players, two 30-to 45-minute halves, resulting in two to three games per night on each field. Weekend May-November: A full weekend day would see the fields programmed from 8:00 a.m. to sunset. Games would consist of 11 players versus 11 players, two 30-to 45-minute halves. Weekday November-May: Two seasonal enclosures would be inflated, one over each field. The two large fields would each be separated into three small sided fields. A full weekday would see limited field usage until 6:00 p.m. The intent would be to have the six small sided fields (three fields per enclosure) utilized for six players versus six players, 50-minute games. A typical game schedule on a weekday evening in the winter schedule would be as follows: Games: 6:00 p.m. to 6:50 p.m., 7:00 p.m. to 7:50 p.m., 8:00 p.m. to 8:50 p.m., 9:00 p.m. to 9:50 p.m., 10:00 p.m. to 10:50 p.m. ~l~ MIWNE a:MACBROOM' THE AGAWAM SPORTSPLEX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM • September 18, 2015 PAGE 2 Weekend November-May: Two seasonal enclosures would be inflated, one over each field. The two large fields would each be separated into three small sided fields. A full weekend would see games starting at 8:00 a.m. and running throughout the day. The intent would be to have the six small sided fields (three fields per enclosure) utilized for six players versus six players, 50-minute games. The most intense usage would be by the youth age groups in the morning hours and would begin to taper off in the weekend afternoons. Practice times would be coordinated where game time slots were not filled; however, the number of participants would be similar. Parking: The preceding discussion regarding the programming of the facility, coupled with the unique understanding of players per team, visitors, and carpooling, allied to the proposed parking lot size and formed the basis for analysis of traffic to and from the proposed use. It is anticipated that the most, and documented that the most, intense use period of the facility will be between November and May, during the weekends, thus not conflicting with normal peak-hour traffic in the area. The number of 220 parking spaces required and proposed has been developed by utilizing the following conservative program estimate: Two enclosures -three small sided fields per each enclosure equals six small sided fields Six fields (12 players per field playing [six players versus six players)) Ten cars perteam=20 cars per field=60 cars per dome=120 cars total for one game hour Overlap parking required for teams leaving and teams coming can be figured by assuming that some players will arrive early, some players will leave late, and some players will stay for additional games. We have assumed 10 cars per field, or spaces for 60 cars, will be required in addition to the 120 cars parked, thus pushing the parking requirement to 180 spaces. Consideration was given to referees and Sportsplex staff at 10 additional spaces, making the total 190 spaces required. With the total parking spaces proposed at 220 and the understanding that individual parking spaces are sometimes larger than normal within a gravel parking space, we have allowed for a 3D-space contingency. S736-01-6-s1715-rpt ~l~ MILONE &MACBROOM • linKb~ /AndfCtl(l< Ardlir.c""" . rmd ._""""""'" selena ~l~ MrWNE &MACBROOMo September 17, 2015 Mr. Marc Strange Town Planner Town of Agawam 36 Main Street Agawam, MA 01001 RE: Apwam Sportsplex MM11I5731H11-6 Dear Mr. Strange: • We are in receipt of correspondence from the Agawam Office of Plaooing & Community Development dated September 14, 2015, the Agawam Police Department Safety OffIcer dated September 10, 2015, the Agawam Department of Public Works dated September 16, 2015, and the Agawam Fire Department dated September 9, 2015. We offer the following responses to any commenu or concerns expressed In these correspondences. SIte Plan RevI_ -Office of Plann'ftC & Commuritv Development -Dattd September 14. 2015 C1. TItle Block [Street Address, Applicant's Name, Address, Scale, Name of Preparer of Plan): Street address needed. Rl. 94 Garden Street 0. Description of Project: Proposed sports fadllty consisting of 2 full size synthetic turf socoer fields, with seasonal enclosures, gravel parklrc area for +250 cars, one 12,800 sf ICte$SOry building and associated driveway, walkways, stormwater management areas and landscaping. R2. No response Is needed. 0. Description of Site: Proposed site is 22.89 acres and is currently two separate parcels of Residential B property located on the south side of Garden Street. An ANR Plan will be necessary to combine these parcels. One parcel contains land that is currently cultivated; the second parcel is Wooded. A Wetland Investigation Report was conducted by Milone & MacBroom, attached, which indicates no evidence of wetlands was found. A formal Request for Determination of Applicability should be filed with the Agawam COnservation COmmission. R3. If determined to be rwqulred, a RFDA will be filed with the Apwam COnCOm. Milone & MacBroom. Inc., One Financial Plaza, 1350 Maln Street, Suite 1012, Springfield MusadluseIIJ OU03 (413) 241-6920 Fax (413) 241·6911 www.miloneandmacbroom.com Connecticut. Milinc • M""sachusetts • North Carolina. South Carolina. Vermonl Mr. Man: sua"", 5epten1ber17,2D15 Pap 2 • • C4. Provision for Traffic Flow: Site is proposed to be acCessed via a 26' wide driveway off of Garden Street. The first 140' of the driveway is to be paved. R4. No response Is needed. CS. Parking: Gravel parking area provides for approxln1ately 220 (6 handicapped plus 1 van accessible) parking spaces. Aiawam's Parking Guidelines do not provide guidance on calculating the number of spaces necessary for such a use. As such, the applicant should provide a parking study. Thlsshoulc:l Indude a comparison to existing simHarfacJlltIes. RS. A Parking Generation Study has been provided to support the parki", allotment propo .... C6. Drainage: See Engineering comments. Ri. Rdtr to tfIe Enaineerln. comments and responses section ofthlt letter. CT. Public UtNltles: All utilities must be shown on the plan. R7. Public utilities are shown on the plan. ca. landscaping/Screenlng and Buffers: The following landscape not must be placed on the plan: "All plantl,.s n1ust be n1alntalned and that portion of the public way abutting the parcel and Including the treebelt shall be maintained In a safe and attractive condition by the owner of the parcel.- RB. WIll Comply. The landsc:api", nob! will b. IIddlld to the plans. C9. Sign Location: The proposed sign elevation and location n1ust be provided. R9. WIll Comply. A sian detail and location meatl", Apwam resuI.tIons wi. be added 110 tIw plans. C10. Exterior Ughtlng: The location of all exterior lighting must be provided. Cut sheets must be provided and all lighting must be recessed and shielded and shall not flow over on to adjacent residential properties. R10. Will Comply. Alilaht fixtu_ will be cut-off type fixtures/larnps and will not cast IIaht off of property. A cut sheet of selected liSht ftxtures and poles will be provided. Cll. Rendering or Elevations: Colors and textures must be provided. RlL WIll Comply. Renderlnp/elevatlons and color palette will be provided. Mr. M.rc Str .... September 17, 2015 Pap 3 • • Cl2. Dumpster location: Dumpster(s) must be shown. All dumpsters must be fenced, gated and screened. R1Z. Will comply. Dumpster location and screenlnc wHl be shown on the plans. C13. Other Comments or Concerns: A Traffic 5tudy should be conducted to explore any potential local impacts. R13. A Parldnc Gttnanrtlon and Preliminary Traffic Study has baan completed for the project. Acawam Police Department Safety OffIce -Dated September 10. 2015 C1. Curb cut must be wide enough for the entrance/exit for the facilities driveway to allow ample traffic flow In both directions as well as for emergency vehicles. The driveway must allow for a large volume of trafflc to keep moving when the facliity has a big turnover between schedule events with teams. Rl. The site Is proposed to be K£eSMCI via a 26' wide drtvelnY off Garden Street. The fIIIt 140' of the driveway ara to be paved. C2. The driveway must be unobstructad for motorist exiting the facility both easterly and westerly direction on Garden Street. RZ. No parkin, will be allowad on the entrance/exit drfveway to the facility. 0 . Where the existing driveway stands IooIdng easterly towards RT 57 off ramp Is unobstructed. However, when looking Westerly towards Poplar Street. The Motorists have an obstruction due to the residence next to 94. Ex. Vehicles parked in the driveway and a tree Une consisting of pine trees. R3. Refer to E,..neerlng comments repnjinc this comment for a detailed respo ..... C4. Where the existing driveway is located presently promotes and issue due to the bend in the road which will also have an effect on motorist safely enterll18lexiting the facility. R4. Refer to El1Iineering comments reprdll1l these comments for detailed responses Ind sJchtIlne/safetv measures proposed. CS. I would also like to see Garden Street have ample no parking signs on both sides of the road even though it is marked with a double solid line and is a no passing zone. We wiD need to keep the roadway clear at all times secondary to the road being heavily used by commerclai vehicles as well as residents within the area. RS. Will comply and work with the Engineering Department on the final location of sips. Mr. MercSt ...... September 17, Zll1S p .... ' • • C6. This area of Garden Street Is also narrow in appearance due to the businesses and residential houses which our in close proximity to the roadway. R6. No response Is needed. C7. I would also recommend the 30 mph speed be posted due to the present traffic and increased traffic from the facility due to overwhelming popularity with soccer especially with a dosed In facility during the winter months. R7. Refer to Engineering comments and resPOlIJes reprding the Installation of 25 MPH advlsolY pllques. ca. I would also recommend an emergency access road to the rear of building for emergency vehicles. RI. Will Comply. Emerpncy VIIhlcle access will be prov\clecl to the .. Ir of the bulcll,.. C9. The facility must obviously have ample parting for the proposed 220 vehicles as well IS following Agawam's Town Ordinance code for Handicap parking. R9. WIll campIy. Department of Public Works -DIted September 16. 2015 Cl. Please submit a traffic Impact study and parking generation calculation for the project. R1. A Plrking Generation and PnallmlnalY Traffic Analysis of the exlstlna. no-build, and future conditions few yelr 2017 has been completed far the project and shows that the proposed project will hfte no Impact on traffic opentIons. Cl. An Engineering study will be required to show that adequate sight distance is achieved It the proposed driveway. There Is a concern that vehicles parking at 84-86 Garden Street will block sight distance. To help prevent vehicles from parking in the way, a Sidewalk should be Installed in the right of way through the driveway. This sidewalk could be extended into the proposed project to the limit of asphalt line. R2. A sidewalk wlU be Installed aiDnl the drfveway fronta&e of 84-86 Garden Street within the rtcht-of-way to prevent vehicles from parklllllln tandem. Silhtllnes will be depicted on the site plan. Mr.M8fCStr .... Septernber 17, 201S PapS • • 0. All walkways and ramps must meet ADA and Mil standards. AI accessible spaces snould be 9 feet wide. See detail on Sheet 50-2. R3. Will comply. C4. Please provIde a bike rack near the proposed building. R4. Will comply. CS. A stop sign and stop bar is required at the exit to the site. Also, please add a center line to delineate enter and exit lanes. R5. WlUcomply; req~ pavement marklnp wID be _ded to the plans. e6. All proposed plantings need to be relocated away from the proposed water, sewer and gas literals. R6. Proposed plantinp will be relocated as requested. C7. Show saw cuts on Garden Street with full depth pavement replacement reqUired. When saw cuts are dose to the edge of the road, repaving shall extend to edge. R7. WI. comply. ca. Two advisory of 25 MPH speed limit signs (W13-1PI and an intersection sign (WHOAI with a curved shall be placed on Garden Street (one in each direction), all signs shall meet MUTeD standards, and be high Intensity prismatic with breakaway posts. RB. Will comply. C9. Add sewer mannole rim/invert elevation information to the plans. Also, add the pitch of the sewer between manhole structures. R9. Sewer rims and Invert elevations will be added to the plans. CIO. Please show proposed snow storage areas. RIO. Snow storace areas will be depicted on the pians. ell. Please show the location of the dumpster for the site. A fence and concrete pad is required. Rll. Dumpster pad and dumpster location wlll be added to the pIMs. Mr. Man: Stranp September 17, lOtS Pap 6 • • C12. Please add the following note to the plan "Silt fence shall be Installed where necessary and needs to remain In place until all disturbed areas have suffldent vesetation to prevent erosion." RU. Nate wiN be adcMcI to the plans. Apwam Fire Department Datllcl Saptember 9. 1015 C1. The accessory building will require sprinklers if it stlYS its current size. There are no further comments, and the project has Fire Department approval. R1. Wli comply. Very truly yours, MILONE & MACBROOM, INC. Mark Aligoni, LA., Principal Massachusetts Regional Manaler • • • • TOWN OF AGAWAM Department of Public Works 1000 Suffield Street • Agawam, MA 01001 Tel (413) 811 0600 • Fax (413) 811 0631 Christopher J. Golba • SuperintendCllt MEMORANDUM To: planning File CC: From: Date: Subject: Engineering Division September 16,2015 Site Plan -The Sportsplex -Garden Street Per your request, we have reviewed the Site Plan entitled, ''Sportsplex -94 Garden Street, Agawam, MA; Prepared for: The Plex Sports Park, LLC, 22 Whipple Tree Lane, Amherst, MA 01002; Prepared by: Milone & MacBroom., Inc., 1350 Main Street, Springfield, MA 01103; Scale: 1" = 40'; Dated: July 13, 201S," and we have the following comments: Site Plan Comments: 1. Please submit a traffic impact study and parking generation calculation for the project. 2. An Engineering study will be required to show that adequate sight distance is achieved at the proposed driveway. There is a concern that vehicles parking at 84-86 Garden Street will block sight distance. To help prevent vehicles from parking in the way, a sidewa1k. should be installed in the right of way through the driveway. This sidewalk could be extended into the proposed project to the limit of asphalt line. 3. All walkways and ramps must meet ADA and AAB standards. All accessible spaces should be 9 feet wide. Sec detail on sheet SD-2. 4. Please provide a bike rack near the proposed building. 5. A stop sign and stop bar is required at the exit to the site. Also, please add a center line to delineate enter and exit lanes. 6. All proposed plantings need to be relocated away from the proposed water, sewer and gas laterals. 7. Show saw cuts on Garden Street with full depth pavement replacement required. When saw cuts are close to the edge of the road, repaving shall extend to edge. 8. Two advisory of 2S MPH speed limit signs (W13-IP) and an intersection sign (WI-IDA) with a curved shall be placed on Garden Street (one in each direction), all signs-shall meet MUTCD standards, and be high intensity prismatic with breakaway posts. 9. Add sewer manhole rimfmvert elevation information to the plans. Also, add the pitch of the sewer between manhole structures. 10. Please show proposed snow storage areas. II. Please show the location of the dumpster for the site. A fence and concrete pad is required. • • 12. Please add the following note to the plan "Silt fence sbaII be installed where necessmy and needs to remain in place until all disturbed areas have sufficient vegetation to prevent erosion." Engineering reserves the right to make additional comments as new information is submitted. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this division. Sincerely, ,- W'., .. ' Vladimjr C8ceres Civil Engineer I 1ttJJirL • Michelle C. Chase, P.E. Town Engineer • • AGAWAM OFFICE OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW REVIEWER: M. Strange/Po Kerr DATE: September 14. 2015 DATE RECEIVED: September 4.2015 DISTRIBUTION DATE: September 8. 2015 PLANNING BOARD MEETING DATE: September 17.2015 APPLICANT INFORMATION 1. Name of Business: The Sports Plex Address: 94 Garden Street 2. Applicant: The Sportsplex Park, LLC. Don Cameron. Manager Address: 22 Wippletree Lane, Amherst. MA 01002 Telephone: 413-265-0263 Email: cameronpainting@comcast.net 3. Engineer: Milone & MacBroom,lnc. Address: 1350 Main Street, Suite 1012, Springfield, MA 0110 Telephone: 413-241-692 Email: marigoni@mminc.com PLAN REVIEW Scale: 1" = 40" Date: September 3. 