The URL can be used to link to this page

8402_SITE PLAN - SKYWATTER - SIX FLAGS gy01 �• SKyww+k� .. Y Edward Czelazewicz 1720 Main Street Agawam, Ma. /6/08 Dear Council Member/Board of Appeals Member, When t read the Sunday paper on June 1'2008 article about proposed new height rules to aid Six Flags, I was in disbelief: The article stated, by raising the height limit it would allow Six Flags to avoid scrutiny by the Zoning Board of Appeals. To the best of my knowledge, the Beard of Appeals,has been accommodating to Sid;°~ Flag's influence a the other departments included in the permitting process have been. Garry Litton stated, ``every time we go before the,honing Board it adds about 100 days to the process",adding he appreciated anything that can speed up the process. The process for the Sky Swatter approved by the Board of Appeals on Jams zh 2006, took approximately 60 days. The process can be expedited for Six. Flags if the council chooses that it would be appropriate, which in my opinion is fair to Six Flags and fair to the residents in the immediate area., or the businesses in the immediate area, better known as abutters.The Board of Appeals has a standard for reviewing to protect the abutters from adverse affects and nuisance, The Board of Appeals process notifies abutters of the proposed structure so they may be aware that something is,going to be constructed in the immediate area.:This process allows abutters to voice their concerns or objections that their insight may anticipate adverse: conditions to be created by the proposed structure. Then,when the Board of-Appeals considers if the concerns could be detrimental, objectionable, or obnoxious, conditions could be attached to the special permit approval in event any abutters insight or concern become a reality. The immediate area needs protection from one main ingredient created by Six Flags which is becoming greater as Sias Flags builds thrill seeking structures on the outer limits of their property, thins affecting abutters. The ingredient is excessive noise.- The town permitting process has allowed excessive noise to become a nuisance in the area surrounding Six Flags. This may or may not been anticipated. floes the planning department consider excessive noise to abutters when reviewing new rides or structures that are to be constructed on the outer limits of Six Flags property? Does the planning department impose conditions of adverse affects in the immediate area's Does the planning department notify abutters ofthe proposed structure to be built? I'm sure this is the-p se-af the-Bo frA als-3yy-raising-t height-limitatio -20fl-f e"hi' would allow new thrill seeking rides to be constructed along the front portion of Six Flags property limits that abut Main Street. The abutters would not know what was being;built, and would have no voice in the matter, so to be protected from excessive noise. beep in mind,that height is a factor when building thrill seeking structures that produce loud screaming from the patrons. l have lived across the street from the park since 1993. poise is expected from an amusement park. People screaming on the roller coasters, and general park noise, can be heard in the distance and that does not create a nuisance. In 2005, one such ride was constructed across the street from the residents on Main Street. Its called the Typhoon Water Coaster. Its twists and turns cause the riders to scream so loudly that it has created a major problem for the residents in that row of houses on Main Street. At first we could not believe that a ride like this would be allowed to be constructed 250 feet from our property line,and.300 feet from our front door. This plan was approved by the planning department, but apparently, did not have to go before the Board of Appeals, due to its reported height of 39 feet. I would like to think that a common consideration of the proposal should have been discussed at the planning board level, in regards to it being a water coaster and its proximity to the residents across the street. We know Six Flags had no consideration, and knew what they were doing. If the planning department took into consideration possible adverse impacts to the immediate area, the plan could have just as well gone before the Board of Appeals for review, although the reported height did not exceed 45 feet. In March of 2000, Six Flags submitted a Notice of Project Change Master Plan to the Secretary of Environmental affairs for a review pursuant to the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act. In the Master Plan was a chapter on noise and thresholds. Since the town of Agawam does not have a well defined noise policy, the Mass. DEP Policy is to be the standard abided.Again, excessive noise is the issue of most concern. I am under the impression that although most, if not all of the town officials, have a fair understanding of excessive noise on a personal level. I don't know how many have a technological understanding of how the standards of DEP Policy are set, measured, and violated. If any one chooses to read Chapter 9 Noise,of the 2000 Master Plan,you are likely to conclude that it appears to be legitimate. Back to the Typhoon Water Coaster excessive noise issue. First of all,no one at the town level could help us resolve the problem and Six Flags did not resolve the problem although they said they would. Six Flags may be a so called"good neighbor" to some for monetary benefits, but for the literal neighborhood,"good neighbor"would not apply. Not all of neighbors complain to Six Flags or town offlicials about excessive noise, but I hear about it very often on the street. The few that do complain would soon realize the legitimate complains may be falling upon deaf ears,and give up. By giving up,the excessive noise issue goes unchecked,and gets worse. That is my fear-of raising the height limit for amusement parks structures to 200 feet. Why even have 200 foot height limitation? The height limit of 200 feet and the idea behind it sounds absurd to me. Apparently, the writer in the newspaper article implies there is more than one amusement park in town. Other complaints about excessive noise would probably be about concert noise as I I-. I-heardthierei n uppusetwb-nbuu-r20-(,Ync-ertg-tlii7s-summer, -that averages one to two concerts per week during the summer. I hope that's not true. I don't ever remember an influx of that amount in the past. Are there permits or regulations that should be followed for such concerts to alleviate excessive noise for the surrounding neighborhoods or is the leash let loose for Six Flags to do whatever they please? I would like to let it be known that the Typhoon Water Coaster height exceeds 45 feet. The deck height is 42 feet,the top of the hand rail is 47 feet, the top of the cowl, which is the tube people enter to begin the slide, is 48 feet, the net before the cowl is 49 feet, the canopy that shades the operators,which is also part of the structure, is 52 feet in height. Theses heights were confirmed by Six Flags surveyors and a surveyor hired by me. Where did Six Flags come up with 39 feet in height for this ride?There are no blue prints to be had to measure actual height by scale. If this structures height was represented properly and went before the Board of Appeals,the nearby abutters would have been notified and could have expressed their concerns about adverse impact likelihood that would have a direct negative impact on them. The impact is excessive noise. These concerns could have been conditions of approval for the special permit.If the abutters concerns became a reality and fell under the standards for reviewing,the Board of Appeals could see to it that any adverse or unreasonable condition created would be abated or mitigated. When I stated that no town official could help with the excessive noise issue, there was one who said that if the ride came before the Board of Appeals, there may be something she could do. Since it didn't,there is nothing she can do. I would like to let it be known that a sound engineer was hired by me to determine if the excessive noise coming from the screaming of the patrons on the Typhoon Water Coaster violated DEP policy, the policy Six Flags is supposed to abide by. Following DEP policy, he determined that there were many violations. There is a ten decibel over ambient violation and a pure tone violation. On May 26h 2007 in a 100 minute monitoring period, he observed and recorded 167 screams. 146 of those screams violated the 10 decibel limit. 156 of those screams produced a pure tone, also violations. No wonder why we can't tolerate to be on our property when the Typhoon is running. On June 2"d 2007 the sound engineer did the same work, but for a 22 minute period. This period was short due to the ride being shut down because of thunder storm threats- In 22 minutes he recorded 46 screams. 36 were over the ten decibel limit. 43 were pure tone violations.No wonder we have to leave our property, or keep the windows closed with the music on in our house to escape these unbearable constant screams. Increasing the height limit will allow Six Flags to construct similar rides, in the same area, and create a more intolerable atmosphere for the residents who live across the street. Six Flags is outgrowing this area, and blasting the area with exeessive noise. Six Flags needs to be monitored more closely. There is another source of a noise violation that intrudes and awakens myself and other neighbors at night. It's the vacuum truck which operates after park hours. The loud noise of the vacuum operating is very loud and immediately awakens me. On memorial day weekend '2,008 at 2®1 am. on Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday I was awaken by this loud vacuum truck. This is not a daily occurrence, its mainly on the weekend, and in the summer time when the park is busy. Where is the consideration from Six Flags for the people-whware--s feelying-mmff the 3u-eet? Most of us who reside around Six Flags were here for many years. When Six Flags began to dig in, they seemed to be concerned about any environmental impacts in the area,which included excessive noise. But as time went on they appeared to become bolder with what they wanted to do. They have grown bolder because they have been allowed to do so. I can understand being cooperative and working together.Jf they continue to grow, they should do so in a responsible fashion with consideration for the people in the neighborhood. If they don't grow in a responsible fashion, what protection or rights does anyone have to object or express their concerns for their own well being? I have not had any considerable problems with Six Flags prior to the creation of the Typhoon Water Coaster.I fear another thrill ride being constructed immediately across the street without my neighbors or me being notified, so we can voice our concerns or being taken seriously, will only intensify the existing burden. I asked the town council and the towns permitting process, not to change the height limitation. I also asked for abutters to be notified for any new structure proposed by Six Flags if the new structure is likely to contribute to the excessive noise condition that exists at the residents on the west side of Main Street. The Town Council and the permitting process should be in control of what Six Flags is doing, not Six Flags influencing them in their decisions. Please consider my concerns. They are also the concerns of other neighbors. If there is any reason anyone wishes to speak to one, I can be reached on my cell phone (860- 798-6680). Sincerely, Edward Czelazewicz MEMO To: Planning Board From Sgt. Richard NILES, Safety Officer Subject: Site Plan-"Skyswatter"- Six Flags New England Date, 11/30/2005 Based upon the information provided, the proposed project would have little to no adverse; effects on pedestrian, bicycle, and or motor vehicle traffic safety. Respectfully Submitted e Mgt, Richard NILES Safety Officer, Agawam Police Department C EIV D 1 3 TO WN OF A G*AM I'll 36 MAIN STREET AGA , MA 01001 .., DECISION OF BCC ` CIF AU,-CA h 2006 % Petition of Six Flags New England c f ro)P � 1l, ate r,'(�� 'C �1 II G`' r� Premises affected: 1623 Main Street u u u d Z 9 U�, K-1v u ki ate. anuRy 9, 7006 — vase#: 1746 The Agawam Board of Appeals conducted a public hearing and meeting on January 9,2006, at the Library Conference Room, Agawam Public Library, 750 Cooper Street, Agawam,MA, for all parties interested in the appeal of Six:Flags New England, which is seeking a Special Permit in accordance with Section 180-49 of the Zoning Ordinances to allow for the construction of a new amusement ride "The Slyswatter" which would exceed the height requirement at the premises identified as 1623 Main Street.. After the public'hearing, and after a thorough review of the facts presented, the Agawam Berard of Appeals made the following findings: 1 The subject property is located in an area of Town zoned Business B. . Six Flags New England is an established amusement park which has been in continuous operation at this location for over 70 years *. The proposed new amusement ride, entitled "The Skyswatter", to be located in the northerly section of the park,has a static height of approximately sixty-five( 5') feet and an operating height of approximately one hundred (100) feet. 4. Section 180-49 of the Town of Agawam's Zoning Ordinances states that "business structures may be erected or altered by Special Permit to a height;in excess of three(3 stories or more than forty-five(4 ')when the business structure constitutes part of an amusement park". 5. The petitioner has received'site plan approval from the Town's Planning Board. 6; Several residents spoke both in favor of and in opposition to this petition. The concern mentioned most often was noise pollution. 7 Six Flags New England conducted a noise study in late August, early September of 2005. The results were within the standards set forth by the Department of Environmental Protection. 8 The Board has found that this specific site is an appropriate location for such a use. 9. The Board has found that the use as developed will not adversely affect the health, safety or property value of the neighborhood. 10. The Board has found that there will be no nuisance or potential hazard to vehicle or pedestrian safety. 11.. The Board has found that there wilt be adequate and appropriate facilities and controls providing for the proper and safe operation of the proposed.use. Page Six Flags New England Case#1746 Based on its findings, this Board is of the opinion that the requested Special Permit is within the authority of the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant under Section 180-49 of the Zoning; Ordinances. Therefore, by the unanimous vote of its three members,the Zoning Board of Appeals grants the Special Permit subject to the following conditions. I, The proposed amusement ride "The Skyswatter" is to be constructed according to the plan prepared and signed by Vana se Han en Brustl n, Inc., Project#09620.00, dated November 3, 2005 and signed by the members of this Board. 1 This Special Permit is for relief from the height requirement only. All other building and zoning requirements must be met. 3. All lighting shall be set up so as to be directed'inward, to avoid any lighting nuisance outside the Path perimeter. 4. The petitioner;shall conduct a yearly noise monitoring study to be conducted at the same time of year as done in the 2005 study. The results of this study are to be submitted to this Board. The Par 's operating sound levels must remain within the Department of Environmental`Protection's standards.. 5. The petitioner shall record with the Hampden County Registry of Deeds a"Notice of Special Permit" form, which shall be provided by this Board and proof of said filing must be submitted to this Board and to the Inspector of Buildings. .; This Special Permit shall become null and void if construction does not commence within two (2) years from the date of this decision. l o ccn Prouty lfi �f Fred Harpin .s J ' town of A*gawam f f T ate Street Agawam, Massachusetts 010 1-183° Tel. 413-7 6-0400 Fax 413-786-992 December 19, 2005 NJ Cn Mark Kane Vice President/General Manager Six Flags New England P.O. Box 307 Agawam, MA 0`1001-0307 Dear Mr. Kane: At its duly called meeting held on December 15, 2005, the Agawam Planning Board voted to approve the Site Plan entitled"Six Flags New England Skyswatter Site Plana' prepared by Vanasse Hangers Brustlin, Inc. and.dated November 3, 2005 with the following.conditions: 1. All comments contained by the Agawam Fire.Department dated November 3+0,2005 d attached must be addressed* 2. A Special Permit from the Agawam Board of Appeals roust be obtained, If you have any questions, please do net hesitate to contact the ]Planning Office at 78 -0400, extension 283<. Sincerely, "Travis Ward, Acting Chairman Agawam Planning Board cc Clerk Engineering Fire Board of Appeals Building File 0 9 AGAWAM OFFICE OF PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN REVIEW REVIEWER: D. Dachos DATE: December 8, 2005 DATE RECEIVED: November 23, 2005 DISTRIBUTION DATE: November 23, 2005 PLANNING BOARD MEETING DATE: Dec ember '15, 2005 APPLICANT INFORMATION 1. Name of Business: Six Flags New England Address: 1623 Main Street, Agawam, MA 01001 2. Owner: Same Address: Telephone: (413) 786-9300, ext. 3202 Fax: 3. Engineer: Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Address: 505 East Columbus Avenue, Springfield, MA 01105 Telephone: 747-7113 Fax: PLAN REVIEW Scale: V = 20' Date: November 3, 2005 Title Block (Street Address, Applicant's Name, Address, Scale, Name of Preparer of Plan): O.K. Description of Project: Redevelopment of stairway and plaza for patrons of Sky-Coaster and the Cyclone and installation of a new "Sky-Swatter" ride. Site Plan Review Page 2 Description of Site: Site is used for access to the Sky Coaster and Cyclone. Provision for Traffic Flow: Unchanged. Parking: Unchanged, Drainage: See Engineering comments. Public Utilities: Unchanged. Landscaping/Screening and Buffers: Unchanged. Sign Location: Not applicable. Exterior Lighting: Unchanged. Rendering or Elevations: OX Dumpster Location: Not applicable. Other Comments or Concerns: AGAVU M FIRET 800 MAINISTREET + AGAWAM,MA 01001 TELEPHONE (413) 786-0657 FAX (413) 7 + -141 David A. pisano Chief of Department 0 Stephen M.Martin Deputy Chief FIRES Michael R. Mercadante Tire Inspector MEMO 11./,30/05 - TO: PLANNING BOARD RE: "WHITE"'WATER E" & *`SRYSWA R E" Dear Sir ; After careful review of the plans and discussions with Park Officials this office is"satisfied" that the needs of the Fire Department will be met. These specific needs are, access to, and around, the rides as referenced in N. F. P,'A. Chapter 1141 FIRE INSPECTOR MICHAEL R. MERCADANTE too alft BOARD "Tlris(Repari)is a true and aommk scommtug o[evema vW Ondmp wash were c=mwibd on the day oT days mwfimed in fix npom n,6(Report)maybe eopW WWI&MRED IN Any WAY OR M 9S1014 S.Per,M.0 L.Pail f'V.'i5ile L Chapter 268:sec.6 A,"WJaaaver;�tny rrn afflter•or eaeployxu atf ahe:GaarmameeaUh a of andrpodtNea.!"tudidlxfrton rhereoj,in the cdvrar aajbts odSrted ds trei ererrttu,filar orpubldisb"MyJalse x rdthrs rrpnrr„anraruarr?r rlarmunat,knowing ahe Same to beld-se Ina maueriad mmkrr,SM1d4LL BE FUNMHIED by o finr ofnot m"than(S1000)DOLLAM and or tMPRHSONMENT For nst mmy Am ONE YEAR. Town of tgawam - 36 Main Street Agawam, Massachusetts 10 1-1837 yc� _ Tel. 413-786-0400 Fax 413-786-9927 MEMO TO Engineering Dept., Police Dept., Fire Dept. FROM: Planning Board SUBJECT: Site Plan - "S yswatter" - Sic Flags New England DATE: November 25, 2005 Please review and comment on the attached Site Plan for the proposed"' at Six Flags New England prior to the Board's December I"meeting. Thank you,. DSD:pr } 0 17 A TOWN OF AGAWAM INTEROFFICE ,. � � �� MEMORANDUM To: Planning, SoARD 0F APPM.5 CC: File From: Enameering Date: December 1, 2005 Subject: SP-306: 05-07 Sky swatter—Six Flags New England Per your request dated November 25,2005,we have reviewed the site plan entitled, "Six Flags New England Skyswatter Site Plan — 1623 Main Street, Agawam, MA; Prepared by: Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.; Scale 1"=20';Dated: 11/4/05" and the Drainage Calculations entitled "Six Flags New England Skyswatter Ride; Dated: November 2005" and have no comments. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our division- Sinc rely, A/7 A eor Ho G -n dune J. "i y art E. Michael C. Chase Tow'Mgmew Asst. Town Engineer HAENGINEMM06 SIX nAGM5.07-SKY SWATTERM SITE PLAN kFVJFW.D0C FRO C10(";"EVED DEC 0 5 2a05 AN ING F' TO WN OF A GA W . ► . 6 MAIN TREET .A rA WAM, MA 01001 BOARD OF APPEALS MEMO DATE; November 23, 2005 TO: Planning Board FROM: Board of Appeals RE': Site Plans for, Six Flags New England ( kyswatter& White Water Family Ride) Attached please find 10 copies of the site plan for the above referenced property. These plans are for your review and comments, and any recommendations you may`have so we can consider these recommendations and comments in our final decision. If you do not respond to this Board within thirty-live(35) days of the above referenced date,we will assume that you have no objections. VAr E NOV 2 3 2005 TO WN OF A GARAM w ' 36MA17VSTREET wd �� AGAWAM, MA 01001 a � BOARD OF APPEALS D MEMO Date: November 22, 2005 To; Building Dept. Planning Board Conservation Commission DPW Fire Dept: Police Dept;_ Assessor Engineering Dept. Health Dept. From; Board of Appeals Subject' Six Flags New England.