Loading...
8044_RIVERSIDE PARK YEAR 2000 PLAN - MAIN ST.- RIVIER TD WU #SG4y ��ver�( � Quark Yea,,-�CrbPh, YYlaan S+rec�-/ TD �� U Riverside Park Year 2000 Flan 1 � Agawam, 1 Massachusetts Prepared for Premier Parks 122 East 42"d Street/49 Floor New York,New York 10168 212-599-4690 Prepared by YMNanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. Transportation, Land Development,Environmental Services 101 Walnut Street P. O. Box 9151 Watertown, Massachusetts 617-924-1770 June 15 1999 R Transportation Land Development Environmental 5 e r v i c e s imag ination�i n nevatolon I energy Crea ting results for our clients and benefits for ou r communities -1�awasse-Hangei�LBr-ustli-n,-Mc— June 15, 1999 Ref: 06494 Robert Durand,Secretary Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 100 Cambridge Street-20th Floor Boston,MA 02202 Att: Janet Hutchins,Assistant Director,MEPA Unit Laura Rome,MEPA Analyst Arthur Pugsley,MEPA Analyst Re: EOEA#11649 Riverside Park Improvement Program Proposed Year 2000 Plan Improvements Dear Secretary Durand: On behalf of Riverside Park and Premier Parks Inc. (the Proponent),Vanasse Hangen Brustlin,Inc. (VHB)respectfully submits this project update and notice of project change concerning Riverside Park and requests that you determine within ten days in accordance with 310 CMR 11.10(6) that the proposed Year 2000 Plan improvements constitute an insignificant change in the Riverside Park Improvement Program and that no additional review is necessary. The Proponent,a publicly held corporation with offices in New York City and Oklahoma City,is the world's largest regional theme park company with 34 parks located throughout the United States,Europe,and Mexico. The Proponent purchased Riverside Park in 1997. As described in greater detail below,the Proponent, through its proposed Year 2000 Plan,will construct a new entrance to the park and redevelop a previously developed area of the park currently used as a racetrack,eliminating a noisy"speedway" racetrack and related facilities, thereby achieving net environmental benefits.The Proponent's removal of the racetrack underscores its ongoing,planned change in the character of the park from an event dependent facility with sporadic, unpredictable operations to a family-oriented recreational facility with more predictable,manageable operations and greater benefits for the regional economy- Further MEPA review of the Year 2000 Plan would not provide additional environmental benefits or serve to further minimize or avoid damage to the environment;it would simply delay the environmental and economic benefits of the Year 2000 Plan. This letter will describe the proposed Year 2000 Plan improvements,the MEPA history,the anticipated impacts and benefits of the improvements,including transportation,air quality,wetlands, 101 Walnut Street Post Off ice Box 9151 Watertown, Massachusetts 02471-9151 617.924.1770 n FAX 617.924.2286 ernail. into@vhb.com www.vhb.com Robert Durand,Secretary Project No.: 06494 June 15,1999 Page 2 wildlife,noise,water and sewer,stormwater management,agricultural soils,hazardous materials, historical and archaeological,and the application of the MEPA Notice of Project criteria in this context. This letter will also address future plarming efforts contemplated by the Proponent. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED YEAR 2000 PLAN IMPROVEMENTS,ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY BENEFITS Premier Parks purchased Riverside Park in 1997 and shortly thereafter began improving the park by replacing amusements,antiquated rides,and increasing rider safety as well as pedestrian and vehicular safety. In addition to many new,state of the art rides and other recreational features, the Proponent has improved the overall appearance of the park and upgraded its operations with significant investment in therning,landscaping,and infrastructure. The Proponent has also dramatically improved the park's fire and life safety systems. The transportation section below describes the pedestrian and vehicular improvements, including the new pedestrian bridge and various roadway improvements the Proponent has undertaken solely at its cost in cooperation with the Town of Agawam and the Massachusetts Highway Department(MassHighway).The Proponent has obtained local approvals,as necessary and appropriate,for all of the improvements constructed to date. The proposed Year 2000 Plan improvements (see Attachment A)will further improve the appearance of the park and its operational efficiency through the construction of a new entrance to the park along Main Street/Route 159. Additionally, the Year 2000 Plan will dramatically improve approximately 7.2 acres of land along the Connecticut River through the redevelopment of the racetrack portion of the park which currently consists of a large bituminous racetrack for stock car racing and other racing events,an unattractive turnstile system and a large grandstand with seating for 6,000,and several paved race pit areas. In removing the racetrack,the Proponent will be eliminating a 52-year-old business,thereby forfeiting 125,000 in annual attendance of longstanding patrons of racetrack events. While the Proponent hopes to replace the lost attendance by virtue of the Year 2000 Plan improvements and achieve a net increase in attendance of 25,000, there is no certainty that the Proponent will be able to make up the lost numbers or achieve the desired net increase. Through the removal of the racetrack and related facilities,the Year 2000 Plan will reduce impervious arcia at the site by approximately four acres. The proposed Year 2000 Plan improvements also will include a 185 foot steel roller coaster,a small "family" mine train ride,a car ride,two minor capacity rides,skill games locations,a 2,500 seat open air theme show area,a 4,500 square footrestaurant,a 600 square foot food stand, a 1,200 square foot gift shop,and new restroom facilities. Riverside Park is an important element of the regional and local economies. In addition to its year- round,full time staff of approximately 80 people,Riverside Park employs more than 4,500 individuals on a seasonal basis,many of whom are local high school students and senior citizens, \\MASPR\PrOOCM\0"94\dm\reparts\NqticeafPr*CtChagtge.doc Robert Durand,Secretary Project No.: 06494 June 15, 1999 Page 3 with a total annual payroll of over$8 million. Since purchasing Riverside Park in 1997,the Proponent, one of the largest taxpayers in Agawam,has paid more than$3.5 million in state and local taxes and contributed over$40 million dollars to the local economy through purchases of goods and services. The Year 2000 Plan will further strengthen the Park's short and long term economic position. The Proponent has made significant efforts to be a good citizen and a good neighbor. The Proponent has donated more than$1 million to various charities and local groups,including$150,000 for ' scholarships for local high school students,$5,000 to