2015 Title Block (Street Address, Applicant's Name, Address. Scale, Name of Preparer of Plan): Street address needed. Description of Project: Proposed sports facility consisting of 2 full size synthetic turf soccer fields, with seasonal enclosures, gravel parking area for +250 cars, one 12.800 sf accessory building and associated driveway. walkways. stormwater management areas and landscaping. • • Description of Site: Proposed site is 22.89 acres and is currently two separate parcels of Residential B property located on the south side of Garden Street. An ANR Plan will be necessary to combine these parcels. One parcel contains land that is currently cultivated: the second parcel is wooded. A Wetland Investigation Report was conducted by Milone & MacBroom, attached, which indicates no evidence of wetlands was found. A formal Request for Determination of Applicability should be filed with the Agawam Conservation Commission. Provision for Traffic Flow: Site is proposed to be accessed via a 26' wide driveway off of Garden Street. The first 140' of the driveway is to be paved. Parking: Gravel parking area provides for approximately 220 (6 handicapped plus 1 van accessible) parking spaces. Agawam's Parking Guidelines do not provide guidance on calculating the number of spaces necessary for such a use. As such, the applicant should provide a parking study. This should include a comparison to existing similar facilities. Drainage: See Engineering comments. Public Utilities: All utilities must be shown on the plan. Landscaping/Screening and Buffers: The following landscape not must be placed on the plan: "All plantings must be maintained and that portion of the public way abutting the parcel and including the tree belt shall be maintained in a safe and attractive condition by the owner of the parcel." Sign Location: The proposed sign elevation and location must be provided. Exterior Lighting: The location of all exterior lighting must be provided. Cut sheets must be provided and all lighting must be recessed and shielded and shall not flow over on to adjacent residential properties. Rendering or Elevations: Colors and textures must be provided. Dumpster Location: Dumpster(s) must be shown. All dumpsters must be fenced, gated and screened. Other Comments or Concerns: A Traffic Study should be conducted to explore any potential local impacts. • • AGAWAM OFFICE OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW REVIEWER: M. Strange/Po Kerr DATE: September 14,2015 DATE RECEIVED: September 4,2015 DISTRIBUTION DATE: September 8,2015 PLANNING BOARD MEETING DATE: September 17,2015 APPLICANT INFORMATION 1. Name of Business: The Sports Plex Address: 94 Garden Street 2. Applicant: The Sportsplex Park, LLC, Don Cameron, Manager Address: 22 Wippletree Lane, Amherst, MA 01002 Telephone: 413-265-0263 Email: cameronpainting@comcast.net 3. Engineer: Milone & MacBroom,lnc. Address: 1350 Main Street, Suite 1012, Springfield, MA 0110 Telephone: 413-241-692 Email: marigoni@mminc.com PLAN REVIEW Scale: 1" = 40" Date: September 3, 2015 Title Block (Street Address, Applicant's Name, Address, Scale, Name of Preparer of Plan): Street address needed. Description of Project: Proposed sports facility consisting of 2 full size synthetic turf soccer fields, with seasonal enclosures, gravel parking area for ±250 cars, one 12,800 sf accessory building and associated driveway, walkways, stormwater management areas and landscaping. • • Description of Site: Proposed site is 22.89 acres and is currently two separate parcels of Residential B property located on the south side of Garden Street. An ANR Plan will be necessary to combine these parcels. One parcel contains land that is currently cultivated; the second parcel is wooded. A Wetland Investigation Report was conducted by Milone & MacBroom, attached, which indicates no evidence of wetlands was found. A formal Request for Determination of Applicability should be filed with the Agawam Conservation Commission. Provision for Traffic Flow: Site is proposed to be accessed via a 26' wide driveway off of Garden Street. The first 140' of the driveway is to be paved. Parking: Gravel parking area provides for approximately 220 (6 handicapped plus 1 van accessible) parking spaces. Agawam's Parking Guidelines do not provide guidance on calculating the number of spaces necessary for such a use. As such, the applicant should provide a parking study. This should include a comparison to existing similar facilities. Drainage: See Engineering comments. Public Utilities: All utilities must be shown on the plan. Landscaping/Screening and Buffers: The following landscape not must be placed on the plan: "All plantings must be maintained and that portion of the public way abutting the parcel and including the treebelt shall be maintained in a safe and attractive condition by the owner of the parcel." Sign location: The proposed sign elevation and location must be provided. Exterior lighting: The location of all exterior lighting must be provided. Cut sheets must be provided and all lighting must be recessed and shielded and shall not flow over on to adjacent residential properties. Rendering or Elevations: Colors and textures must be provided. Dumpster location: Dumpster(s) must be shown. All dumpsters must be fenced, gated and screened. Other Comments or Concerns: A Traffic Study should be conducted to explore any potential local impacts. " . , j~ ~ ... " ~ . ~ 1,. 01 :/,. , J 01 ' • .. 01 ;( -: J J • .. ~ ~ ... l~.I~1 """, . ., ... ~:'4...1'" ... "" .. # # ~ "' -.-, r J :J ~ • -, # ~ ~ .. .., .. , • ~ . ... J ~ . .. ct.MHn-... .... , ... • ~ ;.... J ., I ~ -' 'I The information depicted on this map is for planning purposes only. It is not adequate for legal boundary definijion, regulatory interpretation, or parcel-level analyses. • • ., -," . J ~ I'I,Uo-" .. .. ) ,-,. l J I I, , ~-l . , -" " ~ . ,J~~ oJ,...... ..~ . • I . --: ...... ~ '.1 I . ;-J , / J J- flURllJlC010H OIl ::,.Jo __ ~ .J ,,-:oJ /. I / - .\ @ / / Garden Street -The Sportsplex 9/11/201511 :27 :58 AM L , , B ....... --~ J~ __ --- ,. ® 1 :7836 1"=653' , "",,,! -< ~, -" } / .. The information depicted on this map is for planning purposes only. It is not adequate for legal boundary definition, regulatory interpretation, or parcel-level analyses. Zoning -Garden Street -The Sportsplex 9/11/201 5 11 :26:51 AM ® 1 :3912 1"=326' The information depicted on this map is for planning purposes only. It is not adequate for legal boundary definition, regulatory interpretation, or parcel-level analyses. areal -Garden Street -The Sportsplex 9/11/20 15 11 :28:45 AM 1 :7836 1"=653' The information depicted on this map is for planning purposes only. It is not adequate for legal boundary definition, regulatory interpretation, or parcel-level an alyses. areal -Garden Street-The Sportsplex 9/1 1/2015 11 :29:27 AM 1 :7836 1"=653' • AGAWAM POLICE DEPARTMENT SAFETY OFFICER Date: September 10th, 2015 To: Planning Board From: Sgt. Anthony Grasso RE: 94 Garden Street Sports Complex Site Dear members of the planning board, I have reviewed the site plan for the Sports Complex located at 94 Garden Street and have several concerns: 1. Curb cut must be wide enough for the entrance/exit for the facilities driveway to allow ample traffic flow in both directions as well as for emergency vehicles. The driveway must allow for a large volume oftraffic to keep moving when the facility has a big turnover between schedule events with teams. 2. The driveway must be unobstructed for motorist exiting the facility both easterly and westerly direction on Garden Street. 3. Where the existing driveway stands looking easterly towards RT 57 off ramp is unobstructed. However, when looking Westerly towards Poplar Street. The motorists have an obstruction due to the residence next to 94. Ex. Vehicles parked in the driveway and a tree line consisting of pine trees. 4. Where the existing driveway is located presently promotes and issue due to the bend in the road which will also have an effect on motorist safely entering/exiting the facility. 5. I would also like to see Garden Street have ample no parking signs on both sides of the road even though it is marked with a double solid line and is a no passing zone. We will need to keep the roadway clear at all times secondary to the road being heavily used by commercial vehicles as well as residents within the area. 6. This area of Garden Street is also narrow in appearance due to the businesses and residential houses which our in close proximity to the roadway. 7. I would also recommend the 30 mph speed be posted due to the present traffic and increased traffic from the facility due to overwhelming popularity with soccer especially with a closed in facility during the winter months. C ~ eEl V E 0 8. I would also recommend an emergency access road to the rear of bu'IJi~for emergency vehicles. SEP 14 2015 AGAWAM PLANNING BOARD • 9. The facility must obviously have ample parking for the proposed 220 vehicles as well as following Agawam's Town Ordinance code for Handicap parking. ~.i'im~d' . Sg . ony\!ra}JliJill AGAvfXM FIRE DEPAf.JrMENT 800 MAIN STREET, AGAWAM, MA 01001 TELEPHONE (413) 786-0657 FAX (413) 786-1241 ALAN SIROIS, CHIEF OF DEPARTMENT BERNARD J. CALVI, DEPUTY CHIEF JACOB N. G. DUSHANE, FIRE INSPECTOR FRANK MA TUSZCZAK, TRAINING OFFICER September 9,2015 Plan Review For: Agawam Sportsplex 94 Garden Street Feeding Hills, Ma 01030 Plarming submission 5736-01 dated September 32015. Plarming Board Members; afdchief@agawam.ma.us afddeputy@agawam.ma.us afdinsp@agawam.ma.us afdtraining@agawam.ma.us I have reviewed the plans for the development of the Agawam Sportsplex. As discussed in the team meeting for this review our concerns for this project revolve around the accessory building and access for emergency vehicles. The accessory building will require sprinklers if it stays its current size. There are no current plans for any commercial cooking and thus is not a concern. The site plan as drawn has adequate room for emergency vehicles. Therefor: I have no further concerns about this project and it has fire department approval. If there are any questions please contact this office. Fire prevention is everyone's responsibility. Jacob N.G. Dushane Fire Inspector afdinsp@agawam.ma.us (413) 786-0657 EXT 8883 • • Town of Agawam Interoffice Memorandum To: CC: From: Date: Subject: Engineering Dept.. Police Dept.. Fire Dept.. ADA Committee Planning Board 9/8/15 Site Plan -The Sportsplex -Garden Street Please review and comment on the attached Site Plan for The Sportxplex on Garden Street prior to the Board's September 17th meeting. Thank you. MS:prk FROM THE DeSK OF ... YOUR NAME TITLE T OWN OF AGAWAM 36 MAIN ST AGAWAM. MA 01001 Email address Here 413-786-0400 X Extension Fax: 413-786-9927 • Engineering, LalfdS(upe ATChiltdult' and En"frufUnf1lral 5.:ient'"( ~~~ MILONE &MACBROOMc September 3, 2015 Mr. Don cameron III 22 Whippletree Lane Amherst, MA 01002 RE: WetLand Investlptlon Report 111. Sportsplex 94 Garden Street MMI1I5736-01·S Dear Mr. cameron: • On July 29, 2015, Milone & MacSroom, Inc. (MMI) wetlands personnel conducted a site inspection to identify any wetlands as part of the engineering services associated with the proposed private sports facility at 94 Garden Street in the town of Agawam. As you know, the subject property consists of two parcels Identified by the Town of Agawam as FS 3.1 and FS 3.2 with a combined area of approximately 21.6 acres. The current land use is open agricultural field on approximately S.S acres with the remaining portion of the property vacant forested land. The wetland Inspection was conducted in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act with the methodology provided In the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Interim Rl!j/lonai Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetfond Delineation Manual: Northcentral and Northeast Region. The weather conditions were hot and dry with site conditions suitable for wetland delineation work. Soils were examined using a spade and Dutch auger to verify Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) mapping. Geospatial data from the NRCS web soli survey was accessed prior to the field inspection. The attached NRCS web soil survey map identifies the following soil series on the property: • Merrimac -sandy loam (95% of acreage) • Windsor -loamy sand (3% of acreage) • Ninigret -fine sandy loam (2% of acreage) Based on NRCS descriptions, these three soil series are upland moderately to excessively drained soils derived from glaCiofluvial and outwash deposits. There were Ill! mapped hydric soli series present at the site based upon NRCS mapping. The field investigation was consistent with the NRCS soil survey mapping with D.2lndication of bordering vegetated wetlands present at the property. The soil consisted of a light brown fine sandy loam with!!2 evidence of hydrology or wetland vegetation identified within the property boundary. The underlying soil is comprised entirely of upland soils, thus there will be !!II direct wetland impacts associated with the proposed development. Please call if you have any questions. Very truly yours, MILONE & MACBROOM, INC. Mark R. Arigoni, L.A., PrinCipal Massachusetts Regional Manager Enclosures 5736-01-~s31S-ttr OHVOB ~NINNYId W"M"~" ~tOl to d3S 03A1303t:1 Milone & MacBroom, Inc., One Financial Plaza, 1350 Main Street, Suite 1012, Springfield Massachusetts 01103 (413) 241 -6920 Fax (413) 241·6911 www.miloneandmacbroom.com Connecticut. Maine. Massachusetts. North Carolina. South Carolina. Vermont C2" J'SO"H 42" J'l6'H • ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ Soli Ma~ampden County, Massachusetts, Central Part ~ N Map 5a11e: 1:3,(J60 'anted O'l A ~ (11-)( 8.S") sheet o~-----~~====~oo~------------,~~~==========~v.~ ~ O~--~'00~==~XO=-------~«O~======~&c~ A Map~: WebMertMr Q:mer"axrthII:es: WGS84 B::VetICs: l1TM:zme Ja'4\\GS84 Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey • ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ 713112015 Page 1of3 ... 42" J'str N • .1 42" 3'lIS"N fiIilIi SoH Map-H.mpden County, M .... chu.etto, Central Part MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of In .... t (AOI) D Area of Interest (AOI) Solis D Soil Map Unit Polygons -Soil Map Unit lines • Soil Map Unit Points SpKi.' Point F.Mu,.. ~ 181 III 0 X ., 0 A • ~ 0 0 V + -0 ~ /# Naturol Resources Conservation Service BIowo" 8om>wPit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Ptt Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Maruh or swamp Mine or Quany MiscelWineous Watef Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole SUde or Slip Sodlc Spot Ii!! Spo'Area o Stony Spot en Very Stony Spot ~ Wet Spot [; other ..-Special Une Featu1'e8 w.t.rFutu .... Streams and canals Tnln.portatIon +++ Rails --Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads local Roads Bac:kground • Aerial Photography W.b Soli Survey National Coop.ratlve Soil Survey The soil surveys that comprile your AOI were mapped at 1:25,000. Wamlng: Soli Map may not b. valid at this acele. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause miaunderatanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of 8011 line placement. The mapa do not show the amall areas of contralting toils that could have been shown at a more detailed scate. PleaH rety on the bar scale on each map sheet for map mealurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soli Survey URL: hflp:llwebeollourvey.nree.uada.gov Coordinate Syatem: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Mape from the Web Son Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preservee direction and shape but diltOrtl distance .,d area. A projection that preserves area, such 81 the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be uoed W more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product ia generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data a. of the version date(.) lI.ted below. SoH Survey Area: Hampden County, Maaaachusetts, Central Part Survey Atea Data: Veralon 8, Sep 19,2014 Soli map ~ita are labeled (a. ap-=e .nows) for map scalea1 :50,000 or larger. Date(.) aerial image. were photographed: Mar 28, 2011-Apr 18, 2011 The orthophoto or other base map on which the 1041 linea were complied and digitized probably dltlenl from the background Imagery displayed on the.e mapll. AI a relult. some minor shifting of map un~ boundaries may be evident. 713112015 Pago2of3 ~ • • • • Sol Map-Hampden County, Maaaachueet1a, C8nlnll Part Map Unit Legend HMIpdon COUnI)',II-. CenIRI Pm CIWI07l ..... UnIt .,...,.,1 254A 2548 2540 2556 2766 Totals for Area 01 Interest Natural Reaourcea Conservation Service ..... UnIt_ _lnAOl Merrimac aandy loem, 0 to 3 percent IIapes Merrimac Mndy loam, 3 to 8 percent IIopes Merrimac sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent lIopeo WIndsor loamy aand, 3 to 8 percent lIopea Nlnlgret me 88ndy loam, 0 to 6 percent IIapes Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 19.7 1.0 0.0 0.6 0.5 21.8 "*-It '" MIl 90.4"- 4.6"- 0.2"- 2.1"- 2.1"- 100.0% 713112015 Page 3013 • • TOWN OF AGA W AM, MASSACHUSETTS FORMD Application for Site Plan Approval Please complete the following form and retum it and ten (10) copies oR~~&lV~ ~J Agawam Inspection Services 1 000 Suffield Street Agawam, MA 01001 SEP n A 'OJ A(;,/'"~·.;~ Ii PL" !'