#1746 Six Flags New England #1747' Please be advised that the Agawam Board of Appeals is in receipt of two new applications. Case#1746 (6.30) Seeking a Special Permit in accordance with Section 1 0-49 of the Zoning,Ordinances,to allow for the construction of a new amusement ride the Skyswatter which would exceed the height requircment at the premises identified as 1623 Main Street. Case#1747 (7:0 Seeking a Special Permit in accordance with Section 180-49 of the Zoning Ordinances,to allow for the construction of a new amusement ride the White Water Family Ride which would exceed the height requirement at the premises identified as 1623 Main Street. The Agawam Board of Appeals hearing date is scheduled for Monday, January 9, 2006, starting at 6,30 P.M. and will be held at the Library Conference Room, Agawam Public Library, 750 Cooper Street, Agawam, MA. Plans are in the Board of Appeals office for your review, comments, and any recommendations you may have, so we can consider these recommendations and comments in our final decision.. If no comments and or recommendations are received within thirty-five (3 ) days from the above referenced date,we will assume there is no opposition. Sincerely,:: .. Doreen Prouty Chairperson "A LZ ,a DP/bb VED NO V 2 2 20o5 c 5 Board`Mernber Town Council PLANNINGS Town Solicitor OARD Mayor AGAW AM PLANNING BOARD Form D Application for Site Plan Approval Please complete the following form and return it and 10 copies of the Site Plan to; Agawam Planning Board Office of Planning and Community Development 36 Main Street Agawam,MA 01001 1. Name of Business Six Flags New Eb-gland Addressor 1623 Main Street,Agawam,MA 01001 t Name of Applicant/Owner Six Flags New England Address 163 Main Street,Agawam MA 01101 Telephone l41 786-9300,ext.3202 3. Name of Engineer/Architect Vanasse lean en Btustlin Inc. Address^ 505 East Columbus Avenue, Springfield, MA 01105 Telephone t413 747-711 ` 4 Please give' a brief description of the proposed project: See attached Project Narrative Revised 11/07/0 Six Flags New England Description of Proposed Project in connection with Application for Site Plan Approval and Special Permit Sky-Swatter Amusement Ride Six Flags New England(";Six Flags")is submitting an Application to the Town of Agawam for Site Plan Approval issued by the AgawamPlanning Board and Special Permit issued by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Applicant is requesting permission to modify a previously developed area to construct in its place a new amusement ride known as the" kyswattee'.The proposed ride height has a static height of approximately 4 - feet,which is under the zoning height limitation of45®feet for a Business Zone,but an operating height of approximately 100-feet,requiring a Special Permit.The attached set of site plans provide details of the proposed site improvements,which are generally described as follows: l) Demolition to remove existing,pavement areas and queue-line buildings within the project work limit ) Earthworks operations to re-contour the work area to re-define stormwat r collection locations 3 Construction of a new stormwater collection system,with new deep sump,hooded outlet catchbasins drainage mains and manholes 4) Construction of the new amusement ride,with new queue-line building,loadinglunloading platform,an access road to the existing Sky-Coaster,and a new ADA accessible entrancet'exit to the existing Cyclone rollercoaster: ) Modification of existing electrical and communication distribution systems ) restoration of disturbed areas,including construction of segmental retaining walls,loam and seeding. The work specified above is not Ideated within resource areas regulated by the Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act; The area that is identified for this ride installation is currently utilized as a,entrance/exit stairway and plaza for patrons to access the Sky-Coaster and the Cyclone roller coaster.The area is predominately covered with impervious material as paving and buildings.These existing improvements will be demolished and reworked to accommodate the proposed ride; This new attraction is being proposed for two reasons.Previously constructed new attractions(Water park Expansion,Batman Coaster)have resulted in a guest distribution that weighs towards the south and of the amusement park.By constructing this ride in the north end,it is hopefully that guests will migrate to this redeveloped area,thus providing a more even distribution of guests through the entire park.The second reason for the proposed construction is to help maintain park attendance.The addition of this ride is not anticipated to increase average daily trip generation on the local roadway network.This phenomena has been cited on previous tides permitted through the Town of Agawam,and yearly traffic study numbers submitted to the town have proven that the addition of smaller amusement attractions such as this do not increase traffic but help to maintain current'levels- For the reasons cited above,we respectfully request review of the attached application by the Agawam Planning; Board and Zoning Board of Appeals and seek approval for the construction of this new"Skyswatter"for completion prior to the start of the 2006 operating,season. a Copies of the " swatter" `de .. 4 a 't"t�� "� � �1z `�� hr �'0V 5 �. �;IY�t Y s � s t � f ��' 1t `� 4 �� . jt� ` I t �;'; � 4 i � V l `v � S t_ .��s � :..: �� r ��( ��l t� �, �4y }` �� it�S��t S �� err ��, �} .. ,��i14 \��° �� t t 1.. � fir �$ t ��1��'�3��t ?� " � y� �{{ \1\ �� S l y�l i \�$ �t� jai ..,,�� 1� �4 � SF2. � ��, . �{£ t �f ,4i \f 4n�13 1t �, r`v' t:;', .`¢�'� 1 1.':; l 4 e `tL�t��y:: ��1£�7 Zr t �'j��s � � � � ,,� �s� � �Y, l�� :Q S imam* 1 �S >,' ..... �t„ � )� � '� i) �i f)�Y ��j� t �� t tpt{ `l ��}�1z�££ £ � s{ f ��tt�t�ti��t � �€��[t � c41v�`�t� �� '>, ��e f i �� 4��d �� ti�titi �c. � �}� `\ 14t urt ��jz')�s� Y �.�'i�,�� tic... ��,rs 4�i� s � '�.�' � � �� r��c y t�� } '��`�,5\2cpt� s ,s �� . r �� 3 �� '� `� `�� r t t T � ,�. s: k t 2 �� et �:;, � �� 4� t4�; pie ii ,. t si }�1� �#� tt , �Y7 Y t � �� fit} s t 5 � ��,: i {st�� t ��i#� Ft �i �� t J11�}�� V � s „ o ��,,. t4 } �S 4 }2r k� fit e � Ltst �k �n 7i; h tit ti 2 s ti lfl �k5 }{tom { � S{l k \ l d r Stonnwater Management Report 1 six Flags New rngland Skyswatter Ride Agawam, Massachusetts Prepared for Sic Flags New England Agawam,Massachusetts Prepared b /Vanasse Han en Brustlin, Inc. Springfield,Massachusetts November 2005 RECEWED NOV 2 V 200 } PLANNING Vanasse Hangen Bntstlin,Inc. Table r n Project Summary...... ......... ......... .................. ......... ......... ......... ......... ..........2 ExistingConditions. ......... ......... ........: ......... ......... ........... ..... ........ . ......... Proposed Conditions ........... .......... ..... ......... ......... ......... ......... .....................8 Hydrologic Analysis ......... .......... ......... .......... ......... .......... . ........ ............ .. ....10 Summary....... ..........., ......... ......... ......... ........ .............. ...-. ........... ....... .,.......1 List of Figures Figure i s Site Location Map Figure .Existing Conditions Drainage Areas Figure .Proposed Conditions Drainage Areas Figure 4:Soils Map List of Tables Table 1.Existing Soil Groups Table .Existing Conditions-Perviouslirnpervious Surfaces Table 3,Existing Conditions Hydrologic Data Table 4. Proposed Conditions-Pervious/Impervious Surfaces Table :Proposed Conditions Hydrologic Data Table :Peak Discharge Rates Appendices. Appendix A.Floodplain:Information Appendix B:NRCS Soils information Appendix C:Hydrologic Analyses Appendix 0:Erosion and Sediment Control Plan CADocuments and Settings\e elle\Local Settings\'Ce-porary Internet`Files\OLK55\Drainage Deport-Skyswatter,doc i Table of Contents Vanasse Hansen Brain,Inc. Project Summary This Stormwater Management Report was prepared for Premier Turks regarding proposed improvements to their existing amusement park,Sipe,Flags New England located at 1623 Main Street,Route 159,in Agawam,Hampden County Massachusetts. This'stormwater management report analyzes the project and summarizes project impacts to the downstream watershed area. As per previous agreements made between Six Flags and the Town of Agawam Engineering Department, this analysis provides a comparative took at only the area located within the Project limit of Work. The proposed improvements will include the construction of a new "Skyswatter Ride",with queue structures for both the;Sky swatter and the Sky-Coaster and new loading platforms. The proposed ride will be built between existing rides known as Blizzard River,the Sky-Coaster and the Cyclone. The area for this project is currently an asphalt plaza,which provides access to the Sky-Coaster and the Cyclone. The existing area is approximately 27,2%covered with impervious material,with the remained being tightly packed gravel surfaces. A Hydrocad model,using TR-20 methodology,was developed to evaluate the existing and proposed drainage conditions on the Site. The results of the analyses' indicate that there is no change in peak discharge rates between the pre-and post development conditions for the 2,ltl,and 100 year storm events. The pre-and post development peak discharge values are presented in Table 6 at the end of this report. This stormwater management report provides an analysis of the existing and proposed stormwater management systems and describes how the proposed stormwater management system will improve the stormwater quality and control the stormwater quantity,and compliance with the:Massachusetts Stormwater Management Policy as redevelopment of an existing disturbed area outside of the 200-foot Riverfront Zone_ CADocurnents and Settings\emelle\Local SettingsWernporary;Internet Files\OLKB5\Drainage Report-Skyswatteradpc° Introduction P:W9624.0Mc&(Akr% 1enrn i i-.Ne LoCadon Man.d �"�+,e..:»✓` i xy' ( 7 i 1 �' U 4 - 41+6 i i.R Y,i i+W [ P " 7, r.`'> p"... � • 'e rt,. 6 r '�: "t " . e i "`fie .+*". T ��` � I. ri� f • .'if �'".'�'."* a a+ �*;,-�+,� �'e�+`!t°°'ryi°�T. ie ;�°'+ j ¢e 3 W F k J i (.v ° _ SWW yr W i F i iAI t FWwE{u# iTay ff [)r�t1 eee/ye • . E :Fr n l� °'t�° i W! Y !..�. ,xr'!f ! °i. • ' + * y o }I.�r .p !'4 E W, fi' ar t I a T,. '''. w } •r! . fir.. #a,P t:. f` a ,i air "A w a,, * '" ' r w # ,fir J .X�# r�ti . I it.��v r a a`°� µ�-^'-. .:. �y, �. syi � �m f,1#� �+*..♦ 5� ��& ,q �+°: —OIL _r �. r �: f[ ♦ #'*#i W� a W mr ��R�ai' r i i e � v • A* It uth s i t e s "VS.�� iL�. ($• yyryry � ®+r � T'�t-� S Jk. #� ppt ` ! r V4 Aive fic i e - J 4 d t ` �. �� a_ r �e �.. aE#4 ♦. e �. Ti r r �� w j `� �y'y �MRl. i 4�+� "1i $"t .l �Y� �1•� i i[ � �w-+.r.: " � " • ^x .;e a rrr N b a 7J t t I ` k Scotts �- .. - i i a vi 041 Site Location Map Figure 1 Skyswatter Ride October 2005 Six Flags New England N.T.S. 1623 Main Street(Route 159 Agawam,Massachusetts Vanasse Hangen Brttlin,Inc. 2 Existing Condit* i ions Six Flags New England is a:WO-acre amusement park with numerous rides and attractions. The Park is fawned by Premier Parks and Stuart Amusement Company and is located on 1623 Main Street,Route,159,in Agawam,Massachusetts. The area of the park that will be considered the project area for the construction of the Skyswatter rifle is a 68,475 square foot area located on the northern developed portion of the amusement park and is shown as the "Limit of Work"on the attached` plans. Currently,the Site consists of a large entrance walk and stairway,an asphalt access landing, the Sky-Coaster,and a power shed. The topography in this area is generally sloped from north to south.The existing surfaces within the project work limit are about 73%pervious and 27%impervious including pavement,building and stairs. There are limited grassed and landscaped areas within the project work limit,with the majority of the site being tightly packed gravel access roads. 'Where are no resources areas regulated by the Massachusetts Welland Protection Act located within the project work area. An entire subject Site is located within Zone C as shown on the Town of Agawam Flood Insurance Map,Community Panel number 2501330002A,effective February 1, 1978 included in Appendix A, The 100-year flood elevation for this area is elevation 57. The work area is located above this elevation,and all proposed work is located outside of the 100-year flood plain; As a result,this project has no impact to the existing 10-year flood plain;. CA Documents and Settings\emetle\Local Setttinn s\"Temporary tnternet FiJes^k{JLKB \Drainage R"rt-Skyjswatter.dos: 4 Existing Conditions VRB Vanam Hangen Brustlir�Inc. The entire site area lies within hydrologic soil group C, Table 1 provides a summary of soils found within the boundaries of the Site. Additional Soils information obtained from the Hampden County Soil Survey is included in Appendix B. Table 1 Existing Soil Groups Map Symbol Soil Name Hydrologic Soil Group MaB Mecksville loam,3 to 8 percent slopes C MaD Mecksville loam,15 to 25 percent slopes C Hydrologic Information For the existing conditions hydrologic analysis,the Work area was evaluated as two drainage areas outletting to an existing design point,where peak discharge rates were evaluated.The stormwater runoff in the western drainage area(Drain Area 10) currently sheet flows south from paved areas and turns west where it is collected in the drainage Swale along Route 159. The sto'rmwater runoff in the eastern drainage area(Drain Area 20) flows southeast into the park and eventually enters the existing drainage system. The drainage swale outlets to the Four Mile Brook located to the north,while the existing drainage system outlet into the Connecticut River. Table 2 provides a summary of the pervious and impervious surfaces for each of the above described drainage areas. Table 2: Existing Conditions-Impervious I Pervious Surfaces Drainage Area Impervious Pervious Total Description Surface Surface Area (acres) (/*) (acres) (acres) Drain Area 10 0.29 29.3% 0,70 70Y% 0.99 Drain Area 20 0.22 37.9% 0.36 62.1% 0.58 Total 0.51 32.V/o 1.06 67.50/f, 1.57 CA ants and Setfinp\emeUe\Local Sctfings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKWDtainage Report-Skyswatter,doc 5 Existing Conditions Varwasse Hangen Bmstlin,Inc. Table 3 summarizes the key hydrologic parameters for the drainage area used in the existing conditions analysis. Table 3: Existing Conditions Hydrologic Data Description Discharge Design Area Curve Time of (Drainage Location Point (acres) Number Concentration Area#) (min) 10 Route 159 Swale X1100 0.99 83 69 20 Existing Drainage X1 200 0.58 80 142.8 Systern The above Hydrologic Data and project work limit is referenced on Figure 2,Existing Conditions Drainage Areas. CADDcurnents and 5ettings\eme11e\LAxaI Sett ings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKB5\Drainage Report-Sky swatter.doc 6 Existing Conditions ry V w P� doa � � 1 CIS > ...y�lop m co00 9 In ca If 0 p � t x •Yl� r p f _x C5 co .yam u 01 ol Y. �d`J" ;f .«"f�. _ f', * 3a.. Mom '"•;;. ~�" `^ ,✓' it, .� `,� r''` `*," ':"`*"' ors; � w .. a "-' ' a-.•�: , ''}�' .t u*ESL, 4ws ��,l \ "',�,��,"•_+.,.�.,��._� w ` �h+` p�r•..�. � � �� ...-- } µox CIS Iq t i 1, cr -a.,..4....--�y'� �` ��`q :;'/,,r'� �J�,+� F d �� ::a•<y"`i� ,.CI '�a w'"a,... •`'`w'+..\...t�` � ""W�"� -�� "��-^'�„Y-°" r=.'._. , M. ,fig vvx .v _ .. Lrt In IQ xx 4 ` - 1 x "*~°»,�•......_ ...._..' �..w.._ ...,�.,•..._�„� r+ ,,,mayLqVl CID 71Ir.r � ri i r {' Ana !r to CON Xtri tl Irl M rl wc; �al S v( w Y °.�. '.` '.�,.. _� "'C.T ....� ""' -.-" .-•r' '^" "w""�..r- .".y L1r9 ILI zll 14 m u, r•- X xgo— 897 c� _. s, Vanasse Hangen Brusthn;Inc. rroposed Conditions This project,which will include the construction of the new Skyswatter ride,was designed to comply with the Massachusetts Stormwater Management Policy to the maximum extent possible as redevelopment of a previously developed area. Existing drainage and grading patterns were maintained to the maximum extent possible. The post construction site will analyze the same design points as the existing analysis so that the stormwater reaction to the proposed development can be determined and mitigated: The analysis of the past construction site provides for collection and management of the majority of stormwater runoff. A summary of the proposed collection system includes the following: • New precast concrete catchbasins with -foot sump areas and hooded outlets,new manholes and drain pipes. No change in runoff peak and volume accomplished mostly through routing the stormwater nxnoff into the existing detention basin,underneath Mr.Six's Pandemonium,recently approved by the Town of Agawam in 200412005. The existing drainage patterns have been maintained post construction to the maximum extent possible. Figure 3,Proposed Drainage Areas,provides a view of the proposed drainage area configuration and composition CA kr,cwnents and Settings\ernelle\Local Sett ngs\Temporary:lntemet Files\OLK8 a\Drainage Report-S yswatter doc 8 Proposed Conditions vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Table 4 provides a summary of the pervious and impervious surfaces for each of the above described drainage areas.- Table Proposed Conditions-Impervious/Pervious Surfaces Drainage Area Impervious Pervious Total Description Surface Surface Area (acres) ( (acres) ` (acres) Area 110 0.37 37.4% 0.62 62.6% 0.99 Area 210 0.25 43.1% 0.33 562% 0.58 Total 0.62 39.6% 4. 5 69.5% 1.57 Table 5 summarizes the key hydrologic parameters for the drainage area used in the existing conditions analysis. Table Proposed Conditions Hydrologic data Deseription Discharge 11eslgn Area Curve Time of (Drainage Area a Location Point acres; Number Concentration(min) 110 Route159 X1100 0.99 33 57.8 Swale 210 Mr.Si `s X1 00 0.58 31 14. Pandemonium comparison between Table 2 and Table 4 shows that the redevelopment has resulted in an overall increase in impervious area within the project work limit 32.►°J to 34.5%. ,An increase in the rate of storrnwater runoff from the development would be expected.Because the two separate drainage design points outlet to the saute downstream watershed,that of the Connecticut River,the analysis performed analyzed the collective impact to this down stream area,Section 4 further elaborates on this analysis and the net positive benefit to the overall watershed area: The proposed stormwater collection system will consist of new storrnwater collection main,catchbasins with 4-foot sumps and hooded outlets and new precast concrete manholes. "These Best Management practices will improve the quality of water discharged to the Connecticut River,which previously accepted untreated water discharged from the previous system through sheet flow. CADocurnents and settings\emelle\Local settings\Temporary Internet FUes\OLKB \Drainage Report-Skyswatter,doe Proposed Conditions STORM DRAINAGE PERMrr APPLICATION To the Town of Agawam,Department of Public Works; The undersigned being the Qwner of the property located.at_ 16 3 Main Street Agawam.Massachusetts 01001 does hereby request a permit to alter (eg::Connect to,Alter.Increase Runoff to or increase Impervious cover of an area draining to) a storm drain,water course,channel or detention facility at 1623 Main Street constructed as part of the original amusement Bark formeril known as`Riverside Amusement lark"for a new ride known as"White Water Family hide' I. A plan of the property showing accurately all storm drains, water courses,channels or detention facilities now existing is attached hereunto as Exhibit"A". (Submit in duplicate Plans and specifications covering any work proposed,including soil erosion and sedimentation control,to be performed under this permit is attached hereunto as Exhibit" ". (Submit in Duplicate) . Calculations determining existing and proposed storm water runoff,capacity of existing facilities impacted by the planned work and the design of detention facilities are attached hereunto as Exhibit"C°'. (Submit in Duplicate) 4; The name and address of the engineer or firm who prepared the calculation,design plans and specifications covered by this permit is: Vanessa Ilan en lFlrustlin Inc: 505 East Columbus Avenue,S[rrinafleld,Mai 01105 S. The name and address of the person or firm who will perform the work covered by this permit is: TRD IN CGNSIDERATIGN OF THE GRANTING OF THIS PERMIT THE UI WERSIGNED AGItEES: 1. To furnish any additional information relating to the installation of use of the storm drain for which this permit is sought as may be requested by the Superintendent, . To Accept and abide by all the provisions of Section 175-I through 175-5 inclusive of the Ordinances of the town of Agawam and of all other pertinent ordinance or regulations that may be adopted in the future. a To operate and maintain any storm drain and detention facilities,as may required as a condition of the storm drainage permit in an efficient manner at all times,and at no expense to the Town. 4., To cooperate at all times with the Superintendent of Public Works and his representatives in their inspection of storm drains; and any maintenance thereof; 5 To notify the Superintendent of Public Works immediately in the event of any accident negligence.,or other occurrence that occasions discharge to the storm drain of any wastes or process waters not covered by this permit or allowed by Section 17 of the Ordinance of the Town of Agawam: To indemnify the Town from loss or damage that may directly or indirectly be occasioned by the installation of the storm drain and related facility or connection APPLICANT: Six Fla New England DATE: 11.07-0 ADDRESS.- P.O.Box 307 Agawam, MA 01001 CONDITIONS OF PERMIT: APPLICATION APPROVED AND PERMIT GRANTED PERMIT NO. DATE: SIGNED: N rp ti r� ° Cnuj ra Li C4 CD it de mot' r'` � •..n , " "� � ' `. _ "ter. � vvwa... ♦; "M$. n w.� ��1 ,,. .." . ♦ ram,�� ' r _ • a , a � L1/j1 g ,>a ell- 01 c�t� ,. Ya � ".��`'�•-y.�,.�' �`fir' �^`��. t� �'' fib: � � ! � 'd A, �•'�;;...._ .�r"'�„, ..,� � ;''�, t r k - ,-• � ^ � , ,� ��` �. tit � "- � �` �' G. y�. r t � " 1".`^<„mow .n"✓,'. ram`•..' � d �uT a �\ �. o, .°„�,, ter_„»..-^•"• , `� t _..., w r ♦ 4. a a «,^,fie ` - ._.,,�....-,�.