the Agawam Historical Society,$5,000 to the Agawam High School Career Center,and$10,000 to upgrade Borgatti Park located near Riverside Park on River Road. As described below,the Proponent is also continuing to work with Agawam to resolve longstanding area infrastructure issues. REQUIRED PERMITS AND APPROVALS The Proponent must secure federal,state,and local reviews,permits,and approvals to construct the Year 2000 Plan,including a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System(NPDES)General Permit for Construction and an Order of Conditions for redevelopment in Riverfront Area and flood plain. It is our understanding from MassHighway that an indirect access permit will not be required since the impacts of the Year 2000 Plan are below MEPA thresholds. The Year 2000 Plan will also require site plan approval and a special permit from the Town.The Proponent does not seek "financial assistance" in connection with the Year 2000 Plan. MEPA HISTORY AND CHANGE PROCESS In June, 1998, the Proponent filed an Environmental Notification Form(ENF)with the MEPA Unit in which it described a Riverside Park Improvement Program located entirely within previously developed areas,including the pedestrian bridge over Main Street/Route 159,improvements to existing sanitary sewer pump station,replacement parking,and numerous other parking lot improvements,such as the construction of a stormwater management system. In the Certificate on the ENF,dated July 10,1998,the Secretary of Envirorunental A f fairs determined that the Riverside Park Improvement Program did not require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and that its impacts could be addressed in the state and local permitting processes. The Secretary reiterated the Proponent's commitments to design and construct auxiliary turning lanes at the site drive intersections with Route 159 and to provide police officer control during peak periods. As described in the transportation section below, the Proponent has fulfilled these commitments. NIASMPro')ects\06494\doc5\roports\NoticmfPro�ectChange.d�x Robert Durand,Secretary Project No.: 06494 June 15,1999 Page 4 The Secretary also noted that the proposed location of the new parking area on the west side of Main Street contains prime agricultural soils. The Proponent has used much of this topsoil in the significant upgrading of the park's open space and landscaped areas. The Secretary encouraged the Proponent to comply with the Department of Food and Agriculture's request'that the Proponent offer excess topsoil to Agawam farmers(or donate the proceeds from its sale to the Town's farmland protection program). To the extent that excess topsoil has become available, the Proponent has complied with the request by offering the soil to various farmers and to the Town for use in its recreational facilities. Furthermore,as to any future development of areas with prime agricultural soils in connection with the Park, the Proponent intends to follow the Secretary's recommendation. The MEPA regulations at 301 CMR 11.10 govern"material"changes in projects that have been previously been reviewed under MEPA.1 The Secretary must consider various factors in evaluating project changes, including expansion of a project and generation of further impacts,such as an increase in release or emission of pollutants or contaminants during or after completion of a project. Under 310 CMR 11-10(6) (b),a change in a Project is ordinarily insignificant if it results solely in an increase in impacts of less than 25%of the level specified in any review threshold,provided that cumulative impacts of the Project do not meet or exceed any review thresholds that were not previously met or exceeded, This Notice of Project Change demonstrates below that changes in the Riverside Improvement Program since the ENF are improvements with environmentally b�nign and/or beneficial consequences. Under 310 CMR 11.10(6),a project proponent may include in a Notice of Project Change an explanation of why the Secretary should deem the changes in the project to be insignificant in terms of its environmental consequences,with specific reference to the MEPA factors and other relevant information. Within ten days of receiving a Notice of Project Change that includes such art explanation, the Secretary must respond either with a request for further information or with a determination whether the change may have significant enviroranental consequences. THE IMPACTS OF CHANGES IN THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED PROJECT ARE INSIGNIFICANT The following sections address the impacts of the Year 2000 Plan in relation to potential areas of environmental concern. As to each potential area of environmental concern, this project update/notice of project change demonstrates that project impacts are insignificant and that further review would provide no additional environmental benefits. 'Since fewer than three years have elapsed between the publication of the ENF Uune 10,1999),no Notice of Project Change is required due to the lapse of time. \\b4ASPR N,Projects\06494\docs\report5\Nofic�fPro*2Char%&e.doc Robert Durand,Secretary Project No.: 06494 June 15,1999 Page 5 Transportation The Year 2000 Plan will provide better and safer access to the site and improve traffic conditions on area roadways. Overall traffic impacts of the Year 2000 Plan are under MEPA thresholds requiring the preparation of an ENE An additional 120 vehicles-trips are projected to be generated on an average weekday during the peak season and 240 ve-hicle-trips are projected to be generated on an average Saturday during the peak season. See Attachment B. Peak hour traffic impacts of the Year 2000 Plan are projected to be insignificant inasmuch as 25 additional vehicle-trips or less are projected to be generated by the Year 2000 Plan during any hour on any day during the peak season. The elimination of the existing racetrack,which generates approximately 125,000 visitors per year, including many truck and trailer trips,and has significant traffic peaking characteristics(primarily on Saturdays)will constitute a major traffic improvement.Typically,race participants(with their race cars and equipment)and racetrack patrons gather at the site between 2:00 and 6:00 prn on a race day. Both participants and patrons leave more or less simultaneously,with a substantial portion discharging from the site at approximately 11:00 pm. Any new park patrons as a result of the Year 2000 Plan improvements,however,will be arriving and leaving the park throughout the course of a day,exhibiting more predictable,manageable characteristics. Accordingly, the removal of the racetrack will result in even greater anticipated traffic benefits than a significant improvement already achieved as a result of the completed off-site traffic measures described below contributing to a significant overall improvement in the discharge of traffic from the park on Saturday evenings. The roadway system serving