\It.mu:; BOARD --=.06P'(-=--...:.:7_-=O:::...-__ 20 \5" 1. Name of Business -mE--Sf'~a.ex Phone # ______ Fax #_--===~ email (~c.ot.l1k:r INfO. g~ 2. Name oQPplic~wner 1HE. ae<--5f"'oe:f"5 PAU-.t...LL· liON. CA~ -. . ~~ Address ;:;z.. WHI~~ u..N~ • AMtiJ%!?;r; MA. 01002- Phone # t5\~ U6 Ou,; ~~EG'0f4~~ @.~. "-lET Fax # email 3. Name ofEngineer/Architect MILoblE.. ~ M~M ' l~L... -~~or-l\ I ",A.. ' ~c:\~~ Address \,?~D MMt4 ?~f'E-:r, SOlre lOlZ-, ~~~HaP, MA. oliO::;' Phone # "ft;. v{\. "'lto Fax # __ -___ email ~~~l@ MMlt..\.C-.l.Ct1 4. Please give a brief description of the proposed project: -r~O f\)U" s\U' ?Y"-\'(\.tE:i'lL. 'r\)EF 'f;ou.et-RetPS, wi ~eP6DNAL ~LU>~\,)~, ~¢A\}f!L,... ~t-.\1. ~ ~tZ-5c> t-It~S, ot.l~ 1~.~OO sr ~50~"( BoIU',"" ( A:t..l\? ~O'I~D "CJ'I-IVE.hJ~, W~Y5 1 ?'ft>~W~ tW(NMf~o.tr ~ i tANI>5d<l'I~. C~ ~ ~"f)l!: p~<". ! E~'ilt.l~t.:)\. ~...,:>~\) • ~l~ MILONE &MACBROOM' TO: Town of Agawam· 1~Sfea\~ ~\l~. 1000 !>9Pf'In.O ~ PHONE: METHOD OF DELIVERY: FedEx: [1 Priority Overnight (next business momillg) WE ARE SENDING YOU: [1 Standard Overnight (next business afternoon) • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Date: .. S"'!'.t.ember 3 , 2015 ...... _._ .. . Job No. 5736·01-4 [1 Regular Mail [xl Hand Delivery [ 1 Shop Drawings [ 1 Change Order [ 1 Prints [ 1 Plans ~ Permit Application [ 1 Samples [ 1 Specifications [xl Regulatory Submission [ 1 Copy of Letter Copies i Date i No. I Description -=k~,,~~~j4-~~~~=~-~ -------------------i----·.·.·.·.·.·.·--t--·---·.·.·.-----.--"-,.-.. ,.--.,----------~----.-.--,,-.. ,.-.... -.-.-.-.----------------~------.. :=:==::: .. :t:::=:=::·.::=:=::::::T.·.·.·=J~~=:.~==: .. :::~:===:.=::::::~ .. :.:.:===.=::~= .. :.===::::~:~====:::--':::. 1 I I .... _ .. , .... ,."." .. -, ... _ .... , ... _.-1"------------------_ .. _---.,---·---------t---.. ·_--_·_·······---l------------.---.---------------.... ------------.-----------~------.- THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: 1'4 For approval [1 Approved as submitted [xl For your use [1 Approved as noted [1 As requested [1 Returned for corrections [1 For review and comment REMARKS: COPY TO: File [1 Resubmit __ copies for approval [1 Submit __ copies for distribution [1 Return __ corrected prints [1 OIher _________ _ SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Milone & MacBroom, Inc., One Financial Plaza, 1350 Main Street, Suite 1012 Springfield, MA (203) 271·177 Fax (203) 272·9733 letter of transmittal (mass) (I).doc j . Pamela Kerr From: Michelle Chase Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 4:41 PM Mayor Richard CohEm . To: Cc: Subject: Pamela Kerr; Christopher Golba; Nadine Porfilio RE: March 11 and 12 Attachments: AGAWAM. PDF; Agawam HS Track & FIeld -New layout-pdf Ok, here are my thoughts on the meetings: L Wednesday, March 11th at lOam is the Wide World of Indoor Sports -the concerns for any proposals that I am going to have will deal with the following: a. Sight distance and location of the proposed driveway and its proximity to neighboring intersecting streets and the curve on Garden Street (see attached). b. Queue analysis at the driveway and nearby intersection impacts. These types of projects tend to have significant peak traffic periods before and after events. This could have a negative impact on both signalized and non-signalized intersections nearby. c. Stormwater runoff -Due to the increase in impervious area, stormwater calculations will be required in HydroCAD format, pre and post peak runoff rates for the 2, 10 and 100 year storms will be necessary as well as a DPW Stormdrain permit. Infiltration rates will have to be determined by digging a test pit at the proposed infiltration system location (if applicable). d. Neighboring property impacts (plantings/buffers). e. Accessible parking spaces need to be the same width as standard spaces. Accessible curb cuts and signage to meet ali applicable standards. f. Sewer -That is a long flat stretch and I am not sure how deep the sewer is at the end of Orlando Street and Garden Street at the moment. 2. Thursday's MPO meeting will discuss the TIP and any proposed changes. I plan to have the new 2015 TEC sheets for all of our TIP projects completed either tomorrow or Friday and will forward them to VHB/MMI for review. And then hopefully have them complete by the end of the day on the 10th• (PVPC is asking for them to be completed by the 11th so they have time to review them before the subcommitteemeeting on the 26th• I plan to attend that meeting and push for our projects to continue to be in the upcoming TIP). 3. The track meeting on Thursday the 11th at 1pm: a. My concern with the latest submittal is the proposed paved area behind each endline/endzone of the field (see attached). looking at the other examples of fields/tracks, that area is typically either artificial turf or appears to be the same material as the track around it. b. The corners of the soccer field appear to be very close to the track. Nothing is more annoying on a corner kick than not having enough room to approach the ball or to have inadequate footing for cleats. c. Drainage around the field and track. I am sure MMI will be providing proposed grades in the near future. d. Make sure the angle of the scoreboard is ok for everyone since it should be readable from the grandstands and the concession building. -_. e. Access to the field from Line Street for emergency vehicles looks ok. A gate in the 5' fence around the track should be placed at the driveway there in case the ambulance needs to drive on the field? That is alii have at the moment, If I think of anything else, I'll let you all know. I am sure other issues will come up at the meeting. I can get a summary of the meeting when Iget.back and provide additional comments if necessary. 1 Business Proposition and Intended Use Wide World of Indoor Sports NVWIS) currently owns and manages two facilities in North Smithfield and North Kingston, Rio They have as well, just acquired, received approvals and are under construction in Montville, CT with a new facility that has a planned opening fall of 2015. The group is also on a healthy expansion plan where they intend to opening 6-8 more facilities over the next 3-5 years in the New England I NY I NJ areas . . ' -, . ,. , .. , -_.,. Wide Wond of Indoor Sports (WWIS) provides a state-of-the-art family training facility suitable for all ages non-discriminate of ones abilities. Our goal at Wide World of Indoor Sports is to provide athletes a safe place where they can learn, train and grow to their full potential. Sports we offer include: Soccer. Lacrosse,.Flag Football, Baseball, Softball,.fjeld Hockey, Whiffle Ball and much more! Our facilities are clear span construction offering Non-boarded full size fields, top of the line turf, viewing mezzanine ovenooking all fields, including snack bar & lounge all climate controlled. Attached are the 3-cover pages to the WWIS web site: http://wideworldofindoorsporls.com Client Seeking Land for Sale Minimum 6 acres Commercial/ Indusfria-I Required: Minimum 6 Acres that will accommodate single building-195'X410' Plus 200 car parking with expansion / over flow areas Level topography w/minimal site work to accommodate a sizeable PAD Residential land may work if Zoning will allow for Recreational use Desired: Convenient location Good visibility Easy access Friendly Zoning for an indoor recreation facility Limited or no wetlands Limited or no ledge Comments: Business will create high traffiC on-weekends from Oct-April thus location will need to be friendly towards this high traffic. ClOME :::i.I]\!iCS roURNA1"\O:1E~~TS R ENTALS ;)IRECTIONS :::ONTACT U s ~OVERTISING :"OCATIONS ~KNEWPORT. FocuJed 011 ~ SMr.cus! Wlda Wartd of Indoor Sports prcwides 11 !ltate~ the.art trltining bciity far al ages and abilties. 0.. goal at INIda Wortd of Indoor Sports • to provide athtetee .. place thet tt.y nn 'low to tho!r tuI pcuntllll Sport5 we oifer inclUde: Soccer, UU::.FO$se. Rag Football, 8aseb:lll, SOftball, Reid Hockey, VMleS6aIl and many 1l'I01lI! S Non-Boerded Reid" Fields ollflr top oflne line ~rf Mezzanine ~rlooking all fiekta Climate COnrolied Wide World News f7'il 'Ir.d us "" to.S Fa.:ebco}' GyiwlndQ9fWO[1Ij February Tournament All aI our wum.ments !h~ a ... on /MV. _old out B/U·"I. don1 miss out for FfIbnR17 ~ra"f{I Youth SOt;~er. V~19 Youth SOI'tbII: 10U-UU fyI! Ioymimtnl OOi's Coming Soon: WWIS MontvUte, CTI ...".0.,.11 CMtirW StJtJnJ Follow us on t.c.book br progr. phtaoel cay 8M-444-1234 b more d8lailS. • 219l1S Wide World o! Ird)or Sports -Rllrdoor SpaIS ComPOl(. soccer. lacrosse. flag IooIbaII. _I. _I. girls field hoci<oy HOME AnULT l..EAG UES ~ CUNlCS; CAMPS; TOURNAM£l'I:"TS , RENTALS FORMS 8: POUCiES D!RECTION. CONTACT Us A DVERTISING LOCAnONS -:: WIde Wart!! 01 Indoor Spwta ,"""lOIs • .uc.d.tt.-t ...... f.lciIily for .... Ind abllllll., 0Ir goIIII al ""* Wot1d of IMMt $JIOftS .. to ... .,.,.. ......... ,...,. thIIttt..y c.,..;r-to tt.1r U ~ Sponl ... 6IIr include: Soecw. l.aeto&M, FlItO Foolbln, Ba..t.n, SotbaI, A,1d HadllY, VMIIee..l..-d ,..n,,~1 4 Non.ao.rced AetIH ~olfer bp ollhellne .. ,.. MRDnkw o-'Oaldno AI .... Ct)_ .. ~ Wide World South News Find I.SOO Facebook )1 - F.t)rulry Tournamen A6c10l1~,* tnI8" ._._,. .... Glflour HI". don"l:mIss out for Febt'fMry &.all 'f'oufIt ~ u.-ut, fulltMl'TWNl!!t o,,,;w Coming Soon: WWlS Montvi .. , CTl ..... o.e. .. C_Mrirs-N foIcN, us on Facaboot b ........ -c.a ISO .u 1220' Jot I'l10'' Clads ALL NEW AduR Leogu< n-;.y Cbtd TNtral.~MdU."~ l epgup PClab 21~15 Wido World «Indoor Sports -Rlindoor Sports Canpl ..... soccer, leer056<l, flog _I, __ I. ~rls field-.y , -.--":.,;. . .: . -=.-- Fealurlng: 80,000 Square Feel, 4 Non-Boarded FIelds, Top oflhe line Turf, ComfonabJe l(iewing, Snack Bar & Lounge on Premises • ,--~-~~ -' ---"i----------,,---------::: I C~[I 860 .......... 12.)4 or~lllCt MidJelle fOr IItOI'e InfCl1Mtton at mJcMII~dI~dooflPO(hl.c:om http:lANideworldofirdoorsporbl.com/mv/index.NmI Wide World News 7fnd [500 Facecock 110 ... InfonnaUon on our Montville, CT facilit w;U be posted soonl '/2 Pamela Kerr From: Sent: Franklin, Michael <michael.franklin@coldwellbankermoves.com> Tuesday, February 24, 2015 1:29 PM To: Pamela Kerr Subject: Attachments: RE: Wide World of Indoor Sports AGAWAM.PDF Pam, Thanks so much for the info. It so happens that we are interested in a Garden ST property that is adjacent to the 94 GS you supplied. We have laid this one out (see attached) and it does fit our facility while the 94 GS is a little too small. When we were doing our analysis this particular parcel lacked the minimum 100' frontage as it only has 56' on Orchard and we were told we could not access through a residential neighborhood as well due to our use. It does however have a SO' ROW though one of the other Garden ST properties. let me ask as there is a town property at the end of Orchard that-is contiguous to the Garden ST property we are interest in. If we were to buy this parcel from the town we would then have the proper frontage and then we could access the property for or use on Garden ST and I believe these are all - commercial use properties. Would this work -and whom could I discuss with the town about this proposal of purchase. Please understand our use is very family orientated, a clean use and welcome by most towns. This would be a very good addition to the township of Agawam. When you have a moment please call so we could discuss further. Thanks, Michael Franklin, CNAS Certified Commercial Associate Coldwell Banker 132 Boston Post Rd. East Lyme, CT 06333 Cell: 860-460-8144 www.michael-franklin.net Top Agent East Lyme Office 2012 Come visit us at wVI'W.thevillasct.com 1 From: Pamela Kerr [mailto:PKerr@agawam.ma.us] Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:42 AM To: Franklin, Michael Cc: Erik Wight Subject: RE: Wide World of Indoor Sports Hi Michael-I've attached information on several parcels in town. I don't know the status in terms of their availability (if they are for sale) but I've included the property record cards for each parcel which lists the owner information. This information I'm providing is based solely on the size of the parcel and its location . You would have to do further research on each to determine if it would fit your needs. If I can be of further help, please let me know. Pam Kerr Administrative Assistant From: Franklin, Michael [mailto:michaeIJranklin@coldwellbankermoves.com] Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 2:44 PM To: Pamela Kerr; Erik Wight Subject: Wide World of Indoor Sports Pam & Eric, It was a pleasure speaking this afternoon. As mentioned I represent WWIS and we are looking to expand into the Agawam area. With that said we have analyzed the properties listed for sale and have yet to find anything suitable. You may know of or may come across a suitable parcel and if so we would like to have the opportunity to asses any parcel that may be available. Attached is a brief description along with the business description of WWIS. Take a look and let me know if there are any suitable properties are not listed for sale but might be available. Pam, Eric mentioned that a Business A zone would be the minimum for our use. If you have any questions let me know and we look forward to working with Agawam. Regards, Michael Franklin, CNAS Certified Commercial Associate Coldwell Banker 132 Boston Post Rd. East Lyme, CT 06333 Cell: 860-460-8144 \wlw.michael-franklin.net Top Agent East Lyme Office 2012 2 Aortc:ulturoJl AortcUlur.JI The information depicted on this map is for plann ing purposes only. It is not adequate for legal boundary definition, regulatory interpretation, or parcel-level analyses. Garden Street -Thomas 3/11/2015 8:43:48 AM BU5lneu B eN 1 :7284 1"=607' • Unofficial Property Record Card Unofficial Property Record Card -Agawam, MA General Property Data ParcellD F8 3 2 Prior Pare.IID 2870- Property Owner THOMAS RICHARD S SR THOMAS BARBARA A Mailing Address 535 ROGERS AV City WEST SPRINGFIELD Mailing State MA ParcelZoning BS Zip 01089 Account Number Property Location GARDEN ST Property Use LAND Most Recent Sale Date 8/7/2014 Legal Reference 20380-401 Grantor THOMAS RICHARD S SF{. Sale Price 0 Land Area 15.200 acres Current Property Assessment Page 1 of 1 Card 1 Value Building 0 Value Xtra Features 0 Value Land Value 182,300 Total Value 182,300 Building Style NlA # of living Units NlA Year Buitt NfA Building Grade NfA Building Condition Average Finished Area (SF) NfA Number .Rooms 0 # of 314 Baths 0 BuildJng Description Foundation Type N/A Frame Type N/A . Roof Structure N/A Roof Cover N/A Siding NIA Interior Walls N/A , of B_"dr:Q.oms 0 II of 112 Baths 0 Legal Description Narrative Description of Property Flooring Type NlA Basement Floor NlA Heating Type NlA Heating Fuel NlA Air Conditioning 0% ., of Bsmt a.ragH 0 .. ., of Full Baths 0 # of Other FbrturH 0 This property contains 15.200 acres of land mainly classified as LAND with a(n) NlA style building, bulH about N/A , having NJA exterior and NlA roof cover, with NlA U"it(s), 0 room(s), 0 bedroom(sl. 0 bath{s), 0 haH bath{s). Prope~ Images , NoSketoh No Picture ..... <. Available Available. Disdaimer: This information is believed to be correct. but is subject to change and is not warranteed. http://agawam.patriotproperties.com/RecordCard.asp 2/2312015 AGAWAM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING CONCERNS/COMMENTS March 11, 2015 1. Wednesday, March 11th at lOam is the Wide World of Indoor Sports -the concerns for any proposals that I am going to have will deal with the following: a. Sight distance and location of the proposed driveway and its proximity to neighboring intersecting streets and the curve on Garden Street (see attached). b. Queue analysis at the driveway and nearby intersection impacts. These types of projects tend to have significant peak traffic periods before and after events. This could have a negative impact on both signalized and non-signalized intersections nearby. c. Stormwater runoff -Due to the increase in impervious area, stormwater calculations will be required in HydroCAD format, pre and post peak runoff rates for the 2, 10 and 100 year storms will be necessary as well as a DPW Stormdrain permit. Infiltration rates will have to be determined by digging a test pit at the proposed infiltration system location (if applicable). d. Neighboring property impacts (plantings/buffers). e. Accessible parking spaces need to be the same width as standard spaces. Accessible curb cuts and signage to meet all applicable standards. f. Sewer -That is a long flat stretch and I am not sure how deep the sewer is at the end of Orlando Street and Garden Street at the moment. I~ Unofficial Property Record Card Unofficial Property Record Card -Agawam, MA General Property Data ParcellD F83 1 Prior Parcel 10 2870- Property Owner GIORDANO BUILDING INC Mailing Address 353 NORTH ST City FEEDING HILLS Mailing State MA ParcelZoning RB Zip 01030·1323 Aceount Number Property Location 94 GARDEN 51 Property Use 3 F AML Y Most Recent Sale Date 911/1989 legal Reference 7258·99 Grantor GIORDANO Sale Price 0 Land Area 5.820 acres Current Property Assessment Page 1 of 1 Card 1 Value Building 105600 Value • Xtra Features 26 800 Valu"e I Land Value 125,500 Total Value 267,900 Building Style MULTI·CONV # of Living Units 3 Year Built 1945 Building Grade AVERAGE Building Condition Average Finished Area (SF) 2364 Number Rooms 11 ., of 314 Baths 0 Building Description Foundation Type CONe BLOCK Frame Type WOOD Roof Structure GABLE Roof Coyer ASPHALT . Siding ALUMINUM Interior Walls PLASTER , of Bedrooms 5 .. of 1/2 Baths 0 Legal Description Narrative Description of Property Flooring Type CARPET Basement Floor NlA Heating Type UNIT HTRS Heating fuel GAS Air Conditioning 0% .. of Bsmt Garages 0 .. of Full Baths 3 .. of Other Fixtures 0 This property contains 5.820 acres of land mainly classified as 3 FAMLY with a(n) MULTI-CONV style building, built about 1945 , having ALUMINUM exterior and A$PHAL T roof cover, with 3 unit(s), 11 room(s), 5 bedroom(s), 3 bath(s), 0 half bath(s). Property Images Disclaimer: This information is believed to be correct but is subject to change and is not warranteed. \. http://agawam.patriotproperties.com/RecordCard.asp 2/23 /2015 Agriwu.1l The information depicted on this map is for planning purposes only. It is not adequate for legal boundary definrtion, regulatory interpretation, or parcel-level analyses. 