-..,... ...... (M1 t fY1 w+••e t . C� s Sf �y vim vanasse Hangen Brutstlin,Inc. Hydrologic4 . . i Hydrologic Analysis The rainfall-runoff response of the Site under existing and proposed conditions was evaluated for storm events with recurrence intervals of 2,IO and 100 years. Rainfall volumes used for this analysis were based on the Natural Resources Conservation Service(MRCS)Type III,24-hour storm event for Hampden County;they were 3.0, 4.6 and 6..5 in+cl'tes,respectively. Runoff coefficients for the existing conditions and proposed conditions,as previously shown in Tables 3 and 5,respectively,were determined using NRCS Technical Release 55 (TR-55)methodology;as provided in Hydrocad. The drainage areas used in the analysis of existing and proposed conditions were shown on Figures 2 and 3. The Hydrocad model is based on the NRC S Technical Release 20 20) Model for Project Formulation Hydrology.; Detailed printouts of the Hydrocad analyses are included in Appendix C. Table 6 presents a summary of the existing and proposed conditions peak discharge rates. The following assumptions were made in the calculations: The limit of work analyzed in the stormwater management report is limited to the limit of work where'construction is proposed, This practice has been agreed to with all previous submittals to the Town of Agawam for previous similar projects and is delineated on the attached drainage reaps. Runoff coefficients for the drainage areas are weighted averages based on the different types of ground cover. A minimum time of concentration of 5 minutes was assumed. The events were based on a 24-hour duration storm with a SCS Type III storm distribution curve. C:\Documents and settings\emelle\Local Settings\Ternporary internet'Fdes\OLKB$\Drainage Report-Skyswatter.doc> 10 Hydrologic/ Hydraulic Analysis Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Table 6: Peak Discharge Rates(cfs*) Design Point 2-year 10-year 100-ire ar Qgjign Point Xl 100 Existing 1,60 3.12 09 Proposed 0,67 112 112 lies rats Poi!A XINQ Existing 018 0,38 0.64 Proposed 0,67 05 2.22 Total Existing 1,78 3.50 5.39 Proposed 1.34 2.67 4.34 expressed in cubic feet per second The results show that one drainage area experiences a substantial decrease in stormwater runoff while the other experiences an increase.In looking at design point X1100,the receptor of the stormwater discharge is the Four Mile Brook,which outlets to the Connecticut River,The on-site collection system is located in a gravel roadway between an existing ride and Route 159.This system is part of the originally constructed Riverside Park.By reducing the stormwater flow to this system through re-contouring of high points and collection locations,the impact to the area upstream of the Connecticut River is reduced, Further,the result show that this re-contouring and development with an increase in impervious area is resulting in an increase is runoff from Design Point x1200.This design point is located inner park,at the edge of the development area near a ride called "Mr.Six's Pandemonium".This ride, reviewed and approved by the Town of Agawam in 2004/2005,resulted in a substantial reduction in impervious area,as well as replacement of an aged collection system without controls.To offset this slight increase in stormwater runoff from the subcatchment area,the new collection system for the Skyswatter area will be outlet into the footprint of the Mr.Six ride.The flow path for this collected with will follow are series of ground swales and water quality swales.This flow path,when combined with new Best Management practices upstream of the new collection system,will not only improve stormwater quality but increase the time of concentrations from the discharge location of the new system to the ultimate discharge at the Connecticut River. Because these two discharge locations outlet to the same downstream watershed area,a comparison of the net effect of the development was performed to see if the intent of the Stormwater Management Policy was met,which states that the effect of downstream flooding must be met or reduced for new development.Table 6 shows that,overall,the net stormwater runoff from this development is reduced. CA Documents and settings\emeUe\Local Settinp\Temporary Internet F9es\OLKB5\Drainage Report-Skyswatter-doe 11 Hydrologic/ Hydraulic Analysis YM anasse Hanger Brustlin,'Inc. 5 Summary The Applicant is proposing construction of a new Skyswatter Ride. The ride is proposed for an area not located within any resource areas. The proposed redevelopment of this area will include the removal of existing pavement,a retaining wall,auxiliary buildings,and a stairway to be replaced with the construction of the new Skyswatter ride,queue-line buildings,landscaped/grassed areas,ADA accessible ramps and walkways. This redevelopment has resulted in an increase in impervious area within the work limit.However, the division of the work site into two drainage areas and deign points has indicated that the net effect to the downstream watershed..area,The Connecticut River, is'a reduction in stormwater runoff for a design storms considered. Further,the construction of a new stormwater collection system with improved facilities such as deep sump,hood catch basins and water quality swate will improve the quality of stormwater entering the watershed area. # CA Documents and settings\emeHe1Lc al settangsWempoaary Intemet ices`OLK 51Drainage Report-Skyswattendoc 12Hydrologic/ Hydraulic Analysis am%e Han en Brustlin,Inc. Appendix Floodplain Settings\\ porary Internet FilesOt�D€KB5\Drainage Report- kyswattmdoc C l7 cs�r Berets and 5ettirF s eeneiletil jai 13 Erosion and Sediment Control Ptah t W 0 APF€OXiMlA'TE SCALE Boo t? 800 FEET rn Q : NATIONAL FIGOD HISURAN E PROGRAM tr FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP' TOWN of AGAWAM, � t1 E ,ACHUSETTS zolrl� All F�� AS� ZONE- RAMEN COUNTY ZONE COMMUNITY-fANEI NUMBERZONE B '' E _ 260133 0002 ZONE PAGE 2 OF 2 •:�': (SEE MAW INDEX POP PAGES NO7'PHlNTtiOl w A w EFFECI`iYE ° lV E Ft, t a s ! > �r F +fE .F U.S.DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND UHBAM OF-VEL T Wr CH-OtA,WWRAMCM A00000TTRATrsrfr This is an cocia6 cow of a portion of the above referesteed flood map. it was exceed using F-M3A'On-tine. ramp does rwt refect chartgae or arxtants which may ham been made aLbsequent to the data on the, title block_ For the latest product`Irmn., on about Natlonai Flow insurn e. Program good maps check the FEMA Flood" Map tore at wwwaarac_fama:gou Vanasse Hangen Brustiizt,Inc. Appendix NRCS Soils Information CADocurnents and Settingslemelle\Local Settinp\Ternporary Internet Files\OLKU5\Drainage Report-skywatter.doc i 14 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan . r - i SOIL CODE _ i?ESCRIP'TIQt+I Ir '` Mae MECKE VILLE LOAM, 3 TO 8 PERCENT SLOPE MtgD MEKEL+ILLE LOAIti1a 15 TO 25 PERCENT SLOPES NOTE! 1001 DENSE TREES 1, NR S SOIL TYPES WERE TAKEN FROM **SOIL SURVEY :U GE HIAMP©EN COUNTY, r , , �°' ", MASSACHUSETTS, CENTRAL PART, MAY 1978, SHEET 38a 4 2. THE ENTIRE PROPOSEDSITE AREA IS WITHIN HYDROLOGIC 551 SOIL GROUP C. 3: THIS ENTIRE SITE IS ALSO LOCATED WITHIN AN AREA isW4 DESIGNATED AS AREAS GE 'x `` •. "' $ 14E STRIPPED LANDS TOP SOIL tw AND SUB--SOIL REMOVED, t� I t 4� � �` -y� "'r �' °� ' ''`��': �.-• � `'`�, ',w �,�- .,*' -- �., � 6 ACRES OR LESS.45 s a: r � --� # �. :��ttr`'"f f r"�'—^�""�-� � � •��*"' 1 � A F� � � ��:. E SQ , s�. Az Ii 4 x �.• ram* x " ` ;a F [ f �; � `: �r� ss e; ! r}` ! � } f.^`^ fix" �.{�' / °� ,�� `��`�q i .w� � �• ✓r fJ -� ..� � �" �}�� y` �t !/ � Si y' �•,•"r"` �'•+�r' r� r*°'"�� 1 tl � t'- ��k �`�"� °*x tr r ��". `•.y""'„--�. fi t}i EZ , a`f 0 ✓' +� " �'y r .• `` _ wr y Q 25 50 Feet ggj Figure 4 October 2005 °� I l 4 t �,,� � � c '� ? fr i � 5� �. i r- `"`.°�"�.< pCa a ` � �'�•,� T r g _ rr - j Jr Soils New England I � V Six Flags �y 1623 t(Route 1 9) ', : i i 9 _ #. t• ' f _1 t.. •'' r e': t` r«I� y ;, �'.tr 'r'?1.i",r✓; ^A ' .•fit i� .✓° { a , N rn,Massachusetts ' _. _- _ L PAPS' SHEET NUMBER , Wki Q 300 000 FEET WA LAI -4'y-a. �' r. � �7 mot'. + }`` � `� k' 4� •e3i; �.. r4t�t3 ��''yyyka "� �• �" � , '49p D� �, r � t•�� •� •+�a 1 ,y'' 6Y f fk p. '+i''� � ` � r ".4J. 3 � � �`4 .+�> 'fir.� t �" _+k'?� �" `f �L 3 1�,.' ")r r • °. �:v� � r#� P';, fi }ek"��e� �� rY �.J `d+� Y k. 4�� Y <% 't•t y.. r d �. x � 4L d3 icy i '$ Syr. i � *�_�✓'��, "�� .y v ,�., '� + ° was -�!+ 4r ;3 T v ` M1l.. ..y�{ ® V��' •r, jx9 .fl'•" y /yl�cli 1 +,. w,,�.. y1'U' �! w tj✓li I'Nk �'w ,,+ �a $ ::$ sR*-. ,i: 4 F 1) Y.' F �P P >� �tlAi i ..'.�} .3; v'' r ', ` ' '�. `� ��.� :. .yr�....�.r '�`�•9!. `�` q i. PPP Sotir Ry t""`s: S 'V7 PXu4 ,y4. a - t�t r JAq �w srwF ..AGA , u•MW,aax_o.h..�M„u,� .=..,T } F, _ 1 �` Y `t: �Y!'f 1 uz +. r4„r'��,y,� �"' � a;'„Rr �, �� ;,Y;�,.•e y w '*" 'S i � a - Al 42 oil, 1 E z P' 4 �' �.�,. �._. , �� i'4IO* '. Y• 4 y # TEA $�s �Y�Sks. � e6°.M° Y/k. t✓ :�,;.a ;�`"'� -,i''.*. ` :e' �v, � 4 ,,m c.. matx"#e''�' ,+ x*y�''?d :...�.��ycld,�^'"� ' ..1Jt� 7S ❑ 'r p'-' `S`a- a„r'"'4 rt #.aj CS k i , V' �� .s-� 'i'4 A'� "�.'�[Y�iCa.J l+ wi �5 ..per q �ram•.�.. }� P . � r �,t1. f � L >wr::�'"i v. �'!' t "r•:w 5 v"�.- z 7 � rx k t 2' 'fi AWN 1 >r r R, 140 I SOIL SURVEY Most of the acreage of this soil has been farmed. Some most sanitary waste disposal facilities, and for wetland of this acreage has reverted to or has been planted to wildlife habitat, trees. This soil is not suited to cultivated crops because of the This soil has good potential for farming, woodland, and stones an the surface. openland and woodland wildlife habitat. It has poor paten- Proper stocking rates, deferred grazing, and pasture tial for most urban uses and most sanitary waste disposal rotation help to maintain desirable pasture plant species. facilities and for wetland wildlife habitat. This soil is suited to trees. Productivity is moderately This soil is suited to cultivated crops. The hazard of high. Important tree species are northern red oak and erosion is moderate. The high water table commonly ham- eastern white pine. pers tilling during the spring, and artificial drainage This soil is limited for most urban uses and most sani- systems need to be installed in places. When this soil is tary waste disposal facilities by the seasonal high water cropped, striperopping, minimum tillage, use of cover table, the slow or very slow permeability of the sub- crops, and incorporating grasses and legumes in the stratum, and a high susceptibility to frost action. Capabili- cropping system reduce runoff and control erosion. Mix- ty subclass VIs. ing crop residue and animal manure into the plow layer LxB—Ludlow extremely stony loam, 0 to 8 percent improves tilth and increases organic matter content. slopes. This nearly level to gently sloping soil is deep and This soil is suited to hay and pasture. Proper stocking moderately well drained. It is on hills and ridges. Slopes rates, deferred grazing, and pasture rotation help to are smooth and slightly concave and are commonly 100 to maintain desirable pasture plant species. 500 feet long. Axeas range from 10 to 50 acres in size and This soil is well suited to trees. Productivity is are oval or irregular in shape, Stones are scattered, 5 to moderately high. Important tree species are northern red 20 feet apart,on the surface. oak and eastern white pine. In a typical profile in a wooded area, the surface layer This soil is limited for most urban uses and most rani- is very friable, very dark brown loam about 5 inches Lary waste disposal facilities by the seasonal high water thick. The subsoil is very friable and friable, dark reddish table, the slow or very slow permeability of the sub- brown and reddish brown loam 19 inches thick; the lower stratum and a high susceptibility to frost action. Capabili- 8 inches is mottled dark red and brown. The substratum, ty subclass IIw to a depth of 60 inches, is firm, brittle, reddish brown LwH—Ludlow very stony loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes. loam with yellowish red mottles. This nearly level and gently sloping soil is deep and Permeability is moderate in the subsoil and slow to moderately well drained. It is on bills and ridges. Slopes very slow in the substratum, Available water capacity is are smooth and slightly concave and are commonly 100 to moderate. A perched water table is present at a depth of 400 feet long. Areas range from 10 to 50 acres in size and 18 to 24 inches in winter and early in spring. Roots grow are oval or irregular in shape. Stones are scattered 20 to to the firm substratum. Reaction is very strongly acid to 50 feet apart on the surface. medium acid. In a typical profile in a wooded area, the surface layer Included with this soil in mapping are areas, generally Yr' is very friable, very dark brown loam about 6 inches smaller than 3 acres, of Meckesville, Wethersfield, and thick. The subsoil is very friable and friable, dark reddish Wilbraham soils. Also included are small areas of similar brown and reddish brown loam 18 inches thick; the lower soils that are friable to a depth of 40 inches. Included 8 inches of the subsoil is mottled dark red and brown. soils make up about 20 percent of this map unit. v. The substratum, to a depth of 60 inches, is firm, brittle, This soil has poor potential for farming and openland reddish brown loam with yellowish red mottles. wildlife habitat, good potential for woodland, and fair Permeability is moderate in the subsoil and slow to potential for woodland wildlife habitat. It has poor poten- very slow in the substratum. Available water capacity is tial for most urban uses, for most sanitary waste disposal moderate. A perched water table is present at a depth of facilities, and for wetland wildlife habitat. 18 to 24 inches in winter and early in spring. Roots grow This soil is not suited to cultivated crops, hay, and to the firm substratum. Reaction is very strongly acid to pasture because of the stones on the surface. medium acid. This soil is well suited to trees, and most of the acreage Included with this soil in -mapping are areas, generally is wooded. Productivity is moderately high. Important.,, smaller than 3 acres, of very stony Meckesville, "Nether- tree species are northern red oak and eastern white pine. . , sfield, and Wilbraham soils. Also included are small areas This soil is limited for most urban uses and most sani-`, of moderately sloping Ludlow soils and similar soils that tary waste disposal facilities by the seasonal high water, are friable to a depth of 40 inches. Included soils make up table, large stones, the very slow or slow permeability of about 20 percent of this map unit. the substratum and a high susceptibility for frost action. Most of the acreage of this soil is wooded. Some acre- Capability subclass VIIS, age is in unimproved pasture, the chief farm use. LxC-Ludlow extremely stony loam, 8 to 15 percent, This soil has poor potential for farming and good poten- slopes. This moderately sloping soil is deep and' tial for woodland and for openland and woodland wildlife !moderately well drained. It is on hills ant] ridges. Slopeg habitat. It has poor potential for most urban uses, for are smooth and slightly concave and are commonly 2,00 t 17' 9 C HAMPD N COUNTY, IMIASSACHUSETTS, CENTRAL PART 31 s$ .500 feet long. Areas range from 10 to 50 acres in size and This soil has good potential for farming, woodland„ and are irregular in shape. Stones are scattered 5 to 20 feet openland and woodland wildlife habitat. It has fair poten- ,apart on the surface, tial for most urban uses and most sanitary waste disposal In a typical profile in a wooded area, the surface layer facilities. It has poor potential for wetland wildlife' is very friable, very dark brown learn about 4 inches habitat. thick. The subsoil is very friable and friable, dark reddish This soil is well suited to cultivated crops. Good tilth is brown and reddish brown loam 16 inches thick; the lower easily maintained in cultivated areas. The hazard of ero- 6 inches is mottled dark red and brown. The substratum, sion is,moderate. When this soil is cropped, striperopping to a depth of 60 inches, is firm, brittle, reddish brown minimum tillage, use of cover crops, and incorporating loam with yellowish red mottles. grasses and legumes in the cropping system reduce ru- Permeability is moderate in the subsoil and slow to noff and control erosion. Mixing crop residue and animal very slow in the substratum. Available water capacity is manure into the plow layer improves tilth and increases 3 moderate, Roots grow to the firm substratum. Reaction is organic matter content. very strongly acid to medium acid. This soil is well suited to hay and pasture. Proper Included with this soil in mapping are areas, generally stocking rates, deferred grazing, and pasture rotation smaller than 3 acres, of extremely stony Meckesville, help to maintain desirable;pasture plant species. 14 Wethersfield, and Wilbraham soils. Also included are This soil is well suited to trees. Productivity is high, species are northern tree Important s `red oak, eastern small .areas of similar soils that are friable to a depth of Im p p 40 inches. Included soils make up about 15 percent of this white pine, and sugar maple. map unit. This soil is limited for most urban uses and for most t This soil has Pori, potential for farming and opeland sanitary waste disposal facilities by the brief seasonal wildlife habitat, good potential for woodland, and fair high water table and the moderately slew permeability of potential for woodland wildlife habitat. It has poor paten the lower part of the subsoil. Capability subclass I Ie. tial for most urban uses and most sanitary waste disposal MaC—Me+ kesville loam, 3 to 15 percent slopes. This facilities and wetland wildlife habitat. moderately sloping sail is deep and well drained. It is on i This; soil is not suited to cultivated crops, hay; and the tops and upper sides of drumlins, drumloidal hills, and ridges.; dopes are smooth and convex and are commonly pasture because of the stones on the surface. 100 to 500 feet long. Areas range from 5 to 40 acres in most of the acreage a is T r l twooded. Productivity is moderately high. Important size and from rectangular to oval in shape. He i n a cultivated area, the surface P tree species are northern red oak and eastern white pine. In a typical prof layer is friable, dark brown loam about 8 inches thick; .... This soil is limited for most urban uses and most sani The upper part of the subsoil is friable reddish brown silt .dry waste disposal facilities by the seasonal high grater loam 16 inches thick; the lower part, to a depth of 66 table, large atones, the slow or very slow permeability of inches; is very firm, reddish brown silty clay to the substratum and a high susceptibility to frost action. apability subclass IIs. Permeability is moderate in the upper part of the sub- soil and moderately slaw in the lower part. .Available +� r* aB—Meckesville loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes. This sloping soil is deep and well drained, It is on the water capacity is moderate. .A perched water table is in the tourer subsoil for brief periods in winter and early sups and upper parts of {IrrrTTTlinS, dr`zztrrloidal hills, and spring. Growth of roots is restricted to a depth of about ,,tndges. dopes are smooth and slightly convex and are only 100 to 300 feet long. Areas range from rectan- 24 inches by the very firm hardpan. Reaction ranges from extremely acid to very strongly acid. ~t lea of 5 to 20 acres to ovals of 10 to 40 acres. Included with this soil in ,napping are areas„ generally . ;Ip a typical profile in a cultivated area, .the surface smaller than 3 acres, of Wethersfield and Ludlow soils. yer is friable, dark brown loam about 8 inches thick. Included soils make up about 20 percent of this map unit, ynt r't°;t?e.upper part of the subsoil is friable,reddish brown silt Most of the acreage of this soil has been farmed; some t �ia4am 18 inches thick; the lower part, to a depth of 6t1 has since been developed for honiesites. Axes,is very finn, reddish brown silty clay loam.. This soil has goon potential for farming, woodland, and ermeability is moderate in the upper part of the sub- for openlantl and woodland wildlife habitat. It has fair ° g�4 rnoderatel y slow in the lower part. Available potential for most urban uses and most sanitary waste , a capacity is moderate. A perched water table is in disposal facilities-. It has 'poor potential for wetland wil- e dower p dlife habitat. .�..,. Dart of the subsoil for brief periods in winter yearly spring, Growth of roots is restricted to a depth This soil is suited to cultivated crops, Good tilth is easi- f'°abuiTt.26 inches by the very firm hardpan. Reaction ly maintained in cultivated areas. The hazard of erosion is gea from extremely acid to very strongly acid. moderately severe: When this soil is cropped, strip In ded with this soil in Wrapping are areas, generally cropping, terraces, minimum tillage, use of cover crops, er.,than 3 acres, of Wethersfield and Ludlow soils. and incorporating grasses and legumes in the cropping n ,filed soils make up about 20 percent of this map unit, system reduce runoff and control erosion. Mixing crop' t of the acreage of this soil has been farmed. Some residue and animal manure into the plow layer improves acreage has been developed for homesites. tilth and increases organic ,natter~content. 32 SOIL SVRVEY This soil is suited to hay and pasture. Proper stocking MbB—Meekesville very stony loam, 3 to 8 perce rates, deferred grazing, and pasture rotation help to slopes. This gently sloping soil is deep and well drains maintain desirable species of pasture plants. It is on the tops and upper parts of drumlins, druinjoic This soil is well suited to trees. Productivity is high, hills, and ridges. Slopes are smooth and slightly cony important tree species are northern red oak, eastern and are commonly 100 to 300 feet long, Areas range fr( white pine, and sugar maple. 10 to 40 acres in size and are irregular in shape. Ston This soil is limited for most urban uses and for most are scattered 20 to 50 feet apart on the surface. sanitary waste disposal facilities by a brief seasonal high In a typical profile in a wooded area, the surface lay water table, slope, and the moderately slow permeability is friable, dark brown loam about 8 inches thick, T of the lower part of the subsoil. Capability subclass Ille, upper part of the subsoil is friable, reddish brown E MaD—Meekesville loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes. This loam 11 inches thick; the lower part, to a depth of moderately steep soil is deep and well drained. It is on inches, is very firm, reddish brown silty clay loam. the sides of drumlins, drumloidal hills, and ridges. Slopes Permeability is moderate in the upper part of the st ,are smooth and convex and are commonly 100 to 300 feet soil and moderately slow in the lower part. Availal long. Areas range from 10 to 30 acres in size and are ir- water capacity is low. A perched water table is in t regular in shape, lower part of the subsoil for brief periods in winter a In a typical profile in a cultivated area, the surface in early spring. Growth of roots is restricted to a depth layer is friable, dark brown loam about 6 inches thick. about 19 inches by the very firm hardpan, Reacti The upper part of the subsoil is friable, reddish brown silt ranges from extremely acid to very strongly acid. loam 12 inches thick; the lower part, to a depth of 60 Included with this soil in mapping are areas, genera inches, is very firm, reddish brown silty clay loam. smaller than 3 acres, of Wethersfield and Ludlow so Permeability is moderate in the upper part of the sub- Included soils make up about 20 percent of this map um soil and moderately slow in the lower part. Available Most of the acreage of this soil is wooded. Some at water capacity is moderate. A perched water table is in age has been developed for homesites and cosy merc the lower part of the subsoil for brief periods in winter uses, and some is in unimproved pasture, the chief fa- and early in spring. Growth of roots is restricted to a use. depth of about IS inches by the very firm hardpan. Reac- This soil has poor potential for farming and for opt tion ranges from extremely acid to very strongly acid. land and wetland wildlife habitat. It has good potent Included with this soil in mapping are areas, generally for woodland and woodland wildlife habitat. It has f smaller than 3 acres, of Wethersfield and Ludlow soils. potential for most urban uses and most sanitary wa Included soils make up about 20 percent of this map unit. disposal facilities. Most of the acreage of this; soil has been farmed. Some This soil is not suited to cultivated crops because of of this acreage has been developed for homesites. stones on the surface. This soil has fair potential for farming and openland Proper stocking rates, deferred grazing, and past) wildlife habitat and good potential for woodland and rotation help to maintain desirable species of past, woodland wildlife habitat. It has poor potential for urban plants. uses, most sanitary waste disposal facilities and wetland This soil is well suited to trees. Productivity is hi wildlife habitat. Important tree species are northern red oak, east This soil is suited to only limited cultivation. Good tilth white pine, and sugar maple. is easily maintained in cultivated areas. The hazard of This soil is limited for most urban uses and most s,. erosion is severe. When this soil is cropped, striperopping, tart' waste disposal facilities by large stones the b: terracing, minimum tillage, use of cover crops, and incor- seasonal high water table, and the moderately s porating grasses and legumes in the cropping system permeability of the lower part of the subsoil. Capabi reduce runoff and control erosion. Mixing crop residue subclass VJs. and animal manure into the plow layer improves tilth and MbC-Meckesville very stony loam, 8 to 15 perc increases organic matter content. slopes. This moderately sloping soil is deep and , This soil is better suited to hay and pasture than to drained. It is on the tops and upper sides of drum) other uses because of the moderately steep slopes. Proper drundoidal hills, and ridges. Slopes are smooth and con stocking rates, deferred grazing, and pasture rotation and are commonly 100 to 800 feet long. Areas range f help to maintain desirable plant species, 15 to 80 acres in size ant] are irregular in shape. Stc This soil is well suited to trees. Productivity is high, are scattered 20 to 50 feet apart on the surface. Important tree species are northern red oak, eastern In a typical profile in a wooded area, the surface h white pine, and sugar maple. is friable, dark brown loam about 6 inches thick. This soil is limited for most urban uses and most sani- upper part of the subsoil is friable, reddish brown tary waste disposal facilities because of the slope, loam 14 inches thick; the lower part, to a depth o'. moderately slow permeability of the lower part of the inches, is very firm, reddish brown silty clay loam. subsoil, and brief seasonal high water table. Capability Permeability is moderate in the upper part of the subclass lVe. soil and moderately slow in the lower part. Avail 104 SOIL SLMVEY � "FABLE .