the park has been improved as follows: - the construction of a pedestrian bridge over Main Street/Routel59(approximate cost$2.5 million). - road widening,to provide a right-tum deceleration lane at the southbound entrance to the western driveway to the park(approximate cost$68,000). repaving and restriping of I mile of Route 159 to increase capacity from 2 lanes to 3 by reusing the existing pavement width(approximate cost$115,000). Other recently completed on-site access and circulati on improvements include: - the relocation of the pick-up,drop-off area to eliminate vehicle queues on Route 159 (approximate cost$50,000). - toll collection booths have been relocated to extreme locations of the parking lots to allow for maximum queue storage - transport vehicles were purchased to move visitors from parking areas to the park,parking areas were paved to improve efficiency of parked vehicles. Parking lot improvements were made to increase parking capacity and efficiency. Robert Durand,Secretary Project No.: 06494 June 15,1999 Page 6 The community in the Town of Agawam has already experienced the substantial benefits of these improvements which the Proponent has undertaken solely at its own cost in cooperation with the Town and MassHighway. To date,during the 1999 operating season(with numerous attendance days comparable to the highest attendance days experienced during the 1998 season),the improvements have eliminated the traffic tie-ups experienced in 1998,allowing traffic to flow freely to and from the park. The park's traffic management plan also includes police officer control at key driveways when the park is open to better utilize the roadway capacity. Air Quality The project will improve air quality at the site and its environs by reducing regional emissions of volatile organic compounds(VOCs). The small increase.in air quality emissions of volatile organic compounds due to growth will be offset by the emission reductions from the roadway improvements at the site and the elimination of the raceway and racecars. The 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments(CAAA)and the Massachusetts State Implementation Plan (SIP)require that a proposed project not cause any new violation of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards(NAAQS) for pollutants of concern,or increase the frequency or severity of any existing violations,or delay attainment of any NAAQS. The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection(DEP) has established guidelines that define the modeling and review criteria for air quality analyses prepared for MEPA purposes.The DEP guidelines require an estimate of project-related vehicle emissions. If the VOC emissions from the Build Alternative are greater than the No-Build Alternative,then a proposed project should include all reasonable and feasible emission reduction mitigation measures.Massachusetts has incorporated this criterion into the State Implementation Plan(SIP). Accordingly,a proposed project must not; > Cause any new violation of the NAAQS, > Increase the frequency or severity of any existing violations,or )�- Delay attainment of any NAAQS The predominate sources of VOC emissions includes racetrack operations and project-related traffic. The change in emissions from the proposed project is due to changes in traffic volumes,roadway lengths,and vehicle emission rates. VHB calculated total pollutant emissions using EPA- recommended air quality modeling techniques, VHB estimated the 1999 mobile source emissions of VOCs from the major roadways in the study area to be 1,773.5 kilograms per day(kg/day), As described above,VHB determined that the change in traffic volumes from the Year 200 Plan would be insignificant. As a result, the increase in project-related VOC emissions is estimated to be approximately I kg/day-The elimination of racetrack operations is estimated to reduce VOC emissions by 10 kg/day. In addition, traffic and physical mitigation measures are estimated to reduce VOC emissions by 3 kg/day.The Year 2000 Plan will result in a net reduction of approximately 12 \MASPR\P1*Cn\G"94\dOO\rq�rls\Natic�fProjectChiknge.doc Robert Durand,Secretary Project No.: 06494 June 15,1999 Page 7 kg/day. Thus,the Year 2000 Plan will yield a net reduction in regional emissions of VOCs and, therefore,it conforms to the CAAA and the SIP requirements. Wetlands The Proponent is sensitive to the environmental issues concerning development near water bodies. The proposed Year 2000 Plan will have no impacts on bordering Vegetated Wetlands. The Year 2000 Plan is a "redevelopment" project for purposes of the Rivers Protection regulations. The project will redevelop approximately 4.8 acres of previously developed Riverfront Area in accordance with the performance standards-under 314 CMR 10.58 (5). By the removal of the existing racetrack,the Proponent will reduce impervious area by 2.5 acres. Although approximately 6.2 acres of the 7.2-acre site are within the 100-year floodplain,the removal of the paved racetrack and related facilities will result in a net reduction in fill in the floodplain and the Year 2000 Plan will be designed to have no impact on flood storage capacity. The site is subject to the Wetlands Protection Act and DEP's Stormwater Management Policy and Standards. The Proponent will incorporate stormwater management improvements in compliance with the Management Policy and Standards. Since both are administered initially by the Agawam Conservation Commission through Orders of Conditions, the proposed Year 2000 Plan will not trigger MEPA review unless there is state involvement through a Superceding Order of Conditions. Based on Conservation Commission actions over the past two years, the Proponent has no reason to believe that the proposed Year 2000 Plan will require a superceding Order of Conditions. Wildlife Although the Year 2000 Plan will be located within mapped estimated rare species habitat associated with the Connecticut River,the project will not impact either of the species that might be present in the area.The shortnose sturgeon,a fish found in the Connecticut River, will not be affected as there will be no structures or fill in the River and stormwater measures and net reduction in impervious area will improve runoff water quality. Bald eagle habitat is also mapped within the Connecticut River corridor.According to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program fact sheet on the bald eagle(see Attachment C), the project site is not within the wintering range,year-round range, or known breeding sites for this species. While bald eagles are known to nest in several locations along the Connecticut River in Massachusetts. Riverside Park does not contain any nests;nor does it provide suitable winter roost habitat. Existing large trees along the river bank, which may potentially provide perches for feedings,will not be disturbed. The Proponent will coordinate its efforts with the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program