94 Garden Street 2/23/20152:52:36 PM I~.J Bu!.infl$$ B eN 1 :5652 1"=471' ... oJ, ~ , .. --I "'"' • Unofficial Property Record Card Unofficial Property Record Card -Agawam, MA . General Property Data ParcellD J126 26 Prior PareellD 6970 ~999306 - Property Owner THE ALFRED PAJER TRUST PAJER ALFRED TR LIT Mailing Add ..... 402 COOPER ST City AGAWAM Mailing State MA ParcelZonlng BA Zip 01001 Account Number Proporty Location 319 SUFFIELD ST Property Use LAND-C Most Recent Sale Date 8/17/2012 Legal Reference 19399-342 Grantor PAJER,ALFRED P Sale Price a Land Area 8.680 acres Current Property Assessment Page 1 of 1 Card 1 Value Buikling 0 Value Xtnl F •• tures 0 Value Land Value 195,700 Totll Value 195,700 Building Style N/A • of Living Units N/A Year Built N/A Building Grade N/A Building Condition Average Finished Area (SF) N/A Number Rooms 0 '/I. of 314 Baths 0 Building Description Foundation Type hilA Fr8J118 Type NlA Roof Structure N/A Roof Cover N/A Siding N/A Interior Walls N/A • of Bedrooms 0 .. of 1/2 Baths 0 Legal Description Narrative Description of Property Floonng Typo N/A Baaeme~ Floor NJA Hoating Typo NJA Hlltlng Fuel NlA Air Conditioning 0% .. of Bsmt Garage. 0 # of Full Baths 0 • of Other Fixtures 0 This property contains 8.680 acres of land malnty classified as LANO..c wnh a(n) NlA style building, built about NlA , having NlA exterior and NlA roof cover, with NlA unites), 0 room(s), 0 bedroom(s), 0 bath's), 0 half bath(s). Prope_1'ty Images No Sketch No Picture Available Available -- Disdaimer: This information is believed to be correct but is subject to change and is not warranteed. http://agawam.patriotproperties.com/RecordCard.asp 2/2312015 1-• The information depicted on this map is for planning purposes only. It is not adequate for legal boundary definijion, regulatory interpretation, or parcel-level analyses. 319 Suffield Street 2i23/2015 3:37:30 PM ® 1 :5796 1"=483' " Know what's below. Call before you dig. www.digsafe.com '. , AGAWAM SPORTSPLEX \ \ \ -------- \ \ \ PREPARED FOR: DJC REAL ESTATE LLC 22 WHIPPLETREE LANE AMHERST, MA 01002 -- 94-GARDEN STREET AGAWAM, MASSACHUSETTS PLANNING SUBMISSION 5136-01 SEPTEMBER 3, 2015 REVISION No.1 -SEPTEMBER 2015 / -- PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP: 0' 50' 1M' rs-i .0 1/2" 1" SCALE 1'. tOO' PREPARED BY: ~) MILONE &. MACBROOM® One Financial Plaza 1350 Main Street, Suite 10 12 Springfield, Massachusetts 01103 (4\3) 241-6920 Fax (41 3) 24 1-69 1\ ViVI'W.miloneandmacbroom.com , , , I \ f1 250' 600' LOCATION MAP: ~ ..... 1 o 112' 1" SCALE 1'" &:IJ' LIST OF DRAWINGS NO, NAME 01 02 EX 03 LA 04 SE 05 -10 SD-1 -SD-6 11 AS2 12 AS4 13 AS13 14 AS14 15 A-1 16 A -2 TITLE TITLE SHEET EXISTING CONDITIONS LAYOUT & LANDSCAPING SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROLS, GRADING & UTILITIES SITE DETAILS ELEVATIONS (STRUCTURE #1) ELEVATIONS (STRUCTURE #2) INTERIOR PLAN LAYOUT (STRUCTURE #1) INTERIOR PLAN LAYOUT (STRUCTURE #2) AGAWAM SPORTSPLEX ACCESSORY BUILDING FLOOR PLAN AGAWAM SPORTSPLEX ACCESSORY BUILDING ELEVATIONS j .... \ ZONE RESIDENTIAL B SURVEY NOTES 35' ZONE RESIDENTIAL B (ABUTTER) \ ZONE BUSINESS B (ABUTTER) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ----- THIS PLAN IS BAS~D ON A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY CONDUCTED BY MILONE B< MACBROOM, INC •. DATED AUGUST 13, 2015 AT A SCALE OF 1"=40'. HORIZONTAL DATUM IS NAD83 (MASS MAINLAND FEET). VERTICAL DATUM IS NAVD88. PROPERTY UNES SHOWN ARE BASED ON MASSGIS LEVEL 3 ASSESSORS. INFORMATION REGARDING THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE BASED UPON AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND MAY ElE INCOMPLETE. AND WHERE SHOWN SHOULD BE CONSIDERED APPROXIMATE. THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOULD BE CONFIRMED PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. CALL 811 A MINIMUM OF 72 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS THAT DO NOT MATCH THE VERTICAL OR HORIZONTAL CONTROL SHOWN ON THE PLANS SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER FOR RESOLUTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS TO THEIR SATISFACTION PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION. "DIG SAFE" SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR TO BEGINNING ANY WORK. LEGEND , , o • o >- GIS PROPERTY LINE CHAIN LINK FENCE TREELINE GUARDRAIL SANITARY MANHOLE CATCH BASIN WATER VALVE BOLLARD HYDRANT S[GN GUY WIRE X 197.54 I '\- \ \ \ \ 12" Poplar 8" Poplar \ \ \ \ X 1~5.49 \ \ " "-" " '\. x l'rr.6C "- X 1.97.34 " '\ x ~:;1 7.75 1 7.42. 1< 196.99 @2"POPlar G '1AS 6"-16" Cherry (Octuplet) 16" Poplar .1 ~~i) Poplar 14" Poplar '\ '\ '\ "", '\ '\ '\ '\ '\ '\'\ '\ '\ " 199.&1 X 199.i'O X 199B! X 1%.5S X 199.50 x 199.::17 X J.99,44 "" )( 19S.15 '\ ,a20" Oak I ~6'08k I 40" Maple ......... ~7,77 ___ 01 7.33 .......... , (3 ---------...... (Double) " x, ':-2<1 --__ 24" Mapfe ,_. ___ -.. _____ --- (DoubfeJ< 197.1(; . _-------197__ 22# Maple I "'~-------___ __ , I I ---------------- ZONE RESIDENTIAL B (ABUTTER) X 1WA) ........ ----" ------.--...oo:---------=., ___ ~---___ --...... ---------'--" -----".--~~ --..... I' ZONE RESIDENTIAL B (ABUTTER) -. "'-" . . ----.---------------1 , }x 1~''', 1 , , ,X';;;i"" , , fJ~¥"'''' , , , ,x"o." , 1"1' "., , .:....: 1 X 1'17.'17 l ). J"--/'-.../'-J'-/~"--/'--~~'---/~./'-"'-....J\..._/'......J~"--/ 199.81 SANMH --, T. F. =200. 50 1 ,. -------= ----.. ~. X" , ,X,'97,V , ~/'--./'-.../'-'" / I x ,0,,, X ''''''' ____ -..;''.;..----, --.-.---.----.. ----"~-------;;~,,"'~---,-' ,-, ,X""" 1 , ' ,x,""t I,_A--~~A-..A./~../'~A../'---.AJ'-"'-. / I L ____ '_· ___ --- --------,_._.-._-. ~,--~,----/,-",-~,,--, ...... -./"-/'-J'---/'----" ___ -----' ./ I '----X~j;;';:',";:;rr~"""=_ ---.------'--:-:-:~------------, JX %. x, .. , _ ------..---//" " ~T I / ___ "--"/ .. '--' ___ /'-.../,---","--,5, 0 J.. /.}. J.. . /"-../ '----" -~ ..,. ...-/' M GO . 02 ------ \ 't, .. -_.J > --//-----, ~ -/ "X ,,8.9, / I '"'' ../ ..--"~ Shed // ~-~~ ,,/ Xl"." ,.,,, X",." / ~ . ---~-----><1:1 7.'18" )(198.41 X l99.E' jleo;=~~===~ --/ -~ x JpJ.99 \ ----)( 197.66 ----/ : --X 197.02 " \. X 199.)~ .,.--)(19G.79 ___ --" ....-Xli/G.63 ~ x ... ..... \ /"/' \ "'" XI9l39 x m." '-,-\ (x,,.... \ '-~ X )95. Carport Existing Garage! #94 Existing House FF=203,23 '-"'-''''-X'19!L05 \ "\ ' \ '-X "'.45 \ \ " X 19".'" \ ----~---x,"," \ XlllfUi> . ''''-. \ X '97," X "'-'" ' .. *=..2'-. Garden House GF=199,84 Bit Driveway CBCI~~~::~~~~~-1 X 19S.79 ':!9i '~..9 \-,.... ---"'-, ",,.,. .• , X 1.96,75:,).' X 197.22 X 191.26 \\ I X ' ''' .• ' ',,,) v 1""-,'2 'JIJ ~ ,98.87 " I ''-'--X19','_\ '<1"04 ZONE BUISNESS B Bit Driveway I \ (DEVELOPMENT PARCEL) O----.....-~~------;. x,,,,,,, ;;-;;;-\'990' ~"'\> ...... -I "-~ x "I'" \ ~'~' /1 '\ x '97,24 x,,,,. X '''.34 X "'.57 !g~:;,,,:; X 1911. ;--_..-JSl-x 197_113 / --/ X 195.69 f 197.01 -------:--. X 196.12 . X l<)6,J! '--. / 91,5fj ...._---• / --.. U 000 X 195.88 -........ / '~V,·9504 ..... 19" "-... 'X~:l4 ...... ~ / X ,W8.~3 /-X 195.00 ....... -.. /' x 6.26 :.t.9.> / "'-/ X 198.55 ' ........... ...., ~"",99 X 197Al / X "6.95 ~~ .• o X "-'.31 X "''' X '9'.34 II! _, ___ -+F"-~-::;>;;..."',~>:::---//? //'--------"/ ------/ 10 > ..... """""%' 0 X 1%.55 X 196.70 X,196.26 X 15'5.16 ~196'C8 196.55 " 1'1(>,:3"1 -/ / X '98b -/--r 18" MapJ~ /' / I 24" Maple ,/' x 1!O.51 X 19?83 / I X 195.17 X 190.60 /-///' xm nfl I -' x 1017.60 X 197.89 .-.,..-/ X J97.4O X 197 a I I I X 196.61 6.74 ______ ---~x.J-"'~ X "',10 j ; 0 / )(,)9""-------/---I! / / X",." /"/ -----~~__________ I fl x i\~;tlap, x, ,81 // r--// ------~., OJ x ",l" 1\ j( I -<-2>0lt", x ,,,," < /,../" \ I x"',, ?O!'.?4 "\" //'" i ' It"\ .... x 197,::5 X 197.57 x l\I7.!;() "../ \ j \,.V", /' I 18" Mapl~ X 197.).1 \ j ",.-.;r=;:::::::1=""\~·'" _~~~:¥~x"1ll>.i.. X ,0'0> Jersey Barrier 197.72 \ __ ~!!!!.L!L ----____ ---=-_-_--=-----:x "~,, 7 X l --'OF . x B7.G4 ___ _::.t.. ,"' . _---x 19S,66 20\1, x 196.73 '" \ \t;;~ :=c;;:;;,:;:.::;:;;:;::;_,;;;;;;;~x~"~"~' ;;;;;~,""~~~~Xf· ?!:~,;o :r::CO~~~ \ 1$7.57 1 X 19:;."i7 -- \ ~-----\ X 197.40 ...... _---__ __-_-- \ .... _____ ~\~_J.I _-----::=.JC.-i:::-~-;:;-~==-.0""''---::.-----, L Xl?S.24 _-~---" i _ SAN MH __ -.;.:....:~I-;t--~ ~ -------~ X 191.56 , ZONED BUSINESS B ZONED BUSINESS B (ABUTTER) ZONED BUSINESS B ZONED BUSINESS B T.F.=199.17 INV,=185,32(NW) INV. =185.32(5E) INV.-192,63(E) X 20-0.14 I Xl99,fJ~ 0- 24" Maple 199.43 x T.G.=197.79 INV.=195,08 N) Bit WME-CO_12 .. , X 00.69 , , , '" • . J9fl. £) '" 00. 9 HI,/ o WME--CO,7 \v .. ,,, co." " 9,'1-------1 WME-CO,9 :;::OO.S8 M WME-CO,105 SANMH T.F.=198.83 INV,=186,65(E) INV.=190.45(5W) INV. =187,23(N) INV_ =186,65(W) SAN MH T.F.=197.94 INV,=186,42(W) lNV,.'86.42(SE) CBC! T,G, =197,87 INV,=193,62(S) INV,=193,33(N) z o i= !!: ~ u l3 c (/) Z o -!:: C z o o (!) z -J-!!2 >< UJ o· 2J1 40' ~Mbi4;ii -I o 112" 1" J: =! "' ~ ~ ci z ~ :> w II: " ~ r.d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..J Il. ~ o Il. en W J: J- , -1- JJH JJH MRA DESIGNED aRAWt~ CHECKED 1"=40' SCALE SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 DATE 5736'()1 PROJECT NO. 02 OF 16 SHEET NO. EX CopyrIght MUonl & Mac:8toom, Inc -:<015 1 GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS SHALL BEVERIFIED IN THE FIELD (V.I.F.) PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER. 2. MILONE & MACBROOM INC. ACCEPTS NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ACCURACY OF MAPS AND DATA WHICH HAVE BEEN SUPPLIED BY OTHERS. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM NECESSARY CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATIONS. APPLY FORAND OBTAIN NECESSARY PERMITS, PAY FEES, AND POST BONDS ASSOCIATED WITH THE WORK AS REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND SAFETY OF TRAFFIC ON THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE WAYS AFFECTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT. 5 ALL SLOPES, VEGETATION, PAVING, WALKS, AND IMPROVEMENTS OUTSIDE THE AREAS TO BE AFFECTED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT SHALL BE PROTECTED. DAMAGES RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES OUTSIDE THE PROJECT LIMITS SHALL BE REPAIRED AD NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER 6. TREES AND STUMPS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LOCAL REGULATIONS. 7 THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE SECURITY AND JOB SAFETY. PERFORM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH O.S.HA STANDARDS AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. PA(2) ~ \ \ CB (3) MP(3) PB(2) OF CLEARING (TYPICAL) ZONE RESIDENTIAL B EVERGREEN TREE (TYPICAL) BUFFER PLANTING PB(l) (3) PA (6) VD ZONE BUSINESS B (7) VD (1) PA PB (1) BUFFER PLANTING (6) SA (1) AM (3) SA (1) (3) CB (1) PB (3) MP (4) PB2 (2) PB2 (4) CF (3) PB """'. (5) CF "--LAWN (TYPICA~ (4) CF MP (3) VD (3) ZONE RESIDENTIAL B (2) SA (1) PA (4) CF (4) MP (1) PA (5) CB (3) SA ", . (1) PA (6) SA ZONING DATA (3) PB 15' ::;t:ljAl:K DIMENSIONAL CHARACTERISTICS REO'Df PERMITTED (1) PA LOT AREA --_---J-----ir--:; MAX. BUILDING _ IG COVERAGE 50% CF(6) \ \ (1) PB2 (2) PB (3) MP I?\,-J--BUFFER PLANTING (1) TG (3) MP (3) VD ...I ~ I-Z w Q ... UI w c:: w z 2 MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT MIN. FRONT & REAR YARD SETBACK MIN, SIDE YARD SETBACK PARKING ACCESSIBLE PARKING 45' 35' 15' 6 + 1 VAN REMOVE----~-'ru EXISTING WARNING PROPOSEDf PROVIDED ±22.89 Acres ±20 Mean of 36' More than 35' More than 15' ±220 SPACE 6 +1 VAN 8. SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS DEPICTED ON THESE PLANS AND DESCRIBED WITHIN THE StL T FENCE AND SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROLS SHALL BE INSTALLED WHERE NECESSARY AND REMAIN IN PLACE UNTILAUL DISTURBED AREAS HAVE SUFFICIENT VEGETATION TO PREVENT EROSION. ALL SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL CONFORM TO THE MASSACHUSETTS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL GUIDELINES FOR URBAN AND SUBURBAN AREAS, AND IN ALL CASES BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL PREVAIL. LIMIT OF ENCLOSURE l--+---rT DECIDUOUS SHADE TREE (TYPICAL) CB(4) SHRUB PLANTINGS (TYPICAL) SIGN & POST 9. THE CONTRACTOR MUST MAINTAIN (REPAIR/REPLACE WHEN NECESSARY) THE SILTATION CONTROL DURING CONSTRUCTION AND UNTIL ALL DISTURBED AREAS ARE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED. 10. COMPLIANCE WITH THE NOTICE OF INTENT PERMIT CONDITIONS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF BOTH THE CONTRACTOR AND THE PERMITTEE, 11. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE AMINIMUM OF 6' TOPSOIL AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 12. ALL PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS INDICATE FINISHED GRADE. 13. AUL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TOWN OF DANBURY. 14. AUL FUEL, OIL, PAINT, OR OTHER HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MUST BE STORED AT A SUITABLE OFF SITE LOCATION. DETENTION BASIN RIM ----'" ----, --\ ---------------/-- , \ ------11-___ ._ 1(_._.--r--- I \ \ I ..•. ) ~. '. 24" Maple. r--, , I , 1 , , I ------------- SNOW STOCKPILE . AREA IN LAWN AM(2) 80' BIKE RACK--1 SNOW STI)O(PIIrE AREA IN LAWN (3) PA (3) MP ZONE RESIDENTIAL B INSTALL NEW ~G (1) AM (3) MP PARKING~ (TVDI CAL) '\-.. SA(3) l-~N (4) CB .I';---+"-ASPHALT '>J:1..~ I,U FFER PLANTI NG SA(7) (3) PA (3) VD (2) MP (3) VD (6) CB I I MP(3) \ I ~ PB(4) I L-SEEDED , , MEADOW BA~ " TIMBER--Y GUIDERAIL r:;:::;;.:~ \ (1) AM ..... - _ _ P,(2) AA(1) LIMIT OF ASPHALT SIGN & POST SEE ENLARGED DETAIL B SD-4 TIMBER -...., GUIDE BUFFER PLANTING (6) VD CONTROLLED ACCESS PA r" U1 \ : i \ I I I I I 10' GATED ACCESS ~SEEDED~ MEADOW BASIN , I I ~~~=±~~-~. -~:R ~----. . -~~----------~ --: --=-=-=------1 r 25' HEIGHTLIGHT-'--1' FOR (6) BIKES CONCRETE SIDEWALK ~.r-.. & SCREENED ENCLOSURE TIMBER GUIDE RAIL ~ AM(l) DECI~vyv.", .'\:"--it. LIMIT OF ASPHALT COLUM Lf ___ ~-~~--,-~Jr-'~~""'<>---'-~~~~ D,'cC'dk GRANITE CURB it,;",,'_ 1 HD, (;s(r i UN 90".jS;:.'~H') I \ \ f:flGiiHCHAINLlNK FENCE I , ;:,vI<.K\..)v"DINji ElASIN , i/ "'-, I " , Y·'J"","-" t t '''''\ , ZONED BUSINESS B rj \ , .'-'. I ) I I I I , "-"- LIMIT OF ENCLOSURE ' "-"-"-"- PLANTING NOTES THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UNIJERGR(Julill. ~TI!'[Tlg~ PR!9R TQ ~;>~9_~YATt.t>!<;? P!:ANT PIT? "-"- 2. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A 6" MINIMUM DEPTH OF TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN AREAS. INSTALL SOD AROUND NEW BUILDING. WATER AS NECESSARY TO ESTABLISH SOD. 3, ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 12" MINIMUM DEPTH OF TOPSOIl. 4. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A 4" MIN. DEPTH OF SHREDDED MULCH OVER ALL PLANTING BEDS AND TREE PLANTINGS. 5. ALL PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO AND AFTER PLANTING. PLANT SPECIES MAY BE ADJUSTED BASED ON AVAlLABILIlY AT TIME OF PLANTING. 6. All PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 7. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CARRY A FULL GUARANTEE FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE, TO INCLUDE PROMPT TREATMENT OR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF ANY PLANTS FOUND TO BE INAN UNHEALTHY CONDITION BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL REPLACEMENTS SHALL BE OF THE SAME KIND AND SIZE OF PLANTS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANT LIST. 8. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING AND SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, MULCHING, TIGHTENING & REPLACING OF GUYS, REPLACEMENT OF SICK OR DEAD PLANTS. RESETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE OR UPRIGHT (PLUMB) POSITION. RESTORATION OF SAUCERS. AND ALL OTHER CARE NEEDED FOR PROPER GROWTH OF THE PLANTS. 9. WHERE ASIZE RANGE IS SPECIFIED AT LEAST 50% OF PLANTS PROVIDED SHALL BE OF THE LARGER SIZE. 10. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE TREE STAKES AFTER ONE GROWING SEASON. 11. ALL PLANTINGS MUST BE MAINTAINED AND THAT PORTION OF THE PUBLIC WAY ABUTTING THE PARCEL AND INCLUDING THE TREE BELT SHALL BEMAINTAINED IN A SAFE AND ATTRACTIVE CONDITION BY THE OWNER OF THE PARCEL I .... TRAFF Wl-l0L 36" X 36" -1---'_:"'---:-:.::= -,:... ----l ... r .. 1 I POLE WITH CUT-OFF I \ GRAVEL MAINTENANCE \ \ FIXTURES (TYPICAL) I. , ACCESS \ I I I . , , LIMIT OF ENCLOSURE I' " '11' 'I' II I I I 1 I I \ .I. I I, I ,I " I 1 , , I , 383' 1 I , , 1 , I I I , \ I \ I \~SYNTHETIC TURF~. ..\,\ , . ATHLETIC FIELDS.' ~ I , .' I . I I , , II \ I I' , i 1 1 , I SNOW STIJOCP[[_E AREAIN LAWN I '. . j L_--~----c--~------- I L_-.:--------_-~ .....,......... ~ --- ~ . (3) PA LIMIT OF ENCLOSURE LAWN (TYPICA~ I 1 , 1. I , , I I I I I , I I I , I \ I I I I 1 (3) PA DECIDUOUS _~ SHADE TREE (TYPICAL) AM(2) 15' SEBACK PA(4) "--LAWN "- (TYPICAL) (3) VD TREE k- (2) PB2 TOTAL PARKING SPACES = ±220 (3) CF 5' (3) MP (1) PB2 (3) VD (1) PB2 (4) MP (1) PB2 (1) PA AA(2) (4) CB (3) MP TIMBER--' GUIDERAIL (3) PB2 (3) MP (4) CB (5) DECIDUOUS COLUMNAR '" TREE AA(l) o (3) MP (4) CB (4) CB [lit LDI. (3) VD (5) PB2 t~~~~~::~~~::~~~~~~~~~~~B~U~FFT-E~R~P~LA~N}T~IN~G~----------------------------------~~~ PB (3) (TYPICAL) (3) PB PB2 (5) PLANT SCHEDULE SA" if" .......... /~ .. _/-/,;: 7"1 f:;;;c199.1 7 IS\.' j S53"2tf'.)kV' fi'j\i i RS .T?i<J::) TREES AA QTY 6 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME Armstrong Red Maple W1-10R W13·1P 36" X 36" 18·' X 18' NO PARKING R8-3a 24' X 30" @ R1-1 3~' X 30' HANDICAPPED PARKlNG .. ,,'" ...... ,,""l'JIflI> ""'u_"'''c_''''''' M" .... ~~_>T 0"' ...... "...... R7-8 18'X 12" ® VAN ACCESSIBLE $300 FINE I ~====IJ® R7-8P SPECIAL 6" X g" 6" X 9" NO PARKING BEYOND THIS POINT ¢= SPECIAL 18'X9' NO PARKING BEYOND THIS POINT ==::> SPECIAL 18'X9" AM TG EVERGREEN TREES PA PB PB2 SHRUBS CB CF MP SA VD 9 1 QTY 31 36 32 QTY 44 50 56 30 40 Acer rubrum 'Armstrong' Acer saccharum' Green Mountain' TM Tilia cordata' Greenspire' BOTANICAL NAME Plcea abies Picea pungens glauca Picea pungens BOTANICAL NAME Corn us sericea 'Baileyi' Corn us sericea 'Flaviramea' Myrica pensylvanica Spiraea x bumalda 'Anthony Waterer' Viburnum pllcatum tomentosum Green Mountain Sugar Maple Greenspire Littleleaf Linden COMMON NAME Norway Spruce Colorado Blue Spruce Colorado Spruce COMMON NAME Red Twig Dogwood Yellow Twig Dogwood Northern Bayberry Anthony Waterer Spiraea Doublefile Viburnum SIZE 3IlM3.S" Cal. 2,5" Cal. 3"-3.Sn Cal. SIZE 6'/7' HT. 5'/6' HT, 7'/8' HT, SIZE 4' 1fT .. MIN. 3'-4' HT, 24"-30" HT. 24"-30" HT. 3'/4' HT. SPORTSPLEX 1 SIGN SAWCUT fN V ""_:d//~{:N! ;'NV',~, i 86. 'i2;H-'; "Ii\-" i !iD,"f?iSrl 8" (TYPICAL) CONT. B&B B&B B&B CO NT .. B&B B&B B&B CONT. #5 I \ COMMENTS 6' MIN, BRANCHING HT. 6' MIN. BRANCHING HT. COMMENTS FULL & DENSE FULL & DENSE FULL & DENSE COMMENTS FULL & DENSE FULL & DENSE FULL & DENSE FULL & DENSE B,&B, 0' :20' 40' i _7m1l*1 o 11,," 1" I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 z z 0 iii ;; w 0: JJH JJH MRA DRAWN CHECKED 1 "=40' SCALE SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 5736·01 PROJECT NO. 03 OF 16 LA SHEETNAMI: • ••••••••• • -------- • ••••••••• • -------- [] S&E LEGEND SEDIMENT ALTER FENCE STAKED HAYBALES lGSF 8< HBl SEDIMENT FILTER FENC E & STAKED HAYBALES CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INLET PROTECTION m WHEN SEDIMENT DEPTHS EQUAL 12" (TYP. ALL STRUCTURES) SNOW STORAGE CLEAN-OUT 3-02 RIM=197.80 INV IN=187.66 INV OUT=187.56 206'-12" HOPE S=0.010,/FT 12" HOPE FES INV=185.50 STONE FOR PIPE ENDS FOR PIPE ENl~s---.... \ \ \ \. \ \ STONE FOR PIPE ENDS X E~. 70 12" HDPE FES INV=193.80 ------1---I. I 1 I I CLEA,y oJr 14'~8 '" HOPE I I 100'-8[' UNDERDRAIN . Pir,~' " QIJ5'/FT ..... I :fi'ilf'; lerrv 187'-8,1 1 UNDER DRAIN IN \STOfJE TRENCH i I I I I I I I \ I I 1(:";\,,,,, TOP OF FOU." .......... I"""'; ["':\6"CI,0"y WALL = 198 (lictliple,). • , IN I \ \ y. J~&·'36'-t\2 " Hr.)'PF 5=0.\(11 \. '. AREA DRAIN RIM=l INV AREA DRAIN 1-04 RIM=197.50 I INV I)I,<1,81?"B!':" -.... _ . INV (QU7t''''' 186. 57 I """'. __ .$1,....-1' 22'J /1!".f.xe. IN (N)=185.85 INV IN (E}=193.50 INV OUT=185.60 I \ I CLEAN OUT ------- -- :I,~:,8" HOPE _ --..:= ...:-~ I CLEAN ouf - \ I 50'-12'( HDRE S=O.OlJ.O'/FT CONfllfi,CT To FIELD X,,," PERIMe:rER lORAIN \ I 175'-8" UNDERDRAINI -- --A~~"!3 .. fiiR-AfNl-v£,,-;-, RIM=197.50 INV IN (W)=194.40 INV IN (N)=187.52 INV OUT =187.42 50'-12" HDPE \ I IN STONE TRENCH I I S=0.01O'/FT \ II I ... CONNECT TO FI4D I \ " 38'-6" PVC REFER TO PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR 6" PVC '-/9 . SAN SEWER LATERAL INV 4T BUILDING=195.25 PERIMETER DRAI~ I X""" "',\., I ",j, S=0.015'/FT ~--+--8" HDPE FES '.~'": ';OP OF FOUNQATIQi'. \"' ... _--,,/ SAN MH \ "fALL = ~,~8;i \ \ IN:~~:~~~:~~ I I /'I I INV OUT=194.58 I 1 /// I I I /t~ x,,; I,,' I / 147'-8" HOPE x ,yo ,.rIYORANT ~ .. --' . __ ~. ____ ._ .----· .. <:JJ~,,..)l \ ", "jl,J'1 \ 384'-8" UNDERDRAIN IN STONE TRENCH X 197 3Ci CLEAN OUT -----------x 1"').::4 i I I --- X H11AO •• ' < I I I I 205'-6" PVC S=0.015,/FT L ____ F. {:1 {:3i= =-= - ------ --_ .. - .. ' " .. ' ------ .' 57'-12" HDPE S=0.007'/FT . . . . . , . . . . . . . SANMH RIM=195.30 x ".INV IN=191.51 INV OUT=191.41" "~I I 2" COPPER WATER SERVICE i i -. ·6 ~.CLDIP FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE -..-~"'. l d !fJI . ' , ELEC1flIC& TELECOM SER VIC~ \ 1.W CLEAN OUT 2-03 RIM=197.85 INV IN=194.30 INV OUT=194.20 AREA DRAIN 2-02 RIM=197.80 INV IN=194.64 INV OUT=194.54 STONE CHECK DAM 246'-15" HOPE S=0.004'/FT GAS SERVICE CONTROL STRUCTURE 1-01 RIM=192.50 INV 4" ORIFICE =189.50 INV OUT=188.50 XliI'. ':'3 • • • • • 54!,,1 Mri --'" lNV. :;;;185. 3Z(/;iW} UvV. ,"-i B5. 32{5.; f:;.J I!,,\;.·;.l ;11. 53;'£:) •••• I ~_'" STRUCTION ENTRANCE PAD E1j~) 0 ,..,,:··k/J'/9 x i .!l1 GRADING NOTES THE RESHAPING OF THE GROUND SURFACE BY EXCAVATION AND FilUNG OR A co,..mINATloN OF BOTH, TO OBTAIN PLANNED GRADES, SHALL PROCEED IN ACCORDANCE THE SEDIMENT AND EROSION MEASURES IN ADDITION THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1. THE CUT fACE OF EARTH EXCAVATION SHALL NOT BE STEEPER. THAN TWO HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL (2:1). 2. THE PERMANENT EXPOSED FACES OF FILLS SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN nVD HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL (2: 1). 3. THE CUT FACE OF ROCK E)(CAVATION SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN ONE HORIZONTAL TO TWO VERTICAL (1:2). 4. PROVISION SHOULD BE MADE TO CONDUCT SURFACE WATER SAFELY TO STORM DRAINS TO PREVENT SURFACE RUNOFF FROM DAMAGING CUT FACES AND FILL SLOPES. s. 6. NO FILL SHOULD BE PLACED WHERE IT WILL SUOE OR WASH UPON THE INTO ADJACENT WETLANDS, WATERC OURSES, OR WATER BODIES. PRIOR TO ANY RE-GRADlNG, A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE WORK AREA IN ORDER TO REDUCE MUD AND OTHER SEDrr~ENTS FROM LEAVING THE SITE. \ \ \ I '" -.r 'CQNNi~T 6" PVC TO EXIST SMH =187.15 V.J.F. ." .f./-. "-'.! 98,83 ltV\;. -.~J.)6 65fE; IN\!. -;; ~JU. -t;'1 S ,'V N-N, ,. 18),,:t ](:~.J INV. <S6.6.'iP·) SAN f~:t; 1.'".=-l9f.fH [NV. -," i::ci. -.ilr I/t' J l.Nv·,:;;,: !bJ. 4,1:515 ) t/"l\' _.~ -, -'.-:·.i(.S I ~('j';.' :.I!. _'.J(:·U O' 20' 40' ~'ffi !Nj ~ ;:: D- b! o I/) w c en w -I- ...J -I-:::> ~ (!) Z -C ~ (!) -en ...J 0 0::: I-Z 0 U Z 0 -en 0 fl! W ~ l-Z W :E -C W en o 1/2" ~ ~ ~ ~ -ci z z 0 iii ~ a; >< w --l D- I/) I-0::: 0 D- I/) W :I: I- JJH JJH ORAWN 1 "=40' ~ (J) 1= w (J) :) Iii ~ (J « w " (J) I-~ (J) z :!: w ':f O " ~ ~ -.:t (II « MRA CHECKED SEPTEMBER 3D, 2015 5736-01 PROJECT NO. 04 OF 16 SHEEr NO. SE .1 SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL: THESE GUIDELINES SHALL APPLY TO ALL WO R:K CONSISTING Of ANY AND ALL TEMPORA~Y AND/OR PERMANENT MEASURES TO CONTROL WATER- POLLUTION AND SOIL EROSION, AS MAY BE REQUIRED, DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. IN GENERAL, ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL PROCEED IN SUCH A MANNER SO AS NOT TO POLLUTE ANY WETLANDS, WATERCOURSE, WATER BODY, AND CONDUIT CARRYING WATER, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT, INSOFAR AS POSSIBLE, THE SURFACE AREA OF EARTH f'olATER1ALS EXPOSED BY CONSTRUCTION METHODS AND IMMEDIATELY PROVIDE PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY PDLLlITlON CONTROL MEASURES TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION OF ADJACENT WETLANDS, WATERCOURSES, ANO WATER BODIES, AND TO PREVENT, INSOFAR AS POSSIBLE, EROSION ON THE SITE. lAND GRADING: THE RESHAPING OF THE GROUND SURFACE BY EXCAVATION AND ALLlNG OR A COl'-lBINATION OF BOTH, TO OBTAIN PLANNED GRADES, SHALL PROCEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: •. THE CUT FACE OF EARTH EXCAVATION SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN TWO HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL (2;1). b. THE PERMANENT EXPOSED FACES OF FILLS SHALL NOT BE STEEPER THAN TWO HORIZONTAL TO ONE VERTICAL (2;1). c. THE CUT FACE OF ROCK EXCAVATION SHAl l NOT BE STEEPER THAN ONE HORIZONTAL TO TWO VERTICAL (I ;2). O. I"t(UVl~lUN ~HUULLJ !:SE MADE TO CONOUCT SURFACE WATER SAFELY TO STOR!'1 DRAINS TO PREVENT SURFACE RUNOFF mOM DAMAGING CUT FACES AND ALL SLOPES. e. NO FILL SHOULD BE PLACED WHERE IT WILL SLIDE OR WASH UPON THE INTO ADJACENT WETLANDS, WATERCOURSES, OR WATER BODIES. f. PRIOR TO ANY RE-GRADING, A STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE PLACED AT TH'E ENTRANCE TO THE WORK AREA IN ORDER TO REDUCE MUD AND OTHER SEDIMENTS FROM LEAVING THE SITE. TOPSOILING: TOPSOIL SHALL BE SPREAD OVER ALL EXPOSED AREAS IN ORDER TO PROVIDE A SOIL MEDlUM HAVING f AVORABLE CHARACTERISHCS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT, GROWTH, AND MAINTENANCE OF VEGETATION. UPON ATTAINING FINAL SUBGRADES, SCARIfY SURFACE TO PROVIDE A GOOD BOND WITH TOPSOIL. REMOVE ALL LARGE STONES, TREE LIMBS, ROOTS AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. APPLY LIME ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST OR AT THE RATE OF TWO (2) TONS PER ACRE. MATERIAL: 1. TOPSOIL SHDULD HAVE PHYSICAL, CHEMICAL, AND BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS FAVORABLE TO THE GROWTH OF PLANTS. 2. TOPSOIL SHOULD HAVE A SANDY OR LOAHY TEXTURE. 3. TOPSOIL SHOULD BE RELATIVELY FREE OF SUBSOIL MATERIAL AND MUST BE FREE OF STONES (OVER I" IN DIAMETER), LUMPS OF SOIL, ROOTS, TREE LIMBS, TRASH, OR CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS. IT SHOULD BE FREE OF ROOTS OR RHIZOMES SUCH AS THISTLE, NUTGRASS, AND QUACKGAASS .. 4. AN ORGANIC MATTER CONTENT OF SIX PERCENT (6%) IS REQUIRED. AVOID LIGHT COLORED SUBSDlL MATERIAL 5. SOLUBLE SALT CONTENT OF OVER 500 PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) IS LESS SUITABLE, AVOID TIDAL rlJARSH SOILS BECAUSE OF HIGH SALT CONTENT AND SULFUR ACIDITY. 6. THE pH SHOULD BE MORE THAN 6.0. IF LESS, ADD LIME TO INCREASE pH TO AN ACCEPTABLE LEVEL. APPLICATION: 1. VOID SPREADING WHEN TOPSOIL IS WET OR FROZEN. 2. SPREAD TOPSOIL UNIFORMLY TO A DEPTH OF AT LEAST SlX INCHES (6"), OR TO THE DEPTH SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPING PLANS. TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER: TEHPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER SHALL BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL UNPROTECTED AREAS THAT PRODUCE SEDIMENT, AREAS WHERE FINAL GRADING HAS SEEN COMPLETED, AND AREAS WHERE THE ESTIMATED PERIOD OF BARE SOIL EXPOSURE IS LESS THAN 12 MONTHS . TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVE~ SHALL BE APPLIED IF AREAS WILL NOT BE PERMAN ENTLY SEEDED BY SEPTEMBER 1. ' SITE PREPARATION: 1. INSTALL REQUIRED SURFACE WATER CONTROL MEASURES. 2. REMOVE lOOSE ROCK, STONE, AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRlS FROM AREA. 3. APPLY LIME ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST OR AT A RATE OF ONE (1) TON OF GROUND DOLOMITIC LIMESTONE PER ACRE (S LBS. PER 100 SQ. FT.). 4. APPLY FERTILlZER ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST OR AT THE RATE OF 30 LBS. OF 10-10-10 PER ACRE (7 LBS. PER 1,000 SQ. FT.) AND SECOND APPLICATION OF 200 LBS. OF 10-10-10-(5 LBS. ~e~ 1,666 s(). FT.) WtJeN GrlAss Is ~6Uf1. mEf:j~s Wl f6 sl~ INCHES (6") HIGH. APPLY ONLY WHEN GRASS IS DRY. 5. UNLESS HYDROSEEDED, WORK IN L1ME AND FERTIL1ZER TO A DEPTH OF FOUR (4") INCHES USING A DISK OR ANY SUITABLE EQUIPMENT. 6. TILLAGE SHOULD ACHIEVE A REASONABLY UNIFORM LOOSE SEEDBED. WORK ON CONTOUR IF SITE IS SLOPING. ESTABLISHMENT: 7. SELECT APPROPRIATE SPECIES FOR THE SlTUATION. NOTE RATES AND SEEDING DATES (SEE VEGETATIVE COVER SELECTION & MULCHING SPECIFICATION BELOW). 8. APPLY SEED UNIFORMLY ACCORDING TO THE RATE [NDICATED BY BROADCASTING, DRILLING, OR HYDRAULIC APPLICATION. 9. UNLESS HYDROSEEDED, COVER RYEGRASS SEEDS WITH NOT MORE THAN 1/4 INCH OF SOIL USING SUITABLE EQUIPMENT, 10. MULCH IMMEDIATELY APTER SEEDING IF REQUIRED. (SEE VEGETATIVE COVER SELECTION & MULCHING SPECIFICATION BELOW.) APPLY STRAW MULCH AND ANCHOR TO SLOPES GREATER THAN 3% OR WHERE CONCENTRATED FLOW WIU OCCUR. EROSION CHECKS GENERAL: TEMPORARY PERVIOUS BARRIERS USING BALES OF STRAW, HELD IN PLACE WITH STAKES DRIVEN THROUGH THE BALES AND INTO THE GROUND OR GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FASTENED TO A FENCE POST AND BURIED INTO THE GROUND, SHALL BE INSTALLED AND fJAINTAINED AS REQUIRED TO CHECK EROSION AND REDUCE SEDIMENTATION. CONSTRUCTION: BALES SHOULD BE PLACED IN A ROW WITH ENDS TIGHTLY ABLmlNG THE ADJACENT BALES. EACH BALE SHALL BE EMBEDDED INTO THE SOIL A MINIMUM OF fOUR (4") INCHES. BALES SHALL BE SECURELY ANCHORED IN PLACE BY WOOD STAKES OR R01NfORCEI.4ENT BARS DRIVEN THROUGH THE BALES AND INTO THE GROUND. THE fiRST STAKE IN EACH BALE SHALL BE ANGLED TOWARD THE PREVIOUSLY lAID BALE TO fORCE BALES TOGETHER. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE SECURELY ANCHORED AT THE TOP OF A THREE FOOT (3') HIGH FENCE AND BURIED A MINIMUM OF FOUR INCHES (4'') TO THE SOIL. SEAMS BETWEEN SECTIONS OF FILTER FABRIC SHALL OVERLAP MINIMUM OF TWO FEET (2'). INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE; 1. BALED STRAW EROSION BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL STORM SEWER INLETS. 2. BALED STRAW EROSION BARRIERS AND GEOTEXTILE FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE LOCATION INDICATED ON THE PLAN AND IN ADDITIONAL AREAS I>S MAY BE DEEMED APf'ROPRlAlE: OURING GOI'tSTRUCTION.' . 3. AiL EROSION CHECKS SHAlL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL ADJACENT AREAS ARE STABIUZED. 4. INSPECTION SHAlL BE FREQUENT (AT MINIMUM MONTHLY AND BEFORE AND AFTER HEAVY RAIN) AND REPAIR OR REPLACEfJENT SHALL BE MADE PROMPTLY AS NEEDED . 5. EROSION CHECKS SHALL BE REMOVED WHEN THEY HAVE SERVED THE1R USEFULNESS SO I>S NOT TO BLOCK OR IMPEDE STORM WATER FLOW OR DRAINAGE. VEGETATIVE COVER SELECTION & MULCHING TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER: PERENNIAL RYEGRASS 3 LBS./l,OOO SQ.FT. (IOLUIUM FERENNE) PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER: I. SEE SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SEED MIX 2: TEMPORARY MULCHING: STRAW AT 70-90 LBS./I.OOO SQ.FT. (TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE AREAS) WOOD FIBER IN HYDROMULCH SLURRY 25-50 LBS./l,OOO SQ. FT. ESTABLISHMENT: I. SMOOTH AND FIRM SEEDBED WITH CULTIPACKER OR OTHER SIMILAR EQUIPMENT PRIOR TO SEEDING (EXCEPT WHEN HYDROSEEDING). 2. SELECT ADAPTED SEED MIXTURE FOR THE SPECIFIC SITUATION. NOTE RATES AND THE SEEDING DATES (SEE VEGETATIVE COVER SELECTION &: MULCHING SPEC. BELOW). 3. APPLY SEED UNIFORMLY ACCORDING TO RATE INDICATED, BY DRIWNG, OR HYDRAUUC APPLICATION. BROADCASTING; 4. COVER GRASS AND LEGUME SEED WITH NOT MORE THAN 1/4 INCH OF SOIL WITH SUITABLE EQUIPMENT (EXCEPT WHEN HYDROSEEDING). 5. MULCH IMMEDIAn:LY AFTER SEEDING, I; REQUIRED, ACCORDING TO TE~PORARY . MULCHING SPECIFICATIONS. (SEE VEGETATIVE COVER SELECTION & M.ULCHING SPECIFICATION BELOW). 6. USE PROPER INOCULANT ON ALL LEGUME SEEDINGS, USE FOUR (4) TIMES NORMAL RATES WHEN HYDROSEEDING, 7. USE SOO WHERE THERE IS A HEAVY CONCENTRATION OF WATER AND IN CRITICAL AREAS WHERE IT IS IMPORTANT TO GET A QUICK VEGETATIVE COVER TO PREVENT EROSION. MAINTENANCE: 1. TEST fOR SOIL ACIDITY EVERY THREE (3) YEARS AND UME I>S REQUIRED. 2. ON SITES WHERE GRASSES PREDO~INATE, BROADCAst ANNUALLY 500 POUNDS OF 10-10-10 FERTIUZER PER ACRE (12 LBS. PER 1,000 SQ. FT.) OR AS NEEDED ACCORDING TO ANNUAL SOIL TESTS. 