--FREEZE DATES 3N SPRING AND FALL �y Temperature) 4i+ Probability I 24 F $, 28 F ! 32 F a, Qr l r3 Last freezing ! !_ temperature n spring: 1 year in 10 later than.-- April 10 ! April 17 ! April 30 2 years in 10 ! $ ! 1 later than ! April 5 ! April 13 ) April 26 5 yeas in t later than-- ! March 26 ! April b ! April 18 l First freezing temperature ! ! 1 year in 10 ! ! ! earlier than— ! November 2 ! October 9 ISeptember 29 h 2 years in 10 earlier than-- i November 7 ! October 15 ! October 4 i ! 5 years in 10 ! ! d ~� earlier than-- ! November Ifs ! October 27 ! October 14 INecorded in the; period 1951-73 at Springfield, Massa TABLE 3.•--GROWING SEASON LENGTH Pw y.. !' Gaily minimum temperature �i°. ! during growing season 1 Probability 6 Nigher Higher 1 Nigher ! than ! than ! than 1 24 F ! 2a F 1 32 F ;o 9 years in 10 212 184 160 +}, 8 years its 10 $ 220 ! 190< ! 166 5 years in 10 � 234 ! 203 1 178 �sµ 2 years in 10 ! 249 !' 215 ! 190 1 year in 10 f 257 222 197 ro 1Reaorded in the period 1951-73 at Springfield, Mass, st a�e 4�•a� a i r«" .J rx " 1ti AMPDEN COUNTy, MASSACHUSEM, CENTRAL pART 1 05 TABLE 4.--AOREACB AND PROPORTIONATE EXTENT OF THE SOILS Map symbol` Soil name (' l Acres IFercent - 1 AgA (Agawam fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes .:_ _- I ] AgB (Agawam fine sandy ,loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes- _ _--__-_ -_' --I 1,680 I 0.9 Ago (Agawam fine sandy loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes --� _-- _-1 873 1 0.5: AmB IAmostdwn fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes - -- -_-_-_ --- -, 202 ] 0.1 BaB (Belgrade silt loam', 0 to 8 percent Slopes--___....----_-__-_ - -" -- -- 436 1 p.2 BgB IBroadbrook gravelly silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes____.___-- �- - -_r 620 i' 0.3 BgC' IBroadbrook gravelly silt loam 8 to 1 -_"'I 335 I 0.2 r. BE1B � 5 percent shapes-=.. ___ �._� .�� .._- JBroadbrook very stony silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes _I 335 1 Q.2 Bh0 ]8roadbrook very stony silt loam 8 to 1 p -_� -_ - '_--� 604 1 0.3 ,. ° , 5 percent slopes --- --- --- - --1 547 1 0.3 BhD 18roadbrook very stony silt loam, 15 o 25 percent slopes--_--. _-_ -_ -__I 533 1 0 3 BkB 1Broadbrook extremely stony silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes_-- - _ 208 1 0.1 g , Bk0 IBroadbrook extremely stony silt loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes---- 8011 icrookfield extremely stony fine sandy loam,, 3 to 8 - �__I 335 ( 0.) n; percent slopes-_- :. ..---1 105 l {1) i BOO ]Brookfield extremely stony fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes_.- -_ __-__I 246 1 0.1 °t Boil lBrookfield extremely stony fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes- _- __�_iI 66ti 1 .3 8r0 (Brookfield-Bock outcrop-Brimfield complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes - - --- 106 1 �1) , .•t BrD ISrookfield-Rock outcrop-Brimfield complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes-- w _-__I 677 1 0.3 - : ' BUB )Buxton Variant silt loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes--- --- --_ __ _----I 277 1 0.1 CaA JCarver loamy coarse sand,, 0 to 3 percent slopes---_ __- _ -_- __ _-__ 1 336 I 0.2 CaB (Carver loamy coarse sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes--_ .-__ --- -- -__-_1 141 I 0.1 CaC (Carver loamy coarse sand; 8 to 15 percent slopes-- --- _-. --- -- _-- r CkB (Charlton fine sandy loam; 3 to 8 percent slopes _ --- _: _-- - -_-__I 409 1 0,2 Ck0 lCharlton fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes -- -_--_ N1t 3 to 8 - - ----1 119 I 0.1 l� OmB IOharlton very stony fine sandy loam, percent slopes_-_- __ -_I 685 l 0.4' r.- x CmC ]Charlton very stony fine sandy loam„ 8 to 15 percent slopes__-.-_---s__-- - -_-1 666 1 0.3 �+ CmD (Charlton very stony fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes-- -- - --1' 275 I 0.1 l F.. CnB ]Charlton extremely stony fine sandy loam, 3 to 6 percent slopes --- - ---I 841 1 0,4 i4 rF CnC ICharlton extremely stony fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes _-_ _________-_-1 1,912 1 1.0' Cn D ]Charlton extremely stony fine sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes -_ -- - --1 1,515 I 0.8 COE ICharlon and Narragansett extremely storey sails, 4tep--_____-_____�-__-_--_-_.___- t 2,032 1 1.0+, 0p8 1Charlton_11o11#s-Roo1c outcrop crmplex, 3 to 8 percent slopes-_« - - ---I; 252 l 0.1 1r° v CPC 1 b ariton-laollfs-Rock outcrop complex 8 to 15 percent slopes a-- - --_ -_1 246 I o.1 }ky Drtr ICnaritan»Rock outcrop-Hollis complex, 3 to 15 percent slopes-----------------------1 1,383 1 0.7 `g 'T CrD ICharlton-.Rock outcrop-Hollis complex, 15 to 25 percent slopes----------_,,.----------1 1,463 1 0.8 De IDeerfield loamy fine sand__ _______ _ ____ _ -_ -_- -_ - EdB lEldridge loamy sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes 1 1°346 ] O.7 - - -_ -I 32b 1 0.2 EaA lEnfield silt loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes--- -1 59r 1 0.3` a `EnB ]Enfield silt loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes_-_-_----n_- ---,-„,---------------.__-- 595 1 0.3; 3 �aKnC ]Enfield ;silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes- ] IEnosbur loam sand------------------ -----$ - - __-I 485 ] 0.4' �. $ Y --. - _ .. .._I 4]!5 i T1.3 DAB 101oucester sand loam P p __ - � y , 3 to 8 percent slopes _..-_, _ - -- --_-I 152 1 0.a 1 rrf` 101oucester very stony sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes--------- __ _ �,OhC 227 0.1 101oucester very stony sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent; slopes --_-- ___ - -- 114 1 (1) I0loucester extremely stony sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes.-- ___ -_.._ -_---- _ 1 162 l 0.1 W oucester extremely stony sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes- --_ 301 I 0.2 ~ xD l0loucester extremely stony sandy loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes --1 256 ] 0,1 IHadley very fine sandy loam- � :YgpA lHadley very fine sandy loam, high _bottom, _0-to-3-percent _slopes -- ---I 662 I 0.3` v,x HDH Wadley very fine sandy loam, high bottom, 3 to 6 ;percent slopes-------------------- 1' 363 I 0.2 lHinckley loamy sand, 0 to 3 percent slopes-----..- --_ __- --- -- ------- 6,941 6 AB "Ric lHinckley loamy sand, 3 to 8 percent slopes- -_ -_ __. __, -1 7,572 1 3.3 ---_ 'l]BO (Hinckley loamy sand, 8 to 15 percent slopes --- -__-_.-------------------------I 4,318 1 2.2 D 1Hinekley loamy sand, 15 to 25 percent slopes -1 3,034 1 1.6 1109 IHinckley loamy sand, 25 to 35 percent slopes----__ -_ _� - _ 1 0.7 - _--1 1,273 ]Holyoke very fine sandy loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes--------------------------------l 122 1 0.1 JHolyoke very fine sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes---- --. _-_ _-_ ------- 135 1 0.1 [Holyoke-Rock outcrop complex, ,3 to 15; percent slopes-------------------------------1 321 I 0.2; - Luigi JLimerick silt loam____-..___»-_--_--_-,-, __- -- .._- ..-- -_ ...... -----1 1,062 I 0.5' r g (Ludlow loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes---------------------------------------- ---------I 500 I 0.3 ILudlow very stony loam, 0 to 8 pereert slopes---- __- -- __ --- ___ 480 -I l 1�.2 CXD' Il,udlox extremely stony loam, 0 to 8 percent slopes --_- -- „- -----I 719 1 0.4 4 ham, lt.udlow extremely stony loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes - - -_ --1 159 1 0.1 lMeckesville loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes -- -- -- -- _- --- -__;I 266 I 0.1 IMeckesville loam 8 to 1 percent slopes _----__�__-__-___-- 5 p p - - _I 187 1 0.1 Meekeaville loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes_._.,.-_____ -- _- -- 156 1 0.1 1leckesville very stop loam to 8 --1 0. y y � '� percent slopes �__ -�.:� __ __- a-_I 153 l 0.1 1heckesville very stony loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes ---- --- __- _ _--I 164 I 0.1 113eckesville very stony loam, 15 to 25 percent slopes--.-_ --_ _-_ _ __ _1 136 l 0.1 1heckesviile extremely stern loam --- � - _-1 250 1 0. 1 Oa� Y Y a 3 to 8 percent :elopes_ ___ ,:. __ Dar IMeckesville extremely stony loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes _ --I 194 1 0. 1 IMeckesvi�rq lle extremely stony 216 0.1 Norrimacsandyloa , 0to lo am, percnt5slopes�--to 25 eroen--slap---_-_-,_--__o-.�___--_ -_- 8,337 1 4.3 fir' ee footnote at end of table. t.G TABLE 5.--YIELDS PER ACRE OF CROPS AND PASTURE--Continued Soil name and Corn silage I Corn,sweet Tobacco i Alfalfa hay I Grass- i Pasture map symbol i P i (shade) i legume hay i i ] li TQrALULI Gloucester. i GtH---- ---- --- ---� 16 ¢ 1,600 � _-_ i 4.0 _ _. . 7.5 GhB, Gnc-_--_ _--__ ,. ___i _ _ GxB, GxC, GxD------------ Hadley. He, HbA, HbB-------------I 28 1,800 i 1,600 i 4.5 { --- I i i i i i Hinckley: HgA, HgB----------------- 12 1,700 i 1,200 1 2.5 i 210 Hgc----------.._---___w__,.j _, i 1,600HgD --- _ i i P i i Holyoke; Hob--- -- --- ---i 15 I --- 1 .__ 3.5' i 3•0 I 6.5 Hoc--------- -----_- _----I 14 1 --.- I --_ i 3.0 2,5 i 5 i I I i 2HrI---------------------i I i i i i i Limerick; Lk-----------------------i 12 1,400 3.5 i 6.5 udl"i LUB---------------------- 24 i 1,600 i - t 4.o ;' 3.5 i 7.5 lawn----------_-----------1 1.xB, Lxc--- --------__-- w i; is P I 1 i ockesville; MaB---------------------- 24 F 1,700 1,100 P --_ P 4,0 i 7.5 Mac---------------------- 22 � 1,600 � 1,050 � --_ 1 4,0 I 7.5 P P i P i P clan----------------------i 18 3.5; i 6. Mbb, mbC, M;bts, Mops;, Mcc, i i I I i i Merrimac: MeA, Meb-----------------i 22 i 1,800 I 1,200 {, 4 3 i I i i Mec----------------------i 16 i 1,700 4 3 i P i i i MeD----------------------i •12 3.5 I 2.5 1 _ _ Montauk: MmB------------- -- - 22 1,700 i _ I 4+O i 3,5 � 7,5 i i i i i i Mng, Hnc--------- ---- -I Mook,dap: Mu------------------------i Muck,sball.ow; 1 i Mx-----------------------i See footnotes at end of table.. TAMP) N COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS, CENTRAL PART 1� TABLE 6.--CAPABILITY CLASSES AND SUBCLASSES (Miscellaneous areas excluded. Dashes mean no acreage] Clam I Total I I I Soil 1 acreage I Erosion 1 Wetness 1 problem 3 (e) I (it) (E) 1 I e IAgtagIAergs I I 44,6561 -_ I - _ --_ I � I II 1 31 ,2021 7,4457 I 9,925 1 13,820 111 1 440,66441 5,142 1 3,4400 1 32,122 I I I I IV 1 12,1841 1,768 I 3,6443 1 61773 v I 1,3381 - I 1,33 ; 1 I I i 1 VI 1 15,2191 354 1 1,0244; 1 13,8441 I I I I VII 1 443,4251 4,412 1 4,592 1 344,4421 Vile IIS SOIL SLJRVEY TABLE 7.--WOODLAND MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTIVITY--Continued R { ana ement concerns Potential 2roductivity soil name and JOrdi- I I Equip- ISeedlingl Wind- I II map symbol InationlErosion I sent Imortal-. I throw I Important trees Fite I Trees to plant Isymbollhaxard I linita-I ity I hazard I lindo`x! t°o I_ !, L - Limerick. ! 1 ! I I ! 1 1 Lk----------------I 4w ISlight ISe ere I evere- [Severe ]Eastern white pi,ne1 65' IEastern white pine', I I I ! IRed maple----------- I I white spruce, Ludlow:s 1 I [ I 1 I 1 1.1,13, Lw,1----------l 10 ISlight ISlight ISlight !Slight INorthern red Oak----! 70 'Ea 3terna white pine; I I I I I IEasterns white pine-:-1 75 I red pine, II I I j white spruce,. LxB, L 'C---_------I; .fix ISlight I Modera to lSl ight ISlight Northern red oak---- 70 I Eastern white Caine, I I I I I IEastern white pine--1 75 1 red pine, I I I' I I IRed pine--------- -.I 75 I white spruce. Meckesville Mao, MaC, MbB, MbC1 20 ISlight !Slight ISlight: ISlight INorthern red oak----1 80 IEastern white pine, I` I I 1 I IEastern white pine_-1 75 1 European larch, I I I ! I ISugar maple-__------ 1 63 1 Norway spruce. MIMaD, MbD-}-- -_-,I 2r ISlight, IModeratel light ISlight INorthern red oak----I 60 IEastern white pine, 1 1 ! I IEastern white pine--I 75 l European larch, ISugar maple---------1 63 1 Norway spruce. MOB, MCC, McD-----I 2x ISlight IModeratel light ISlight l orthern red oak----! SQ IEastern white pine;, 1 1 ! I I IEastern white pine--I 75 1 European larch, ISugar maple---------1 63 I Norway spruce. I I I Merrimac: I ! ! I 1 1 It 1 Melts, MeB, MeC------1 spa ISlight !slight IModeratelSlght [Northern red oak----1 51 IEastern white pine, I I ! I 1 IEasternM white pine--1 64 1 red pine, ISugar maple--------- 1 56 1 MeD---------------I us ISlight ;McderatelModeratelSlight INorthern red oak----I $1 !pastern white pine, 1 l I [ I IEastern white pine--1 64' 1 red pine, JSugar maple--------- 58 Montauk; 1 ! ! I I 1 1 1 MmB--------------- 30 ISlight 15l ght ISlight ISlight !Sugar maple------ -1 65 INorway spruce, [ I ! 1 I INorthern red oak----1 70 1 whine spruce. I I IEastern white pine--I 75 1 MnB, MnC----------1 3x ISlight IMo eratel5light ISlight ISugar maple-n-- __---1 65 I orway spruce, I ! ! I I !Northern red oak----1 70 1 whits spruce, I ! 1 I I IEastern white pine--I 75 1 red pine, a # eastern white pine. Narragansett; aB, NbB----------I ao ISlight ISlight ISlight- ISlight INorthern red oak----1 60 IEastern white pine, I 1 I ! ! )Eastern white pine--I 68 1 red pine, I I 1 1 I ISugar maple--------- 55 1 white spruce, I 1 1 ! ! 1 1 1 eastern hemlock. I 1 1 I ! I 1 [ tMaC, IrbC----------1 rMr IModeratelSlght !Slight I,SIi'ght INorthern red oak----1 60 IEastern white pine, I I ! 1 ! !Eastern white pine--I 68 1 red pine, 1ugar maple---------1 55 1 white spruce, 1 ! ! I 1 I 1 I eastern hemlock. NcB---------------1 Ux ISlight I ModeratelSlight ISlight INorthern red oak----I 60 jEast rn white pine IEastern white pine-- ) 68 1 red pine, t I ! I 1 ISugar maple---------1 55 I white spruce, t1 eastern hemlock. See footnote at end of table, ; 7 . P4 HA14 P D N MA SA H US r , CENTRAL PART 127 TABLE B.».-BUILDING SITE 3DEVELOAMENT«-Continued r4q I Dwellings Dwellings i Small � .� Soil name and Local reads Shallow without J with ; commercial map symbol $ excavations basements basement ° s i buildings � and streets r Holyoke: e MOB--a----_.._--- ..__ISevere; ISevere !severe: ;Severe: q ISevere: I depth to rock. I depth to rook. " depth to rock. depth to rock. ; depth to rock.. r P + HOC----------�«___.,;Severe: !severe: ;Severe: ;Severe: ISevere: I depth to rock. I depth to rock, depth to rock. I slope, depth to rock. P I depth to rock, I DHrC a + Holyoke part.----ISevere; ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: depth to rock. I depth to rock. " ISevere; depth to rock. # depot to rook. slope, s �v depth to rook. I F Hock outcrop I I � q I ` part. I I I I Limerick, , ; I Lk__-----_....-,...,.__.[Severe:; ISevere: ISevere ! � qy !Severe: ,Severe: I floods, I floods, floods, I floods, I floods, q wetness:. I wetness. " wetness. e q r + wetness. , wetness. x" Ludlow; + q tuB, Lw -----------ISevere: ISevere ISevere: iSe+rere: � wetness. i frost action. I wetness q frost ISevere: " action. I frost action. frost action. ; q LxB---------------- : I Severe: 1 ° ,5evet°-'S ISevere: ,Severe: I wetness, I frost action, I wetness, 1 frost action, y r�s large stones, large stones. I large stones, frost action.� large stones. $ ,3 r, frost action. j o q e xipLxC«_----__---t-«___ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: ;Severe: ISevere: ., wetness, I frost action, I wetness;, 1 elope frost action. tM` I large stones. large stones. I frost action, ; frost action, I �+ - I I large stones. ; large stones. I w`l�eekeaYi l'le: I I I ----------------'Moderate: (Moderate: (Moderate ' : " iModeratet (Moderate: wetness. wetness, wetness. q �t , slope, I Frost action, I frost action. i # frost action, wetness,. Mac...._..-�._ q I q -�-wgModerate' (Moderate; (Moderate. � �'^s •., ISevere: Moderate: slope, I slope, ; slope, slope; I slopes " I wetness. ( Frost action, ; wetness. I I frost action, wetness. I k aEs, Mb)D. ._. ..__- evere ISevere. ISevere: ISevere; [severe: ".P �1`• 1 slope: I slope. I slope. 1 slope, I slope. e It ------------'Moderate: !Moderate:t : IModerate� Moderates Moderate: wetness, ( wetness, I wetness, ; slope, I frost action. .. { large stones. I frost I action, large stones. frost action,large stones I wetness, I w i I large stones. ; ` I e �ltCn"...-®.._____. --(Moderate llmod at ! � I; er e: IMc�cer;�.e. ;S�e:=r e:; Moderate:: slope, � I slope, slope, I slope.: I shape, wetness, wetness, I wetness, I I frost action, 1 large stones. I large stones. i large stones. a I __~---------ISevere:.: ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: IModerate: I large stones. I large stones,. I large stones. I large stones. I large stones, u I I I I frost action. '"�." ---------ISevere: ISevere: ISevere: (severe: (Moderate: s}•,�. I large stones. I large stones'. , large stones. I slope, I slope, ;- 1 large stones. i large stones, I I I I frost action. '-----------ISevere: ISevere: I,Severe ISevere: II Sevsre: slope, I slope, q slope, I slope, I slope,. %sw I large :stones. I large stones. i large stones � large stones. I r Pete at end of table. i w 138 SOIL SURVEY �} w TABLE .--SANITARY FACILITIES--Continued a I Septic tank I I Trench $ Area Soil name and $ absorption $ Sewage lagoon $ sanitary $ sanitary map symbol $ fields $ areas $ landfill $ landfill , Daily d and E fear l $ Hinckley: $ d HE----------------!Sevvere: E g dsevere $Severe; ISevere: Mar. slope. ; slope, I slope, I slope, $ area real seepage. I seepage. I seepage. I slope, too sandy P Holyoke; I $ $ $ $ HOB----------- ----ISevere: dSevere: Isevere: °¢ I depth �o rock. I depth to rock eag $Poor: ' p � $ depth to rock, I seepage. $ thin lays s seepage. seepage. I I area real i ' •„ HOG----------------,Severe: ;Severe: Isevere: (Severe: $Poor; :# I depth to rock. I slope, $ depth to rock, $ seepage. I thin Jaye ° d depth to rock-, ; seepage. $ area real.: ' > seepage.2HrC: I d I Holyoke part-----ISevere: Isevere- ,Severe: (Severe: EPoarr !I "$y $ depth to rook,. $ slope, $ depth to rook, $ seepage. $ thin Jaye I $ depth to nook, ! seepage.; I I area real d seepage, d i Rack outcrop part. Limerick: $ I $ d tk-----------------Isevere: ISevere: ISevere: Isevere: IPoor: floods, floods, I floods, I floods, I floods, wetness, vetness . ! wetness„ ; wetness. wetness. Ludlow: $ ! $ $ d LuB----------,----- Severe: IModerate: ISevere: ISevere: (Fair: Peres slowly.�. I small stones. I wetness. I wetness:... small sto w LwB-----------..----ISevere: IModerate. ,Severe: d Peres slowly. I large stones. : ISevere: IF rt y� I wetness. w I B I � wetness. � large sto LxS----------------(Severe:: !severe: Isevere: ESevere: jPoor: I large stones, I large stones. I large stones, , wetness. I lame star F , I Peres slowly. I ; wetness. I ?� a LxC----------------ISevere; I Severe: ISevere: (Severe: I Pa®r:: I large stones, I large stones, I large stones, I wetness. I large sto I Peres slowly. I slope. I wetness. I d d 'I Meckesville: I I I I I � '! MaB-------------- IModerate IModerate: Moderate: (Fair:1� � --(Severe: Peres slowly. I slope, I wetness. I wetness. I small sto c small stones. I µ�. MaC----------------ISevere: (Severe: IModerate: IModerate. Mir. I Peres slowly. I slope,, I wetness. I wetness, I slope, I $ I $ slope, I small stet I I 1 MaD----------- ---- Severe: !Severe: I I sI I IModerate:: (Severe: Poor, I slope, I slope. I wetness, I slope, I slope.: + " I pares slowly. slo pe. ! wetness. I � MbB--------------- Isevere: IModerate; IModerate: I Mod ers to: I Fair: Pares slowly. I slope, j{ wetness, I wetness. I large stc large atones.. i Large stones. MbC`---------- ISevere: ISevere:tl e! IModerate:: IModerate: IFair; . I Peres slowly. I slope.: I wetness, I wetness, I slope, s I I I large stones. I slope. I large atc s MbD-------:._-------(severe; ISevere: ISevere: 15evere: 1poor, } .• I slope, I slope. I wetness. I slope, I slopes. f ! pens slowly. 1 wetness. " See footnotes at end of table. : 6 148 SOIL SURVEY s' �Y, TABLE t0.--Cf13V8'f'FRUCT3t1N MATERIALS--Continued w.., Soil name and I Poadfill Sand 1 Gravel { Topsoil # reap symbolIf'* x, 1 1 I ;; Holyoke: I 1 1 I ra Noll, HOC - --_..-------Poor: ;Unsuited: IUnsuit+ d. jPoor: •=y �r thin layer, I excess fines, ; excess fines,, I thin layer, . I area reclaim. I thin layer. I thin layer. I area reclaim. tHrC: I I 1 I aXv Ie Holyoke part-------]Poor: lUnsuited: 1Unsuit d: Pear: n��f I thin layer, 1 excess fines,, excess fines, thin layer, $ I area reclaim. a thin layer. thin .layer. I area reclaim.- Rook outcrop pert. Limerick: I 1 I I z � Lk---------__.,- ®----jpoor: lUnauited: Wnsuited„ 1P�cor: vAi, wetness, I excess fines. I excess fines. wetness. frost action, _ ` Ludlow: LuB------------------IPoor: ;Unsuited: IUnsuited: IFair; I frost action.. I excess fizzes. � excess fines. I small stones: k �' $nyf LwB;, LxB, 'LxC--------I Poor: ]Unsuited: Iftnauitsd: @Poor: d " I frost action. I excess finesa � 1 t � excess fine. I large stones. Meekcaville': MaB, Fair: @Unsuited: jUnsuited: @Poor: Y � frost action, I excess fines.:: ; excess Pines:.. I small stenos; low strength:. Matti------------------lFair: lUnsuited: jUnsulted: 1poor: slope, I excess fines. $ excess fines. I slope, I frost action, ,' I small stones. I low strength. Mb8------------------@Fair: 1Unsuited: lUnsuited; @Poor: I frost action;, I excess fines. I excess fines:; I large stones. I low strength. MbC------------------lFair: lUnsuited: Iflnsuited: IPoor: I slope, I excess fines; I excess fines. I large stones _0 e I frost action, t a� 1 low strength. MbD, MOD------- ----1Poor: @Unsuited: 1Unsuited: @Poor: I slope. I excess fines. I excess fines, I slope, Z � F, I I I large stones. 1 I I l MOB----- ----------IFair: IHnsuited: Iln®uited: @Poor: I large stones, I excess fines.. I excess fines. I large stones. }b I frost action I I I 11 1 1 ro ` McC------------------@Fair: @Unsuited: @Unsuited: IFoor: .� I slope, I excess fines. I excess fines I large 'stones. I large ,atones, I I frost action. Merrimao: MeA MOB-------------IGcod-----------------@Good----------------@Good-._--,.---------IFaior: 1 1 1 I thin 'layer® C _ I area reclaim. h � ti MeC----------------..-.[Good---------,---_---IGood----_---®_-.