during Conservation Commission review of the Year 2000 Plan. Robert Durand,Secretary Project No.: 06494 June 15,1999 Page 8 Noise The Year 2000 Concept Plan for the Riverside Park in Agawam,Massachusetts will dramatically improve noise conditions at sensitive receptors near the Park. In particular, the Year 2000 Plan will reduce the total sound levels at many of the residential areas around the project site. DEP's noise regulation,codified at 310 CMR 7.10,describes regulated sources of noise and provides guidance for enforcing the noise regulation. DEP noise policy(DAQC Policy 90-001)states that a source of sound will be in violation of the DEP's noise regulation(310 CMR 7.10)if the source: > increases the broad band sound level by more than 10 dBA above the ambient sound level,or > produces a "pure tone"condition. VHB monitored noise levels in residential areas adjacent to Riverside Park.The predominate sources of noise are roadway traffic,racetrack operations,amusement park rides and equipment,and crowd noise. VHB collected sound data at residential areas on days when the Park was crowded and during time periods with and without the racetrack operations.The results show that the apartments located on Riviera Drive experience an increase in the sound levels from the racecar related noise of racetrack operations by approximately 15 decibels.The residential areas along Mark Street and South Street experience an increase in the sound levels from racetrack operations by approximately 5 decibels.The residential areas across the Connecticut River along West Street in Longmeadow also experience an increase in the sound levels from racetrack operations by approximately 5 decibels. These areas will experience substantial reductions in sound levels with the elimination of the racetrack. The residential areas along Main Street(Route 159)near the park,where roadway sound levels dominate, will experience no increase in noise because there will be no increase in traffic.The residential areas along Riverview Street near the park may experience small noise increases of approximately I to 3 dBA due to amusement park activities,but they will also experience a reduction in noise as a result of the elimination of the race car related noise of the racetrack. The Year 2000 Concept Plan for the Riverside Park will result in substantial noise reductions at the Riviera Drive,Mark Street,South Street,and West Street(Longmeadow)residential areas.The Riverview Street residential areas may experience small noise increases with offsetting reduction in noise attributable to the racetrack.Any of the increases will be well below the DEP guideline of 10 decibels and the type of noise that occurs at the park will not generate a pure tone. N NMA5PR\Pwjects\06494\docs\rcport3\NoticeaffrojectChange-doc Robert Durand,Secretary Project No.: 06494 June 15,1999 Page 9 Water and Sewer Impacts of the Year 2000 Plan are insignificant because new facilities will generate impacts below MEPA thresholds. Both water usage and sewage generation will increase substantially less than 100,000 gallons per day. The Town intends to increase the size of the existing eight-inch water main to a twelve-inch waterline scheduled to be constructed in the fall of 1999. This construction effort will include additional service connections to the park.The number and the locations of these connections will be finalized before construction of the water line starts.The anticipated completion date is May 2000- The sewer demands for the Year 2000 Plan will be adequately met by the improvements to the pump capacity of the Riverview Avenue Pump Station located immediately adjacent to the Park.Adequate capacity is available at the pump station and the force main that connects to the existing gravity system in Main Street.The Town has experienced capacity constraints within two sections of the gravity system in Main Street,primarily due to two sections of downstream segments of the sewer system which are smaller than the upstream segments.The total length of the smaller segments is approximately 750 feet.The Proponent is committed to work with the Town to address these issues as part of a long-term program. Stormwater Management The Year 2000 Plan will dramatically improve stormwater management at the site. Stormwater conditions in the area where the Year 2000 Plan will be constructed are currently uncontrolled.The paved areas of the racetrack and associated parking generally sheet flow directly to the Connecticut River. Stormwater runoff from the interior of the racetrack is collected by several shallow catch basins and is discharged directly to Threemile Brook,without any water quality improvement measures. The Year 2000 Plan will correct existing deficiencies in compliance with DEP's Stormwater Management Policy and Standards. Among other things,the Year 2WO Plan will improve stormwater management at the site through the construction of a vegetated buffer strip,reduction in impervious area increasing opportunity for infiltration,and water quality improvements, including Best Management Practices. Furthermore,during review under the Wetlands Protection Act,the Agawam Conservation Commission will be provided the opportunity to review detailed project site plans for compliance with the performance standards.Although the performance standards for a redevelopment project allow some latitude in compliance with the 80%removal rate for Total Suspended Solids(TSS),the Proponent is committed to providing a stormwater management system I connection with the Year 2000 Plan with measures that will meet or exceed the TSS 80*/o criterion. \MA5PR\Pr*cts\06494\Jocs"\repoft$\Notic�fProjectChartge.doc Robert Durand,Secretary Project No.: 06494 June 15,1999 Page 10 Hazardous Materials In connection with its purchase of Riverside Park,the Proponent commissioned a comprehensive environmental site assessment,including borings,monitoring wells,and other sampling. The Proponent's environmental consultant identified two locations where small releases had taken place in connection with an abandoned UST and the racetrack area. The Proponent has undertaken a Limited Removal Action in accordance with the MCP to address contaminated soil conditions.Any unanticipated contaminated site conditions will be managed during construction of the Year 2006 Plan through special handling and disposal in accordance with the Massachusetts Contingency Plan and DEP construction procedures. The removal of the racetrack will eliminate permanently a potential source of contaminants. Hist oric/Archaeo logical The Year 2000 Plan will be constructed entirely in previously disturbed areas of the Park.Moreover, in response to a letter in connection with the ENF for the Riverside Park Improvement Project,the Massachusetts Historical Commission determined that the project was unlikely to affect significant historic or archaeological resources. LONG RANGE MASTER PLANNING The Proponent is developing a