3. ON SITES WHERE LEGUMES PREDOMINATE, BROADCI>ST EVERY THREE (3)YEARS OR AS INDICATED BY SOIL TEST 300 POUNDS OF 0-20-20 OR EQUIVALENT PER ACRE (8 LBS PER 1,000 SQ. FT.). PERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER FERMANENT VEGETATIVE COVER SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AS VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE PROJECT ARE COMPLETED IN ORDER TO STABILIZE THE SOIL, REDUCE DOWNSTREAM DAMAGE FROM SEDIMENT AND RUNOFF, AND TO ENHANCE THE AESTHETIC NATURE OF THE SITE. IT WILL BE AFPLIED TO ALL CONSTRUCTION AREAS SUBJECT TO EROSION WHERE FINAL GRADING HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND A PERMANENT COVER IS NEEDED. SITE PREPARATION: 1. INSTALL REQUIRED SURFACE WATER CONTROL MEASURES . 2. REMOVE LOOSE ROCK, STONE. AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS FROM AREA. 3. PERFORM ALL PLANTING OPERATIONS PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS OF THE SLOPE. 4. APPLY TOPSOIL AS INDICATED ELSEWHERE HEREIN. S. APPLY FERTILIZER ACCORDING TO SOIL TEST OR; • SPRING SEEDING: WORK DEEPLY IN SOIL, BEFORE SEEDING, 300 LBS . OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER PER ACRE (7 LBS. PER 1,000 SQ. FT.); THEN SIX (6)T0 EIGHT (8) WEEKS LATER, APPLY ON THE SURFACE AN ADDITIONAL 300LBS._OF 10-10-10 FERTIL1ZER PER ACRE. AFTER SEPTEMBER 1, TEMPORARY VEGETATIVE COVER SHALL BE APPLIED. • FALL SEEDIN-G: WORK DEEPLY IN SOIL, BEFORE SEEDrNG, 600 LBS. OF 10-10-10 FERTILIZER PER ACRE (14 LBS. PER 1,000 SQ. FT.). SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT ONTROl NARRATIVE SEDTMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS DEPICTED ON THESE PLANS AND DESCfUBED WITHIN THE SEDIMENT A ND EROSION CONTROL NARRATIVE SHALL BE lMPLEMENTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ~RMANENT COVER AND 5TABILlZATION IS ESTABLISHED. All. SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHAll. CONFORM TO THE TOWN Of AGAWAM STANDARDS, AND IN ALL CASES BEST f-1ANAGEMENT ?MCneES SHAll. PREVAIL.. 1. puR-pas!: AND DESCRIPTION Of PRO)t:c r A.) CONSTRUCTION Of ATHLETIC fACIUTIES. 6.) ESTIMATED AREA Of DISTURBANCE: :&12.0 ACRES 2. IDENTIFICATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL CONCERNS A.) CUTS AND FJLLS ASSOCIATED WITH ATHLETIC FIELD CO NSTRUCTION. e.) PROTECTION OF DN-SITE AND Off ·SITE STORM DRAINAGE. 3. ~iffil~~~~~CORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT AR£ AS f OLLOWS: .. DETAILfD SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PlAN. .. TeMPORARY DIVERSION BERMS NID TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAPS. PLANTING SOIL MIX WATER AND TAMP TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS MULCHING OF PLANT BEDS: FINISHED GRADE COMPACT SUB GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED SHREDDED MULCH SHALL BE PLACED TO A LIMIT OF ONE FOOT BEYOND THE CENTER OF THE OUTERMOST SHRUBS IN SHRUB BED. ROOTFLARE 4" DEPTH OF MULCH EDGE OF MULCH AS PER PLANS OR TO DRIPLINE OF TREE SHRUB PLANTING NOT TO SCALE DRIVE POST AT ANGLE AND DRAW VERTICAL SUPPORT POST 1/4 WIDTH ROOTBALL 2" HIGH EARTHEN SAUCER ,.--I'INIS~IED GRADE L. ...... . . . ... ,.,/< w t "'"".' R C.R .. USHEU 'STONE S. . '. •• . GEOTEXTILE (OPTIONAL) i! . l(.t.;. >"'; " ••.. "..'.1/ .... ·: _.;'<';; 'oj,' :'. c" .••• '.' ,""_.', ,,~ ·-"·f·~ ... , ....... ':. I [I 15'J,U~IIIU~ -::l!OGTION A-A - - 50'MINIMUM ::Ij:-~:::-::::~~~~~T?:~d., !"T~--.. ~l~~ti~~~i~~~~~~:fl I I I . I I A_ MA.I.N .. 1A. IN .SIDEWALK.,/-I\ ThlROUGH ENTRAN CE ". r--4--~ (IF PRESEN1) .. I I I I i I ! I r-- - NOT~S: 10 ... 'tAc8 SIn: £NTRANc:~ I:; TO fjAVE A TEMPORARy cONsTRugnQN I'N,TRf.NC;~, 2. STONE IS TO BE 1-3/4" TO 3" ANGULAR CRUSHED STONE. ~, ANY. sO:PIMENT TRAGKED INTO THE ROAOWAY. NEEDS TO BE CLEANiOO iMMEDIATELY. 4. ADD!TIONAL STONE IS TO BE ADDED TO THE PAD AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN THE ORIGINAL DEPTH. 5. ANY SIDEWALK DAM AGED DURING CO NSTRUCTION MUST BE REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTORS/DEVELOPERS EXPENSE. 6. SIDEWALK MUST REMAIN PASSABLE, IF THE SIDEWAlK BECOMES UNSAFE OR IMPASSABLE. A TEMPORARY SIDEWALK/ SIDEWAll< DETDUR MUST BE PRQVIO!;:O. SLOPED SI[)Es::~~~~i~~ 5' TILLED TOPSOIL, TIP. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE o ... , N CLEAN BACKFILL REMOVE TOP PORTION OF BURLAP ONLY COMPACT :, Utll.>IKAL)~"J BEND BACK WIRE SECTION TREE PIT RUBBER HOSE LIM IT 0 F BALL PLAN NOTE: DOUBLE STRAND NO. 12 GAUGE GALVANIZED WIRE TWISTED. DO NOT OVERTIGHTEN WIRE SUPPORT STAKES SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR ONE YEAR AFTER INSTALLATION TREE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 2EACH,DUMP ~.--------~ STRAPS EXPANSION RESTRAINT (7\" NYLON ROPE, 2" FLAT WASHERS) . C---~r-~---r--~ INSTALLATON DETAIL BAG DETAIL DUMPSTRAP----------~'< TREE PROTECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PLAN ~JPACKED STRAW ~ VIEW _-DRIP LINE LIMIT OF CLEARING AND GRADING ~-ORANGE PLASTIC CONSTRUCTION FENCE 3' MIN. Hr. 1" REBAR FOR BAG REMOVAL -.-----''''':;;:>;::-~ BINDING WIRE OR TWINE COMPACTED BACKFILL FROM INLET OPTIONAL METAl. HANGING FRA[,jE FOR TRAFFIC CONDITIONS SIL SACX"---- . 4 :" • INLET SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DEVICE FOR CATCH BASIN NOT TO SCALE DUHP STRAP 1.) EXCAVATE A tRENCH 4" DEEP AND 2" LARGER THAN THE LENGTH AND v.lDTH or THE StRAW BALE. B 2.) PLACE AND STAKE StRAW BALES, TWO STAKES PER BALE. 3_) WEDGE LOOSE StRAW BETWEEN BALES TO CREATE A CONTINUOUS BARRIER. PLAN 4.) BACKFU AND COMPACT THE EXCAVATED SOIL liS SHOWN ON THE UPHILL SIDE or THE BARRIER TO PREVENT PIPING. FIGURE 7-7 PLACEMENT AND CONStRUCTION OF A STRAW BALE BARRIER ELEVATION: POINTS A SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN POINTS B. PLACEMENT & CONSTRUCTION OF STRAW BALE BARRIER NOT TO SCALE .1' .. ".:.' . "':~~':~"~:-; NOTES: NOT TO SCALE ~ALTER FAB~C I ' 5' 06 10' MINIMUM FROM TOE OF SLOPE ~mR FABRIC SE CTION A-A HARD\\\JOO Sl~KE .... "' ... " , '. :>. ;'" ' .• ' .,-' ""'" . ~,.' " i ,.- 1. SILT FENCE IS TO BE INSTJo,LLED BEFORE ANY LAND DISTURBING ACTIVATES START AT THEC9NSTRUCTION S.TI" -OR-AS DIRECTED IN THE SiTE'S EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION PLAN· 2. INSPl:CT SjLT FENCE ON WEE~" Y BASiS AND AFTI"R EACH RAIN ANY DETERIORATED/DAMAGED SILT FENCE MUST 8E REPLACED IMMEDIATE~ Y. 3. REMOVE SILT FROM FENCE AS NEEOEO -OR-WHEN THE SILT HAS ACCUMULATED TO HALF THE ORIGINAL HEIGHT OF THE FENCE. 4. \\1-IEN JOINING TWO SECTIONS OF fEN CE, ROLL THE END STAKES TOGETHER SUCH THAT THERE Is NO GAP IN TllE FENCE, OVERLAPPING FENCE SECTIONS IS NOT AN ACCEP TABLE ALTERNATIVE SILT FENCE NOT TO SCALE COMPACT lRENCH z o ~ ~ ~ w Q :< =l ~ ~ '" ~ .; z z a Ui :> w c: CJ) ...J ~ o w !:: CJ) JJH ECR MRA DESIGNED ORA.WN CHECKED AS NOTED SCALE SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 DArE 5736-01 PROJECT NO. 05 OF 16 St-EET NO. 50-1 SHEET N.o'ME Copyright Milone & Mac8room. Inc .2015 • o M • ... , <Xl HOTMIX ASPHALT SURFACE COURSE ~~~~~~~~~~~~;»~~~~~_-HOTMIX ASPHALT BINDER COURSE ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t--DENSE qRADED CRUSHED STONE BASE (M2.01.7) ~g;~A~~~~~g;~A~~~~~ft---SUB-BASE (M 1.03.0 TYPE B, 3" MAX.) VARIES (SEE PLAN) 5" ,.-'----1" RADIUS r----EXPANSION JOINTS CONTINUOUS THROUGH TO THE fACE Of CURB (20' O.c. MAX.) 90° .CORNER POST PLAN 45° POST PLAN STRAIGHT POST PLAN I' CHAMFER (lYP.) END POST PLAN 3'-0" STONE LEVEL SPREADER AS SHOWN lLJ---COMPAcrED S UBGRADE 4 "xIO" (NOMINAL) -.....1-____ ----"6·"'-0'-· ""O",.C"". O:::R..:A;:::S~IN.!:O",ICA~TE",D'--____ -I TIMBER RAIL " . " ~ '" CHAMFER (TYP.) HOTMIX ASPHALT ACCESS DRIVE NOT TO SCALE 2% CROSS PITCH MAX. . . / FINISHED GRADE / /""HOTMIX ASPHALT WEARING COURSE HOTMIX ASPHALT BASE COURSE COMPAcrED SUBGRADE HOTMIX ASPHALT SIDEWALK '. NOT TO SCALE .---STIFF BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO DIREcrlON OF TRAVEL 3000 PSI CONCRETE WITH 5%-7% AIR ENTRAINMENT AND 6x6 W1.4xW1.4 W.W.F. NOTES 1. CONCRETE TO BE 3,000 PSI AT 28 DAYS. EXPANSION JOINT AT INTERVALS NOT TO EXCEED 20'. EXPANSION JOINT TO RUN TO THE FACE OF CURB. 2. TO BE USED IN ALL LOCATIONS WHERE CONCRETE SIDEWALK ABUTS ASPHALT OR GRAVEL. 3" 6" 6" 6" WIRE MESH #4 REBAR CONTINUOUS (TOP. AND BOTTOM) GRAVEL 4"xl0" (NO~tINAL) MORTISED RAIL 1O"xl0· (NOM INA.l ) TIMBER POST FLUSH INTEGRAL CONCRETE WALK 8t. CURB EASE EDGE CONCRETE CURB OR GRADE BEAM SHALL BE FLUSH WITH SAND/RUBBER IN FILL MIX, SEE GRADING PLAN SYNTH ETIC TU RF -SEE DETAIL I II II " II NOT TO SCALE 4" 6" MIN. ,.---CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE CURB, 3,000 PSI AND 5%-7% AIR ENTRAINED NOTES 1. TIMBER SHALL BE PRESSURE TREATED, YELLOW PINE. 2. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 90°, 45°, OR END POSTS WHERE REQUIRED, 3. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR THE ENTIRE TIMBER GUIDERAIL SYSTEM . I II II 1 II I I ---- FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION 3' STONE LEVEL SPREADER AS SHOWN ON PLAN 'l. . _.' '< . , o ~ , '" -' M S'-O" D.C. OR AS INDICATED PLAN . '" , N • 9 <0 . ... " HMA PARKING AREA PAVEMENT SECTION MORTISE TIM SER RAIL INTO POST (lYP.) 6" DEPTH x~" THICK STEEL EDGING, POWDER COAT BLACK FINISHED GRADE TIMBER RAIL 6M -1" WASHED STONE 10"xlO" (NOMINAL) TIMBER POST PROCESSED GRAVEL BASE POST AND BEAM TIMBER GUIDERAIL DETAIL COMPAcrED SUBGRADE NOTE: EXPANSION JOINTS 20' O.c. MAXIMUM SCORE.JOINTS 5' O.C. TYPICAL (SEE JOINT DETAILS) CONCRETE SIDEWALK NOT TO SCALE 3/8" WIDTH FIBER BOARD & POLYETHYLENE JOINT FILLER. JOINT fILLER SHALL BE 1" DEPTH FINISHED GRADE 5/8"x24"L PLASTIC SLEEVE & DOWEL (12" O.c.) CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION SEE DETAIL NOTE: EXPANSION JOINT PROVIDE PREFORMED EXPANSION JOINT AT ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINT, SAWCUT, AND OTHER LOCATIONS WHERE CONCRETE ABUTTS EXISTING CONCRETE. . . . . .... '" ." . . NOT TO SCALE 1" DEPTH SAWCUT , ·····4··-............. ~ ••... : .•. ", .. ~ . . .' .. .' .. . ... ,". SCORE JOINT NOT TO SCALE NOTE: CONCRETE PAVEMENT SecrlON SEE DETAIL PROVlDE PREFORMED EXPANSION JOINT AT ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINT, SAWCUT, AND OTHER LOCATIONS WHERE CONCRETE ABUTTS EXISTING CONCRETE. NOTES: 1. REFER TO SYNTHETIC SURFACE DETAIL FOR MORE INFORMATION ON BASE MATERIAL 2. PROVlDE EXPANSION JOINTS IN CURB @ 20' MAXIMUM 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ANCHORAGE OF TURF WITH SUPPLIER FOR TURF ATTACHMENT REQUIREMENTS AT CURB FLUSH CONCRETE CURB OR GRADE BEAM NOT TO SCALE ~ OF FIELD . I I SYNTHETIC TURf FIBERS FINISHED GRADE = TOP Of INFILL MIX SLOPE FINISHED GRADE TOWARDS SIDELINES EITHER DIRECTION FROM CROWN OF FIELD ---INFILL LAYER ~I._~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~---DYNAMICSTONEBASE 'i' -TOP LAYER ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~"\~~~---DYNAMICSTONEBASE :::: -BOTTOM LAYER NOTE: SLOPE BOTTOM DYNAMIC STONE LAYER AND SUBGRADE AT 0.5% TOWARD THE COLLEcrOR PIPE Ff\QM ~Ef'!TEf\ b!f'!!' 9F m!:fl, SYNTHETIC INFILL TURF NOT TO SCALE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 12" WIDE COMPOS ITE FLAT DRAIN 25' ON CENTER, CONNEcrED TO PERIMETER COULEcrORS COMPAcrED SUBGRADE 4,000 PSI WITH 5%-7% AIR ENTRAINED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE AS SH 4" WHITE LINE OR ---I AS PER LOCAL REGULATIONS 1" RADIUS 9' W:-I 14' NOT-VAN ACCESSIBLE SCALE: ~" = 1 '-0" HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN, SEE LAYOUT PLAN FOR LOCATION LINE NOT REQUIRED IF SPACE IS ADJACENT TO CURB 4" WHITE LINE OR AS --I PER LOCAL REGULATIONS I 9' I 8' : 17' VAN ACCESSIBLE ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL DETAIL . '" NOT TO SCALE I & HANDICAPPED -PARKING !,KlAl ~LATE P.EQUlRfD UH4UTHOIUZiD VEHICLES MAY I~ "~JoIOVfDAT OW""",'' EXPENSE VAN REFLECTORIZED (ENG. GRADE) WHITE TEXT AND SYMBOL ON BLUE BACKGROUND (TYP.) i-.' . , . FINISHED GRADE 4t- 0 ' Sf'~'S~~~~biit~p'~' .. ~. ~i~E~~--COMPACTED STONE SCREENINGS HOTMIX ASPHALT PAVEMENT (SEE DETAIL) ( ACCESSIBLE WHEN REQUIRED 1 r NON-WOVEN GEOTEXTILE 60' FABRIC (EXXON LANDSCAPE ~ FABRIC OR APPROVED EQUAL) '~mWIII\T~1 m. m' m!!:!mll~!lml m' .. mW0W' PROCESSED GRAVEL BASE ~L rllm I ~jJj~n ,lLrm?~\-rlm"'ill~"'c --COMPACTED SUB GRADE '11=11 "",lib I ~ "'=I I j1.lliTJ ' = "IJ.SII I:=;J I' STONE SCREENINGS MOW STRIP NOT TO SCALE MATERIAl WHERE CURB MEETS SIDEWALK APPROVED BACK Flu.. MATERIAL TAMPED PROCESSED GRAVEL BASE 6"1~~~t9~~~~~SUB BAse MIN.l' -lS~~ CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE CURB NOT TO SCALE $300 RNE D D D D D D D D D ALUMINUM SIGN (TYP.) D.P.W. BREAKAWAY POST PERMANENTLY INSTALLED INTO FINISHED GROUND ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN NOT TO SCALE HANDICAP/VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN, SEE LAYOUT PLAN FOR LOCATION LINE NOT REQUIRED IF SPACE IS ADJACENT TO CURB HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE MARKING NOT TO SCALE D.P.W. BREAKAWAY POST --~" STEEL TROWEL FINISH fINISH GRADE OR FINISH PAVING 3000 PSI CONCRETE BASE SIGN MOUNTING NOTES: FOR POST MOUNTING, USE NON-CORROSIVE 3/8" MACHINE BOLTS W/ WASHERS, 2 PER SIGN. FOR WALL MOUNTING, USE NON-CORROSIVE 3/8" LAG BOLTS WI LEAD EXPANSION SHIELD, 4 PER SIGN. NOTE: . BOTTOM OF FOOTING TO BE 1'-0" BELOW FROST LINE, EXISTING UNDISTURBED GRADE OR FINISHED GRADE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. z -:E o , ... TRAFFIC SIGN POST NOT TO SCALE ~ -~ W C W I--(f.I JJH lJj ...J a.. ~ o a.. C/) w J: I- ECR MRA DE.5IONED DRAWN CHECKED AS NOTED SCALE SEPTEMBER 30. 2015 Oll,TE 5736·01 PROJECT NO. 06 OF 16 SHEET NO. 80-2 SHEET NAME Ccpyrlslht M.lonB & ""IcBroom, lno::· 2015 NOW: THE GRANI Tr:: CURBING$HAll 13r:: INSTALLEQ ASSPECIFIEQ ON DETAIL SHEET H~4, GUTTER LINE ISOMETRIC VIEW ill T TOP VIEW FRONT VIEW SID E VIEW GUTTER LINE GRANITE TRANSITION CURB T. G SAWCU ""5,... PAVENEH T,,\ NOT TO SCALE 1 1/2'1 BIl\JIiIINOUS COt-jCRETE Ta:' COURSE 31/2" Blrul.4lNoUS COOCRElt BINDER COURSE PERt.4ANENT TEMPORARY JACK HAMMER -oR SAWCUT EDGE FOR ~P, PA'w'EUENT .. /~ WCUT STING. \):~ '. .. ,1, ' .:;~\:t:~~;9C~SSEP GRAVEL BASE C04Jfti::"', .''; COMPAClED IN 6" LIFTS .. ;:(ROWABtE Fi ll. ~l:L DEP~~A'( BE~~' ,.::"": -'''!:O'D lI! PW SJJP '" ,:::'. '. !. I~ . ;. ~ 12' Mil<. /'////t// '~,U"TS ~t DISPlAC£D f!AVEMENT I. "ATERt. ' COMPACTED IN 12· LIFTS' NOTES; I. TEN,PC)RARY PAVEMBiT Olltl't, TRENCHES IN SlllEET TO REMAIN FOR It, t.lINII.!UY or 60 D,4,ys. 'TEMPORARY PAII£IJENT 3~ BINDER COOOSE IN ONE \JFT -COLO PATgl JqiQ~_ t\S "OPlt H~.~E IJ~P _ 1'II'E H IS U~AV~lAIl!£ 2. RE~VE TEMPORARY' PA\I£MENT AHD REPLACE WTH PEAMANENT PAVEWENT J. F'A'llEMENT T1-HCKN(S'S TO BE 5-hlINIMU~. Ofl GREATER TO J.4ATOi ~5T1Nq CONDlT1ON~ 4. WHERE PAVEMENT IS CUT 2',...0-OR LESS FRON EDCe: Of RO.AtD, REPAVING TO EXTEND TQ EDGE OF RaAD~ 5. EDGE rF EJCJST\NG PAI,£l,jENT SHAll BE lREAlID WiTH " TACK qDAT PRl9R TO P!-A~T OF ~ P£Rt.lANEHT PATOi. fI, EXCEPT AS OlHER'MSE OIRECTED BY THE D.P.W. SUPT .. Tl£ EDGE QF ilAVEUENT ADJACErH TO PATCH SHAlL ~. HE.!-lEO '!YIlH INFRARED EQUIPMENT TQ SEAL, THE JOI~TS, PERMANENT PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT SEE DETAIL H-\ FOR THICKNESS HMA TOP COURSE HMABINDER NOT TO SCALE TYPE VB VERTJCA~ GRANITE CURB HEIGHT VARIES 15' -17' GRAVEL BASE ~l:(?l--1-------_ \---~ _______ -=tj~"~:~ CEMENT CONCRETE GRAVEL SUBBASE PROCE:WRE DE:S'CRI:BEO 'H£HEIN IS IIPPUCA:8LE IDa,y t; CURB IS Til :IE S~T AfTi;Ij:' lASE AND/OR lrNDER COUIUE f'aII:E IN PLACE. DJnERIo'JSC CEHEh'T CDNCliEn: \lllI.: :a.E: EUMI~IITrn II~D GRAVEL 'W1LL BE BRlJJ(jI1T LP iO THl BDrTtlM 1lF' THE lASE c:a.R~ rD~ r£~RJPnl>l, HATERlIILS Af.lD CCti$TIlUCT~ Ncnms, sa $I'CCYJCATIQNS, NOTES: 1. SHALL CONFOR~ TO M9.04·1 ~NLESS OTHERI'I1SE STATEQ 2 ,WT NEAT LINE 6· FROM CWRB L1N€ AND ~'MOVE BINDE~, BASE AND STONE, AND REPLACE \\HH CEMENT CONCRETE. 3. ACCEPTABLE CEMENT CONCRETIS ANY CLASS UND ER SECnON ~4 OF THE 1988 MHD STANDARD SPECIFlCATION S: ALL TEST REQUIREMENTS ARE WAIVED. HMA IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE SUBSITUTE. 4. \\l1EN ~T ON RADII, TH< C~RBING SHAlL 8E CUT \\ITH THE REQUIRED RADIUS OF CURVATUlE. VERTICAL GRANITE CURB NOT TO SCALE BEGIN VERTIC AL GRAN ITE CURBI NG~.-·. /-.~ .•. tE:: FULL HE[(;HT J b,;:'-UUt<1::Ill\ltJ TAPER TO RAMP DETECTABLE I.{ARNING PANEi." <SE~ MHD DRA\lIN~ ~M/E 107.6.~R) FULL HEIGHT , 6.S' CURBING __ _' TAPER TO RAMP ~EE SHEE~ H'~ FOR L£NGTli~ NOTE (fROM TOWN CODE SECTION 159-33, HDN!JMENTS)I I, ALL PROPOSED MONUMENTS SHD'WN ON THE DEfINITIVE PLAN SHALL BE INS TALLED AND THE1R INSTALLATJliN SHALL BE CERTlFlED BY THE DE VELOPER'S ENG1NEER DR SU~VEYOR. MONUMENTSSHA~L BE OF STONE OR CAST CONCRETE, FOUR (4 ) INCHES ' SQUARE AND THREE FEET LPI'Ki, SET FLUSH 'WITH me FINlSHED GRADE., THREE-FPURTHS-lNCH TO ONE INCH STEEL PIPES DR GUN BARRELS THREE (3) FEET LONG HAY BE USED AT LDT CORNERS. "'HERE STREET MONUMENTS AND LOT CORN ER'S OCCUpy THE SAME POINT, STONE DR CONCRETE MONUMENTS SHALL BE USED. 1tl<3' . SIDEI'!A :,' ; . ".' • • OUND (rw) m • • i<f • • • THIS SHEET '0 • • • • ; ... • • • • • • .,. • • .. • lliUE:. 