------1Good----- -----------IFair: 1 I I 1 slope, ! + I I I I thin layer, I I area reclaim. ; , +.. MOD=-----------------]Fair: Good----------------IGood-----------------jPOOr: w I slope.; I I slope. See footnote at end of tabus, !j r H ' PDEN COUNTY, MASSA HUSEIT , CENTRAL l';ttHRT 155 TALE 11 --WATER MANAGEMENT--Continued I Pond I Embankments, 1 Aquifer-fed I I Terraoes Soil name and 1 reservoir I dikes, and I excavated 1 drainage J and i Grassed map symbol 1 areas I levees 1 ponds i J diversions � waterways Hadley: I 1 I I 1 I A, HbA, Hbb-----ISeepage--------JPiping, INc seater-------INot needed-----INot needed-----INot needed, seepage, J inekley HgA, Hgti, HgC, I 1 I I I 9 0, HgE---------ISlope, )Thin layer, ° y � !No water needed-----]slope, ]Slope, I seepage. I seepage, ; J too sandy. I droughty. r Holyoke, I I 1 I 1 I HOB, Hoc--- -----Islope, IThin layer,, INa water, INot, needed'- --]Slope, Islope, I depth to rock, ] piping, 1 depth to roek. 1 I depth to rock, ] droughty, seepage, 1 seepage. I I rooting depth.1 rooting depth. r IEJrC: I I i � P I Holyoke part---ISlope, IThin layer, No water, INot needed-----ISlope, Islope, I depth to rock,] piping, I depth to rock.1 I depth to rock, J droughty, seepage, I seepage. I I I rooting depth, ! rooting depth. kook outcrop part. 1 ] J J J I I 1 imerick: I i Lk---------------ISeepage--------IPiping, IFavorable------[Wetness, INot needed-----]Wetness J J low strength. I I floods, I , ] II I I udlow: I I I I I J Lull--------------131op------------Low strength---IDeep to water !Peres slowly, IPerca slowly, JPeros slowly, ! slope, I slope, i slope. ILIIII, Lxa, 6.xC----ISIOpe----------ILow strength, IAeep to water, IPeres slowly, IPeres slowly, JPeres slowly, I I large stones, I large stones, I slope, I slope, I slope, I I I I large atones. I large stones, 1 1 I I I Meckesville: 1 J 1 1 1 I MaB, MaC, Map----ISlope----------tPip.ing---------INo water-------INot needed-----ISl.ope----------ISlope, I I 1 J I ] MbB, MbC, Mbp, I I MOB, McC, MOLD----ISlope,- IL,arge stones, Io water-------INot needed-----ILarge stones, !Slope, ilarge stones. I slope, 1 I I' slope. I large stones, = piping` I I 1 I I terrimae: I 1 I J [ I MeA, MeB, MeC, I I 1 I I J HOD----------- --]Slope, ISeepa;ge----_---Inks water-----.--INo't needed-----1 lope, Islope, I seepage, 1 I I I too sandy. I droughty. Montauk: 1 1 I 1 J I MmB-----------_-Isla e I J p , �Pi.pirrg_-.------.-�Nta water--=----]Not needed-__-.-JP+3res slowly:, IPeros slowly, seepage,, 1 I erodes easily, l slope, I 1 1 I 1 slope, erodes easily. Mnb, tinc---------]Slope----------ILarge stones, INo water-------INot needed-----ILarge stones, Marge stones, piping I ] I pores slowly, I peros slowly- 1 1 slope, I slope. Muck,de+ep: I I I I 1 I MN---------------]Excess humus, IExcesa humus, IFavorable------]Poor outlets, INot ne tted-----INot needed . I seepage, 1 hard to pack, I J excess humus, I I seepage.: I I floods. I 1 Muck,shallow: I 1 J 1 I 1 M ----------- --,]Excess humus, ]Excess humus, (Favorable--- -]Poor outlets, INot needed-----INot needed. I seepage, I seepage, I 1 excess humus, I I II hard to pack. floods Narragansett. I I I I J I Na$, NaC---------ISlope, [Piping, INd water-------[Not needed----- dope, Islope, I seepage. I erodes easily.1 1 erodes easlly.1 erodes easily. I 1 I f I 1 See footnote at end of table, 162 SOIL SURVEY <; TABLE 1 .--RECREATIONAL DEVELOP NT-«Continued fr°' I Soil Hasse and Camp areas ; Picnic areas Playgrounds Paths and trails map symbol I Hadley: `. HbA HbB-------------I evere: IModerate: IModerate: Islight. - o I floods I floods, floods. I Hinckley; ) �� HgA, HgB--------.._---IModerate: )Moderate: )Moderate: I Moderate+: ' too sandy. I too sandy. , too sandy. I too sandy. HgC------------------IModeratet IModerate: )Severe: IModerate: :• I too sandy. I too sandy. I slope. I too sandy. HgI}------------------[Severe: Revere: )Severe: I Mcderate t slope. I slope. I slope. too sandy. HgE------------------!Severe: I Severe. ISeveret Isevere: slope. slope. I slope. I slope. Holyoke: HoB------------------jSlight—-------------I"light---------------ISevere: ISlight rig" I I I depth to rack.- I e ' ItoE....-_®----.. -- —IModerate: tfloderal=e; Severe; (:alight.:, I slope. I slope, I slope, I ) depth to rook. I 1HHolyoke part------IModerate:: IModerate Iseveret ISlight. I slope. I slope. I slope, :r I ) depth to rock.. I e 1 I 1 Rook outcrop part:. Limericks I I I Lk-------------------ISevere: Revere. )Severe: ISevere: I floods, I wetness. I wetness, I wetness. wetness. I I floods. ) * Ludlow: LuB------------------IModerate: I light.--------_- --..«_)Moderate: ]slight; Iperes slowly. I perns slowly. LwB------------------JHoderate: I light---------- «---IModerate: IModeratet I large stones. I I pares slowly. I large stones. `> LxB------------------)Severe« IModerate: )Severe: Isevere: { ,. t large atones:. � large atones., � large atones. � large stones LXC----------------.-)aevere: )Moderate: )Severe: [Severe: .k Ilarge stones,.. I large; stones. I slope. I large stases mockesvi l.le: I MaB------------------IModerate: ISlight---------------IModerate: ISlight. Iperes slowly. � Peres slowly,., ) MaC— ----..«--------IModerate: IModerate Isevere: islight .. � < I pares slowly. ) slope. I slope. I I I I I HaD------------------Isevere: Iseverez Revere: IModerate: i dslope. I slope. slope. slopes. i See footnote at end of table. 6 <'AF * a�l ag y py HAMPDEN COUNTY,, MASSA ENTRAl- PART 171 TABLE 13.--WILDLIFE HABITAT POTENTIALS--Continued 1 Potential fcar brat el$ment _ of e t al as h bit Ors_' Soil name and i Grain _ Grass s1 Wild bard- Gonif- I Shallowl Open- I wood- Wetland map symbol I and I and I herba- 1 wood 1 erous I Wetlandl dater I land I lard I wild- I seed I legumesl ceous I trees I plants 1 plants I areas I gild- I wild- I life life I as 1P I I 1 l - I 1 1 I I Ludlo 1 k 1 I I l I I I LxG---------------Ivory [Very 10ood k Good' l Good ]Very I very I Pour Weir IVery poor. I poor.. I I poorA poor. 1 poor, Meckesville: I I I l l 1 ! l I MaB---------------IFair IGood IGood IGood IGood IPdor IVery IGood IGood; IVery I 1 I poor. I I I poor;. I 1 I i Ma ----- -----_-.--IFair IGood IGood IGood IGood IVery IVery IGood IGood Ivory I poor. I poor. I I 1 poor.. I I j I I I I I ---------------]Poor IFair IGood IGood IGood IVery IVery IFair IGood IVery I I I I I poor, I poor. I I 1 poor, I I I 1t F Mod_,.._,._-®___--_..IVery ]`Poor IGood lGood IGood" tPoor IVery IPdor IGood IVery I poor. I I I I poor. I I I poor, MbC, NOD----------Ivory IPdor IGOOd IGood' lGood lVery IVery IPdor IGood IVery 1 pour. I 1 1 I I poor. I poor. I I I poor, MeB---------------lVery Ivory IGood IGood IGood !Poor IVery IPdor )Fair Ivory I poor. I poor, 1 I 3 I poor. , 1 1 poor, 1 11 I l 1 1 MCC, HOD----------IVery IVery IGood IGood IGood IVery IVery IPdor IFair lVery 1 1 poor. I poor. 1 l I poor. I pour, I poor. a I l 1 � I I 1 Merrimac: I I I I I I r Rea, MeB, MeC---_-IFair 1Fair $Pa.ir IFair IFair IVery IVery JFair IFair IVery 1 i 1 I 1 j poor. I poor. 1 I I poor, Mel)------r_-__----jPoor lFair IFair IFair IFair IVery 'Very lPair lair IVery I I l I i I poor. I poor. I I 1 poor. I I I i I l 1 Montauk: I I I 1 MmB-----------}-IFair IGood lGood IGood lGood 1Pour IVery ]Cold IGood IVery I l I I poor. I 1 I poor'.. I I I I 1 MnB---------------IVery Ivory I Good ]Good IGood 1 P or IVery I Poor IFair Ivory I poor. I pour,. I I 1 1 1 poor;. I I I poor. I 1 l k I I $ I I I MnG---------------Ivory I nary lGood I GOod' IGood IVery IVery ',Poor l Fair IVery poor. I poor. i I I I pour. I poor. I I I prior, MMu------- 1 I I 1 p��..__�._....-__.._..__ ]Very Ivory ]Poor IPdor IPdor IGood ]Good IVery ]Poor IGood. I poor, I poor. k I 1 poor. I I I I 1 1 Muck.pshallow. I I I I Mx- .__.�_----_----IVery Ivory !Poor 1 Poo 1 POOr IGood IGood lVery [pool- l Good poor. I' poor. I I I I 1 l poor. I I Narragansett: I I I I I 1 I I I I Na --------------- IGood ]Good IGood IGood IPdor IVery IGood IGood IVery I I I I I I poor. 1 l poor; NaG---------------]Fair IGood l000d IGood IGood lVery IVery IGood IGood IVery poor, I poor, I I I poor. NbB--�__-- ----__IVer IPdor IGOc�d IGood IGood IPdor IVery IPdor IGood IVery IVery I I I I I I poor, I I I poor; NbC---------------I Ivory 1 Poor lGood IGood IGood I very Ivory I Poor l goad I Very I poor. I 1 I I I poor. I poor. k I I poor. NcB----- ---------Ivory IVery 1 Ccod IGood IGood IPdor IVery IPdor IFair r Nary 1 poor. I poor. I I I I I poor. I f l poor. k 1 See footnote at end of table. F 1 HAMPDEN 'COUNTY, MASSACHUSETPS, CENTRAL PART 181 TABLE 14.- ENGINEERING PROPERTIES AND CLASSIFICATIONS- Continued 1 ' 1 1 Classifcation1Frag= I Percentage passing ! Plan- i Soil name and IDepthl USDA texture I I Iments I sieve number_- !Liquid 1 ticity map symbol Unified , AASNTO I > 3 1 4 1 10 1 40 200 1 limit 1 index I inches I I I _ 1_ I I In ! Limerick: I I 1 1 1 I ! I E I Lk----------------1 0-1215ilt loam- ---1ML IA-4 1 0 1 100 ! 100 195-100180-90 1 <30, 1 NP 112-24ISil-t loam- ---IML 1A-4 1 0 1 100 ! i00 195-100180-90 1 <30 1 NP 124-6015ilt lcam-------IML 1A-4 1 0' 1 100 1 100 195-100lb5-90 <25 I NP 1 Ludlow: Lua--------------- " � 1 0-5 (Loam------------IML, CL-ML,A-4 1 0-5 180-95 170-90 165-85 155-70 1 <45 I NP-8' 1 5-241Loam, silt loam 1ML, CL-ML1A'-4 1 G-5 180-95 170-90 l65-85 155-70 I <45 1 NP-7' 124-601Loam, gravelly lML, CL-MLIA-4 1 0-10 170-90 165--85 160-80 150-65 1 <35 1 NP-7' } 1 1 loam, silt 1 ' 1 � loam. Lw>i---------------1 0-5 IVery stony loam lML, CL-MLlA-4 f 5-10 180-95 170-90 165-85 155-70 1 •<45 I NP-8 1 5-241Loam, silt loam IML, CL-MLIA-4 1 0-10 180-95 170-90 165-85 155-70 1 <45; 1 NP-7 124'-60!Loam, gravelly IML, CL-MLIA-4 1 5-15 170-90 165-85 160-80 155-65 ' <35 1 NP-7 ! I loam, silt 1 ! 1 1 loam. LxB, LxC'----------1 0'-5 !Extremely stony IML, CL-MLIA-4 110-15 180-95 170-90 165-85 155-70 1 <45 1 NP-8 ! 1 loam. I I I I 1 ! 1 1 1 ! 5-24!Loam, silt loam IML, CL-MLIA-4 1 0-10 180-95 170-90 165-85 155-70 1 <45 1 NP-7 124-601Loam, gravelly 1ML, CL-MLIA-4 1 5-15 170-90 165•-85 160-80 155-65 1 <35 1 NP-7 1 1 loam, silt 1 I I ! ! I 1 f 1 I I loam. ! I 1 I ! I I I 1 I I I f 1 I ! I I ' ;I Meckesvilie; I ! 1 ! I I ! ! I 1 I Mab, MaC, MaD-----1 0-8 !Loam---------- -IML 1A-4 1 0-5 190-100185-95 170-85 155-70 1 --- I -- Y. ! b-191Loam, channery IML, CL IA-4, A-bl 0-20 160-100164-95 160`-90 155-79 124-39 1 2-13 I silt loam. I I { 119-60ILoam, channery IML, CL, !A-4, A-21 0-20 145-95 140.90 135-85 130-65 1 23-30" 1 2-9 l siltI siltyloam cla`y I 0M ! 1 1 I ! I ! loam. I ! 1 ! ! I I ! ! ! ! ! I 1 1 hb'B, MbC, MbD-----! 0-8 !Very stony loam IML IA-4 1 5-15 160-100170-95 165-85 155-80 1 --- I -- n'-19ILoam, channery IML !A-4, A-61 0-20 160-100160-,95 160-90 155-70 1 24-39 1 2-13 r I I silt loam. I I I I 1 I I I 1i• 119-60ILoam, channery IML, GM IA-4, A-21 0-20 145-95 140-90 135-85 130-65 1 23-30 1 2-9 silt loam, , I I 1 i e } 1 silty clay ! loam. McB, McC, McD-----1 0'-8 1Ext;remely stony 1ML IA-4 115•-35 180-100170-95 165-85 155-80 1 --- loam. I -- i 1 8-191Loam, channery- IML, CL IA'-4, A-61 0-20 160-100160-95 160-90 155-70 1 24-39 1 2-13 1 I I silt loam. I I I I I I I 1 I jig-601Loam, channery IML, GM IA-4, A-21 0-20 145-95 140-90 135-85 130-65 123-30 1 2-9 y, ! 1 silt loam„ 1 1 1 1 ! 1 I 1 1; I silty clay loam; ,Merrimac: I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 MeA, MeD, MeC, MeD! 0-7 ISandy loam--- --ISM 1A'-1 , A-21 0' 185-95 170-90 145-60 120-35 I <20 1 NP 17-151Sandy loam, ISM IA-1, 1 0' 165-95 155-90 140-75 115-50 1 <25 1 NP I I gravelly fine I I A-2, I I I I I I 1 I I sandy loam. I 1 A--4 I I I I I 1 ! 115'-261Cravelly loamy ISP-SM IA-1, A-21 0 165-95 155-90 125-70 110-30 1 <25 1 NP I I loam, sandy I I I i Fh 126-601Stratified sand 1SP-5'M, IA-1, A-21 5-25 155-65 145-60 120-40 1 0-10 1 --- I NP I I and gravel. 1 GP-GM, SP, GP See footnote at end of table, di; HAMPDEN COLTNTY, MASSACHUSE'ITS, CENITLAL PART 191 `ABLE 15.--PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF SOILS--Continued 1 ) Ava,ilabl.eI I Shrank- JRisk of no, on Erosion name and 1 L1e1>th1 Perinea- 1 hater P Soil 1 swell I Uncoated I i 1 I aetora symbol 1 1 bility I capacit; I reaction 1 potentiall steel 1 Concrete 1 K 1 T I I n/hr I Inr in 1 1 1 ow: I 1 I I 1 1 1 0-5 P 0.6-2.0 10 11-6 2d P 4.5-5.5 P`Low ow)L IHigh ..-- 0.24 � 3 1 5-24 1 0.6-2.0 10�0 -0.24 1 4.5- .5 I,Low- � -1Low- --Inigh- ----j 0.43 1 124-60 P 50.2 10,08-0- 12 1 5.1-6.0 ILow-------ILaaw- -PHigh- - -P 0,17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 ---------------1 0-5 1 0.6-2.0 10.11-0.26 1 4,5-5.5 1Low-------1Low - 1High _ ; 1 5-24 1 0.6-2.0 10.09-0.24 1 5.1-5.5 PLow-------1Lo ----Phi h 0:43 1 3 � � � ---1 ta.�3 1 124-60 a 10.08-0.12 1 5.1-6.o PLow-------ILow ------1High -- --1 0.17 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I ) I b, LxC----------1 0-5 1 0.6-2.0 10.11-0.2a 1 4.5-5.5 1Low-------;Low --- --1Hi h------ - . 1 5.24 1 0.6-2.0 Il,11 0- ,24 1 5,1-5,5 P -�-�'Low-_- --IL w -__---IHi h --_--1 .43 17 1 -. 124-60 1 <0,2 ;0.06-0.12 1 5.1-6.0 1Low-------1Low -.-----1High ----_1 0.17 1 suille: I 1 I P 1 1 1 I 1 MaC, Map-� -_I 0-t4 1 0.6-2.0 10,14-0.111 1 4.6 5,5 1Law-------IL w ------rHigh ___ _; 0.32 I 1 1 6-19 1 0.6-2.0 10.12-0.16` 1 4.6-5.5 1Low-------ILew-------IHigh------1 0.28 1 1 19-60 1 0.2-0.6 10-08-0.12 1 4.6--5.5 'Low-------1 Moderate P High_.-- ---P 0.28 1" Mbi , 0-8 0.6-2.0 11 0,12-0,16 1I 3.6-5.0 I1 Low_--.__-]Low------ 11 High --- 1 I 0.32 ) 11 1 B-19 P 0,6-2_0 10..10-0.14 1 3,6-5.0 ILow-------ILow-------Nigh—;---1 0.28 1 119.60 1 0<.2-0. 10.08-0.12 1 3.6-5.0 PLow-------IModerate IHigh------1 0,2& 1 1 1 1 1 1 ; 1 1 I MoC, McD-----I 0-8 1 0.6-2,0 10.10-0.14 1 3.6-5.0 ILow ------1Lew ------1High------1 0,32 1 4 1 8-19 10.6-2.0 10.10-0.14 1 3.6-5,0 )Low-------1Low-------[High ---1 0.28 1 119-60 I o.2-0.6 Io.O_o.12 1 3.6-5.0 jLow-------1Moderate 1High------I 0.2d I err mac: I I I 1 I I I I 1 . A, MeH MeO, McOI 0.7 1 2.0-6,0 10.12-0.18 1 3.6-5.5 1Low-------fLow-------!High -----1 0.17 1 3 1 7-15 1 2.0-6.0 10.10-0.18 1 3,6-�5.5 ILow-------ILow ------;High -----1 0.24 I 115-26 1 6.0-20.0 I0.07-0.14 1 3.6-5.5 1Low-------1L0w-------Nigh------ 0.17 1 126-60 1 6.0-20.0 10.01-0.08 1 3.6-5.5 ;Low - -?Low 1High------1 0.17 1 d � lontauk^ I I 1 I 1 b -------- -----� 0-7 1 0.6-2.0 10- 16-0 20 ' 3.6-5.5 1Low -PLdw 1Hi h �-_ 0.431 3 1 7-22 1 0 6-6.0 10.10-0.16 1 3.6-5,5 1Low-------1Low -Nigh -1 0.24 I 122-60 ;0.06-0.6 10.02-0.08 1 3.6-5.5 ILowa-------ILow- -)Hi.gh-- -- -1 0,20 1 MOB, NnG---------- 0-7 1 0.6-6.0 10.11-0.15 1 3-b-5.5 !Low -----!Law ----!High ---1 0.2b 1 3` 1 7-22 1 0.6-6.0 10.10-0.16 1 3.6-5,5 !Low-------ILow ---.--!High ----- 0,2b I 122-60 10.o6-0.6 10,02-0,16' 1 3.6-5.5 ]Low-------!Low-------!High------1 0.24 Ick,deep: 1 1 1 1 Mu-- -------------1 0•-60 1 0.6- 0 10-1€3-0# 30 1 3..6-6i 5 1LoQ-------!high------141i. 1t___,---1 . 1 -:-- 1 I 1 # I I 1 1 1 e1�As1�a�.�ow: 1 I 1 I 1sx- 3 1 1 1 I _ -.- --I 0 1 0,6-20 )0.18-0.30 1 3.6-6.5 ILcaw- _--PHigh-_- -IHigh -1 - 1 130-60 1 0.6-20 10.0 --0.18 1 4.5--6.5 ]Low-------l H gh------J Hi gh_-_--.-t --- I 1 1 1 1 I Narragansett: 1 1 1 1 I Nab, Na0----------I o-8 1 0.6-2.0 10,.14-0,20 1 4,5 -_ 5.5 )Low -----!Low --1Mo erate 1 0... 2 1 3 1 8-26 1 0.6-2.0 10.17-0.24 1 4. �-5.5 !Law - �---!Lox �----!Moderate 1 0,43 1 128-50 1 2.0-20.0 10.08-0,16 1 4.5 5.5 !Low -!Low-------1Moaerat 1 0.28 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Nb , NbC---------- 0-8 1 0,6--1.0 10,1 -0,18 1 4,5-5.5 ILow-------;Low ---•---IModerate 1 0.32 1 3 1 8-28 1 0,6--2.0 10.17-0,24 1 4.5-5,5 ILow-------1Lox ___---IModerate 1 0.43 1 128-60 1 2.0-20 10.08-0.16 1 4.5-5,5 !Low-------ILow -_----IModer°ate 1 0.2t1 I . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 NeB, NoC, NcD-----I 0-8 1 0.6-2,0 1o,10-m6 1 4.5-�5. !Low-------ILow -_--IModerate 1 0.32 1 1 8-28 10.6-2.0 10.17-0.24 1 4,5-5,5 !Lowe -----)Low ----1A1oderate 10,43 1 126-60 1 2.0-20 l i1.08-0.16 1 4.5�-5.5 1 Low---�----1 Low-------1 Mo eratt 1 e 1 0,20 1 Ninigrek.` I 1 t I I I I I Ng----------------1 0-10 1 2.0-6.0 10,13-0,20 1 4.5-5.5 Mom----_w_1Low _-- --!High------1 0,26 1 3 110-31 1 2.0-6.0 10.10-0.18 1 4,5-5.5 [Low-------!Law ------IHigh -- --1 0.43 1 ® 131- 0 1 6.0-20 10,02-0.13 1 4.5-5,5 ILow-------[Low - -. _11.1igh---- -1 0.17I Paxton• Pab, PaC----_- -1 0-6 10.60-6.0' 10-13-0,2 1 4.5-5,5 Mow_e------jLow- -lhoderate 1 0.24 1 3 1 6-30 1L1.6a-.6.o 10.10-0, 18 1 5.1-6.5 !Law-------!Low-------1Mo erate 1 0.43 1 130-60 10.06-0.6 10.08-0,12 1 5.1-6.5 PLow-------!Low ------IModerate 10.17 I I I 1 I I PbLs', POC PbO-----I 0-6 1 0.6-=6,0 10.10-0.18 1 4.5-5.5 ]Low-------11:owa --. --_!Moderate 1 0.24 1 1 6-30 1 0.6-6,0 10.10-0.16 1 5.1-6.5 ILow-------)Low -IModerate ; 0.43 1 130-60 10.06-0.6 10,08-0.12 1 5.1-6.5 1Low�-----~_1L:ow -- --_thoderate 1 0.17 1 PCB, PeC, PC0--•.--1 0--6 10.60-6,0 10.05-0-15 1 4,5-5.5 [Low-------It;ow-------jModerate 1 0,24 1 3 1 6_30 10.60-6.0 10.10-0.18 1 5.1-6.5 ILow-------!Low------_-Ihoderate 1 0.43 1' 130=60 10.06-0.6 10.08-0.12 1 5,1-6,5 I Low ------I Low-----_-I moderate 1 o.17 I See footnote at end of table. 196 SOIL, SURVEY TABLE 1'6.--SOIL AND WATER FEATURES--Continued 'Hydro-1 -_ 44fn .��- Boil name andr i logiclPotential mapsymbol !group ; Frequency , Duration ;Months ! Depth ; Kind ',Months Depth 1 Hard. 1 frost M d + 1 1 1 1 Ln 6 i Charlton'. 1CrC: Rock outcrop part. Hollis part----,' CID !Hone----------- -__ r -__ r 76.0 � --- a -_ � 10-20 !Hard !Moderate. l:CrD» I 1 , Charlton part--1 B ;None-------- >6.4 560 --- kLow. I Rock outcrop i It Hollis part----1 C/D None--------1 -__ ; ___ 1 >6.0 1 10-20 !Hard Noderate, h' i a 1 a 1 1 Deerfield: De--------- 1 B ','None--- ----� -_m , __ 1-1.0-3,0FApparentlDec-Apr¢ >60 --- IModeratze. 41 1 ' 1 1 1 Eldridge: EdB--------------1 C !,None--------+ --- i -__ 11.0-2.0,1ApparentrJen-May; >6Ja E -_- !Moderate, Enfield: i EnA, EnB, Ent:----1 B !None--------; 1 _- 11 >6.0 1 -__ 1 -_- 1 >60 1 Noderate E,s---------------1 D ;None--------1' --- i -__ 0.5-1,0 ApparentINov-Mepl >60 + 1Ploderate.. Gloucester: 1 1 1 � 1 GrB--------------1 A ',None-------- - 1 _-- 1 >6.0 F 1 I , --- 1 -_- I >60 'Hard ,Low, yy}}h}B}r, .yGy��hyC,yy, GxB.w 1: i None � 1 1 m II�� 1 t 1 1 1 ii..OxC ttxD--------- A °None---,---_-1 --- ` -,_— 1 >6.0 I k I. i _:"` I4oW.;... Hadley, 1 1 1 1 1 1 ! 1 He, HbA, HbB-----! B {Common----M--1Brief-----;Oct-Apr!3.D-6,0:ApparentlNov-May; >60 Hinckley: HgA, HgB, HgC, 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 a ' HgD, HgE---------I A !None--------- 1 -- 1 �-- 1 >6.0 1 -- 1 _- 1 >60 1 1 LI�r, k ' I k 1 ... pp 1 1 Holyoke: HoB, HoC---------1 CID !None--------1 -_ i --- i >6.0 1 --- 1 --- 1 10-20 !Hard 'Moderate. 1 i i P i i HrC: Holyoke part---1 CID !None--w-----I _-- 1 -__ 1 >6w0 1 --_ 1 -_- + '10-20 !Hard !Moderate. 1 1, Rock outcrop Limerick. P Lk---------------1 C !Frequent----1Br1,ef----_'1 Apr-Jun1q.5-1.5!Apparent!Jan-Jun', >60 1 --_ ;High. 4 1 1 1 ! 1 1 ! 1 Ludlow: LuB O LwB, LxB, LxC--------------1 C 1N'one-------- 1 11.5-2.0IFer hed ',Nov-Apr' >60 1 Meckesville: Meg, MaC, MaD, 1 I k r t I 1 MbB, MbC, MbD, MbB, McC, McD----1 C ',None--------M -_- --- i.-2.5-3 51Perdhed 1t}X'-Apr', >611' 1 _-- ;Moderate. 1 1 1 1 Merrimac: MeA, MeB�g, MeC pe f 1 ;, , k 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 MeD-------------- A 1Non�e--_-----1' 1 -_ 1' >6.0i --- 1 --- 1 >60 1 _-,_ "Low. 1 1 1 Montauk: C rNone--------MmB--.---___---_-_k � 1 --- 1 2-3 ',Perished !Apr-May$ >60 1 -_- ;Moderatp. I :. See footnote at end of table, >i I HAMFDEN COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS, CENTRAL PART 199 TABLE 17.—CLASSIFICATION OF THE SOILS [An asterisk in the first column ladloates a tax ad'unot to the series, $ee text for a description of those characteristics of this taxadjunct that are outside the range of the series}' Soil name Family or higher taxonomic class Agawam-------------------- Coarse-loamy over sandy or sandy skeletal, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts Amostown------------------1 Coarse-loamy, mixed, merste Typic Dystrochrepts *Belgrade------------------1 Coarse-silty, mixed,, mesic Aquic Dystric Eutrochrept's Brimfield--- --- _--; loamy, mixed, mesic Lithic Dystrochrepts Broadbrcok----------------- Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Fragiochrepts Brookfield----------------; Coarse-loamy, nixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts Buxton Variant------------ Coarse-silty over clayey mixed, mesic Aquic Dystrochrepts Carver -— --1 Mixed, mesic Typic Udipsamments Charlton - --1 Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts - Deerfield-----------------1 Mixed, mesic Aquic Udipsamments Eldridge---- --- ---1 Sandy over loamy, mixed, nonacid, mesic Aquic Udorthents Enfield-------------------1 Coarse-silty over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Typic Dystroohrepts *Enosbur$ -- ---; Sandy over loamy, mixed, nonacid, frigid Mollie Hapiaquents Gloucester - - --1 candy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts Hadley------ ---- --1 Coarse--silty, mixed, nonacid, mesic Typic Udifluvents Hinckley------------------4 Sandy-skeletal,, mixed, mesic Typic Udorthents Hollis--------------------1 Loamy, mixed, mesic Lithic ;Dystrochrepts Holyoke --1 Loamy, mixed, mesic Lithic Dystrochrepts Limerick - _- --1 Coarse-silty, mixed, nonacid, mesic Typic Fluvaquents Ludlow--------------------1 Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typio Fragiochrepts *Meckesville---------------, Fine-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic F agiudults Merrimac--------------- --F Sandy, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts Montauk----- -� --1 Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic FragiochreptsMuck,deep--- --1 Typic Medisaprists: Typic Medibemists. Fibric Medisaprists Muck,.shallow--------------1 T"erric Medisaprists, 'Terric Medihemists Narragansett---- ---------' Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic 'Dystrochrepts Hinigret --- --- ----1 Coarse-loamy over sandy or sandy-skeletal, mixed, mesic Aouie Dystrcohrepts Paxton --, Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Fragiochrepts Peat r- - -- --1 Typic Medifibri:sts; Hemic Medifibrists Podunk--------------------1 Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Fluvaquentic Dystrochrepts Pollux------------------ --1 Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic-`Typic 'Dystroehrepts Hayoham-------------------1 Coarse-silty, coxed, nonacid, mesic Aerie Haplaquepts Hidgebury-----------------1 Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Aerie F"ragiaquepts Humney--------------------1 Coarse-loamy, mixed, acid, mesic Typic Fluvaquents Saco Variant--------------I Coarse-silty, mixed, nonacid, mesic Aerie Fluvaquents Scant c Variant-----------1 Coarse-silty over clayey, mixed, nonacid, mesic Typic Hapinquepts *So arboro------------------1 Sandy; mixed, mesic Histic Hum,aquepts Scituate---- --_ ----1 Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic 'Typic Fragiochrepts Sudbury---------- ---- -_1 Sandy, mixed, mesic Aquic Dystrochrepts Suncook- _---_-_-__--_-.-C Mixed, mesic Typic Udipsamments Terrace escarpments--- ---1 Typic Udorthents Onadilla.----_---------------------- Coarse-silty, mixed, mesic Typic Dystrochrepts Wareham---_- -_- _-_-_I Mixed, mesic Mollie Psammagiuents Wethersfield-------------- Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Fragiochrepts Whitman-------------------F Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic; Typic Fregioquepts *Wilbraham----------------- Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Aquic Fragiochrepts Windsor -_- --1 Mixed, mesic Typi.o UdipsammentsWinooski---- _- --_-; Coarse-silty, mixed, nonacid, mesic Aquic Udi 'luvents Woodbridge________________1 Coarse-loamy, mixed, mesic Typic Fragiochrepts , *US �saxe,ssra- 45.�1Od73 IL SURVEY TABLE 16;--5(1TL AND WATER FEATURES--Continued ;Hydro-« Flooding I name and ; logic« «Potetltial p symbol !group 1 Frequency i Duration 'MonLha «« Depth Kind 'Months It Depth i Hard- ; frost So.' arlton: « « « « « ; « « 1 k Mont, MnH outcroptok art. Muck Hollis part---.-1 k d M CID ;Horse--------f -tea k �®- « >6.A { ! �-� r ICE-20 Hard IModerate Hum, N 4 ¢ — r k w t k w I k w �— w f k Muck it: r f k k w k d w k k { 1harlton part.