long range master plan for additional improvements to the Park, including additional new rides,expanded parking,transportation improvements,and other amenities. The Proponent is committed to the development of such a master plan in cooperation with the Town. Among other things, Premier Parks,in cooperation with the Town and MassHighway,proposes to pursue the following improvements to benefit the community at large as well as Park visitors: The three intersections of Route 159/Elm Street/Elbert Street,Route 159/River Road,and Route 159/School Street will be reconstructed to provide center left-turn lanes. The intersections presently have single approach lanes on Route 159,and the existing turning movements impede traffic flows at the intersection. The three signals will also be coordinated to maximize traffic flows,manage queues,and minin-dze stopping on Route 159. Route 159 north of the park's western driveway will be widened to provide adequate shoulders in both the northbound and southbound directions. The roadway is presently 40 feet wide and will be widened to South Street to provide added safety along Route 159. \NMASPR\Pro*M\M94\docs\reparts\Nyofice&ProjectChange.4oc Robert Durand,Secretary Project No.- 06494 June 15,1999 Page I I The park has adequate parking to serve current demand,including the raceway. The amount of parking is not expected to change in connection with the Year 2000 Plan,as the change in peak day patrons will be generally constant. As part of its long range master planning effort, the Proponent will also be considering plans for additional parking. The Proponent looks forward to further discussions with the MEPA Unit as long range master planning for the park takes shape in the monLhs ahead. The Proponent anticipates another MEPA filing before year end. On behalf of the Proponent,VHB requests that you determine that no further environmental review is required. Further MEPA review would not lead to any additional public or environmental benefit (or minimize or avoid damage to the environment)beyond that which will be realized in any event as part of the Year 2000 Plan, particularly as a result of the removal of the racetrack. The Proponent has complied with the Secretary's requirements under the ENF Certificate.The Proponent's privately funded roadway improvements demonstrate its willingness to work with the Town and MassHighway to address longstanding transportation concerns.Accordingly,there is nothing to be gained by further MEPA review of the Year 2000 Plan. Furthermore,further review would simply delay the redevelopment of the site without corresponding environmental benefit. If you have any questions conceming the enclosed materials,please call me at(617)924-1770, Ext. 1511. Additional copies of this project update/notice of project change are available upon request. Very truly yours, V N�ASS'E HANGYN BRUSTLIN,INC. nne ZebrowAski Senior Project Manager MASPR\Projects\064 94\docs\reports N Not!ceofProlec tCha nge-doe Robert Durand,Secretary Project No.: 06494 June 15,1999 Page 12 Distribution Secretary of Environmental Affairs 100 Cambridge Street—20"Floor Boston,MA 02202 Attention: MEPA Unit Department of Environmental Protection Attn: Environmental Reviewer One Winter Street Boston,MA 02108 DEP/Western Regional Office Attn: Environmental Reviewer State House West—4'Floor 436 Dwight Street Springfield,MA 01103 Massachusetts Historical Commission The MA Archives Building 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston,MA —02125 MHD—District 2 Attn: Environmental Reviewer 811 North King Street Northampton,MA 01060 Agawam Conservation Commission Town Hall 36 Main Street Agawam,MA 01001 Agawam Planning Board Town Hall 36 Main Street Agawam,MA 01001 Executive Office of Transportation&Construction Attn: Environmental Reviewer 10 Park Plaza,Room 3510 Boston,MA 02116-3969 f \\MASPR\Projects\06494\docs\reports\NoticeoftojectCh4nge.doc Robert Durand,Secretary Project No.: 06494 June 15,1999 Page 13 Massachusetts Highway Department Attn: Environmental Reviewer 10 Park Plaza,. Room 4260 Boston,MA 02116 Luisa Paiewonsky,Director Bureau of Transportation Planning and Development Massachusetts Highway Department Ten Park Plaza Boston,MA 02116-3973 Timothy W. Brennan, Executive Director Pioneer Valley Planning Commission 26 Central Street West Springfield,MA 01089-2787 Deborah S.Dachos, Director ' Town of Agawam 36 Main Street Agawam,MA 01001 Christopher C.Johnson,Mayor Town of Agawam 36 Main Street Agawam,MA 01001 James T.Daley, P.E. ' Town Engineer Department of Public Works 36 Main Street ' Agawam,MA 01001 Mr. &Mrs. Dennis B. Hopkins 108 Monroe Street Agawam,MA 01001 Town of Agawam Inspection Services Department 36 Main Street Agawam,MA f \\\i A5 P R\Projects\06494 N docs\reports\N o O cN EP rojectC hamge.doe 1 Robert Durand,Secretary Project No.: 06494 June 15,1999 Page 14 Marcia Starkey Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Department of Food and Agriculture Lancaster Regional Office 142 Old Common Road Lancaster,MA 01523 i 1 \\MASPR\Projects\06494\docs\reports\NoticeolProjectChange.doc 1' I �� � � ta I � 1 .��.. II a i 1 1 1 i 13 A_. r. _ - - - - _ _ -- - - - _ zzzw fl- }� l CD wr N il-41— , - 1llll1ll � IL ce 1 4 W D l r 6n Y Illllllllllll { Z JI � '•L�. '�ll I L.: 1 •C �r � II1+l!l11I1l� � r C,- Imo. �, C,• � } a W w Ln l U WLU /// W ,i Ittr`r ii W � , ,,,,,�, �•- -� � ll it � .J__ � �` I LL 1 l I O ' r l t f ••T ,� ' STEEL ROLLER COASTER - _,Y��"' E.RTOWN RESTAURANT — - � FLAT iil�1= A w xrTAlEKcu v + GaIr�K STAJ - I 7. iIMiLY MINE TRAIN MINE TRAIN STATION k. STAGE CAR RIDE ;fir At It .��; Ar i � '� - � ti .w 'd( 'cRFOfTJMAPICE AREA -- i FLAT RIDE 9 . ` - � � �—�'�` EXISTING CAROU RAM/DOWN TO ♦ ,�-' S EL EXISTING GRADE SKILL GAMES ; !+ r LOCKERS/STROLLER RENTAL � .00D T N" FRONT GATE COMPLEX `4 v ;� ✓ ] t` l 4 � t EXISTING fusT AID SEASON TVENTRY EXISTING AR SUPERVISOR 1 RAMP DOWN TO V _ f l J .,.1 �✓�-r I ' RIVERTOWH IEVEt �J EXIT MERCHANDISE---------. PARK RR OUTDOOR THEATER CASH _ OUIOFPARKRR SHOW 'r RIVERTOWN ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN GUEST SERVICES -_ SEASON TICKETS/ ry TICKET TAKING `� r r- GROUP SALES ? aM h 1y F£AfVR!LANDSCAPE TICKET MOMS FEATURE LANDSCAPE EMERGENCr VEHICLE ACCESS FRONT ENTRY ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN Figfre2-2 Year 2000 Plan North 1 10 111 100 300 Feet May 25, 1999 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' Year 2000 Plan Trip Generation Summary Vehicle Trips ' Time Period 1999 Existing Year 2000 New Vehicle-Trips (1.7 mil) (1.725 mil) Year 2000 Plan Friday Daily(vpd) 8,325 8,445 120 Friday Evening Peak Hour(vph) Enter 415 420 5 Exit 275 280 5 Total 690 700 i 0 Saturday Daily(vph) 16,455 16,695 240 ' Saturday Midday Peak Hour(vph) e Enter 1,455 1,475 20 Exit 125 130 5 ' Total 1,580 1,605 25 Saturday Night Peak Hour(vph) Enter 170 175 5 Exit 1,145 1,160 15 Total 1,315 1,335 20 1 1 ' ' Gi06494docsVw[esltranlacldoc Year 2000 Additional Attendance-Park