1. FOR SIDEWALK CURB CUT SLOPES. AND TRANSITION LENGTHS REFoR TO DETAIL SHEET H-i \lHE RE ALU1\lED BY 1O\lN ENGINEER, DUE TO SPACE CONSTRAINTS, ETC CURB HEIGHT MAY BE RED UCED TO SIDEWALK CURB C UT NlS 2. JOINTS TO BE Q 5 rOOT INTERVALS (ON RADIUS, 5 FEET IS MEASURED ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE AND ARE TO BE RADIAL TO THAT POINT 4' BPIJEEN RAMPS SIDEWALK CURB CUT NOT TO SCALE CONCRETE COLLAR PLACE AROUND 'VALVE BOX PRIOR TO FINISH PAVING. SEE C~C. COUAR DET~LS 6~ VAlVE MEatANICAL JOINT VALVE BOX ASPHAL.T CURB ' ASPHALT PAV[),jENT SEE DETAIL. H'IORANT SEE SPEC PLACE 1/2" C. Y. ~IN. WASHED OR BROKEN STONE AROUND H'fOOANT DRAIN ),:;~~~~~:~ rD? -.m:~-III----,,~""-----;fI}--~' :~~~~':: UEOALUO .... J. H'l'ORANT T~' j,lEGAWG . 6~ 0.1, NIPPLE PE i PE NOTE: WrlEN HYDRANT IS ON lHE END OF lHE UNE PRo?E~ 'JHRUST ~~~:~ I~D IS TO a£ SPECIFEO BY THE DESIGN ENGINEER AND lHE PROPER RESlRAINT DISTANCE SHOWN ON THE PLANS M.J. SHOE W RETAINER GLANDS HYDRANT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE NOlES; 1. ALL ~DEWAll( SLDPEEiS~AR~E!J~~~lR~EEiea:TJSL~WE~~'S~T~O~B(~~~T~~W~~TO THE BEST EXTtNT PRACTICABlE. 2. AA£ ;0 BE TO nlr FOUND IN J. ALL .DEWAll(S Ill! 10 BE 4000 PO (28 DA\') Pa<TlNID "'WENT CCIDlETE. W1X ~R !1/lRAJl'ED. i. cma:NG TO BE \{RTICAL GRANITE CURB -OR-CAST IN PlACE PORllAND CEJ.£NT CONCRElE If SUBlllJTEl TO tJiD APPROVEQ BY [IPW. SCORE UNES 0 5'-0~ IIHERVAlS 6. ~EN THE SIDEWAll( 5 INSTillED ON .A C~~VE, 11£ ~l_Q" SCQ!f LJtU; INTERVA~ IS WEA~RE ~ /1.000 THE ~~DE 11£ ~~ 10; TOOL All ..Kl11flS AND EDGES 11. Yet1E:N TRANg110NI~C rnow ~T1CAL GR.ulI~ OJRB to NODIRED nfE 2 BERM A .. FT GRANllETRANSlTlON IS REQUIRED. ATTrI.lPTlNG TO BLEt.lQ THE l10IllRED 1\1'E 2 IlEI!Jj TO THE GIlA~TE CURBING, OR RnD CUTllNG A ORAl'ITE lROOllON ARE NOT AN ACCfPT.IBl£ AlTERNATIVE. 12. SlJEWAlK IS TO BE PClJRED IN AlTERNATING 20" L£N.(ffiiS TO ACCOONT FOR PANEl. CONTRN:llON DURI~ OR.,,~. -. U INST.fIJ. 1/t THICK PRUOONEO IDANOON JOI)jT Fll£R (1.I.9.1!.O) AT 20' IlTERVAlS 14. BROC».I FIIJSH SIDEWALK OPPOSITE 10 mE DflECDQfi (i' TRAIJEL t5. s[)£wAlK IS REQlJRED TO BE COVERED 'Mn-I pusnc AND kEPT !.laST FOR WINNOW OF 72 HouRs N"TE" IT HAS SET-lJP. 16. OETECTAB!£ WARtING PANEl. ARf TO CCJ.lPL Y Y1UH NJf-. 4.2~.2 1'7: DETECTABlE WARNING PAte.. TO BE CAST tI PlACE DElECTABlE WARNING PANEL. 24-X60", fEDERAl.. YELiOW; lTE~f. 24601OPAD2Y. lED. BY; A.DA S(X,UTIONS IN~. , SURVEY C~ClE. mo FlR. N. BILLER~A. NA 01B6~ \\\WI.ADA~ILC<)l -00-APPROVE~ EQUAL 18. Sl1EWALKS ARE TO BE INSTAll.ED THROUGH QRlVEWA)'S, SI[)EWAlJ( fiNISH ~$ TO BE BROOY flNISHED, NO AlTffi~Al£ mliSH IS ALlO,(@ !,~, STM!~D, EPOXY FINISHEIl. ETC., ... THE 1.50: (:to.50X) C~OS$'';llCPE MUST BE ~AJNTA.lNED THROOGH DRI\EWAYS. 19. ANY CHANGES ~ SOUNDS, PINS, EASENENTS, AND rOOM-A'S SHOUlD BE SHO'" ON AMENDED DEnNInVE PWls PRIOR TO THE SIGN CfI' Of THE PLm1 UST. 20. ALLlI<lI!lI!'NTA]ON 5 TO CQNPIY III)H MlAW6\1 TO\\\< I'OQ( SECTION l~"Jl BIlIJ/ • • UinlmlllJ! Higt-~ld~ RaOidwa Pitch Tr.1nlidon Length· ., Curb ,>;'~V ' {l::"1:':-:::':'~" ',,1:',,'il," '~:,~~ :}~. '·';V' ';;0 TO 0.5 r-9-:~·_?6.5TOf·'~;< !,;:'?~:'N/>' :~~;:££nC:: >1 TO 1.5: 9',.' 3~ ,;1:)~t~ TQ2~i.~_~: ;:tt}~;> ,U'<iO'lj·;:·-;':.O;i' >ZT0 2.!i 11'-0" ,,~·-':;>2:5TQ:l'_:';·". ~~.:~).~,~ 12!-rc ~':"Zj~~: .>3 TO 3.5 13' -9'" :'?'·:;:::·~3:5TCi "4 ~-~':': "(1. ~:'. 15',~6"i~':---,;,,?=rr :i>4 15' -6- '!HE ABOVE LENGTHS ARE ~CUl.Al[l) USING ruE" 7.!lI PANEl. SLOPE. USE: Of' SHAU.C~ CRADES ~ REQUIRE l.O~R IiGH SlD~ 'AtfC) LOW SIDE TR~SI~ IDC1MS. ~ECK WITH TIlE TO""'" ENctIEER _ BEFOftE USiNQ ANY' GAAl)£S B[S!O[S THOSE umD IN ~ T...a.t ABO't£. TAll.E VAIitfI«j ~ (SEE ttm DRA\IlNG l IVE JJ1.6.5IU SIDEWALK CURB CUT W I DETECTABLE WARNING PANEL NOT TO SCALE A_4_ S_4_ P """ VARIES 12'_20' VARIES O.2~\ IINE_-, " ,., r " g~. ,,0 '0 5:1 MAX. o~ SIDEWALK " "'0 5% MAX, on ",-H SLPPE ...:-tt . SLOPE r CURB REnJRN 12'-16' • ",0. 5.0'Y " . TREEBELT "' ',~O ,,0. "" ,"oj "19 a" BERM - .;. I on", I A ..-J / S.J ,- GUTTER LINE C L '" TREE8ELT SlDEWA{ K 'l~ 3."% SLOP~ 1.50% ;;0.50% GUTTER LINE ~! ;... b 0li) : .,.0 0.54' BERM '" " r-..~ 0 .; COO 6.'Q- LIN ROPERTY UNE SECTION A-A 1.50:1 :O.50lI GUTTER UNE --, S,-~f-':...-,-'--:~~:=:::::::'·""·'----- --____ -c-___ ~1~.!.rL_:'IP=P-~:~~5-·~-~-·--~:U·~· ______ ~·"~"l·g... • MAXIM UM --~ ~g ..... ci ... SECTION B-S SIDEWALK VAR IES DRIVEWAY SIDEWALK I "--...L I VARIES 11~ I ~ "! ... ... " ~ r SECTION C-C NOTES: 1. CONCRETE; SIDEWAL~ IS TO ~UN CONnNUOUSLY THRDUGIj DRIVEWAys 2: CONCRETE USED SHALL BE 4000 PSI WITH A MAX: ~GGRECATE SIZE OFJ/4" AND SHALL CONTAIN ~-7:!> ENTRAINED AIR. 3. CONCRETE DEPTH DEPTH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 4' WITH A MINIMU~ DEPTH of ,r' III DR,VEWAYS 4. 9DEWALKS 9'IOULD BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE APpU C"nON FOR A BUILDING PERMIT UNLESS THE BUILDER REQUEST'> IN WRITING THAT THE SIDEWALKS BE DELAYED AND GUARANTEES THAT THE SIDEWAL~ WILL CONFORM TO THE STANDARD DRIVEWAY DETAIL 5, ALL DRIVEWAYS REOUIRJ; A DPW DRIYEWAY PERMIT 6. ALL SLOPES A~E MAXIMUM. DRIVEWAYS ARE TO BE DESIGNED SUCH THAT WATER \\Ill. NOT FLOW INTO DRIVEWAY FROM THE ROADWAY. 7, DRIVEWAY SHALL BE PLAOED SQ l~~T STREET INFRASTRUCTURE. SUCH AS, F!RE HYDRANTS. \!lIUTY POLES AND CATCH BASINS, ARE LOCATED NO CLOSER THAN SFT TO THE POINT WHERE THE DRIVEWAY'S CURB RETURN MEETS WITH THE STREEn cURB LINE. STANDARD RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY NOT TO SCALE z o ;:; S. ~ ~ Q en ...I -« .- W C w !:: en :I: , , '" ~ -• Z Z 0 00 ~ II: JJH DESIGNED ~ w en >< ::l W I-J; u ..J W « Q. w c.:: en (/) I-~ ~ en z 0 w ~ Q. Q (/) c.:: « w « ~ (!) :J: v (!) I-C1l « ECR MRA DRAWN CHECKED AS NOTED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 DATE 5736·01 PROJECT NO. 07 OF 16 SHEET NO. 50-3 SHEETHAA£ Copyflght Mlklf'.a & ~'I3cafOOIl1.lnc· 2015 I Ji'------.. , IA , II \ , I ) , 1/ , ~I V -----III,' 8/t Drillewe,Y I I I ~l ~---~o--------~l I '0 I IS', I I 2 1.63' ----------L ___ _ E SEMENT DI KS/PINS TYP PAil-KING STALL TYf;l 18' X 9' '" f, ! \ i \ SIG DIST~NCE EAS MENfr \ I \ EAS ME~T \ DIS '" IPfNS TY? I I ~f . \ I " \ , SIGN LIMITS 2" 5'-10" 2" LIMITS OF LETTERING r ----------------------------------------~~--------------------------------------------------~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i . . AGAWAM1 MASSACHUSETTSJ L ____________________________ ~_--------------------_____ ~_.~~-.~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <fJ I--:E ~ Cj '" Z I.!) -<fJ \ \ \ \ \ --1._, SPLIT FACE CMU'S TO MATCH ACCESSORY BUILDING ARCHITI"CTURAL (COLORS TBD) ___ FINISHEDGRADE~--~--_r--~L---._---L--_,----1---,_---1----,_--JL--~----L---~---L--~----1---_r---1----r---JL---r----L---,----L--~----1---lr---1~~r_--~--_r~-JL---r_---L--~----L---lI--~----r_--~---r--~ '" ,..; ---'"'--" ------..... -... ----- ENLARGED DETAIL B SCALE: 1" = 10' 1"¢ RETENTI ON U.BLE \11TH TYP I C~.L THIMBLE EYE END S (M IN 3REAKING STRE NGTI OF 103,000 LBS) SUPPLIED 8 Y AIR STR UCTURE MANUFACTURER -/ TOP OF CO~ICRE,E BEAM TO BE IfI S,ALLEC FLU SH WITH INTERleR AND EXleR OH G~AC[S 12" " .. .~ .. 15" " • f , .. , " , ~--P,IR STRUC TU"E ~1EMBRANE EXTRUDED PROFILE SUPPLIED BY AIR STRUCTU RE MANF. CAST INTO CONCRETE BEAM BY CONC RETE CONTRA CTOR --1~;'" NEW CONCRETE BEAM (SOIL FORMED) 3500 psi (25 MPo) MIN. STRENG TH 5% -8% AIR ENTRP.II"IENT • c/w REINFO.'CI'IG BY CONCRETE CONTR,'CTOR • · • RE fEN TION CABLE ANCHOR SUPPLIED BY AI~ STRUCTURE "AN UFP,cm,E~ CAST I~TO ~ CO NCRIC It: BEAM BY <= CONeRE IE CONTRACWR 8 CABLE ANCHOR RECESSED "- INTO 13" WIDE x 18" LONG ~ o x 7" DEEP POCKET FOR CD « SEASO fl AL COI,CEALMCNT " ..JJ..-,,-'cr-'·-14 -#5 (1 5\~) HORZ. BARS 4 -CS (1 5M) HORZ BARS CON TINUOUS @ 10" o.c. MAX ",'-' ;.-Z Q<= -' -' « 3< ." <C w co ,.-o , , • , ' . • • , ., • • -." , 4" • 4" COVER 'COVER -. . -,.~ -. , ~. " '. . ., " , " , " , , , . " . . , :i .:.;; • • ~ '" ~. ~. . , • CONTINUOUS @ 12" o.c. MA X . v--2 -#4 (10M) VERTICAL L BAR S @ 12" o.C MAX. 2x4 SHF AR KE Y , , 00 • • ~ u..'~ .11 33" "'''- w o '" ," L ---0 '. ~ ..L. ____ ~ .. .::..L ~-=-----'-t~~__'_:::-:-:::-:-:--:-:::=-':::-=__:__"'_i___i~~~~%:' 36" 32" TOTAL WIDTH OF BEAM -:-;:;;---4-- #4 (101.1) DOWELS @ L.t' o.c. 28" 3E" 2" WA LL A8~)vE FOO-I~G #4 (1 0M) DOWEL S I---:.:...---l-----".c.:=--=-"-":....-------+--------j @ 12" o. c 56" OVE.'A LL V~D TH OF BEAM FOOTING GRADE BEAM SEC TION -WITH IN CAB LES - SC ALE 1" = 1'-0" #4 TIES @ 12" (8) #6 BARS PLAN SEE "ENLARGED ~ DETAIL A" \- \0 , N o , N o , 3" (TYP.) %"x10' COPPER CLAD GROUND ROD I I -"bTT,~ 2'-0"0 ELEVATION / / / / / 24"0 CONC. FOOTING 3" COVER LIGHT POLE INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER 1" BEVEL (TYP.) (4) ANCHOR BOLTS, VERIFY SIZE AND LOCATION WITH LIGHT MANUFACTURER (COORDINATE WITH REBAR LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED) 3" MIN. COVER FINISHED GRADE 1lt2" RIGID CONDUIT (MIN.) PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR (8) #6 BARS #4 TIES @ 12" PARKING LIGHT POLE FOUNDATION DETAIL SCALE : %"=1'-0" / / / RAIL TIE WIRE (9 GAUGE WIRE 14" O.C.) 1'-6" I I TOP RAIL / / CHAIN LINK FABRIC, 2" MESH SIZE, 8 GAUGE (11 GAUGE COREboME POST CAP KNUCKLE SELVAGE TOP AND BOTTOM TERMINAL / CROWN CONC. FOOTING TO PREVENT ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Lr--PONDI NG t: AROU ND POST TENSION BAND AS REQUIRED O.D. BOTTOM RAIL .. • o iD ' , M r... 10' H-~~~~-~!........~~~-,~__;rl ." CHAIN LINK FENCE POST AND RAIL SIZING .. I " •... EQ EQ. 1'-0" NOTE: CONCRETE FOOTING ----4 ~. I • 3,000 PSI • COMPACTED""",-.. . " SUBGRADE, TYP. ~IIEW=III;jl 11:::.:l I I:"-JTT== 1. ALL CHAIN LINK POSTS, RAILS, FABRIC AND HARDWARE TO HAVE A THERMALLY FUSED AND BONDED PVC POWDER COAT . COLOR: BLACK CHAIN LINK FENCE NOT TO SCALE POST 0 R RAI L TYPE TERMINAL OR COMMON LINE POST TOP RAIL INTERMEDIATE RAIL BOTTOM RAIL GATE POST GATE FRAME SPLICE TO LUMINAIRE WIRING #6AWG BOND TO POLE (4) ANCHOR BOLTS. VERIFY SIZE AND LOCATION WITH LIGHT MANUFACTURER (COORDINATE WITH REBAR LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED) 3" MIN. COVER I lW' RIGID CONDUIT (MIN.) PROVIDED AND INSTALLED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR I I :J CONNECTION PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS %"X10' COPPER CLAD GROUND ANCHOR ENLARGED DETAIL A SCALE: 3"=1'-0" 6FT HIGH FENCE 2-7/8" 2-3/8" 1-5/8" NONE 1-5/8" 2-7/8" 1-7/8" / / (J) ...J -~ W C w !::: (J) I :r: ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ -0; Z <II Z 0 iii :; w 0: JJH DESIGNED SCALE ® ~ --1=0 ","" 0'1'1'3 ~ --0 NO~~ C{j ;;;-S ~ ~ _ 0 ~~~8 "8 ,.t::l ow:-e ~ ~"'i.l=~ ..... ~.a ~ "'8 ~o ~ "iI~ ~ .,..... 00 ~...e 0 U "d,o ~~-o-", S ",'" S . ",'" ~ p --~ ~ IV 0 .~ M 8\1')p.,-~(f.l~ ~ ~ I I , , , [ ECR MRA ORAWN CHECKEO AS NOTED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 DATE 5736-01 PROJECT NO. 08 OF 16 SHCETNO. 50-4 SHEET NI'J.£ Copyright MIlOne & MacBroem. Inc ·20111 SEE NOTC ","m~~ ED CONCRETE REINFORC OUTLET S WITH 8" W TRUCTURE ALLS BonOM OF BASIN IIljllllllm IIljlllldlllll a )"." . ' ':' IG-. ; , "<1': "R····.;··.: FOOTIN " • • ~ -, . .< , , " · • • • · I-" ~'" • " " . .. ~ .. ~ , • • · • . " • ", • : , 8" -1/2" CRUSHED STONE BoDDING : ' \ . • ". :" )- , #4@ 12 D.C. ..: • :r . - EMERGENCY OVERFLOW GRATE L-SEE PLAN VIEW t t .• " , "I """" 8' OVERFLOW EL. r< " . !'-OVERFLOW WEIR " . " FRONT SIDE ONL y · · · • · , • • • • " " " • I" [:>-#4 @ 12" D.C . · f------------~, .' .I=-" ~ OUTLET PIPE --~ f.-· ( " • • \ · • / ~,~ .~ • · • • • n. :E · ::J • V1 , . ., " 12" .J .. , l' • · ~ (typ) J -3" LAP " . • i" • • , , " • , 0: , " ! . · ~ .~ .~ " ?; • ....... ' . ~ ~ ' . • , , ~ " • " . . " . , • ~ . :r )-:r :r Y FRONT VIEW NOTTO SCALE REINFORCED CONCRETE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE WITH 8" WALLS BLACK ANODIZED ALUM. TOP GRATING TO BE 1-1/2" X 3-1/16" SWAGE LOCKED FLUSH TOP BAR GRATING. OUTSIDE DIMENSION OF GRATE: 54" BY 42". SUSPEND GRATING OVER STRUCTURE. <I 3-1/4" 1/2" BY 1/2" BoVEL (TYP.) <I NOTCH DETAIL NOTTO SCALE <J B"W x 8"L x B"H CONCRETE CKS INTEGRATED INTO r BLO OUT LET STRUCTURE AT ALL 4 CORNERS r/~v :-V OUTL~ PI~ / II II . I to- ~ ... 1-" -' -< " ;-w Iu .. '" u z 0 u 1+ , I I OVERFLOW WEIR FRONT SIDo ONLY I 5'-4" (4'0" INSIDE WI 8" REINFORCED CONe. WALL) PLAN VIEW NOT TO SCALE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE NOT TO SCALE RAISED .DlAMOND ~RFAc:e: DE~~N COVER TO READ "DRAIN" IN 3" HIGH UTTERS COVER TO BE EQUAL TO "LEBARON L26C2" AS APPROVED BY lHE TOYiN ENGINEER I II A 2'" 101 24" MANHOLE COVER N.T.S. :.101.6..1 I a L'~~---------ffl~ 2fi 1/4- (2) PICK Hct.ES REQI,IIRED FRAf.lE TO BE EQUAL (AS APPROVED i;3YllIE TOWN ENGINEER) TO -LEBMON LK 110A~ TOTAl WEIGHT OF FRAME &CQVER .... -4sa LBS I I ~~l ~~,." ~ili3~~r~" I ~112· I SECTIQN A-A 24" MANHOLE FRAME U.s. 1!li.7.r DRAIN MANHOLE FRAME &. COVER NOT TO SCALE ALUMINUM MANHOLE STEP DROP FRONT DESIGN CAST IN WALL I STANDARD MANHOlE FRAME AND COVER . TO BE LABELED "DRAIN" o;<r==~ -'''~~------'::'''-'''\~~'¥"~~ BRICKS MAY BE USED FOR GRADE ADJUSlI.IENTS ~ l . t.IiH. ',. FRAME TO BE SET IN FULL BED OF MORTAR .. ' ~~ .~ SEAL PIPE CONNECll0NS ______ . " ~. ~ PROVIDE "V' OPENINGS PIPE OPENINGS TO BE PRECAST IN RISER SECTION _---MORTAR ALL JOINTS I.AIN. 0.12 SQ. IN. STEEL PER VERTICAL FOOT •. PLACED ACCORDING TO AASHTO DESIGNAll0N M19~ 1 -113 BAR AROUND OPENINGS FOR PIPES 1S" DIAMETER AND O"VER, 1" COVER FLOOR OF STRUCTURE TO 8E HEADERS LAID FLAT BRIa< CHIPS AND MORTAR OR CEMENT CON CRETE CLASS "A" (If' HAND MIXED SEE LATEST SPECIFICATIONS) INVERTED ARCH ~TH . '--"~ BRICKS LAID ON EDGE NOTE: FOR DESCRIPTIONS, MATERIALS. AND CONSTRUCTION MEn--IODS; SEE LATEST SPECIFICAllONS , 11/2" ~ - Il"\ ,J , '--- JOINT DETAILS rtf' "UN, 1 J , e I ,. • PRECAST UNIT o ~ f:::;~:::;:::;:::;~:::;:::;:::;:::;:::;~\'l PRECAST RASE L i D ,.~ I I ~ BASE DETAILS NOT TO SCALE CAST IN PLACE BASE • ., I wm:. 1. WHERE PRECAST CONCRETE UNIT IS USED FOR SUMP, lHE TOP OF lHE UNIT SHALL BE AT LEAST 6' BELOW lHE BOTTOM OF lHE PIPE OUTLETTING FROM lHE CATCH BASIN. '---NORMAL FINISHED GRADE , o , .• ~---BRICK, CLASS "A' CONCRETE OR ~ " ;: . ::I , , b , , 'c", ~ ~ , .' . --. ,,~". ::' -i s :1 4"-0" • 5'-4-I--~--';;---j. Is" r SECTION A-A DOWNSPOUT (SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS) PVC DOWNSPOUT ADAPTER PVC CAP FOR CLEANOLfT (SCREW-IN) FINISH GRADE III II II I, TO SITE STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM MASONRY CONCRETE UNITS. IIl-IERE BRICK OR MASONRY CONCRETE UNITS ARE USED. CORBEUUNG WLL BE PERMITTED. MAXIMUM CORBEUL TO BE 3" • CLASS "A" CONCRETE OR PRECAST UNIT YARD DRAIN NOT TO SCALE ".' ~ IN SANDY SOILS ',. APf'L Y DAMP- PROOFING ON 4 WALLS SECTION B-8 NOTE: INLINE DRAIN ALTERNATE YARD DRAIN AND GRATE FOR ShlALL AREAS ADJACENT TO BUILDINGS. WHEN B' PIPE IS SPECIFIED 6" PVC DOWNSPOUT CONNECTION NOT TO SCALE AREA DRAIN AND GRATE NOT TO SCALE 6' PVC SDR 35 ~ . NOm S EE UTIUTY PLAN FOR A PPROPRIATE FITTINGS =::;> FLO W 0 ~v PIPE AS SPECIFIED (SEE PLAN) ~ r:-REMOVABLE CAP -FLUSH WITH GRADE FINISH GRADE I"'"'" I '" w c ~ '" Q. ~ I,.-i WYE CON =::;> FLOW NEcnON 24" GRATES/COVERS PEDESTRIAN GRATE HAS H-l0 MEDIUM DUTY RATING QUALllY: MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO ASThi A536 GRADE 70-50-05 MATERLo\L: DUCTILE IRON PAINT: CASTINGS ARE FURNISHED WITH A BLACK PAINT LOCKING DEVICE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST PRICE INCLUDES FRAME '" GRATE/COVER AS MANUFACTURED BY NYLOPLAST, BUFORD, GEORGIA OR APPROVED EQUAL PEDESTRIAN APPROX. DRAIN AREA = 164.10 SQ. IN. APPROX. WEIGHT WITH FRAME = 99.50 LBS. INUNE DRAIN 24" AREA DRAIN/YARD DRAIN GRATE NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE z o ;:: 0-iii: u (J) w c Cf) ..J ~ W c W I--en I ~ ~ ~ ~ '2 I'" , ~ ci z z 0 in '> w '" JJH DESIGNED U) I: w U) >< :::I J: W l-e) ..J W 0.. w < C/) £t: U) I-~ I-U) 0:: z ::i! 0 w ::! 0.. 0 C/) £t: ~ W < (!) < ::I: ~ (!) I-CO> < ECR MRA DRAWN CHECKED AS NOTED SCALE SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 DATE 5736"01 PROJECT NO. 09 OF 16 SHEET NO. 50-5 SHEET NA.ME C{]pyrl.# Mlbnl! & M"cl>room, Irc.2015 rifT UR TQ 10' FROM HOUSE •. s"/FT INSIQ~ 10 FT pva MAIN SEilER.,.......,,....,,,.;! !3\JILOING. SEWE~ LONGSWEER 4-5." BEND PRPPERTY UNE ~.·l Ii. PLAN -ALTERNATE TEE WYE 4' MIN,COVER ~r;ss THAN MIN. MLJ$T ~E APPROVED CITY GIN~:pr , ,45' LONG· s.wr:EP 4~' BEND 45' WYE PVC BUILDING SEWER SECTION NOTES: ,. BUILDING SEWERS SHALL ElE 4"\'1 EXCEPT AS DIRECTED BY mE ENGINEER ~. LO«AlJON AND pEPmS Of BUILDING SEWERS T9 se DETERMINED IN THE FIELD 8Y mE ENG.INEER 3. AiL PIPE TO BE"RING~ ilTE" (RUBBER GASKElJ BUILDING SEWER CONNECTION NOT TO SCALE RAISEO OIAMONP SURFACE DESIGN COI£R TO READ "SEWER~ IN JW HIGH LEmRS COlIER TO BE EQUAL TO "LEBAAClI{ LJ2.C19- AS /lPPROItU) BY -WE TOYIN EHQtiEQi FRA"':E TO E£ EQiJAL (AS ipPROVED BY 11-£ TO'fttol ENGINEER) TO MLE~ARCXi lC32S- TOTAL WEIGH OF FRAME 'Ai ,COVER -551 les ~I ___ --"3::..' 3""10..'"_--.,,,.--11 ~_I ~..,~ I ' ?': li ;= a . 101 . --r /-LIiL I 30" MANHOLE COVER N.U. :201.8.1 I I SEC]QN A_A 30' MANHOLE FRAME TYPE 'C ' KU _ .. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE FRAME & COVER NOT TO SCALE PVC MAIN SEWER PICK HB.£S REQUIRED COM BAc BY 'ITI'~ ." "I;: '" '" PACTED ~RANULAR > KFILL AS APPROVED 8 THE ENGINEER ~ . ./0,. t.. "",, ·""v"vov .• 0 INITIAL BACI(FlLL " () Q.,... . -. :t: ~ . ... "-'" " "<><>~<>44 ..J 44~ " 6' ~ 1 '" w /' .