—« B !None « _tr j —__ « >6.0 � -. « --- « >6Q I — «Li7Y7. Rock outcrop f k f w k 1 1 d k w Naa part. k t a w + k k d r w HbC tollis part----I., C/ 'None--------« _ « -.. ; >6.O ; -- 1 - i 10-20 «Hard «Moderate. NOD' 4 f. ; ' Nin ¢ t 9 w r field. E-, r--------------; ' B fH#rye--------« � - ; _-� 11.0-3.01ApparentjtDec-Apr,"k >60 ; --- 'Moderate. �` H 1 ¢ Id. P . #ridge-; 14 at 1 4 w F k I E B --------- ---1 'None--------« --- « -- «1 0-2.0IApparent«Jars-May; >60 1 .�� IModerater._ Poi Pb( « « Field: i a i s a w Po( k ¢ k k d d t nA, EnB, EnC----« B «None--------« _-- « ..- 1 >6.0 « -- -;- « >60 a - _ 'Moderate. 1 , Pea` En#sbur w k f w t ¢ r k w P@ w ¢ r + w t t k w s-----------_---; D !None--------„ ®_— r --- f0+ --1.0¢ pparent«'Nov—May' >60 « — - IM#aerate. k N ¢ I d t r _r: Pod k d d ¢. ¢. k d N t. ¢: #ucesterx y j « f 1 P tfB--------------I A «None--------« - - - « 6.0 ; ®,_ « « > o Harr 'Low. Pol yid GhB¢ GhC,: Gx0, GxC GxD---------k A "Norse--- --- w 1 d r 1 1 'I Be¢ w k -c --" w _-- d >6.O k --- r _�- 1 >6O , --= !Low. _ Ck adley k tl f t A 1 1 @ q He, HbA, HbB-----1 B !Common------,Brief-----«t1e -Apr!3 0-6.0:Appar-ent�Nov-May; >60 1 --- lHigh Ri #indkle HgA, HKB, HgCw r e # « « Bt HgD, HgE--- ---i A !gone--------1 --- « _-- i >6.0 � --'- � --- 1 >60 -- iG#t+p .„ 1 I Holyoke: HOB, HOC-------;--- CID !None--- ---« _- i -- 1 >6.Q ; _-- p« -.- ; 10-20 !hard IMaderAtex:: Holyoke part--- ClD INcone---- ---« >6.fl « --4 i --- « td}-c�Q s1)ard !Moderate.'.~:' Buck outCr#p part. Limerick Lk---------------i G 'Frequent----;Brief--.--I Apr-Junis3.5-9.!Appareoat«.an-Jun« >60 a -_- IHigb Ludlow: n d w P i d d w f N by LuB, LwB, LxB n LxC---------------I C' '.None--------a --# _-- 1 1.5-2,O I Perched Nov-Apr', 560 ; - w: «Hi.gh Meckeaville'a i k ¢: ¢. t: w w n n %. ! «3-.w``.•. e' MaB, MaC, Mafia, 1 &^li f :"tR •MbB, MbC, MbCM: MOB, MCC McD----' C " r -- --- , d k i 'Moderate ' k '#Torre_- .�.--% , «2,5-3,5,Pea~ h d !Nov-Apr% >60 w -- r r Merrimac: MeA, MeB, MeC Y MOD------'----- --X A None--------1 --:- ; i k' d ¢,• +a. Montauk: Mme---_-------- w !None n k t d t w BCdB..t* -^—¢ C ------....d __- « .,.._ V 2-3 rPerChed !Apr-May' >60 i —..,. ,M#dar ,,yy.�� ¢ n ## k r t k t ¢ r See footnote at end of table, - 1 1� VRB 16artasse Hann Brusthri,lne. pew ix Hydrological i CA Documents and Setttngs\emelle\Local Settin \T'emporary Internet FilesROLKBS\DrainageReport-Skys attar d oc 15 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,'Inc Hyfdrocad Analysis: Existing Condition CADocuments and Settings\e elle\Local Settings\Temp+arary Internet Files\OLKBS\Drainage Report-gkyswatter.€oc 16 Erosion and Sediment Central Plan 10, 1 .00 Areal 0 Reach 100 Drain 200 ' 20 Drain Area 20 Reach 200 StlbC�t Re id tin Link Drainage Diagram for EX Prepared by(enter your company name here) 1Of26/201 Hyd(OCADO 7.00 slr 001 2U 0 ISW2003 Applied Microcomputer`Systems VRB anasse HaWn Brustlrrt,Inc. 2-Year Storm Event . Existing CADocu rYents and et6nSs\emeJIe`L at ea rs \Temporary Wemet Fitcs\OLKB5\Draina e Re rt-Skyswatter do 17 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan EX Ty /t 24-hr Hamp-02 Rainfafl= .00" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Page 2 H droCA 7.00 sdn 001234 0 1986-2003 Apgtied Microcom uter Systems 10 2 /2005 Time span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=-0. hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SC Rear routing by Stor-Ind+Trams method Pond routing by Star-Ind method Subcatchment 10: Drain AreslO runoff Area=43,200 sf Runoff Depth=1.34- Flaw Length=247' Tc=6.9 min CN=83 Runoff=1.60 cfs 0.111 at Subcatchment 20: Drain Area 20 Runoff Area=25,276 sf Runoff Npth=l M„ Flow Length=222` Tc=142.8 min CN 80 Runoff=0.18 cfs 0.052 at Reach 100: Reach 100 Inflow=1,.60 cfs 0.111 at Outflow=1.60 cts 0.111 of Inflow=0.18 cfs 0. 2 Reach 2f�. [beach, 0 at Outflow=0.18 cfs 0.052 af` Total Runoff Area= 1.572 ac Runoff Volume=<0.163-af Average Runoff Depth 1.24" x EX Type It/24- r Hamp-02 Rainfa11-3. 0" Prepared b {enter your company name here] Page 3 H droCA 7.00 sln 001234 @ 1986-2003 A2plied Microcomputer Systems 1912812005' Subcatehment Q: Crain Areal Runoff 1.64 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.111 af, Depth= 1.34" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=S S, Time apart=5,00-29.00 firs, dt= 0.05 hr Type III 24-hr Ham -02 Rainfall= .00" Area # N Description 8,886 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 5,556 65 Brush, Good, HSG G 16,045 74 >75% Grass cover, Good, HSG C 12,713 98 Raved parkin parkiDS & roofs 43,200 33 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description min feet ftlft ft/sec cfs .5 100 0.1100 0.3 Sheet Flow, SOUTHWEST-100 FT Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2= 0.04" 1.4 147 0.0120 1,8 Shallow Concentrated Flog,WEST SOUTH WEST-143 FT Un aved Kv= 1`6.1 fps 6.9 247 Total EX Type tll 24- r Harnp-02 Rainfall=,3.001,' Prepared by(enter your company name here) Page H droC l 7.00 s/n 001234 01986-2003 Applied Microcom uter Systems 10126 2005 Subcatchment 20$ Drain Area 20 Runoff = 0.18 cfs 0 13.96 hrs, V lume= 0.052 et@ Depth.= 1,0 " Runoff by S S TR-20 method, UH--SCS, Time Sparc-5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Type III 2 -hr Hamm-02 Rainfall= .00" -Area f CN Description tion 9,700 98 Paved parking & roofs 5,273 74 >75%Grass cover, Good, FISG 10,303 65 Brush good HSG C 25,276 80 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description Mir feet ftlft` ftic` cfs 141.0 100 0.0060 0.0 Sheet Flow, Southeast 100 feet Cress: Short n=+0.150 P2=0,04a 0.9 122 0.1860 2.2 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Southwest 122 feet Woodland Irv=5.0 fps 142.8 222 Total EX Type III 24-hrHamp-02 Rainfall--3.0011 Prepared by fenter your company name here) Page 5 HydroCA007.00 s1n 001234 01986-2003 Mlied Microcom2uter§Ystems 10/2V200S Reach 100: Reach 100 Inflow Area 0.992 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.34" for Hemp-0 2 event Inflow 1.60cfssib 12.10hrs, Volume= 0.111 of Outflow 1.60 cfs @ 12.1 hrs, Volume= 0.111 af, Atten=OP/6, Lag=0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span-- 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs E Type llf 24- r Hamm-02 rainfall=3.00" Prepared by(enter your company name here) Page 6 HydroCA 7.00 Jn 001234 0 198 -20G Appl et#Microcomputer 5Lsterns, 101261200 f Reach 200 Reach 200 Inflow Area 0.680 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.08 for Hamp-02 event Inflow _ 0.18 cfs 0 13.96 hrs, plume 0.052 of Outflow = 0.18 cfs @ 13,96 hrs, 'Volume 0.052 at, Atten= 0%, Lag=0.0 mien Routing by for-In +Tran method, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Vanasse Hang en Brustlin,Inc. I O-Year Storm Event- Existing CA Documents ents and Settings\e etlie\ calSett's gss'Tem rary tntearaet ales\OLK 5\Dra nage R port- kywatter.doc EX Type Ill 24-ht Hamp-10 Rainfall= .6p" Prepared by {enter your company name Mere}, Rage k droCA 7.00 s1n 001234 Chi 1986-2203 Applied Mlcrocom uter 5 sterns 1 ra12612QQ5 Time spar=5.00-20. 0 hrs, dt=0. 5 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, ll =SC Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method Pond routing by Stor-Ind method Subcatchment 10: Drain Area'10 Runoff Area=43,200 sf Runoff Depth=2 6 " Plow Length=247` Tc=6.9 min CN 83 Runoff=3.12 cfs 0,218 of Subcatchment 20: Drain Area 20 Runoff Area=26,276 sf Runoff Depth 2.24° Flow Length=222" Tc=142.8 min CN=80 Runoff=0.36 ofs 0.109 of Reach : Reach 100 Inflow= .12 ofs 0218 cif Outflow=3.12 cfs 0.218 of Reach 200: Reach 200 Inflow= .38 cfs 0.109 of Outflow=0.36 cfs 0.109 of Total Runoff Area 1.572 ac Runoff Volume 0.326 at Average Runoff Depth =2. 9" 9 p EX Type III 24-hr Hump-f 0 Rainfall--4,6`0" Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 8' H roCA 7.00 s/n'001234 01986-2013 Applied Microco ,uter S stems 1012612005 Subcartchment 10: Orsini Areal Q Runoff = 3.12 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.21`8 af, Depth=, 2.63" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=S S, Time Sparc=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Type IlI 24-hr Hamp-10 R ;infell=4.60" ,Areal sfi GN Description 8,886 89 gavel reads, HSG C 5,556 65 gush, Good, HSG C 16,045 74 > 5%Grass ewer, Good, HSG G 12 713 98 Paved 'arkin & roofs 43,200 83 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description min' (feet)., ft/ft' ft/sec` cf 5Z 100 0.1100 0.3 Sheet Flow, SOUTHWEST-100 FT Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2=0.04" 1.4 147 0,0120 1.8 Shallow Concentrated Flow, WEST SOUTH WEST-143 FT Unpaved Kv- 16.1 f s 6.9 247 Total EX Type 111 24-ftr Hamp-10 Rainfall=4.6011 Prepared b [enter your company name here Page 9 HydraCA 7..00 s/n 001234 0 1986-2003 A22lied Mi roccm2uter Systems 10/2g/2005 Subcatchnnent 20: [gain Area 20 Runoff 0.38 cf @ 18.84 tars, Volume-- 0.109 af, Depth= 2.24" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, tfH= CS, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Type III 2 -hr Hamp-10 Rainfall=4.60" Area CN Description tion 0,700 98 Paged parking & roofs 5,278 74 >75%Crass corner, Goad, HSG C 10,303 65 Brush Good, HSG C 25,276 60 Weighted Average; Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description min feet ft/ft ft/ ec cfs 141.9 100 0.0060 0.0 Sheet Flow, Southeast 100 feet Grass: Short n=0.150 P2 0.04" 0.9 122 0.1860 2,2 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Southwest 122 feet Woodland KV=5.0!ps 142.E 222 Total EX Type;lll24- r Hamp-f 0 Rainfall=4.601, Prepared by(enter your company name here) Page 10 Hydro HydroCADO 7.00 sln 001234 d 1 60-200 A I"red Microcom uter Systems 1 22L20Q Reach 100: Reach 100 Inflow Area= 0.992 ec, Inflow Depth = 2.63" for lamp-10 event Inflow 3.12 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0,218 of Outflow 3.12 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0.218 af, Atten= %, lag= 0.0 rein Routing by Star-1nd+Trans method, Time Span= ,0 -20, hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs EX Type 11124-hrHa rya p-10 Rainfall=4.6001 Prepared by (enter your company name here) Page 11 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 001234 C 1986.2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 10/26 Reach 200: Reach 200 Inflow Area 0.580 ac, Inflow Depth,= 2.24" for Hamp-10 event Inflow 0.38 cfs @ 13-84 hrs, Volume= 0.100 of Outflow 0,38 cfs 0 13.84 hrs, Volume= 0.109 af, Atten=0%, Lag=0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Spam 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs VM Vanasse Hangen'Drustlin,Inc; 100-Year Storm Event - Existing C ADoeuments and Settings\emeHe\Lcocal Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OL,KBS\DudnageReport-Skyswrattendoc 19 Erosion and Sediment`Control Plan EX Type III 24-hr Hamp-100 Rainfall=6.50" Prepared by(enter your company name here) Page 12 Ff droCADQD 7.00 S/n 001234 01986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 1012 2005 Time span=5.00-2 .00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Traits method Pond routing by tor-Ind method Subcatchment 10: Dram Area10 Runoff Area=43,200 sf Runoff Depth=4,29" Flew Length=24 ' Tc=6.9 min CN=83 Runoff=4.99 cfs 0.355 at ubcatchment 20: 'Chain Area 20 Runoff;Area=25,276 sf Runoff Depth=3.78" Flow Length:222' Tc=142.8 min CN=80 Runoff= .i64 cfs 0.183 of Reach 100: Reach°100 Inflow=4.99 cts 0.355 of +outflow=4.99 cfs 0.355 of 4 cfs .1 Reach 2fJfl: beach 2i�t1 1nflow=0.6 _ 0 83 of 4ufflow=0.64 cis 0.183 at Total Runoff Area® 1.572 ac Runoff Volume=0.537 of Average Runoff Depth=4.10" #� a EX Type M 24-hr Hamp-100 Rainfall 6.50" Prepared by {eater your company name here} Page 13 HylroCADO 7.00 sh 001234 01986.2003 Aeplied ftrocorn uter Systems 10126 2005` Subcatchment 10: Drain Areal 0 Runoff _ 4.90 cfs @ 1210 hrs, Valum = 0.355 at, [depth= 4.25" Runoff;by SCS T - 0 method, UH=SCS, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs, Type III 24-hr Ham -100 Rainfall=6.50" Area (so CN Description 8,886 89 Gravel roads, HSG C 5,556 65 Brush, Good, HSG C 16,045 74 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG C 12,713 98 Paved Larking & roofs 43,200 83 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description miry feet ft/ft ftlsec cf 5.5 100 0.1100 0.3 Sheet Flow, SOUTHWEST 1'I00 FT' Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2=0.04" 1.4 147 0.0120 1.3 Shallow Concentrated Flog,WEST SOUTH WEST-143 FT . ��. Unpaved Kv=16.1 fps 6.9 247 Total �,. . X Type !lt 24-hr Hamp-100 Rainfall=6.5o Prepared by (enter your company name here) Page 14 H droGADDO 7.00 /n 001234 01986-2003 Applied Mi=22M2uter S stems 1,,012@L2005' Subcatch nt : drain Area 24 Runoff 0.64 cfs @' 13.82 hrs, Volu e= 0.183 af, Depth= .78" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span=5.00-20,00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Ham -100 Rainfall=6.50" Area (§D CN Desc6ption 9,700 98 Paved parking & roofs 5,273 74 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG C 10,303 65 Brush, Good, 'HSG C. 25,276' 80 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope 'Velocity Capacity Description min feet ft/ft ft/sec cfs' 141.9 100 0.0060 0.0 Sheet Flow, Southeast 100 feet Grass; Short n=0,151 P2 0.04u 0.9 122 0.1860 2.2 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Southwest 122 feet Woodland Kv--5.0 fps e w �14 .8 2� Total EX Type 11124-hr f-IHamp-100 Rainfall " Prepared by{enter your company name here] Page 15 H droCA 7.00 s/n 001234 0 1 6-2003 A22lied Microcom uter Systems 1 Q12612005 Reach 1{ Reach 100 Inflow Area 0.992 ac, Inflow Depth = 4,29°" for Harp-100 event Inflow 4.99 cfs @ 1`2.10 hrs, Volume= 0.355 of Outflow 4.99 cfs @ 12.10 hrs, Volume= 0,355 af, Men=0%, Lag=0.0 ruin Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs EX Type 111 4- r Hamp-100 Ralnfal1=65 " Prepared by(enter your company name here) Page 16 HydroDA 7.00 s/n 001234 C 1986.2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 101281200 Reach 200: each 200 Inflow Area-= 0,580'ac, Inflow Depth = 3.78" for Hamp-100 event Inflow 0.64 cfs 0 13.82 hrs, Volume= 0.183 of Outflow 0.64 cfs @ 13.82 hrs, Volume 0.183 af, Men= %, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span=5. 0-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Vanasse Han en Brustlin,Inc; Hydrocad Analysis: Proposed Conditions C\Documents and Settings\emelle\Local 5ettings\Tem rary Internet F es\QL} B5\€drainage Report-Skyswatter.doc 20 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan 100 110 V Drain ,area 110 Design Point 1100` 1 a6 200 Drain Area 120 Design Point 1200 t�bcat eae t on II �CDrainage Diagram for PR Prepared by(enter your company name here) 10/26/2005 IHYdtOCAM7.00 n OO1234 t 3 Applied Microcomputer items VRB Vanasse Hangen Brustfin,Inc. 2-Year Storm Event- Proposed CA eats and Settings\ernelle\Local Setti gsWemporaryInternetFiles\C7LK135\13,ranageRetort-5kyrwatterdoc 1 Erosion and Se meat Control Plan PR Type !lf 24- r Ha p-02 Rarnfafl= .0 " Prepared by{enter your company name here) Page H droCA 7.00 sin 001234 41 86-2003 Ap ied Microcomputer Systems 1 /2 '20q�' Time apart=5.00- 0.00 hra, dt=0.05 hr , 301 prints Runoff by SCS TR-;20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-lnd+Trans method - Pond routing by Stair-Ind method Subcatchment 110: Drain Area 11 Runoff Area=43,200 sf Runoff Depth=i 31� Flow Length=167` Tc=57.8 min CN'=83 Runoff=0.67 cis 0.109 of Subcatch nt 120 Drain Area'120 Runoff Area=25, 76 sf Runoff Depth=1.21" Flow Length=160' Tc= 4.9 min C =81 Runoff= .67 cis 0,058 of Reach 1100Design Paint 1100 lnflow=0.67 cis 0.109 at Outflow=0.67 cis 0.109 at Reach 1200: Design Point 1200 Inflow=0.67 cis 0.058 of Outflow=0.67 cis 0.058 at Total IRunotff Area— 1.572 ac Runoff Volume_,0.167 of Average Runoff Depth_ 1.26 1 PR Type III 24-hrHamp-02 Rainfa/W.OX Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 3 HydroGADO 7.00 s/n 001234 0 1986-2003 Applied Microcomeuter Saterns 12126(2005 Subcatchment 110.* Drain Area 110 Runoff = 0.67 cfs @ 12.80 hrs, Volume= 0109af, Depth= 1,31" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamp-02 Rainfall=3.00"' Area (sf) CN. Description 27,003 74 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG C 16,197 98 Paved pArpin-q & roofs 43,200 83 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description �rain) (feet) ftft jft/secj _jSfs) 57.6 100 0.0570 0.0 Sheet Flow, Southwest 100 feet Crass: Short n=0.150 P2=0.04" 0,2 67 0.0890 4.5 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Southwest 67 feet Grassed Waterway Kv-- 15.0!ps 57A 167 Total PR Type Ill 24-hr Hamp-02 Rainfal1=3.0o,, Prepared by {enter your company name here) Page 4 HLdroCADO 7.00 sin 001234 0 1986-2003 A2plied M!2rc�ccrn user Systems_- -1 0126/20os Subcatchment 120: Drain Area 120 Runoff 0.67 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0,058af, Depth= 1.21" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamp-02 Rainfall=3.00" Area Lf) _ CN --2pjchkt ion 11,049 98 Paved parking &roofs 5,825 74 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG C 8,402 65 Brush, Good, HSG C 25,276 81 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description Imin.._ feet . (L ftL JLVsejc fL JSs_ _ _ J 14.3 100 0.0100 0.1 Sheet Flow, Southeast 100 feet Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2=0.04" 0.6 60 4.1280 1.8 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Southeast 60 feet Woodland Kv=5.0 fps 14.9 160 Total PR Type ///24-,fir Hamp-02 Rainfall=3,000 Prepared by(enter your company name here) Page 5 Hydro D@ 7.00 s/n 001234 01986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 10/26/2005 Reach 1100: Design Point 1100 Inflow Area 0.992 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.31" for Hamp-02 event Inflow 0.67 cfs @ 12.80 hrs, Volume-- 0.109 at Outflow = 0.67 cfs 0 12,80 hrs, Volume= 0.109 af, Aften=0%, Lag=0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span=5.00-20,00 hrs,dt= 0.05 hrs PR Type fit 4- r Hamp-02 R rn fl= .000 Prepared by(enter your company name here) Page 6 Hydro ADO 7,00 stn 00123 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 1012£f200S Reach 1200: Design Point 1200 Inflow Area - 0.580 ac, Inflow Depth = 1.21" for Harnp-02 event Inflow 0.67 cfs 0 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.058 of Outflow 0.67 cfs 0 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0.058 af, fatten 0%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-Intl+Trans method, Time Span=5,00-20.00 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs; YM Vanasse`Flangen Bru"stlin,Inc. 1 -Year Storm Event- Proposed „\'Documents and Sett ngs\e elle\LocaI SettingsWernporary Internet Fdes\OLK 5\Drainage Report- kys atter.doe 22 Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. PR Type III24-hrHamp-10 Rainfall=4.60" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Page 7 H dro A 7.00 s/n 001234 01986-2003 A22fled Microcomputer S sterns 10/26/200 Times an=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt--0.05 hr , 301 points Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trade method - Pond routing by for-Ind method Subcatchment 110 Drain Area 110 Runoff Area=43,200 sf Runoff Depth=2.50" Flow length=167' Te= 7. min CN=83 Runoff=1,32cfs 0. 1 of 'Subcatchment 120:: Drain Area 120 Runoff Area=25,276 sf Runoff D pth=2.45" Flow Length=160° Tc=14.8 min CN=81 Hunoff=1.35 cfs 0.119 at Ruch 1100 Design Point 1100 inflow=1.32 cts 0.214 at +outflow=1.32 ofs 0.214 at Reach 1200Design Point 1200 Inflow=1.35 ofs 0.110 of Out#Row=1.35 of 0.119 at Total Runoff Area= 1.572 ac Runoff Volume-0.333 of Average Runoff Depth 2.54" PR Type 11124-hrHamp-10 Rainfall=4.60" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Page 8 HydroCADO 7.00 s/n 001234 0 1986-2003 Ap2lied Microcomputer Systems 10/2§/2005 Subcatchment 110: Drain Area 110 Runoff = 1.32 cfs @ 12-78 hrs, Volume= 0.214 af, Depth= 2.59" Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamp-10 Rainfall=4.60" Area (sf) CN Description 27,003 74 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG C 161197 98 Paved parking & roofs 43,200 83 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description (minj (feet) (!/f]t (fVsec) (cfs) 57.6 100 0.0570 0.0 Sheet Flow, Southwest 100 feet Crass: Short n=0.150 P2=0,04" 0.2 67 0.0890 4,5 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Southwest 67 feet Grassed Waterway Kv= 15.0 fps 57.8 167 Total PR Type lff - rHamp-1f R ire fl 4. 1' Prepared by jent r your company name here) Rare 9 droCAM 7.00 s/n 001234 01 -20 3 Applied Microcomputer Systems 10128 20Q Subcetchment 120: Drain Area 120 Runoff 1.35 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, V lume= 0.11 af, Depth= .4 " Runoff by SCS T1 -20i method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.09 hrs, dt= 0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamp-10 Rainfall=A, 0" Area (2D CN Description 11,049 98 Paved parking & roof 5„825 74 >75%Grass cover, Good, HSG C 8,402 85 Brush, Good, HSG C 25,276 81 Weighted Average To Length Sloe Velocity Capacity Description (min) feet ft/ft ftlsec efs 14.3 100 U100 03 1 Sheet Flow, Southeast 100 feet Smooth surfaces n= ,911 R2=0.04a O.6 60 0.1280 1.8 Shallow Concentrated Flaw, Southeast 64 feet Woodland l v= 5.9 f 14.9 1 Trata; PR Type 1112 -hr Hamp-10 Rainfal1=4.60P Prepared by(enter your company name here) Page 10 droCA 7.00 s/n 001234 01986- 0 Applied Microcomputer Systems 1 0 /200 Reach 100: Design Poirot 1100 Inflow Area = 0.992 ac, Inflow Depth = 2.59n for mp-10 event Inflow 1. 2 cfs @ 12.78 hrs, Volume- 0.214 of Outflow 1.32 cfs @ 12.78 hrs, Volume= 0.214 af, Atten= 0%, lag=0.0 min Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs PR Type I//24-hr Harnp-10 Rainfeti=4.60 Prepared by {enter your company name here} Page 11 dro A 7.00 s/n,001234 01986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 10122LO05 Reach 1200: Design Point 1200 Inflow Area 0.580 ac, Inflow Depth = 2.45" for Hamp-10 event Inflow = 1.35 cfs @ 12,21 hrs, Volume= 0.110 of Outflow = 1.35 cfs @ 12.21 hrs, Volume= 0119 af, Atten=0%, Lag=0.0 miry- Routine by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span= 5.00.20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs VM Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc, t 00-Year Storm Event - Proposed CADocuments and Settings\emelle\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Fi1esWLKB5\Dra nage Report-Skyswatter,doc 23 Erosion and Sediment Control flan PP Type llf 4-hr Hamp-100 ,rainfall- . 00 Prepared by (enter your company name here) Page,12 H droCADS 7.00 S/n 001234 0 1986-2003 Applied Microcomputer Systems 10126 200 Time span=5.00- 0.00 hrs, dt--0.05 firs, 301 points Runoff by S+ S TR-20 method, UH=SCS Reach routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method - Pond routing by St or-Ind meths Subcatchment 110 Drain Area 110 Runoff Area=43,200 sf Runoff Depth=4. 2" Flow Length=187' Tc=97.8 min CN=83 Runotf=2.12 cfs 0.349 of Subcatch nt 120 Drain Area 120 Runoff Area=2 ,276 sf Runoff Oepth=4.07" Flow Length=160' T =14.9 min CN=81 Runoff=2.22 cfs 0.197 of Reach 1100 Design Feint 1100 Inflow=2.12 cts 0.349 of Outflow=2.12 ofs 0.349 of Reach 1200: Design Point 1200 Inflow=2.22 ofs 0.197 of Outflow=2.22 cfs 0.17 of Total Runoff Area= 1 572 a0 Runoff Volume 0.546 of Average Runoff Depth=4.17 rr PR Type 11124- rHamp-100 Rainfall=6. 0" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Page 13 HygroCADO7.00 /n 001234 0 1 36-2003 Applied MicrocornputeL sterns 10/26/2005 Suhcatichment 110: Drain Area 110 Runoff 2.12 cfs @ 12.77 Mrs, Volume= 0.349 of Depth= 4. " Runoff by SCS TR- 0 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, d =0.05 hr Type III 24-h Hamp-100 Rainfall=5. " Area f CN 2 cri Lion 27,003 74 >75%Grass cover, Goad, HSG C 16I97 98 EMed arkin roofs 40,200 83 Weighted Average Tc Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description mire feet ft/ft ftlec cfs 57.6 100 0.0570 0.0 Sheet Flow,Southwest 100 feet Grass: Short n= 0.1 0 P2=0,04` 0.2 +67 0.0690 4.5 Shallows Concentrated Flow, Southwest 67 feet Grassed Waterway a Kv= 15.Q f 57.8 167 Total PR Type flf 24-hr Hamp-100 Raftlfafl=6.50" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Page 14 H droCA 7 00 sln 001234 41986-200 A ed Microcom uter S, sterns. 1012612005 Subcatchment 120: Drain Area 120 Runoff - 2.22 cfs 0 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.197 af, Cepth= 4,07 Runoff by SCS TR-20 method, UH=SCS, Time Span= 5.00-20.00 hrs, dt_0.05 hrs Type III 24-hr Hamp-100 Rainfall-5.5 " Area JED CN escr'r Lion 11,049 98 Paved parking & roofs 5,825 74 >75% Crass cover, good, HSG C 81402 65 Brush, Good, HSG C 25,276 81 Weighted Average Te Length Slope Velocity Capacity Description rain feet ftlft ft/sec cfs 14.8 100 0.0100 0.1 Sheet Flow, Southeast 100 feet Smooth surfaces n=0.011 P2=0.04" 0.6 80 0,1280 1.8 Shallow Concentrated Flow, Southeast 60 feet Woodland Kv=5,0 f��s 14.E 18t� Total e PR Type to 2 -err Harnp-f 00 Rainfa = . 0' Prepared by{enter your company name here) Rage 1 H droCA 7.00 In 001234 01986-2003 Applied Microcomputer S stems 1 Q12 1 0p, Reach 11 : Design Point 1100 Inflow Area 0.992 ac, Inflow Depth= 4.22" for Hamp-100 event Inflow 2.12 cfs @ 12.77 hrs, Volume= 0.349 of Outflow 2.12 cfs @ 12.77 hrs, Volume:-= 0.349 at, Atten=0%, Lag=0.0 mire Routing by Stor-Ind+Trans method, Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs PR Type 1/ 4- r Hemp-100 Rainfall-6.50" Prepared by (enter your company name here) Page'16. F# dro ADO 7.00 s/n 001234 0 1986-2003 Ap2lied Mlcrocom inter Systems 1 QLZOL2005 Reach 1200; Design Point 1200 Inflow Area 0.580 ac, Inflow Depth = 4.07" for Tamp-100 event Inflow = 2,22 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0.197 of Outflow 2.22 cfs @ 12.20 hrs, Volume= 0,197 af, Atten=O%, Lag= 0.0 min Routing by Stor-ind+Trans method,Time Span=5.00-20.00 hrs, dt=0.05 hrs , VHB Vanasse Hangen Brwtlin,Inc. Appendix D Erosion and Sediment Control Plan r C:\Documents and Settings\emelle\Local SettingsWernporary;Internet;Files\OLKB5\Drainage;Report-5kyswatter.doc 24 erosion and Sediment Control Plan Vanasse Hangen Brwt1m,Inc. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan The following recommended erosion and sedimentation controls will be employed during the earthwork and construction phases of the project.The following controls are provided as recommendations for the site contractor and do not constitute or replace the final Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan that must be implemented by the Contractor in Compliance with EPA NPDES regulations. Silt Fencing In areas where high runoff velocities or high sediment loads are expected,hay bate barriers will be backed up with silt fencing.This semi-permeable barrier made of a synthetic porous fabric will provide additional protection.The silt fences and hay bale barrier will be replaced as determined by periodic field inspections. Catch Basin Protection Newly constructed and existing catch basins will be protected with hay bale barriers (where appropriate)or silt sacks throughout construction. Gravel and Construction Entrance/Exit A temporary crushed-stone construction entrance/exit will be constructed where possible within the project area. If deemed necessary after construction begins,a wash pad may be included to wash off vehicle wheels before leaving the project site. Maintenance )P- The contractor or subcontractor will be responsible for implementing each control shown on the Sedimentation and Erosion Control Plan. In accordance with EPA regulations,the contractor must sign a copy of a certification to verify that a plan has been prepared and that permit regulations are understood. >►► The on-site contractor will inspect all sediment and erosion control structures periodically and after each rainfall event.Records of the inspections will be prepared and maintained on-site by the�contractor. >, Silt shall be removed from behind barriers if greater than 6-inches deep or as needed. CA Doctunents and Settings\emelle\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLKB5\Drainage Report-Skyswa tter.doc Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Damaged or deteriorated items will be repaired immediately after identification, >- The underside of hay dales should be kept in close contact with the earth and reset as necessary. * Sediment that is collected in structures shall bedisposed of properly and covered if stored on-site. * Erosion control measures shall remain in place until all disturbed earth has been securely stabilized.After removal of structures,disturbed areas shall be regraded and stabilized as necessary. The sedimentation and erosion control plan is included in project plan set;a reduced version and Erosion Control Maintenance checklist is included here for quick reference. CADoCurnents and Settings\.ernelle\Local SettingsWernporary Internet Files\OLKB5\Drainage Report-Skyswatter.doc "Vanasse Haagen Brusttin,Inc. Skkyswatter Ride Six Flags New England Agawam, Massachusetts; Best Management Practices - Inspection Checklist Construction Practices Best Inspection Date inspector minimum Maintenance and Key Cleaning/Repair deeded Date of Performed by Management Frequency inspected items to Check ❑y+es []no (List items) Cleaning/Repair Practice Hay BalesiSilt Fence Weekly and after rainfall events Gravel Construction Weekly and after - Pads rainfall events Catch Basin Weekly and after Protection rainfall events Catch Basin Weakly' Inspection/ Cleaning Temporary Diversion Weekly and after Swale$ rainfall events Temporary Weekly and after Sedimentation rainfall events Basins Erosion Control Weekly and after MattingNagetated rainfall event Slope Stahilizatlon Street Sweeping Daily inspection of REV ed surfaces In the event of a spill refer to the Spill Response Procedure and contact appropriate agencies.phone nuni aers attached. Stormvtrater Control Manager CADocurnents and Settings\emzUel tSe ` is\Temp rary Internet Files'aCILKB5\Drainage It"rt-Sky atterxdoc Issued tors, Review N"W T V SL It Date veU S Ilk I d Latest Issue-, Nov e , 2005 Skyliwatter Sit PIZIR 6 A"& A00114 /., 3 Maul Z)truut Ag,-,"awam, S S" idi", (0"%;'huS(C__WL__WL_S . Drawing Title Latest Issue ! ` Ittforination -1 Legend and General Notes 11/ /2 + A Owner, C-2 Demolition Plan 11/3/2005 Premier Parks & Stuart Amusement Company 2 - Layout and atefi s an 11/ /2 05 Main Street 01 P.O. Box 307 C-4 Grading and Drainage Plan111 12 0 Agawam, Massachusetts Cry Utilities Pan11/3/2005 ant C-6 Site Details 1 11/3/2005 ....a k PROMor1 l s New England LOCATION *R. 1 11 / - to Details 2 / 3 Main Street P.O 307 Site Details 11/ /2 o 005 . Box ICA Agawam, Massachusetts h Assessor's a�s hus+ ttsLot R r Cox �, t' Reference y * f * * site Location Map0 IWO 2WO Fa ons st APPROVED V A A WA TM PLA � s . Date NOVRECEIVE 35 PLANNING BOARD anasse Hangen Brustli , Inc. Transportation Land Development Environmental Services O N . IV[ 1a z 505 East Columbus . venue Springfield, Massachusetts 0 1105 en cri ,...q Legend Abbreviations Notes: Exist Prop. Exist. Prop. General General Layout and Materials Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. ;7J CONCRETE Transportation ABAN ABANDON 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY 'DIG-SAFE7 (1-888-,344-72,33) AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE 1. DIMENSIONS ARE FROM THE FACE OF CURB, FACE OF BUILDING, FACE OF WALL, AND CENTER LINE PROPERTY LINE HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT EXCAVATING. OF PAVEMENT MARKINGS� UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. Land Development ACR ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP Environmental Services PROJECT LIMIT LINE RIPRAP 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SITE SECURITY AND JOB SAFETY. CONSTRUCTION 2. CURB RADII ARE 5 FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. RIGHT-OF-WAY/PROPERTY LINE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ADJ ADJUST ACTIVITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE NTH OSHA STANDARDS AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. 3. CURSING SHALL BE BITUMINOUS CONCRETE CURB WITHIN THE SITE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ON 505 Fast Columbus Avenue APPROX APPROXIMATE 3. ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, PARKING SPACES, RAMPS, SIDEWALKS AND WALKWAYS SHALL BE THE PLANS. Springfield,Massachusetts 0 1105 EASEMENT P7.33 TO X 27.35 TO x CONSTRUCTED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE FEDERAL AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AND NTH TO THE 413-747-7113 FAX 413-747-0916 TOP OF CURB ELEVATION BIT BITUMINOUS STATE AND LOCAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS (WHICHEVER ARE MORE STRINGENT), 4. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND DETAILS CONTIGUOUS BUILDING SETBACK 26,85 13C X 26.85 BCx BUILDING, INCLUDING SIDEWALKS, RAMPS, BUILDING ENTRANCES, STAIRWAYS:, UTILITY PENETRATIONS, 0+00 10+00 BOTTOM OF CURB ELEVATION BS BOTTOM OF SLOPE 4. AREAS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND NOT RESTORED WITH IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CONCRETE DOOR PADS, COMPACTOR PAD, LOADING DOCKS, BOLLARDS, ETC. BASELINE 1132.I's X 113215 X SPOT ELEVATION (BUILDINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALKS, ETC.) SHALL RECEIVE 6 INCHES LOAM AND SEED. 5. PROPOSED GRANITE BOUNDS AND ANY EXISTING PROPERTY LINE MONIUMENTATION DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT 45,0 rNX 45.0 TWX TOP & BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION BWLL BROKEN WHITE LANE LINE 5. WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, THE SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SET OR RESET BY A PROFESSIONAL LICENSED SURVEYOR. ZONING LINE A5 8W . 3815 aw CONC CONCRETE EARTHWORK OPERATIONS REQUIRED UP TO SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. BORING LOCATION 6. PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS TOWN LINE (4 iQ� DYCL DOUBLE YELLOW CENTER LINE 6. AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF PROPOSED WORK DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS AT INTERFACE WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENTS, AND EXISTING GROUND ELEVATIONS ADJACENT TO 0 TEST PIT LOCATION SHALL BE RESTORED BY THE CONTRACTOR TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITION AT THE CONTRACTOR'S DRAINAGE OUTLETS TO ASSURE PROPER TRANSITIONS BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED FACILITIES. LIMIT OF DISTIJRBANCE Q�'A'd MW MONITORING WELL EL ELEVATION EXPENSE. 7. SYMBOLS AND LEGENDS OF PROJECT FEATURES ARE GRAPHIC REPRESENTATIONS AND ARE NOT ELEV ELEVATION 7. IN THE EVENT THAT SUSPECTED CONTAMINATED SOIL, GROUNDWATER, AND OTHER MEDIA ARE NECESSARILY SCALED TO THEIR ACTUAL DIMENSIONS OR LOCATIONS ON THE DRAWINGS. THE WETLAND LINE WITH FLAG ENCOUNTERED DURING EXCAVATION AND CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES BASED ON VISUAL, OLFACTORY, CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE DETAIL SHEET DIMENSIONS, MANUFACTURERV LITERATURE, SHOP 102,5DX SPOT GRADE ON DECK EXIST EXISTING OR OTHER EVIDENCE, THE CONTRACTOR S14ALL STOP WORK IN THE VICINITY OF THE SUSPECT DRAWINGS AND FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF SUPPLIED PRODUCTS FOR LAYOUT OF THE PROJECT FLOODPLAIN MATERIAL TO AVrAID rURTHCR �31'MtAQIKO Of T"t MATERIAL, AND OIJALL 140TIrY 711C OWNCR FEATURM. .----IjD-- -UD- UNIDERDRAIN FDN FOUNDATION IMMEDIATELY SO THAT THE APPROPRIATE TESTING AND SUBSEQUENT ACTION CAN BE TAKEN, BLSF- 1YID ffD- 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT RELY SOLELY ON ELECTRONIC VERSIONS OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, AND BORDERING LAND SUBJECT TO FLOODING �"_' I '�=l 0 DRAIN FFE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL PREVENT DUST, SEDIMENT, AND DEBRIS FROM EXITING THE SITE AND SHALL BE DATA FILES THAT ARE OBTAINED FROM THE DESIGNERS, BUT SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF PROJECT 8z NTLAND BUFFER ZONE 6'RD- ROOF DRAIN RESPONS18LE FOR CLEANUP, REPAIRS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION IF SUCH OCCURS. FEATURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PAPER COPIES OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THAT ARE GRAN GRANITE SUPPLIED AS PART OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. If's 12*S -NDZ NO DISTURB ZONE SEWER 9� DAMAGE RESULTING FROM CONSTRUCTION LOADS SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO GTD GRADE TO DRAIN ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. I 6RA 200' RIVERFRONT AREA FM FORCE MAIN LA L I ANDSCAPE AREA 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTROL STORMWATER RUNOFF DURING CONSTRUCTION TO PREVENT ADVERSE Demolition uliW -OHW- OVERHEAD WIRE IMPACTS TO OFF SITE AREAS, AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO REPAIR RESULTING DAMAGES, IF 1. THE CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING MANMADE SURFACE FEATURES WITHIN THE GRAVEL ROAD -6*W- WATER LOD LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE ANY, AT NO COST TO OWNER. LIMIT OF WORK INCLUDING BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, PAVEMENTS, SLABS, CURBING, FENCES, UTILITY POLES, SIGNS, ETC. UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EDGE OF PAVEMENT -eFP- FIRE PROTEC11ON MAX MAXIMUM 11. THIS PROJECT DISTURBS MORE THAN ONE ACRE OF 'LAND AND FALLS WITHIN THE NPDES EXISTING UTILITIES, FOUNDATIONS, AND UNSUITABLE MATERIAL WITHIN THE PROPOSED BUILDING CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT (CGP) PROGRAM AND EPA JURISDICTION. PRIOR TO THE START OF FOOTPRINT AND TEN FEET BEYOND AND BENEATH PROPOSED EXTERIOR COLUMNS, PER DRAWINGS BITUMINOUS BERM -2*DW- DOMESTIC WATER MIN MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR IS TO FILE A CGP NOTICE OF INTENT WITH THE EPA AND PREPARE A AND SPECIFICATIONS. STORMWATER POLLU71ON PREVENTION PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NPOES; REGULATIONS. BITUMINOUS CURB GAS NIC NOT IN CONTRACT CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THE OWNER HAS ALSO FILED A NOTICE OF INTENT WITH THE EPA. 2. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE TERMINATED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, IN CONFORMANCE WITH CC LOCAL, STATE, AND INDIVIDUAL UTILITY COMPANIES STA I "C NDARDS SPECIFICATIONS, AND DETAILS. THE CONCRETE CUR13 -E- ELECTRIC NTS NOT TO SCALE 12. PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY SEWER OR WATER LINES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE UTILITY SERVICE DISCONNECTS WITH THE UTILITY THE TOWN OF AGAWAM ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. NO PIPING SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITHOUT THE REPRESENTATIVES. CURB AND GUTTER -STM- STEAM PERF PERFORATED PERMISSION OF THE DEPARTMENT. EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB -T- TELEPHONE 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF DEMOLITION DEBRIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE FEDERAL, MONOLITHIC CONCRETE CURB -FA- FIRE ALARM PROP PROPOSED Utilities STATE, AND LOCAL REGULATIONS, ORDINANCES, AND STATUTES, REM REMOVE CA'I'V---- -CATV- CABLE TV 1. THE LOCATIONS, SIZES, AND TYPES OF EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN AS AN APPROXIMATE Erosion Control PRECAST CONC. CURB REPRESENTATION ONLY. THE OWNER OR IT'S REPRESENTATIVE(S) HAVE NOT INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED RET RETAIN SLOPED GRAN. EDGING THIS INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, THE UTILITY INFORMATION SHOWN DOES NOT 1. PRIOR TO STARTING ANY OTHER WORK ON THE SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY APPROPRIATE VERT. GRAN. CURB CATCH BASIN R&D REMOVE AND DISPOSE GUARANTEE THE ACTUAL EXISTENCE, SERVICEABILITY, OR OTHER DATA CONCERNING THE UTILITIES, AGENCIES AND SHALL INSTALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND AS NOR DOES IT GUARANTEE AGAINST THE POSSIBILITY THAT ADDITIONAL UTILITIES MAY BE PRESENT IDENTIFIED IN FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL APPROVAL DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THIS PROJECT. DOUBLE CATCH BASIN R&R REMOVE AND RESET LIMIT OF CURB TYPE THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS AND BEGINNING GUTTER INLET' CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATIONS, SIZES, 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, AND REMOVE SEDIMENT SAWCUT SWEL SOLID WHITE EDGE LINE AND ELEVATIONS OF THE POINTS OF CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES AND, SHALL CONFIRM THEREFROM ON A WEEKLY BASIS AND WITHIN TWELVE HOURS AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND @ DRAIN MANHOLE THAT THERE ARE NO INTERFERENCES NTH EXISTING UTILITIES AND THE PROPOSED UTILITY ROUTES, DISPOSE OF SEDIMENTS IN AN UPLAND AREA SUCH THAT THEY DO NOT ENCUMBER OTHER V� TRENCH DRAIN SWLL SOLID WHITE LANE LINE INCLUDING ROUTES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY. DRAJNAGE STRUCTURES AND PROTECTED AREAS. E� BUILDING TS TOP OF SLOPE 2. WHERE AN EXISTING UTILITY IS FOUND TO CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED WORK, OR EXISTING 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE FULLY RESPONSIBLE TO CONTROL CONSTRUCTION SUCH THAT EN BUILDING ENTRANCE E PLUG OR CAP CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM THOSE SHOWN SUCH THAT THE WORK CANNOT BE COMPLETED AS SEDIMENTATION SHALL NOT AFFECT REGULATORY PROTECTED AREAS, NiETHER SUCH SEDIMENTATION TYP TYPICAL INTENDED, THE LOCATION, ELEVATION, AND SIZE OF THE UTILITY SHALL BE ACCURATELY DETERMINED IS CAUSED BY WATER, WIND, OR DIRECT DEPOSIT. CLEANOUT JRLD LOADING DOCK WITHOUT DELAY BY THE CONTRACTOR, AND THE INFORMATION FURNISHED IN WRITING TO THE FLARED END SECTION OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE RESOLUTION OF THE CONFLICT AND CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO 4, CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING SUCH THAT EARTH MATERIALS ARE BOLLARD NOTIFY PRIOR TO PERFORMING ADDITIONAL WORK RELEASES OWNER FROM OBLIGATIONS FOR EXPOSED FOR A MINIMUM OF TIME BEFORE THEY ARE COVERED, SEEDED, OR OTHERWISE [D] DUMPSTER PAD HEADWALL iig�h ADDITIONAL PAYMENTS WHICH OTHERWISE MAY BE WARRANTED TO RESOLVE THE CONFLICT. STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION. C8 CATCH BASIN 3. SET CATCH BASIN RIMS, AND INVERTS OF SEWERS, DRAINS, AND DITCHES IN ACCORDANCE NTH 5. UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF PERMANENT GROUND COVER, SIGN SEWER MANHOLE ELEVATIONS ON THE GRADING AND UTILITY PLANS. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND CLEAN SEDIMENT CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE AND DE13RIS FROM ENTIRE DRAINAGE AND SEWER SYSTEMS. DOUBLE SION CS 4. RIM ELEVATIONS FOR DRAIN AND SEWER MANHOLES, WATER VALVE COVERS, GAS GATES, ELECTRIC 00 CURB STOP & BOX CO CLEANOUT AND TELEPHONE PULL BOXES, AND MANHOLES, AND OTHER SUCH ITEMS, ARE APPROXIMATE AND VN SHALL BE SET/RESET AS FOLLOWS: Existigg Conditions Information WATER VALVE & BOX STEEL GUARDRAIL DC8 DOUBLE CATCH BASIN TSV ------ - ------ WOOD- GUARDRAIL TAPPING SLEEVE, VALVE & BOX A. PAVEMENTS AND CONCRETE SURFACES. FLUSH 1. BASE PLAN: THE PROPERTY LINES SHOWN WERE DETERMINED BY AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY SIAMESE CONNECTION DMH DRAIN MANHOLE B, ALL SURFACES ALONG ACCESSIBLE ROUTES: FLUSH PERFORMED BY HERITAGE SURVEYS IN 2000, HYD HYD CIP CAST IRON PIPE 2, TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NGVD DATUM. Sk isk PATH 11 FIRE HYDRANT C� LANDSCAPE, LOAM AND SEED, AND OTHER EARTH SURFACE AREAS. ONE INCH ABOVE 41; COND CONDUIT SURROUNDING AREA AND TAPER EARTH TO THE RIM ELEVATION. TREE LINE WATER METER No. Revision Dote Apirvd, WIRE FENCE DIP DUCTILE IRON PIPE 5. THE LOCATION, SIZE DEPTH, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PROPOSED PRIVATE POST INDICATOR VALVE UTILITY SERVICES SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED BY, AND Design d by-EIA4 FENCE G WATER WELL FES FLARED END SECTION APPROVED BY, THE RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANY (GAS, TELEPHONE, ELECTRIC, FIRE ALARM, ETC.). .1 Drawn by EIM FINAL DESIGN LOADS AND LOCATIONS TO BE COORDINATED NTH OWNER AND ARCHITECT. CAD checked by Approved by a STOCKADE FENCE FMI FORCE MAIN Date 0 GAS GATE 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE ARRANGEMENTS FOR AND SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING FEES scale None November 3,2005 STONE WALL G-M F&G FRAME AND GRATE FOR POLE RELOCATION AND FOR THE ALTERATION AND ADJUSTMENT OF GAS, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, Project Title RETAINING WALL a GAS METER FIRE ALARM, AND ANY OTHER PRIVATE UTILITIES, WHETHER WORK IS PERFORMED BY CONTRACTOR --s New England OEW4 F&C FRAME AND COVER OR BY THE UTILITIES COMPANY. Six Fla, 0) ELECTRIC MANHOLE 6 STREAM / POND / WATER COURSE EM Gi GUTTER INLET 7� UTIUTY PIPE MATERIALS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLAN: 7r", DETENTION BASIN ELECTRIC METER GT GREASE TRAP - STORM DRAINAGE PIPES SHALL BE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHELYNE (HDPE) Skyswatter Site rlan C=1_A".3 0. ........... HAY BALES LIGHT POLE HDPE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE 8. SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR AND SHALL FURNISH 1623 Main Street -x-x- SILT FENCE OT TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXCAVATION, INSTALLATION, AND BACKFILL OF ELECTRICAL FURNISHED SITEWORK RELATED ITEMS Agawam, Massachusetts HH HANDHOLE SUCH AS PULL BOXES, CONDUITS, DUCT BANKS, LIGHT POLE BASES, AND CONCRETE PADS. SITE -4- MINOR CONTOUR 10 TRANSFORMER PAD CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OF DUCT BANKS IF REQUIRED BY THE U11LITY Issued for HW HEADWALL COMPANY AND A$ INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. -20- MAJOR CONTOUR -0- UTILITY POLE HYD HYDRANT 9. SITE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE AND BACKFILL TRENCHES FOR GAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GAS @ PARKING COUNT 0- 0� GUY POLE INV INVERT-ELEVATION OJviPAW� hff6AJfMENf§- Rcvie-w I GUY WIRE & ANCHOR 10. ALL DRAINAGE AND SANITARY STRUCTURE INTERIOR DIAMETERS (4� MIN.) SHALL BE DETERMINED BY COMPACT PARKING STALLS HH 1= INVERT ELEVATION THE MANUFACTURER BASED ON THE PIPE CONFIGURATIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. FOR Not Approved for Construction 0A. OYL 0 HAND HOLE MANHOLES THAT ARE 20 FEET IN DEPTH AND GREATER, THE MINIMUM DIAMETER SHALL BE 5 FEET. Drowing Title DOUBLE YELLOW LINE pil Pa LP LIGHT POLE SL STOP LINE PULL Box MES METAL END SECTION 14 Legend, Abbreviations CROSSWALK qt-Ch"Re- MATCHLINE PWW' PAVED WATER WAY ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP PVC POLYVINYLCHILORIDE PIPE and General Notes ACCESSIBLE PARKING RCP REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE VAN-ACCESSIBLE PARKING NIM VM R= RIM ELEVATION SMH SEWER MANHOLE F77,�-9N.r n b a r TSV TAPPING SLEEVE, VALVE AND BOX UG UNDERGROUND C. UP UTILITY POLE HN IV Sheet of 1 10 o: 8 L Project Number 09620.00 09620-LG.DWO P.