Related 1999 Difference Between Projected Existing Year2000 Growth Year 2000 2000 and 1999 Existing Annual Attendance Bmakdown jt�, -0 - -1-.700,00fl PerceriM90 of Affendance using Bus' 5% 5% 5% Attendance by Car 1,615,000 %,638.750 %42.500 Attendance by Bus 85,QW 86,250 7,500 Vehicle Occupancy- Annual Attendance 3.9 1,700,000 3.1 9 725.000 3,9 150,000 Bus Occupancy- 40 40 40 Annua)VehkAes by car 414.103 42G.192 36,538 bV bus 2,125 2,155 18S Total 416.228 422,349 36.726 Pick up Drop Off 15% 15% 15% (15%at cars are pick uWdrop off,calculated from ATR counts) Total Cars Pick Up and Drop Off 62.115 63.029 5,481 Total Cars usiN Parking Lot 351,987 357.163 31,058 Total Buses 2.125 2.156 lea Yehicle Tfips 1`2 Mos;in ang 2 Intig a Total 1 416,228 422.349 36.726 (Vehicles Pick Lip and Drop Off) Annual Vehicle Was 248.462 252.115 21,923 Vehicle 7'Pos 11 rm in ano I Mh outl (Vehicles P"and Buses Only) Annual Vehicte trips 708,224 718.639 62.490 Total Annual Trips -14,069- Annual Trips Converted to Friday and Saturday Adlust to peak conditions Frid3y 0,87%of Annual Trips equals Peak Friday 0.87% 0.87% 0,87% (Percentage based an 3rd highest Firsday at 1998 season) 7- 122 Saturday 1,11%,,1 Annual Trips eqUaf3 Ptiak Saturday 1.72% 1.72% 1.72% (Percentage based on 3rd highest Saturday Of 1998 season� Daily'(Peiitk) ---'-16,455� 7-7— -118,07�- 242 Site Trips Assigned to Peak Hour Analyzed Peak Hour Trips Friday peak 5-6 PM Based on site drive counts.5.3%K Factor 9.3% 8.3% 8.3% Total Trips j] 7 Entenng�601/.) 414 421 37 Exiling J40%) 276 280 24 Saturday Midday I I-t2 PM Elased counts,1,1%K Factor 9.6% 9.6% 9.6% Total Trips 1586 Entering 1453 1475 128 Exiting(8%) 126 120 11 Saturday Evening I D-1 1 PM Based on site drwe counts,8.0%K Factor 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% Total Trips 7 31 ii -1-9 Entering(13%) 171 174 is Exiling(871.) 11 45 1162 101 Annual AnwKiiinw of Riv*mKft Park promdo by Piwnkiir Pwks Plmdiid by P�,P.,k. Ave"Vohide Occupancy lor 7 A��I Parks ipmodod by Preiriiat Parks). S"Ong Capacty,of Ouses MASPAM494U*crNn&Lkwowronpgw-xlsy2D=g Riverside Raceway Trip Generation Raceway Information from Saturday 5/22/99 Attendance(without racers and employees) 1998 Attendance' 125.000 Number of Feature Races 5 Number of Races in 1998 41 Number of Laps 210 Number of Cars 150 Attendance per race 3.049 Capacity of Raceway 6,200 Ticket Sales Percent of Capacity 49% Pit Attendance 857 Ticket Upgrades to include Raceway 585 Vehicle Occupancy— 3.9 Raceway Season Passes, includes Park 300 Total Trips per vehicle 2 Raceway Tickets sold at Main Gate 820 2562 Total Daily Vehicle-Trips (Raceway Including Shared Trips with Park) Shared wilh Park Ticket Upgrades 585 Percentage of Raceway Trips Shared with Park 50% Season Passes 300 Assume 50%of Pit Attendance uses park 428.5 Total Race-Only Vehicle-Trips L�.___ .782 1 1,314 Percent Shared with Park 51% Racecars Numbe r of Races each night Qualifying Races is Feature Races 5 Total 20 Number of Racecars Average Number of Racecars in Qualifying Races 10 Average Number of Racecars in Feature Races 20 Total 30 Total Racecars at Raceway per night 6— pt� Pit Crew(Assume 50%of racers will have another vehicle) 75 Total Trips made by each Aacecaf and Pit Grew 2 Total Daily Trips by Racecars A§P Total Daily Trips-Raceway Attendees and Racecars 1,232 Annual Atlenclance of Raceway provided by Premier Parks Average Vehicle Occupancy for 7 Premier Amusement Parks ... Based on dala from races,Saturday May 22, 1999. mawspr/06494/tech/trattle/racewayfripgen.xis-y2OOOrw Riverside Park Agawam, MA Daily Trip Summary Annual Aftendance* 1999 Existing Projected 1,700,000 Year 2000 Plan Projected 1,725,000 Net Increase with Year 2000 Plan Year 2000 Plan Projected Attendance 1,725,000 1999 Existing Projected Attendance 1,700,000 Diff erence 25,000 Annual Raceway Attendance* 125,00e Existing Raceway Vehicle-Trips" Attendee Trips" 780 Racer Trips 450 Total 1,230 Annual Year 2000 Additional Attendance' 150,000 (for New Major Attractions, Coasters, Rides, etc..) Net Daily Trips" Year 2000 Daily Trips 1,450 Raceway (1,230) Total 220 (calibration check 220 - 240) Trip Generation estimate 240 Provided by Premier Parks Calculated by VHB using data provided by Premier Parks A Average of all races for 1998 *As noted in die text,in removing the race=k.the Proponent will be eliminating a 52-yw-old business,thereby forfeiting 125,000 in annual attendance of iongstanding paLrons of racetrack events. While the Proponent hopes to replace the lost attendance by virtue of the Year 2000 Plan improvements and achieve a net incecase in attendance of 25,000.them is no certainty that the Proponent will be able to make up the lost numbers or achieve the desired net increase. MASPR\06494\tech\t(attic\racewaytripgen.xls-y2OOOsm 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Natural Heritacre & Commonwealth of iviassachusetts Division of Fisheries & Wilfflife Endangered Species Field Headquarters Route 135 Program Westborough, MA 01581 Z:) (508) 792-7270, ext. 200 MASSACHUSETTS ENDANGERED SPECIES BALD EAGLE Haliaeetus leucocephalus (Linnaeus) EJ)2,�dQLOGY: The genus name is of Greek origin "hahaetos," meaning a bird, a sea eagle; the species name is of Greek origin "Ieukas" meaning white and "kephale" meaning head. IDESCREMQN-The Bald Eagle is one of the most impressive and mz estic birds in North America. It is one of eight species in the genus Hiliaeetus, the "fish" or "s:ea" eagles, and is the only member of the genus that regularly occurs in North America.This spec:ies is one member of the family of Accipiters, all of which are in the order Falconiforme5. It is also the largest raptor (bird of prey) in Massachusetts, attaining a wingspan of 2.0 to 2.2 meters (6-5 to 7.0 feet) with a body length of 0.9 meters(3.0 feet),and a weight ranging from 3.6 to 6.6 kilograms (8 to 15 lbs,) at maturity. Both sexes are similar in appearance but the females are notably larger than the males as is true with most raptor species. Adult Said Eagles are distinctively colored with a white head and tail, Decrad, Richard 'v. and RudLs, Deborah D. brown body, pale yellow eyes, and bright yellow beak and feet. The adult l`IS' Enriand Wildlife. Arnhem. MA:U.S. piumage is attained at 4 to 5 years of age. The plumage of immature Bald Dept. of Agriculture- N.E. Forest Experiment Eagles may varf considerably. Immatures go through a sequence of Station, Technical Report NE-M, t986. plumage types before reaching maturity. These plumages include a uniformly dark phase in the first year, followed by phases with various amounts of white on the belly, back, wings, tail, and head.The eye and beak color also change with age, from dark brown and blackish-gray at hatching to bright yellow in adults. In all feathered stages, the tail is rounded and the lower half of the tarsus is unfeathered. Bald Eagles fly with heavy, deep strokes and soar on flattened wings. In silhouette, the beak, head, and neck are almost as long as the