-" ... " D/2 '" SPRINt; LINE Of PIPE ... Z HAUNCHING '\.. / ~ D/2 (SEE NOJE ~l '" BEDDlNG ~' ::0: '" (SEE NDTE 3) vv,,~~ ,v,. ""CRUSHED STONE AS ORDERED BY FOUNDATION THE ENGINEER NOTES, 'If ,II · I, THE INSTALLATION OF PIPE SHALL CONFORM HJ THE REGllUREHENTS OF ASTM STANDARD l}-2J21. e. THE EMBEn~ENT MATrRIAL SHALL·BE 3/4' CRUSHED STONE; 3. USE H~ND DR I£CHAHICAL T~MPING TO COMPACT' THE ~EDDI~ (lND HALiNCHING. . . '-. '. --,_'c'," ,.'", 'u' -.'.' -'.' -- -,~. . ... GEDIEXTll..E TD BE' !J~E~ \!!:IER:E; -"ND "S D~~EC;TE»-]I:'( E~NE£;R. SANITARY AND STORM SEWER TRENCH SECTION "NEENAH" R-750p SERIES FLOOR BOX FRAME AND LID. OR "QUAL w/s.s. CAP SCREW LID CLOSURE----,.. C1ASS "A" CONCRETE BIT. CONC. PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED NOT TO SCALE 24-" SOUARE 11 1 2' 1/2" 6" 12" 16" ~"L..J-''''-Hl1::I--' ~ j" CLEAN OUT w/ , .r _ SCREw IN PLUGS VARIES SWEEP GRASS , ru ..., + '" '" "-'" ::0: <C ~ R '" <L ~ "- -1-----:",..--NOl£: 4" 0 PVC SEWER PIPE WYE AND FITTINGS TO BE ASTM D-3033 OF D-3034 SDR-35 SANITARY CLEAN OUT *REQUIRED EVERY 100' OF LATERAL NOT TO SCALE ~EAL PIPE CONNECTIONS 'lMTH .APPROVED RU8BER aOQT ~YSTEM {riP,) (KQR-"W-:;EA!_ p~ <9 .. ;. SHELF ST;,INLESS STEEL 5ITRAPS 2' qc. (SJ'E PET~ll A) . f ,~ •. L< .. :.:.,,~. ~ ~·.:II";: {:·i:·; ~\~t) .. ~_·, y. :::~'!' 90' BEND DETAIL A iJr··, f'l..AH. .,. :!TAJ<jLlSS STEn.. SlitAt'. CHANNEl DEPTH INSIDE DROP MANHOLE * N,T.S. 202.6.3 * TO BE USED WHERE DROP IS 1'-6" OR GREATER SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE INSIDE DROP NOT TO SCALE SEE 202.7.1 AND 202.e.1' ~~~~~~;;==~---STANOARO MANHQ..[ FRAME AND COVER ,---~ TO INCLUDE "SEWER" , ' 8~ NI~. " , , ADJUST TO GRADE 'MTH NO LESS THAN ~~ AND NO MORE lliAN 12~ OF CONmETE SRIC!< toIASONAY. fR~E TO BE SET IN A fUll. BED OF I,(~TAR. ~ ___ ~1f:;:==:l~=~~~::=-~flAT SI..AB TOP FOR t. SHAlLtlw MA~Olts [T---~-SEAL AU. JOINTS WITH APPROVED J+-------4! PREFORMED 81T. JOINT FIlLER ~t_Vp--,----t1~}---I.4INI"'UM 0,12 SQ, IN, Of SlEEL PER 'VERT1CAL FOOT, PLACED ACCORDING: TO 'AS1l.I SPEClFICATlON C 475 < i5 w'" ~ . 0: W WI ~"*I" OIA. 'hjr~~--r--'="'-"""---!~ SEE JOiNT DETAILS BROW r-+-t---~--,.'vERTEO ~Qi Willi HARD )~~J+.t==---a..A,( aRI~ LAID ON EDGE ~r:J:"J:;( SHELF OF STRUCTURE TO BE t-HEAOEAS '-AIO FlAT [~~=~~~=:::::::3---'--BII:ICK CrllPS OR CRUSHED STONe; MD ~ORTAA 0.80 fF PIPE DI.-\. KoR-rN~-SEAl OR, EquAL S,CDON A-A ALL IN VOIO 6ET'I'tEEN SEAL AND 8RIct<S (UP TO SPRIHG Ut-(:) JOINT DETAil S CHANNEL PEPDi SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE NOT TO SCALE 2" WIOfR '--I;.}AN DROP. F'~FEi' " x =l '" -~ -ci z z Q '" It a: I/) ~ I/) r;j ::> i-J; C/) ...J W ~ D.. w ..J ~ I/) C/) .... I/) ~ ~ I/) ct z ::!; W 0 w ~ C D.. 0 C/) ~ ct W W ct ~ !::: Cl :I: ~ (!) C/) I-'" ct JJH ECR MRA AS NOTED SEPTEMBER 30. 2015 5736·01 PROJECT NO. 10 OF 16 SHEET NO. 50-6 . N 0 ~ ~ 0. " I ~ > u a: I <3 I ..., I "- " ~ -c "- '" :§ "5 u ~ c c • '" .S • c ~ c c .2 U .5 " c 0 U I ~ u c 0; ,!! 1= . . . r . . ([.Jit I I I I I .. I I f---L_ ---~--------""""-----~---~-~----~~ ----------'_ ------'"'"""" --1 .Jr ·'L J L~ _____ ~_ _ __ W NORTH END ELEVATION Of STRUCTURE 11 \@7 SCALE 1/20"=1'-0" .. I---------------"---~---~----------'------ '" "-' '" j2 u :::> ~ if) ~ I-25 Gl :r: ,., < "-' a. • 0 I N ~F:: f' F:: "- 0 1 0 1 L _______________ ~ _______________________________________________________ _ W EAST SIDE ELEVATION Of SJRUCTURE #1 \@7 SCALE 1/20"=1'-0" w '" G :::> ~ '" ~f'-., ~ i3 ~~~ .... :r: • Q 0 "-' -• :r: I I -• '" '" r-N C5 "' I f\! 0 "' -0-I • "' -'0 -..-I I e -:.,. -N '" r-- L ____________ -""""'--_______________ 1 ________________ - --- ---- r-I p W SOUTH END ELEVATION Of STRUCTURE #1 \@lSCALE 1/20"=1'-0" w a< f? u ::l ~ VI b .... i3 ILi :r: ,., < w a. • C> I ~~ N r- °1 50'-0' 10' 10' 10' 10' 1f'F:: Ifni 1------------------------------~------------------------------L-JW~~WE=ST SIDE fI [VATION Of STRUCTURE f1 \@7 SCALE 1/20·=1'-0" • 0 ~ -1 • R "' -I N r-- +- 10' 5' 5' 15' If' It 1 . \ - -" J . NO: DATE: (DDjI.IMfT"r') RE~SIOO: ~E INFORM,.,OON OOIHAlNED IN THIS DR,t,W!h'G IS LECAIl.¥ PRlVlL£CED AND CQNnOENTlAL AND IS IN1E~D(D ONt.. Y FOR mE USE OF lliE IH[JI't'Il)'JAL Cf! o.Il1TY BElOw. ANY OllifR USE, OISSflllINllnON, DISTRI8Ul1OH OR COpy or NS DR",WI'I'IG IS STRlCll Y ~OHIBJTED. .4I.L DI~!:NSlOHS ON llflS IlR},WlNG SHAll. 8£ VERIFIED BY -mE CONTRACTOR IN TliE COORSE or WORK REPCRT ,6,NY Dl5rnEPANClES OR O~ISSIONS TO THE EItI.lNEER PRIOR TO C:ow.I£NctMENT cr \\ORK. 00 NOT SCAlE DR"'~J'It(;. A CUENT ACCEPTANCE SlGMAlURE C+I lHE FlRST PMi£ C( 1. OOIJrlD S[T or Dru.-.wGS AO<NDVtUOC£S lllE ACCEPrANCE CF AI.l.. P.IIl)::S CONJ.lJNED 11'1 '!HE BCtJ~ SE1 OF GRAWlNG DETAIlS. ~ A --DETAIL NUMBER \:D B --SHEET WHERE DETAILED ==PRELIMINARY ONL Y== ==NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION== ,------, Il'dIq ~ Iffiso Lf(}:{)I A division of The Farley Group ~ 6 Kerr Cre5cent ~ Puslinch. ON. Conado NOB 2JO L Phon., 1-888-445-3223 Fox: 1-888-445-304-3 Email: man101hefarle1.9roup.com I...L.. __ --' CmnMr Spacz SdvtIons CLIENT: THE SPORTSPLEX CLIENT ACCEPTANG£ SIGNATURE; DAI[ ACCEPI[D: PROJECT: AIR SUPPORTED STRUCruRES FOR MULTI-USE (2 DOMES TOTAL) (230'-0Itx 380'-O"X 72'-0") LOCATION: DRAWING: 94 GARDEN STREET AGAWAM, MA 01030 ELEVATIONS (STRUCTURE #1) PRO.£CT NORTH: DRN BY: J.K.S. REVIEWED BY: DATE: AUGUST 25, 2015 SCALE: AS SHOWN PLAN NORTH: PROJ. f. DRAII1NG I: AS2 r N 0 = -~ "'- I > ~ 0: I 8 I ..., I ~ M ~ -0 0- '" . 6 :: , '-' ." c 0 1J, .'" • .!i .~ " , -.. 6 '-' il 0 ffi • ~ '" . . ~ .. . rr~ I I I I I I . -r. I L __ ..., f--1 f--~ ~~ _________ ~~ __________ ~ ______ -'--r-------_______ ....J L ________ ~ L ___ J W NORlli END ElEVATION OF STRUCTURE 12 ~ SCALE 1/20"=1'-0" w <>:: r= '-' => g: V1 ~ I-is c;; :I: ~ a. • 0 I ~~ '" ..... . DI °1 ..... ~ . ° 1 L __ -------------~ ___________________________________________________________________ ~--------------1 ~--L-~ WEAST SIDE ELEVATION Of STRUCTURE #2 ~ SCALE 1/20"= 1 '-0" S4 SCALE 1/20"=1'-0" . If'~ j I~fl I w <>:: r= '-' :> g: til LL a I-:r (!) C;; :r "" .. w [L • 0 I '" " b I ~ . I °1 b -I -co '!-. I -'" °1 L _______________ ~ ___________________________________________________________________ ~---------------J wWEST SIDE ELEVATION OF SmUCTURE 12 ~ SCALE 1/20"=1'-0" . . . . NO; DATE:: (DD;\4M/\"r') REVlSlOO: DiE INFORMAno~ CONTAINED IN THIS DRAWING IS LEGALLY PRNILEGEO "HO COOFlDrNTlAL AND IS INTENDED Qt(L,( FOR lHE USE OF ~E IHDl\IIl)UAl OR iNl1TY BELOW, ANY OTHER USE, IlISS9.1JNA llON, DlSTRlBUllON' OR COPY OF THIS DRAWINC IS STRICQY PROHIBITED. ALL DIMENSION'S tiN lJIlS DRAWING SHALL BE VERIFIED e'r' 'J1oIE CONJRACJOR IN 1HE COI,..IRSE OF WORK. R~T ~'( D~EPANCIES DR Q),jISS~S TO 1l-!£ ENGmEER ffilOR TO Cot.lUENCEMEltT OF WORI(. 00 NOT SCALE DRAWING. A cuan ACCEPToWC£ SlGtMTIJRE" (Jl mE FIRST PAC£ OF A BOUND SET Of DRAIWoIGS ~s 1HE ACCEPTANCE Of AlL PAGES CONTAINm IN M l'I(lJNO SET OF DRA'tdHG DUALS. ~ A --DETAIL NUMBER ~ B --SHEET WHERE DETAILED ==PRELlMINARY ONL Y== ==NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION== [ilGll1ll@W 1!!lIml~ 1lt1iJ:s. A division of The Fcrley Group 6 Kerr Crescent Puslinch. ON, Canado NOB 2JO /' b:::::::: Phone: 1-88B-445-3223 Fox: 1-888-445-3043 ~;;;;d~ Emoi: monf@l:hefarkygrcup.com CI¥Urtws,x-~ CUENT: THE SPORTSPLEX CUENT ACCEPTANCE SIGNATURE: P~OJECT: AIR SUPPORTED STRUCTURES FOR MULTI-USE (2 DOMES TOTAL) (230'-O"x 380'-O"x 72'-0") LOCATION: D~AI\1NG: 94 GARDEN STREET AGAWAM, MA 01030 ELEVATIONS (STRUCTURE #2) PROJECT NORTH: ORN BY: J.K.S. REVIEWED BY: DATE: AUGUST 25, 2015 SCALE: AS SHOWN PLAN NORTH: PROJ. g: DRAWING N: AS4 .. N o c .Q u E " 8 I r o , b '" '" • <> ~ .. . .. 380'-0" OVERALL LENGTH OF STRUCTURE (INSIDE mGE TO IN~DE EDGE OF PROFILE) . ~--~~--~----------------~----------------~------~--~----~------~--~--------------~----------~----------------~----------------~~ .. VEHICLE AIRLOCK 91'-0" I I SINGlE ~lA~RC~t.JCV T EXIT f/3 I I 110'-0· WINCH STAND 1/1 I I SINGLE w.. EMERGENCY r EXIT fI4 I I I . 88'-0· WINCH ~ STAND 1/2 SINGLE EMERGENCY EXIT #5 r.-' , 91'-0" . .. I I I I b : : ,..... ( C -f-o 0 P 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 ----, ----1----ffir-::,-__ ~28~'-o~' +-_~ __ -I __ ~~ __ +-____ -I ____________ -t __________ T'l'P~ICA~L~~~U~("~'"b:":R~O~W-=":2~B~IN~DI~RE~C~T~~~lJGH~T~FI::XTU~RE~S~CI~~'~-O·~TYPI~C~"'-~SP~A~ClN~G:":"~'~'1")2+ 1+ ______________ + ____________ t __________ -I-_+~28~'-~O~· __ --II ) o o o o o o o I 0 I 0 I \ ) I \ ~ ~NGLE ~=-__ ' __ ==dlb_ __ ~- o \ ~ • o I b '" I I ~~ 4---------------~_--... _.~-~~=_~~--+_--~~--+_----------------~--~~~.~--t'1~,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J_t~--------------------------~~~~~~~.~-T-~--r "'N"I.-lI' 28' 6' T'l'PICAL ".U~ ROW 18 DIRECT HANG1NG UGHT FIXTURES. 19'-0' T'l'PIC"'-SPACING 28' 6' JII,J . • o I ~ • <> -' " EMERGENCY 0 I 1-EXIT #2 ) Of-0 O ·} 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 COMBO UNIT r1\ ~ TYPICAL II II ENTRANCE \ ASI2J HANG UGHT TO DOMrrE ;;;;;;;;\,.,r-~ ~ FIXTURE ABOVE I I ~ (110 TOTAL) ~ I I o o ) o o - J.-28'-6" /' rmCAL ~SIDf LI< ."nu ROW --18 DIRECT HANG1NG UJH1 ... ,um,'l,. D 19'-0' n1'ICN.. SPACING ,"~'-u I ( r-_.Aer __ ~~--~A----+_~A_~r_--~-~------~A----~OI -~ ---~ r-----~:~------~:~+_--~~-~-----:e-------~--~ WARMUP AREA 28'-6' ~ I I 15'-0· HIGH REMOVABLE DlV1DER NET --.~ 15'-0" HIGH REMOVABLE DIVIDER NET -....,,-1 SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY I AIR STRUClURE MANF. SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY I AIR STRUClURE MANF, I I T'l'PICAL I~SIDJ lI( '''"U ROW --1B DIRECT HANGING LIGHt FIXTUR£S D 19'-0" TYPIC"'-SPACING 10LO -u I , , SINGLE ( C -0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 In EMERGENCY 1-o o o o c 28'-5- 28'-6- o I b -- ~ __________________ E_X __ 'T~L~_~ll:_~~~~~~~ __ +-~ ____ ~~~~~~~ __________ ~I~ __________ ~~~~~~~ __________ ~+I~ __________ ~~~~~~~ __________ ~~~-4-rtlr~-----~ ~ 20' O' 20' 0" 100' O' WIDTH OF SOOCER FIELD 5' 1 S' 100' 0" \\lOTH OF SOCCER FIElD 5' I 5' 100' O' \\lOTH OF SOCCER FIElD 20' O· : "I b ~N~ I HEAT AND • 1 I EMERGENCY : IN~~,~ON ~ ( '\ I ( '\ I ( '\ Em 17 t!. -Hm u I CJ I ~ L...----.f---------fII!/-28'-0" TYPICAL I U( 1 ""u ROW 28 INDIRECT LIGHT FIXTURES • 1~'-O" TYPICAL SPACING \~. 1') ~ ~ -[-0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 COO 0 0 0 r • o _, ~ '" GENERATOR, 0 is, & STANDBY INFLAnON FAN '-------, I • o -' ~ ~ , in 91 '-0" I I I ~ SINGLE EMERGENCY Em #10 I 110'-0· W flOOR PLAN LAYOUT Of STRUCTURE 11 aNTERIOR YlE\\1 \@7 SCALE 1/20"=1'-0" I I SINGLE ~ EMERGENCY EXIT 19 I I I 88'-0' o o o SINGLE ~ EMERGENCY rnT§8 v o o I I I I 28' O' o o ) 91'-0· . . NO: [lAre (DD/MMj'YY) IIEVISICt4: 11-iE INFORMA.TTON CONTAINED IN lHIS DRA'MHO (S LIGAL1.V PRMLECED AND CONAOENTlAl AND IS INTENDED ONLY fOR THE USE OF THE lNDi~UAL OR fNllTY sao,--AN'!' alliER USE, OISSEMIN,lillON. OIS'TRIB\Jl1OH OR COPY Of' Th','S DRAWING IS S~CTl Y PRDHlBlT£O • ALL OJUEHSION! ON TliIS ORAWING !ili.LL BE ~RIFlEO BY TIE COtHMCmR IN 'THE COURse OF 'NOOK. REP~T MY DI~EPAHC1ES OR Oll!lSSIi:ttS TO Tl-/E ENGtlEER PRlOR TO COt.IMEHCDlENT OF WCIlK. 00 HOT SCAlE ORA1INC. A QJEl'tT ACCEPTMCE SI(;NAWRE" (IN TlfE FlRST PAGE OF A BOUND SET ry [lRAWNGS ACMNOVlt.£OG!S THE ACC£PTANCE ~ ALl. PMES CO~TAlNED IN THE BOONO SET OF DRAWINC DETAILS. ~ A --DETAIL~lJMBER ~ B --SHEET WHERE DETAILED ==PRELIMINARY ONL Y== ==NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION== I?~~ 1Jl1ii@. A division of The F oriey Group 6 Kerr Crncent ?us/~ch, ON, Canada NOB 2JO ~h:::::::::; Phon.: 1-888-445-3223 Fa" 1-888-445-3043 '::L---:--::---' Email: manfCthefarleygroup.com CrmfM SpIxIr Sdutions CUENT: THE SPORTSPLEX CLIENT ACCEPTANCE SIGNATURE: DATE ACCEPTED: PRO..ECT: AIR SUPPORTED STRUCTURES FOR MUL Tl-USE (2 DOMES TOTAL) (230'-0"x 380'-0"x 72'-0") lOCA~ON: 94 GARDEN STREET AGAWAM, MA 01030 DRAINING: INTERIOR PLAN LAYOUT (STRUCTURE #1) PROJECT NORTH: DRN BY: J,K.S, DATE: AUGUST 25, 2015 SCALE: AS SHOVvN PLAN NORTH: PROJ. f. DRAWING 8: AS13 ~ . " u or ;3 I '" J. " r b I ""0 ~ b ,I '" ~ ~ HEAT AND INFLAnON UNIT " -+------- b I N • o I ""0 N GENERATOR, 0 &: STANDBY INFLATION FAN [rr------~r----- '------------ "- " ) 28'-0" " 91' -0' " -1-0 o b ,I ~ I "" SINGLE EMERGENCY Ijh EXIT 113 I I o o \---------) o o 380'-4 OVE:RALL LENGTH OF STRUCTURE (INSIDE EDGE TO INSIDE EDGE OF PROFlLE) " 110'-0· " I'I1NCH STAND 1/1 o 10 0 0 C I o SINGLE EMERGENCY r,tl EXIT #4 , I I I o o " . o I'I1NCH STAND fJ2 o b TlPICAL LJ(r'''~ROW --28 INDIRECT" ..",U~ lJGfIT nXnJRES 0 ~'-O'.TmCAL SPACING (324'-~j..l , 1 1 1 \ / 1 I 1 . " o . SINGlE EIoIERGENCY EXIT N~ J ,I l I o o "" I I I I o o " 91'-0" . " o o " SINGLE EMERGENCY EXIT #8 • o I ""0 '" .ct-+-------------,-.~ ~INrJ,.L-26'-6' TYPICAL ~Slot LI. " """ ROW --18 DIRECT HANGING UGHT FlXlURES 0 19'-0' TlPICAL SPACING \~." -v I 10 1 28'-5' _"1 .. 8 . ...., --------!f- b I ~ b I ~ • o I "in I') • o .I t<l EMERGENCY VEHICLE AIRLOCK EXIT #2 28'-6' I : -WARMUP ----1----1-----AREA ~ ____ I _____ .L ____ ~- 26'-6' I C(-o o /' o ~ ~12 '-TYPICAL HANG LIGHT FIXTURE ABOVE: (110 TOTAL) 01 1 1 1 1 o o o o o TmCAL ~~ u< ,,,no ROW --16 DIRECT HANGING U)lH"I "",~" ..... " 19"-0' n'PICAL SPACING \""" -" o o o o 1 I 1 I r--~er--~~--~~~----t-~:~r---t-er~------~~e-----~ol I 1 p~--~~~~--~~~+-~~~e--+---~~~--~~ , o ~ b I ~ o 1 15'-0" HIGH R£MOVABLE DIVIDER NET ----~ 15'-0' HIGH REMOVABLE DIVIDER NET ___ /I SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY 1 AIR STRUCTURE MANF, SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY 1 AIR STRUCTURE MANF, 1 1 TmCAl I ~SlD~ Lo. '''"" ROW --16 DIRECT HANGING UGHT FIXruRES 019'-0' TYPICAL SPACING (323'-0' 1 , , o o o 01 0 0 0 0 0 jO o o o o 26'-S' 28'-6' ~ING~F~-a~~~~2a~'-~0'~~ __ ~~~'~0~"-++-__ +-__ ~ ____ ~la~~-~0~'~M~D~~~O~F~S~OO~~~R~AOD~ ______________ ~5'_flll~5'~~ __________ ~10~~~a'_M~D~~~~~SO~~~R~A~OD~ ____________ -t~5~'!1~5~'~ _____________ 1~0~~-~O~'~~~~~~~S~~~ER~n~OD~ ______________ ~~~~' ~~~4r·I~~ISlNQE EMERGENCY EMERGENCY EXIT II ~ ( "" 1 /' ~ 1 ( ~ EXIT #7 ~~IT \ 1 (\ 1 \ ENTRANCE v v u TO VOMnEr-~:-~~~~~~ __ -+ __ -+ ____ ~ ____ -+ ____________ -t ________ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--------------~----------~~----------t-~~~~~~ . t-28'-0' TYPICAL ~I'~u, ut, """ ROW 28 INDIRECT LIGHT FlXruRES. ~'-O' TmCAl SPACING \("3,"2'~'-O:...'..I"J 1 28'-0' 1 , , o o o o o 0 10 0 0 coo 0 0 0 ~ I I 91'-0' I I c.i SINGLE EMERGENCY EXIT Hl0 1 110'-0' W flOOR PLAN LAYOUT Of STRUCTURE #2 (INTERIOR VIEW) @ SCALE 1/20"= 1'-0" 1 I I . I I' SINGLE ~ EMERGENCY EXIT 19 1 J 1 88'-0' o o o I siNGLE ~,L+J EMERGENCY ElI1TI/8 o o o o c I I I I 91'-0' b .. I o ~ ~ • o b '" • " . NO: PATE: (Dll,1M.lJYY) RE\,SHf/: mE INFORt.4 .... nON CCfI'TAINED IN lHIS DfM'MNC IS LECAU. Y PRMLEOCD All) CONFIDENTIAL AND IS ItI'TENDED 0Nl. Y FOR WE USE 0:: TIfE INOIYIDUAL ~ OHITY BElOW. AN'f OTHfR US~ OISSEMIN'-'TlON, C1S7lllBUlIOO OR COpy Of THIS DRAWING IS SYRleny PRctliBllID. Ail DIMENSIONS OH lHIS ORA""G SHAlL BE V!RffIEC BY lHE COItmAClOR IN nlE 00lIiSE or WORK. REFMT MY OiSrnEPAHClES 00 Ot.4ISS1ONS TO T1i£ ENGilEER PRIOR 10 r;w~nCEMENT Of \\OO'p(. DO HOT SCALE OOAYoING.. A OJ£NT ACCEFTA.>.JCE SJGNAlURE" ON Tl£ FIRST PACE or A 80UNC SET OF DRA~GS AO<NOVl1..EDGES THE ACCEPTANCE Of AlL PMES CONT,6JNErl IN THE BruND SET or DRA'rItfC: DETALS. CD. A --DETAIL NUMBER ~ B --SHEET WHERE DETAILED ==PRELIMINARY ONL Y== ==NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION== ~~!Jros.. A division of The ForteI' Group 6 Kerr Crescent PuS/inch, ON, Canada NOB 2JO ~6::::::::; Phone: 1-885-445-3223 Fox. 1-888-445-30013 LL _____ -' EmcH: mOflfCUJeforleygroup.com Cmrtlwl$pa SdutkJnr CUENT, THE SPORTSPLEX CLIENT ACCEPTANCE SIGNA lURE: DATE A~PTED: PROJECT: AIR SUPPORTED STRUCTURES FOR MULTI-USE " ,(2 DOMES TOTAL)" ... (230'-0"x 380'-Q"x 72'-0") LOCATION, 94 GARDEN STREET AGAWAM, MA 01030 DRAII?NG: INTERIOR PLAN LAYOUT (STRUCTURE #2) PROJECT NORm " .. " .. :Ill PLAN NORTH: DRN BY, J,K,S, RE"'EII£D BY: DATE: AUGUST 25, 2015 SCAl" AS SHOWN PROJ. I: DRAIIING t " .. AS14 .I :..-_---.:. = 1= DN MEZZANINE 1&t++t-HH-H+t+H-H+H-IDN G>® UJOMENS G) (E) MENS MEZZANINE PLAN SCALE: 1116" = 1'-0" j MENS WOMEN5 UP H-H-t++++-I-BI UF I ~ I fo-( -----EXTENT OF MEZZANINE Af30VE -----~), FOYER FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE; 1116" = 1'_011 121-1Z)" l _.U=II .... I -. \!) ~I I -== ::r -\!) ~::t: I -== -. ., . , Xl9 LUZ ---1 ........ 0..0 If)--I ~3 OCO &~ ~O <(If) sill «U 19U «« No • Date .......... ".... -- F~oFOeeD FLOO~ FLANe -- ... ..,4J4 A-l -AS NO'\'t=p J .., , -- METAL ROOFIN~ --- -, "" ~ -- elG:NA~E: " .... .... I MEZZANINE LEVEL --I-I -I, I-, - MEtAL SIDING; I' = CSI ~-= . I SFLlT rACED CMU , ~ CSI '\ ." I N -~- .' - GF'4DE ~-~ ~ ~. -~ ~ £::! .. ~-III'-. -~ . . .. , • -, -" .... i .. I' I' FRONT ELEVATION - SCALE: 1116 ·" 1'_~1I I , . . = Xt9 wz ......J ....... I 0...0 {f)......J ~s OeD B5?2 RIGI-IT-5IDE ELEvATION SCALE: III"". I'-~II LO «{f) ~~ «U r 19U ----. «« -. . No. ~ Dale 1't'IeII:t .... -~ /6~ 1,,\ / Vll~ '\V / "': ,\1/ REAR ELEvATION SCALE: 1116" = 1'-fZ)" -- FROPOSED I EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS • I . . --- -&.24.14 A-2 -'\'\. / -LEFT -SIDE ELEvATION ,6& NO't!I:) SCALE: 1116 11 = I'-~II I..'