-\09 620.00\cod�I d\PI onset\09 620-DM.dwg #4�7 7 71-) �� il\ gpl, e5�-�— .......... r o 00 WORK ID WORK UMIT LINE 0 C LIMIT LIN 0 0 Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. J Transportafion Land Development -C> N1, Environmental Services z REMOVE 0 TING ORK LIMIT LIN EXIS MIT BUILDING a�l -n 1 505 East Columbus Avenue 1B Q� Springfield, Massachusetts 01105 X> N' 413-747-7113 FAX 413-747-0916 "'D REMOVE EXISTING REMOVE All 0 FENCE EXISTING WALKWAY k6 0 OCT < C)o , 0 A Q, REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING 0 rJ D, 0 0 R t-1) L REI-0 14, REMOVE EXISTING RETAINING WALL z �/EXISTI� HYDRA VL, 0 EXIS N REMOVE PORTION 4 FENCE OF EXISTING RETAINING WALL OCP R3FLUSH REMOVE EXISTING REMOVE BUILDING EXISTIN L FENCE/ '-b A r OVE 0 REM EXI TING EXISTIING E SAWCUT ALL -WALKWAY 7) MIT OF V/AtK AY TO\\ Rr BE R MOVED x W, 'J EXal S T11 G REMO rSTAIR X, + SA W, 84,0 REMOVE K LIMIT LINE—/ 20 0 20 40 7, WALKWAY ENTRANCE FLU H I I --- I SCALE IN FEET 'k WO K LIMIT)LIN -16 Z� all x x !3. L c P 4- 2-, r�l 7( 80tv; 79"bw RK LIMIT LINE r---1* ; I J 00 CGP ALppvd, No. Revision Dote 'x lip 0 -Irl Designed by DrawA by Checked by jjF /N1 EIA4 DU 0 CAD checked by Approveo by 0 Scale V=201 Date November 3,2005 Project Title 4 LIMIT OF 78.5 001 7 WALK TO D ix M S* Flags New England BE R D + SAWCUT Skyswatter S"te Plan 1B 5 12 OVE REM'�' 0, N E' 1623 Main Street EXISTING WALKWAY V r Agawam, Massachusetts LV 77� >� rW.:N Issued foe 00000T K Al INg Tyl 79.0 Review D E E S 79.0 I�X Not Approved for Construction 1 790 Drawing Title SAWCUT Flo f0 Demolft*on Plan U 0 C 0 )'mHP2 LIMIT OF WALKWAY T REMOVE 0 G� 0 0 EXISTING RE EXIT WALKWAY BE REMOVED WALK' Y AND 81111 ,711.5 STAIPS Drawling Number 00 0 OD 7787 H Sheet of LIMIT OF WALK 2 8 A\- BE RI �7 Project Number 09620.00 WJRK LIM 7 LINE SAWCUT--, HV r ...... LJ 09620-DM.dwg P:\09620.00\Cod\id\Plonset\09260-LM.dwg 4 > =14-00 31N) 'o 4 *1 00, -17'47' -157 000�'� W 0 0 FENCE WORK J LIMIT LIN N (S4E401.92 WORK LIMIT -LINE 0 N 381402.87 296839.0 1 5 R-17.06 E 296802,98 1 LZEJ 14.32' Site Data Chart A42) 8' WIDE A=48'16'01" r�vr _� T, � .1, -,1 V WORK LIMIT AREA: 68,475 SF N -I-_ / I ACCESS GATES C= 1-90!_ F _'RETAINING -N64'217i6"'W Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. -WA 0 'y EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA' 49,858 SF 83.49' 10 EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA: 18,617 SF Transportation L d ev pni ENCE 66 an D elo ent 3813701 V PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA: 45,281 SF 296757602 '*--PT 6+13'.21 Environmeiltal Services (0; PC 6+04.1 4' HIGH LP FENCE 6.6861 'WORK LIMIT U 505 East Columbus Avenue 14 PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA- 23,194 SF N - E 2,9699 .2187 % CHANGE IN IMPERVIOUS: ±24.6 % '\ I R &#555639- LL Springfield,Massachusetts 01105 N d138,4.4 413-747-7113 -FAX 413-747-0916 Cd�S26'1 438& E 68 8 057 LAI 0 F N Af E 2 021.5638 381370:6515P3 70:6'503 3' EN -29688%,777 FENCING FOR 7 ir Sign Summary +4 5 SUMP N49871352.431 "Nit* .............., QUEUE LINE��:t -29689 E 008.260 <��.8' .9,9326 T 3' WOODEN C)R=5.00' LP* 3 FOR - SC-1 L=15.71' 4 EXIT ONLY QUEUE\.,LINES C)A=180*00'OD" 7- ��o I C=10.00' 81341.1597 _Q9041 P LV NOTE: RIDE ENTRANC LP/ 01 2968 SC-2 (ORIENT ARROW RIDE MANUFACTURER AND SIX -IN UIRED) -NEW RETAINING )NAL�, AS REQ V 21 ' __ FLAGS NEW ENGLAND PERSONNEL it IZ(11 N 381334.1421 Lr- I(- - I - 0 -,-- N 381311.31 2 TO FIELD CHECK FENCE AND WALKWAY + 1 I JJ E 296'767.3672 E 296924. 1 RETAINING f NEW ill N 38 )L=18;38' A 0 W�� 'to 0 PLACEMENT WITH ALL EXISTING AND V, 1316.1219 Ftkll 6E� FASTLANE ADA 3' WO DEN SC-3 296906.1783 0 0 PROPOSED RIDE CLEARANCE AREAS TO FENCING FOR ENSURE RIDE SAFETY ZONES ARE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE 45,E QUEUE LINES 8 N"2 43 5 1, PC 1+30. LIP 1+33.6 MAINTAINED. 3'_W�OODE T FENCING 7' FASTLANEONLY R=4 00"i k QUEUE N =3.68. C-2 �L R-1 U 6 P 2+80.44 SC-4 (ORIENT ARROW *Lpk"� i:�__ I AS REQ A-5218'53" x I 4= � UIRED) N % Q.4' C18-S2 E 296920.154- "A SC_ it 2 3-1. q -5 EXIT/ADA P I'll 94, SC, 38�129 -6024 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE LP N 381290�3 31 LU, ENCE 381280.0 0 (�J r LP E 296861.5772 N pf� 11 100� HIGH R=6 E 297041.9232 T L=3.35 �n 4+55.4.1 70, 61, FENCE ENCE Al�,29-14'1 2' C= 31 CE 3�2� *400 A=151 'W �4e3YE SC-3 C13-S�0,0'03'29 �10 M0 WALL. 3- Ae-- R=mo& L= ).85' A= YOO 00 PTP-Z 1 +48.5 R=12.00' C=26.87' 4% R=9.00' < T-1--L=12. 46' PC O+36.!J11 SC-2 CB-N-35*17'2O"E-J` 84*z0'9 6=59'2932' A--2 4,' 0' C=11.91' .80' CB=NI5'11'09'E lk R=12 L=11. 8' �\�13=S87*31'03'E 4, A -16'1 C-ii 13! _J + loom" if IL Cd=S17-1 -48-W 44 81'2 INE N 3 . 36�4�8 Sc- K LIMIT L J -40001 E 2961730.326 R 1> 20 0 20 40 WOR i K UMIT-,'UNE I FLUSH SCALE IN FEET -2 + �7 110 fee (b 4 00 --WORK LIMIT LINE CBPi Revision Dole PPV4, Designed by Checked by r E=l = by EIM 11JF CAD checked by Approved by k scofe ln--21Y "ote November 3,2005 Project Title % A=7, J4 I 3*36',30- z 7A PC I C=10 + 178' A Six Flags New England L Ce= 38*531125'W R=8.0/0- 1z I It, SAWCU L=12'.Vf' A=86*02'7 Skyswatter Site Plan �0 O��- x X-10.92' \P� _7 r C8=N3X4 4 "E 1623 Main Street 12') Agawam, Massachusetts (111161,IRP 7'0�1< LIMI' ri#N Issued for ff i2+'�i46 PC 12+21.84 D,TREES Review P 3 73.5521 'V Not Approved for Construction N 3010 <:� \I---*'- E 296764.8585 Drowing Title L SAWCUT bD Layout and L4 'y *45'1 f' 0 0 2 Nio 0 Materials Plan U <\ 0 n 'U 0�D 0 0 0 <0 Drowing Number P 0 1 .97 K=, V.UU 13.53' 77 86'OT36" Lt71777,71," /77z*' 7' AL U-3 C-12-29' U N 613=N45'09',15e� Sheet of 01 3 8 > 4' 6' _6NE ,4.42 9 057 W4RK LIMPT SAWCU Project Number 09620.00 09260-LM.dwg P:\09620.00\ood\id\Plonset\09620-GD.dwg 'V1 f k X 93A V A 80,7 X 1092 I V A Irl �0 10.8 E�RQSIO '0 -QSIO CONTROL z I X WORK BARRIER 8 9, A Ut WORK LIMIT LINE X V X 8 0 0 , , , -f \OXI - �� 7 - z�-- 21 9 5,3 X 9, z 94.5 X I-J � �a X -9 /X > Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc it> Transportation co Land Development 1 A 0?" 3,3 Enviromnental Services X .1 OJ X i 0 G-1,3 ,pv 0 ORK LIMIT L�N 0. 505 East Columbus Avenue X W Springfield,Massachusetts 0 1105 061 X 413-747-7113 FAX 413-747-0916 ---1 02:5U. 10 5 X X C14 I UL.0 X7 8 C rk� X N 0 L X # N hd'01�T"RU -A14 0 , i R! RARIER I i / X X STAL6-� I N C) \-J LT SAD Q ?U: MP. CB 8 TX C) R=! 10 5 N, 111ill MOP) X -7 X �9, 5 ;N A 0-I-,-1C— V W- INST� /10911 SILT �S�CK OC vw� X —Al� D 3, 2. C X ;71X xft r- C� 77 A 7 "Ll LJ INSTALL 7, OT SILT SAC 5,4 A16 A C8 2 .3X �-J X %-A 77" 81.6 X 102.5DX X X 98.X3 6-51) 1 102.51) rJ zz V 5.5 X 17�\E-:� r L. o. V '%� D 1 J, I =a3.2 B ix 4 X t$ONf OL X )IN" 6ARRIER 0 "; TABILIZ 81 4� r tONSTRUCT17-0 D EX!3 UFO" 94z FES' X C> 8 3/5 X 0 14 ORK LIMIT LINE 0" X 9- 3,8 qK J N 20 0 20 40 N y JV WORK LIMI LIN A --- I . \ -, H SCALE IN FEET X I r,T 95.7 X if -- - --- r"/\ X I L X 9 79. X .......... r1X0612 4 4 XX XTI 94A I-- IAI\ 4 1 A V X /N� X 9- 5, X rid 4 95�O 813 X D z?� 07 WORK LIMIT LINE \9- 16 -D 0\'D X 84.9- No. Revision Date �P�vd. 5- 6 7,V T( I/ I .\ -� I I It X 8 7.2 Designed by Drown by TcWe-o—k, EIA4 ElAd d by JIF X y 9,4'. C AD checked b Approved by I0 Scale Dote 11*=2V November 3,2005 V- Project Title 7 7' 84 111.1v 95A - Six Flags New England X t Z X Xa7 A I\, Skyrswatter Site Plan X A 1 k 1,�! 9N. 9 6,8 1623 Main Street X N 12" 943 Ut '5A Agawam, Massachusetts issued for 90,5 W1 K LIMP WE 9 1 r X 96.4 Review X C) D, REES Not Approved for Constraction 10�w 79 0 Drowing Title 7, 1116 X X Grading, Drainage and 9.6 0 Erosion Control Plan z X 80 4,9 9 5,Q X OP, 5 AHP2 f X X oc) 0 0 C) 4,11 dw /i,D 79,3 Drowing Number X X /q Ar X co JJJ HP 95,8 1�- , ---iN X V,N 7 5D FU k - C -..01 ,\ \r �7/ 171 1 V �7- Sheet of 4 8 fl 2 Of t-� ;,L� Project Number --i k I �/T K WJRK LIM T WNE com HV 09620.00 X95,8 J V1 09620-OD.dwg P:\09620.00\cod 1d\Ptonset\09620—UT.dwg J 0 T 0 00 X 0 0 WORK WORK LIMIT LINE LIMIT UN 00 f)O 0 611 Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. I V Transportation �OMM Land Development 2- V Environmental Services z RD ORK LIMIT UN iq 505 East Columbus Avenue �5h�- Springfield,Massachusetts 01105 /0" 413-747-7113 FAX 413-747-0916 RE E S P F N11 S -- - r d) REPLACE \�EXISTING LINE 6- SUMP CB P N WMM 3 1.6 C8 2 7 It- (OUT) 0 L 0 f 71 0 V 1 91 U 1=92.8 (OUF) 0 n 196 IL r r\. - N� -N OMIT CB 2 LP L J �i ,, 'r- - , )n \ r P 0 P LP 1=49.8 OU W1� 11--,- LID 4V 0 0 V A P U IP *LP r LP*- Ile TD 1 J R=812 B JA6 I=82.2,-(o "0 UD R=83A I-80.3 OUD 81.4 .2 -N 07 R=BC fal \< —416 840 20 0 20 40 ORK LIMIT LINEJ 8 -5 -T X mmmi C SCALE IN FEET LIMIT/LINU JX V 79.7tw bw 79, Ar % 78. 1W -WORK LIMIT LINE 4� No. Revision Dote vd. �PP Deeigned byom 10rown by EIA4 10hecked by JJF CAD checked by Approved by Scole 111=201 Date Novenaber 3,2005 <) 0/1 Project Title FE < 4-1 4,0k.................. 111MH 7 Six Flags New England A, Skyswatter Site Plan 1623 Main Street 14" HIP3 [-V 1rwed for Agawam, Massachusetts 2" f-') 4�* K LIVI INE A Review -�D TREES V, 7 . 78,5 - X )P3 H Not Approved for Construction Drawing Title A t)v 79 0 Bl�—q-3-7 &4 0 Ufflities Plan \'4- V OD 0 I LJ 00 N\ HP2 00 C) 0 0 FYI 79.10_ By" 1�5 4YDrawing Number X F L 0 IT U 'JuriN-J C-5 ELEC FU PROVI S FLAI� NEW EN A ECTR L 7-7- 4 Sheet of 01 0 I N JE - - DEPARIM N 5 8 _j a Project Number 09620.00 P:\09620,00`cod\id\Pianset\096 0 -OT.d �O A § GALVANIZED STEEL GRATE.. .• SEE DRAINAGE PLANS GALVANIZED {2 STEEL anasse Hanged rust�'a in', Inc. STANDA24" DIA. 3 _� � � ;.- FOR RIM FLEV. CATCH BASIN COMPATAB A S 1. ALL SECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNEDNTH FOR H S-20 LOADING SYSTEM TRENCH DRAINe�Transportation . : 2. COPOLYMER MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE o S 1 .` Land Development 09620.00 SEE DRAINAGE PLANS Environmental Services INSTALLED AT 2" O.C. FOR THE ,FULL ENQ FOR PIPE SIZE, LOCATION 4 " DIA, MIN. DEPTH OF THE STRUCTURE. 1. ALL SECTIONS SHALL BE DESIGNED CAP w' AND INVERT ELEVATION �. . FOR HS-20 LOADING. � � 5�t EastColumbusA Avenue Alternate E>Vicen. €c Cone Section 4 s�s .PROVIDE "V" KNOCKOUTS FOR PIPES PAVED AREA LANDSCAPED AREA ilt+ ate RQ Slab 2. PROVIDE "V'" KNOCKOUTS FOR PIPES Springfield, 0 10 WITH 2 MAX`. CLEARANCE TO OUTSIDE SIDE MIN. �, � ANGLE FRAME SYSTEM tiAI1TH 2 MAX. CLEARANCE TO OUTSIDE SEE APPLICABLE - 4 1 tlr PIPE. MORTAR ALL PIPE ; , , x - ° T - 24 S{UARE + x OF PIPE. MORTAR ALL PIPE PAVEMENT SECTIONS COMMON FILL/ CONNECTIONS. GEfI� _TYP . " FINISH CONNECTIONS, ORDINARY `BORROW' ACO DRAIN SYSTEM GRAD COMPACTED GRANULAR FILL (OR .APPROVED EQUAL � SURFACE TREATMENT 8 24 DIA._ 8 4. JOINT SEALANT BETWEEN PRECAST 48 DIA. MIN. . JOIN E 8 VARIES- ACCESS SECTIONS SHALL BE. PREFORMED 3 T SEALANT BE P N PRECAST SAWCUT BUTYL RUBBER. SECTIONS SHALL BE PREFORMED Alternate T011)Slab BUTYL RUBBER. SEE NOTE 5 �,.� .. FINISH � � 1 FINISH; S. DRAIN MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER ..� P SURF GRADE A FRAME DE TH AND ACE.. • � . . «a � � 4. CATCH BASIN R ME AND ORATE . . .. ry ... ., ° a ALL BE SE"I•' IN FULL MORTAR BED., c� ' ,, W ... TREATMENT VARIES . ° BRICK SHALL BE SET IN FULL MORTAR BED. � � �. . B . �; ADJUST TO GLADE WITH CLAY ADJUST TO GLADE WITH CLAY BRICK .* AND MORTAR 2 BRICK COURSES e U O '� + a U N I ., AND MORTAR ' 2 BRICK COURSES ,_ f ca , . TYPICALLY, 5 BRICK COURSES SEE NOTE, 4. ,... � a .. *, « ;.: �;: TYPICALLY, 5 BRICK COURSES � * � y. � p Q' ° , �� ° r} MAXIMUM)" __ _... :�: nr,xi�iu�t o ° ° as O ° a STEPS. SEE" . c 'f `` 06 ---WARNING TAPE . t ct �C i , u . a a 7 C7 * ICI OTE Z' _,.. <:4* ';,« a 4 : " .. , t j e t l 0 t r+ p i ° z� G a' e, a' 8 ti SEE NOTE 4 , " , :,. .•° , a ° �,° —CAST—IN—PLACE� c « �.. CONCRETE , 'c ` `.: ^,` * � , ? :" °a*°^ ° ,n: .'' - 8 SEE NOTE 2 a SHELF TO CONCRETE FORMED 0 4B DIA. MIN — �:. . ., ° _ cc:� ' 4B DIA, MIN. � ��.�.,.�._.a,_.__.m.a_.��,_.v...e �.,>: -� ��r V)J=to AT" SLOPE OF 1 PER FOOT c� , . t a W �. .., ? ° ° ° COMPACTED GRAVEL ,�s� � SEE NOTE , ; � � *��-: ,, Cy, � OUTLET 0 a � `� � ', & .:p LAND TAMPED HAUNCHING O � � J ° COMPACTED OUTLETHO .. r ` O°o '' °o�:ff COMPACTED BEDDING �oc� � � °, °�, � O 0 0 «�g SUBGRADE 0y VARIES �' DIA. y/,DIA. ,y r r / ✓ :.; CK INVERT VARIES 12 COMPACTED' C i r./ + . ®.. DIA, � MIN. SUBGRADE Section A-A VARIES DISTANCE VARIES 12 �.4 "$ _• •'a _,* . SEE NOTE 2. SEE DRAINAGE PLANS 2O " r „a ,' ':; �; TRENCH DRAIN CATCHBASIN .; Notes SEE NOTE . f • ^* , € .. COMPACTED Notes. 1, TRENCH DRAIN SHALL BE HEAVY DUTY d ry° GRAVEL A °•ap:..o° O °" .`... 'P. .»'raft a'?a a fP:.e b. �I+�• ..:.. ,,,,..:... c ,. CB TYPE DESIGNED FAR HS 2G LOADING: IJ TRENCHES AR CON CONSTRUCTED T_ �. WHERE UTILITY _ _ F U THROUGH cs °. - a COMPACTED O BERMS OR OTHER SUCH SIDE 2. CONCRETE aI-IA.LLI... 8E COMPRESSIVE �crt .;: DETENTION BASIN BE S C SPECIALMR1� P I CEMENT � - SUBGRADE SECTIONS,. PLACE TRENCH BACKF`ILL WITH MATERIALS � MOMENT STRENGTH 4C1oO PSI, E � CEMENT CONCRETE INVERT { �a`.`y. SIMILAR TO THE "SPECIAL SECTION REQUIREMENTS. . TRENCH DRAIN GRATE SHALL MEET ,.� A .. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITY ACT (ADA) COMPACTED GRAVEL ° 2. USE METALLIC TRACING/WARMING TAPE OVER ALL PIPES. Cr, .C' 0 .. Ca d O. ' . Q0 1 ,a REGULATIONS. COMPACTED SUBGRADE O° i3 p" �o-4,"a .a'.'°',°,, a..°°. R "r�n, 3. FOR HOPE PIPE, DIMENSI{�N (S 24 lICHES. Flab DIA, r% �t . f VARIES' Drain,Manhole 6/0 Cad as i Hood6/ Utility Trench 6 0Drain .T , Source: VHS LD-11 XT.S. Source: VHS LD-101 N.T.S. Source; VH8 LD— 0 N.* S. Sourc+r: VHB LD-190 SURFACE TREATMENT VARIES: F'ROVID'E FENCE WHERE WALL R ✓a -- S "° — R = d HEIGHT EXCEEDS 4 FEET SLOPE 6" CEMENTITI+OUS VARIES , . �.�, VARIES—� ADHESIVE No. Revision Dote ppvd 4: CAP ; u• Designed by Drown by Checked by ,� • TOP COURSE EN «>��1F" f�.. DEPTH' VARIES CAD chocked by Approved by IMPERVIOUS FILL /r Cj o0 MIN. sc°ti I .T.S. Dote NQrelr��er 2(ID5 MIN. 12`" THICK O O a a° O Od Pro'ect 13tie APPROXIMATE n a EXCAVATION ° LIMIT 00 O0, 0 a°e O d p , °° ° #x Flags « { 00 EOS TIIET1C f 0 0° 0 0 4 ° , � d0 yS c e�' Site MODULAR CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT , aco ° O " ° d d° O°a dt p «° FACING UNITS 0 0 a ° Q 00 a O O d r qO o00 0.O ° o <7 t ° }� °a 4Op O y� yrp Street Main n FREE DRAINING A °d a °0 °°� o00 � ° 000 ° O°° d 0 °ate #O O ° 00 MATERIAL AVV7flcIISSc1+C�lUS " Issued for EDGE OF PAVEMENT' COMPACTED Review UNDERDRAIN SEE NOTE 2. GRAVEL (SLOPE TO DRAIN) COMPACTED Not Approved for COnstl�uctioau SUBGRADE Drawing Titte LEVELING PAD, COMPACTED SUBGRADE Notes : 1.. ECC REFERS TO EXTRUDED CONCRETE CURB WHICH Details Nufie IS CAST—IN—PLACE IN THE FIELD. " DETAIL PROVIDED FOR GENERAL INFORMATION ONLY. 2» F,,.I ECC IS USED, CONTRACTOR IS TO DETERMINE STAMPED FINAL DESIGN OF MODULAR WALL SYSTEM THE EXTENDED LAYOUT DIMENSIONS OF THE BASE TO BE PROVIDED B WALL MANUFACTURER 'BASED ON COURSE IN ORDER TO AGCOMODATE PLACEMENT OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS. TIME ECC. Drawing dumber _ u-6 e n e . n i / Extruded Concrete Curb C I'+I T. . Source.. VHS REV LD_750 N.T. Source;; VHB LD_4 JOHN U Vr 1 0 Sheet of "► Project Number 09620—OTdwg E:\09620. 0\cod\ld\Planset\09620- OT,dw Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Transportation Land Development Envirownental Services ". CHAMFERED TOP 5 East Columbus Avenue 413-74 711 FAX 41 -74"7-091 EXTRUDED 6 " WHITE CEDAR POST" CONCRETE CURB 1Y2" BITUMINOUS TOP COURSE FAIN AT NI? POSTS 1YJ" BITUMINOUS BINDER COURSEWHITE CEDAR SPLIT BAIL p o ' (MIN. 4" SECTION) �F-tINISH yRADE + ' B , 1 COMPACTED GRAVEL 1 .-- CONCRETE 0WALKWAY , 0 0 d K9C30 x x x COMPACTED SUBGRADE 00 10" APPROX. FINISHED . f CRANE:.. tC a '. Stmdard Pu ex>ible Payeateid _ lalt� %` rr rr err., rr^rr rr 4" CEMENT CONCRETE W.W. MESH 6.-00 O.C. TYP. ct 6x6wI.4xw1.4) Notes: 6" COMPACTED GRAVEL LAT SHEETS, RA Section (1 " MAX. STONE SIZE) CENTER DEPTH 1. FENCE DESIGN BY W FLAGS NEW COMPACTED Fence Post ENGLND VENDOR. SUBGRADE PAVEMENT SECTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND WILL BE 2. MATERIALS TO BE SUPPLIED AND BASED ON THE RESULTS OF FARTHER GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS. * INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH TREAT THIS SECTION OF POST WITH A "CHAIN LINK MANUFACTURER'S WOOD PRESERVATIVE AS SPECIFIED BY INSTITUTE' PRODUCT MANUAL THE FENCE MANUFACTURER: Notes: Note: 1, CEMENT CONCRETE SHALT. BE> 4000 PSI-TYPE 11 Concrete Walkway at Queue Line Bituminous Concrete Pavement Sections 9/04 Split Rail Fence (Queue Line) 3 Perimeter Fence 60/0 N.T. .> N.T.S. Source: VHS REV LD-430 N.T.S. Source. VHS REV LO-460 Source: VHB REV LD-481 5/8" ROUND LATCH ROD %"RNBUCKL GATE ]-STRETCHER BA LIGHT POLE ANCHORING- PROVIDE BASE COVER SYSTEM BY MFG, POST tv S FURNISHED BY POLE MFG. 1" CHAMFER TRUSS ROD BRACE No. Revision Date ppyd. 1I 11 11 T1IBE RED CONCRETE z LIGHT POLE BASES AR BAIL IN PARKING LOT TO Designed by Drown b F1�fi Che eed by ,.I'F BANDS BE PAINTED YELLOW CAD checked by Approved by `¢ '8 HORIZONTAL TIES @ 12" C.C. Scale N.T.S. gate November I et ,CI�I S 'VERTICAL. MEMBERS TO BE � 4� VERTICAL—E0: PACED' Project Tice' SELECTED BY THE OWNER ra '�". I (2)' — 4- COMMUNICATIONS NE , GROUND LI a, CONDCJITS Six Flags New England FINISH GRADE (MATERIALS' VARY) . � NOMINAL - ' - Skyrswatter SitePlan O.D. SOCKET *" FOR ATCI# ROIL c , >, TYI : COVER CEMENT CONIC. '� . . r 1623 Main Street BASE (2500 PSI) 6" AUTOMATIC GATE BACKSTOP SET IN ,I FOR EACH GATE WHEN OPEN � CONDUIT AND GROUND I ND ROD Agawam, Massachusetts a CONNECT TO INSIDE, METAL POLE E1o:e ( ` - 4" PVC CONDUITS :" SEE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SIZE issued for t (2) 4" LV CONDUITS , , •�, #3 REAR 1. !UBULAR GAIE EM$- 11ELL A UI ® _ Review *SINGLE GATE OPENING 7" ::.: 13' eNOM, I.D. 4" NOM. O.D. EBAR ._. 1- Not Approved or Construction ,, .� ty �y�g(THE ABOVE LIMITS +0f" �E OPENINGS ARE INCLUSIVE COMPACTED f� (�, �y s�,�+ ,G'EI1'&9lCY 'f?A "� ALUMINUM L.ACtMi-AL.rTE48 #S �!r \ '°+.✓ ^Jw'a'S't^''+,.s`ri r ,I •: r�1Vd6r1{� jE��L BOLT LAYOUT CONDUIT CONFIGURATION AS 'SHOWN ON PLANS MOUNTING *SINGLE GATE.FRAME OVER fi '. 1, 6 N.O.D.O. . 1.90 N.Ob. UNDISTURBED1.B0 N.O.D. SUBGRADEI�MIN.) PROCEDURE AS PER MFG. SPECS 2" COVER 3. USS OO Comman ON REBAI DIAMETER 3/8"� 3/8" = FEED ►� tt�I[l �°� 4. MATE DESIGN BY SIX' FLAGS NEW ENGLAND VENDOR LVDetails . GATE POST BASE—PARTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE (2500 Psi), = BRANCH FOR DESCRIPTION, MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION METHODS. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. (1) — 4" COMM Notes; END POSTS TO BE USED ON LATCH SIDE OF SINGLE GATE OPENINGS (1) 4� LV' = BRANCH LIGHT" POKE FOUNDATION DESIGN IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON FINAL POLE AND FIXTURE SELECTION AND GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION. Drawing Number Fence Gate HighF Jr It Voltage Conduits Low Voltage Commun.icationsConduit Light Pole Foundation Detail (Up to 151 Pole)e 10 .F 1V.T.s. Source: VHB N.T.S. MT. �:T.Sw Source= �I�_3�c JOHN , I r ! A Sheet' of 8 Project Number 09620.00 0 09620-OT.dwg an sse Hangers Brusdin, Inc. _SI `E C' Trwspertatl n< 4' MI 0� Land Development ' MIN .f ,,, CATCH BASIN �iRAT 3�'�lroD�tt�l:al Services 1,� x IY x 4' WOOD STAKE fsa,a° '"op r �cp4 -ts«'°c ' A��; �1NC' OR APPROVED EQUAL ,gib °Q¢° ' p ,,� a ,p t 1" DEBAR FOR 505 East+Columb is Avenue tt3rn ^fit . . SILTSACK Springfield,Massachusetts 01105 . ..._:. BAG REMOVAL SILT' FENCE 0. p p pb R p pp : f x b '_N"44 Plan Yi:lew Yr: SITE so, Plan Yiew EXISTING 4..(MIN. J PAVEMENT WORK " f AREA ' .:3de'p� pA•,q'.®p" pp'. p..p CATCH BASIN DRAT FILTER FABRIC�ry MOUNTABLE BERM FLOW PROTECTED 1W CRUSHED STONE SILTSACK AREA F ow CrIass-lection g TOP OF GROUND Nnt s- ?t 4" EMBEDMENT �. ENTRANCE WIDTH SHALL BE A TWENTY—FIVE ) FOOT E PANION RESTRAINT (MIN.) MINIMUM, BUT NOT LESS THAN THE FULL WIDTH AT POINT'S ERE INGRESS OR EGRESS OCCURS. Section`'view PLACE 40 OF FABRIC 1' MIN. 2. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH ALONG TRENCH AWAY SHALL. PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO FROM PROTECTED AREA STAPLE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF--WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP NO BACKFILL AND COMPACT B DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE AS CONDITIONS DEMAND- $ AND REPAIR OR CLEANOUT OF ANY MEASURES USED TO 1. INSTALL SILTSACK IN ALL CATCH BASINS WHERE INDICATED ON TRAP SEDIMENT. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED THE PLAN BEFORE COMMENCING WORK OR IN PAVED AREAS A OR TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS—OF—WAY MUST BE AFTER BINDER COURSE 1S PLACED I HAY BALES HAVE BEEN STAPLE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. BERM SHALL BE PERMITTED. REMOVED. PERIODIC INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE SHALL. BE 2. GRATE TO BE PLACED OVER SILTSACK. "Wood Stake PROVIDED AS NEEDED. 3. SILTSACK SHALL BE INSPECTED PERIODICALLY AND AFTER ALL Joint De• p 3. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR STORM EVENTS AND CLEANING OR REPLACEMENT SHALL BE TO FINAL FINISH MATERIALS BEING INSTALLED. PERFORMED PROMPTLY AS NEEDED. MAINTAIN UNTIL UPSTREAM AREAS HAVE BEEN PERMANENTLY STABILIZED Silt Fence Barder s/ ilized Construction Eid 6/03 Sfftsacka "' end Trap 6/03 N.T.S. Source; VHS LD-650 N.T.S. Source tB LD-682 N.T.S. Source: VHB Ltd— 7" No. Revision Dote ppvd.: Designed by Drawn by �# Necked by UF CAA checked by Approved by Soule N.T.S. Date November 3,2005 Preyect Title Six Fags New England Skyswatter Site Plan 1623 Main Street Agawam., Massachusetts Issued for Review. Not Approved for Construction Details Drawing Number ,I0#-II3 �r rIVI 41 1 cc tt sheet of T " 8 8 Project,Number P-\09620.00\cod\ld\Plonset\09620-EC-dwg AV x 93 A x J ,_/ 0 10 0 90�7 803 X1092 60,5 80,6 0,6 x x )X 1-3 9 5.3\,, IL N X93� 94.5 X XIS)"5� Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc /X x 10 C51,1 Transportation k"WWWWW',�i 0 )z 10 6,7 X X 10 6,3 A Land Development Q-,- 3 ironme X1023 10 � ,3 Env ntal Services x x 0,6 C) 9 513 x 0 x $05 East CehMfi=AhvU= 7, 5 SpringWUam&umO1W5 413-747-7193*11=44WWO09 W N, 105,8 x X8 x 0 19 5, V X X 10 5 W 101.2 N 9` 3 x 80\-1�7 _1 -35 e J X x L 4Q . x x 9 7,:r?-- 8018 -7 77 \1 kv 1053 x /00 , �\\/l 0 5 f'7 U x f 105,-9 X X 8' X q,:-, 0 3, x A L J X97, IN x4c j5.4 C x 1),6,8 0 C) 81,6 X MAI x N37 "X x k3 C Wi-,,,-)r-J,,,U, iN, U 0 pi-0 X9T5 11,,\ xQr J 4 VB lif x 0 A-_ x 9&7 X'792, 81.4 X9 94,7 . ...... x x A 9 5 7 + C7 93 7 L 95�3 x x 84.0\ 7 _J, X 3,8 20 0 20 40 X SCALE IN FEET x 96,5 4. 7 bw X. 8 7 79.3 94�O x 0 94.6 9 5 0 x x T Z 81.7tw 7&15�1 x7V _1,,111,1 .?bw 3PI N x 843 x No. Revision Dote 0,ppvd.I 3 7, X 9 6,3 z x 87.2 Designed by FIA4 Checked by � I I Drown by EIA4 JJF x N CAD checked by Approved by 94�3 8L 11" 00 <> �V. scole 111--2W Date January 5,2001 \ IL r Project Title Omf 1 7� 951 Six Flags New England x x X97.4 call x Skyswatter Site Plan ;-,SJ 14" CO 1 96.8 FES ONE 1623 Main Street x 79" 3 x 1�o _LV Agawam, Massachusetts V 80.5 Issued for 5;6 _4 I X9O^ 6" x 96.4 x Review Q96,9 T. REES Y_ x P3 Not Approved for Construction 0 OW 79,G Drowing Title 40 X V 12Z _- - Ex*sting x 6 9 5,9 _4 4,9 � I 1, 11 % 0 1 � Cond*fions Plan k 0 X8Q,7, x 5� 0 C) J iP2 A 0 LJ V \A 00 000 /941l 7 9 3 \96. xx Drowing Numtw x X 7 7T87 K I Ta HP "') V + 95,8 > 7777777 7/ / Sheet of Project Number COMM 09620.00 HV /J_ X95,8 09620-EC.dwg