tail. L 00' Range of Bald Eagle ME WinLer range ange M Year-round range Winter R Surnmerrange 0 Historical Breeding Site Year-round range Distribution of Bald Eagie in Massachusetts BAYSTATE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS, 012VVIM 296 North Main Street EAST LONGMEADOW, MA 01028 DAT JO N I V (413) 525-3822 FAX (413) 525.8348 A " oN To h6s�flo±io !n Li.s 4�i RE: h i WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings ❑ Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Copy of fetter ❑ Change order ❑ COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION rj THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Resubmit copies for approval For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ Return corrected prints ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIBS DUE 19 ❑ PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS r COPY TO SIGNED: M1 Lu if enclosures are not as noted,kindly notify us of once. ENF Distribution List Riverside Park Two full sized copies plus an additional copy of the first 2 pages to: Secretary of Environmental Affairs 100 Carribridge Street—20'' Floor Boston, MA 02202 Attention: MEPA Unit One copy to each of the following: Department of Environmental Protection Attn: Environmental Reviewer One Winter Street Boston, MA 02108 DEP/Western Regional Office Attn: Environmental Reviewer State House West—4'b FIoor 436 Dwight Street Springfield, MA 01103 Massachusetts Historical Commission The MA Archives Building 220 Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 Pioneer Valley Planning Commission 26 Central Street West Springfield, MA 01089 MHD--District#2 Attn: Environmental Reviewer 811 North King Street Northampton, MA 01060 Agawam Conservation Commission Town Hall 36 Main Street Agawam, MA 0 100 1 Agawam Planning Board Town Hall 36 Main Street Agawam, MA 01001 r ENF Distribution List (continued) Riverside Park Executive Office of Transportation &Construction Attn: Environmental Reviewer 10 Park Plaza, Room 3510 Boston, MA 02116-3969 Massachusetts Highway Department Attn: Environmental Reviewer 10 Park Plaza, Room 4260 Boston, MA 02116 Department of Food & Agriculture Attn: Environmental Reviewer 142 Old Common Road(Safford House) Lancaster, MA 01523 TOWN OF AGAWAM O�� 9 INTEROFFICE y �o�oR�o MPy� MEMORANDUM To: Planning Board ,,,, CC: VRK, File ._. From: Engineering Division ,1L1. •��3� Date: July 14, 1999 Subject: " Riverside Park Year 2000 Plan "- Main Street - 1 v 911 ie ml - SP 306 Per your request dated June 21, 1999 we have reviewed the report entitled, Riverside Park Year 2000 Plan, Agawam, Massachusetts, Prepared for Premier Parks, Prepared by VHB/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc., Dated June 15, 1999 " and we have the following comments: 1.) We are concerned with the possibility of a greater increase in attendance than expected. The addition of a 185' steel roller coaster is a major attraction. If Premier Parks has data on park attendance after adding a major attraction, such as a 185' steel roller coaster, at another park it would be beneficial to receive this information. An increase in attendance larger than anticipated can have a much greater effect on traffic, parking, water and sewer usage, noise and air quality. 2.) The water system south of South Street will still be a dead-end system when completed. Water distribution Studies and DEP standards call for elimination of dead-end waterlines. In the future, our plans are to a connect the water main from Main Street (Route 159) to Suffield Street (Route 75) near the Connecticut State Line (via cross country to Suffield Commons Condominium Project). Riverside Park could contribute to our plans by installing a water main from Main Street into the western parking area. This additional water main connection, when completed, will improve the level of service and reliability for the water distribution system. 3.) We would like to inform the Planning Board that we are still waiting for the overall existing drainage system information of Riverside Park. We understand that VHB is in the process of completing this survey and that it will be completed and submitted to us shortly. 4.) The drainage problems caused by Gravel Parking Area West of the Riverview Avenue Pump Station has not been addressed. We have not received any response to this matter and we understand that VHB will be submitting existing contours of this area and the surrounding area upon completion of the ariel topography. The minor changes that were created at the Pump Station do not address this problem and are only for the drainage on the Riverview Avenue Pump Station Site. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our division. Yours truly, Sincerelry� John P. tone Van cs DPW Superintendent Civi Engineer I h:lengineer\sp1306121.wpd TIMOTHY W. BRENNAN EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR r PIONEER VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Q01 t ��� 26 CENTRAL STREET, WEST SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS 01089-2787 (413)781-6045 FAX: (413)732-2593 July 7, 1999 Mr. Robert Durand, Secretary Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 100 Cambridge Street, 20th Floor Boston, MA 02202 Attention: MEPA Unit Reference: Review Comments on the Notice of Project Change for the Proposed Riverside Park Year 2000 Plan, Agawam, NfA - EOEA#11649. Dear Secretary Durand: The Pioneer Valley Planning Commission(PVPQ has the following review comments on the Notice of Project Change for the above-cited project. The proposed project consists of the construction of a new entrance to the park and the redevelopment of an existing racetrack with additional rides, games, and concessions. Transit Access The existing park conditions do not provide satisfactory locations for transit and regional buses to load and unload passengers. Understandably, the Proponent does not want bus passengers to be dropped off along Route 159 for safety reasons. Currently, the newly developed drop off area near the pedestrian overpass does not have sufficient radii and clearances to accommodate a bus. In addition, there is no permanent bus stop location for Riverside Park employees. We would like to request that a transit access plan be developed and implemented to allow for a limited number of bus stops at the site. This plan should take into consideration the needs of scheduled bus services accessing and egression from the site. We also recommend that the Proponent consult with the Pioneer Valley Transit Authority, Peter Pan Bus Lines and the PVPC to address transit and regional bus access to the site. As a large. seasonal employer, the access for workers utilizing low-cost public transportation is a regional priority, particularly in the era transferring from 01 Printed on Recycled Paper s � t - 2 - welfare to work. Access by public transportation reduces local traffic and congestion in the vicinity of the site and limits the need for on site parking. We are convinced that it is to Riverside's benefit to be a supportive partner with public and private carriers to provide safe and efficient access to the park. Long Range Plan It is our understanding that a long-range master plan for additional improvements to Riverside Park is likely to be completed in the fall of 1999. The PVPC would like to request a copy of this, and any future studies conducted for Riverside Park. In addition, we would also be happy to meet with the Proponent prior to the filing of this document to discuss the impact of any proposed future expansion on the Pioneer Valley region. Connecticut Impacts Riverside Park generates a significant portion of its traffic from the state of Connecticut. As a result all future studies conducted for Riverside should include an analysis of impacts across the Massachusetts State line into Connecticut. The proponents are also encouraged to provide copies of all future plans and studies to the Capital Region Council of Governments (CRCOG) which provides regional planning services for municipalities in the Greater Hartford area. Thank you for the opportunity to offer our comments on this proposed development. Sincerely, Tim y W. Brennan Executive Director cc: F.Lawlor,PVPC Commissioner Agawam E.5hibley,PVPC Alternate Agawam D.Dachos,Agawam Planning Department A.Zebrowski,Vanasse,Hangen,Brustlin M.Kowalekski,Capital Region Council of Governments G.Shepard,PVTA P.Picknelly,Peter Pan Bus Lines TOWN OF AGAWAM 'SETTS 01001 .36 MAIN STREET AGAWAM. 14-:15SACHU Tel. 413-786-0400 June 30, 1999 Ref 06494 Robert Durand, Secretary Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 100 Cambridge Street - 20'h Floor Boston, MA 02202 Re, EOEA #11469 Riverside Park Improvement Program Proposed Year 2000 Plan Dear Secretary Durand-, The Agawam Office of Planning and Community De'velopment has reviewed the Riverside Park Year 2000 Plan submitted as a project change to the June 1998 Environmental Notification Form. The proposed project, as described, consists of the removal of a 52 year old racetrack and the redevelopment of approximately 4.8 acres of previously developed Riverfront Area into rides and attractions. The notice of project change documents the proposed improvements to traffic, air quality, riverftont area, and especially noise. As was noted in the submission, local approvals in the form of an Order of Conditions and Site Plan approval will be required. The Agawam Conservation Commission will be responsible for a detailed review under 314 CMR 10.58 (5) and the project will be required to meet all requirements for redevelopment within the Riverfront Area. Chapter 180, Section .180713 of the Agawam Zoning Ordinance requires detailed Site Plan Review by the Agawam Plan.ning Board- To dat e, in cooperation with the Town, Riverside has constructed a pedestrian bridge over Main Street to allow for the use of the west side of Main Street for parking and enable Park patrons to access the Park without traffic delays. Road widening for dedicated tuming lanes and restriping of Main Street has also been undertaken by Riverside to improve traffic flow within the vicifuity of the Park. The Town and Premier Parks are attempting to secure grant funds to make improvements to three intersections along Main Street as it approaches Riverside Park to enhance the level of service of these intersections to address present conditions. The Office of Planning and Community Development looks forward to an in depth analysis of projected traffic conditions and improvements which should be included in the proponent's anticipated MEPA filing which is to be filed before the end of the year as referenced in this document. Sincerely, S Deborah S. Dachos, Director Office of Planning and Community Development cc: Mayor Conservation Commission Planning Board TOWN OF AGAWAM -SETTS 01001 .36 MAIN STREET AGAWAM. AASSACHU Tel. 413-786-0400 June 30, 1999 Ref-, 06494 Robert Durand, Secretary Executive Office of Environmental Affairs 100 Cambridge Street - 20' Floor Boston, MA 02202 Re: EOEA #11469 Riverside Park Improvement Program Proposed Year 2000 Plan Dear Secretary Durand: The Agawam Office of Planning and Community Development has reviewed the Riverside Park Year 2000 Plan submitted as a project change to the June 1998 Environmental Notification Form. The proposed project, as described, - consists of the removal of a 52 year old racetrack and the redevelopment of approximately 4.8 acres of previously developed Riverfront Area into rides and attractions. The notice of project change documents the proposed improvements to traffic, air quality, riverfront area, and especially noise. As was noted in the submission, local approvals in the form of an Order of Conditions and Site Plan approval will be required. The Agawam Conservation Commission will be responsible for a detafled review under '314 CM`R 10.58 (5) and the project will be required to meet all requirements for redevelopment within the Riverfront Area. Chapter 180, Section -180-1') of the Agawam Zoning Ordinance requires detailed Site Plan Review by the Agawam Planning Board. To dat e, in cooperation with the Town, Riverside has constructed a pedestrian bridge over Main Street to allow for the use of the west side of Main Street for parking and enable Park patrons to, access the Park without traffic delays. Road widening for dedicated turning lanes and restniping of Main Street has also been undertaiken by Riverside to improve traffic flow within the vicinity of the Park, The Town and Premier Parks are attempting to sicure grant funds to make improvements to three intersections along Main Street as it approaches Fiverside Park to enhance the level of service of these intersections to address present conditions. The Office of Planning and Community Development looks forward to an in depth analysis of projected traffic conditions and improvements which should be included in the proponent's anticipated MEPA filing which is to be filed before the end of the year as referenced in this document. Sincerely, S Deborah S. Dachos, Director Office of Planning and Community Development cc: Mayor Conservation Commission Planning Board MEMO TO: Engineering Department & Police Department FROM: Planning Board DATE: June 21, 1999 SUBJECT: "Riverside Park Year 2000 Plan" Please review and comment on the attached Riverside Park Year 2000 Plan. The Planning Board will be discussing this report at their July 15'h meeting. Thank you. DSD:prk TOWN OF AGAWAM .36 MAIN STREET AGAWAM, MASSACHL�SETTS alOal y Tel. 4I3-786-0400 � M MEMO TO: Planning Board Members Conservation Commission Members FROM: Deborah S. Dachos, Director Office of Planning& Community Developmernt DATE: June 24, 1999 SUBJECT: Riverside Park Year 2000 Plan, Attached, for your information, is the"Riverside Park Year 2000 Plan". The Planning Board and the Conservation Commission will eventually receive presentations on this document and the proposals contained within it. DSD:prk